Next Article in Journal
Cheese and Butter as a Source of Health-Promoting Fatty Acids in the Human Diet
Next Article in Special Issue
Immunogenic Effects of Dietary Terminalia arjuna Bark Powder in Labeo rohita, a Fish Model: Elucidated by an Integrated Biomarker Response Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Transcutaneous Detection of Intramural Microchips for Tracking the Migration of the Equine Large Colon: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gill Oxidative Stress Protection through the Use of Phytogenics and Galactomannan Oligosaccharides as Functional Additives in Practical Diets for European Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) Juveniles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bacillus subtilis Effects on Growth Performance and Health Status of Totoaba macdonaldi Fed with High Levels of Soy Protein Concentrate

1
Molecular Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Marine Biotechnology, Centro de Investigación Científica Y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Ensenada 22860, Mexico
2
Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), Carretera Transpeninsular Ensenada–Tijuana No. 3917, Col. Playitas, Ensenada 22860, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(23), 3422; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233422
Submission received: 5 November 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 2 December 2022 / Published: 5 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Feeds to Improve Shrimp and Fish Aquaculture)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In this study, we investigated Bacillus subtilis 9b effects in Totoaba macdonaldi fed with 30% and 60% of soy protein concentrate substitution. We found that B. subtilis 9b supplementation improved feed intake, weight gain, and internal organs condition of T. macdonaldi fed with 30% substitution. Animals fed with 60% of SPC substitution and B. subtilis doubled their weight and presented 20% more survival than its control diet without B. subtilis 9b probiotic strain. B. subtilis 9b was able to modulate T. macdonaldi intestinal microbiota and increase its resistance to Vibrio harveyi pathogenic strain.

Abstract

T. macdonaldi is a carnivorous species endemic to the Gulf of California. Indiscriminate exploitation has put totoaba at risk, inducing the development of aquaculture procedures to grow it without affecting the wild population. However, aquafeeds increasing cost and low yields obtained with commercial feeds have motivated researchers to look for more nutritious and cheaper alternatives. Soybean (SB) is the most popular alternative to fishmeal (FM); however, antinutritional factors limit its use in carnivorous species. In this study, we analyzed B. subtilis 9b probiotic capacity to improve growth performance and health status of T. macdonaldi fed with formulations containing 30% and 60% substitution of fish meal with soy protein concentrate (SPC). In addition, we investigated its effect on internal organs condition, their capacity to modulate the intestinal microbiota, and to boost the immunological response of T. macdonaldi against V. harveyi infections. In this sense, we found that T. macdonaldi fed with SPC30Pro diet supplemented with B. subtilis 9b strain and 30% SPC produced better results than SPC30C control diet without B. subtilis and DCML commercial diet. Additionally, animals fed with SPC60Pro diet supplemented with B. subtilis 9b strain and 60% SPC doubled their weight and produced 20% more survival than SPC60C control diet without B. subtilis. Thus, B. subtilis 9b improved T. macdonaldi growth performance, health status, modulated intestinal microbiota, and increased animal’s resistance to V. harveyi infections, placing this bacterium as an excellent candidate to produce functional feeds with high levels of SPC.

1. Introduction

Aquaculture is one of the fastest-growing industries due to the high demand for aquatic food products. However, this industry requires a fast adaptation to increasing problems such as aquafeed (feed for farmed aquatic animals) ingredients price, diseases, and low yields [1]. Fish products are the main source of proteins and lipids in aquafeed formulations; the balanced amount of essential amino acids and fatty acids required for optimum development, growth, and reproduction of aquacultured animals is of great importance [2]. However, overexploitation of small pelagic fishes to produce aquafeeds and livestock feeds has induced ecological problems and increased the price of fish products. Therefore, research turned to economic, more accessible, and sustainable alternatives to aquafeeds formulation [3].
In this sense, feeds that provide health benefits beyond their nutritional value known as functional feed (FF) seem to be an economically attractive, environmentally friendly, and safe alternative to improve growth performance and health status and induce physiological benefits beyond traditional feeds in cultivated organisms [4]. Alternatives to substitute fish products have been studied throughout the years; poultry, livestock, and fish byproducts, as well as plant and unicellular products are among the most important [5]. Due to their low cost and abundance, vegetable ingredients have become the most investigated to substitute fish products in aquafeeds formulation [3,5,6]. Soybean products (SBP) are of great interest in animal feeding due to their high protein and lipid content, making them an excellent alternative to fish products in aquafeeds production [5,6]. However, antinutritional factors (ANF) such as non-digestible carbohydrates, enzyme inhibitors, and allergenic proteins contained in soybean meal (SBM) and SPC, have limited the use of SBP in aquafeeds production. ANF can induce health problems such as distal intestine enteritis, pancreatic hypertrophy, liver damage, and animal’s death [7,8,9,10,11]. Despite the adverse effects of ANF, SBP have been included in feeds of aquacultured animals such as Litopenaeus vannamei [12], Oncorhynchus mykiss [13], Diplodus puntazzo [14], Salmo salar [15], and Siganus rivalatus [16]. Carnivore fishes such as Totoaba macdonaldi have shown less tolerance to SBM and SPC due to the lack of enzymes capable of digesting ANF present in the SBP [17]. Therefore, the addition of probiotic bacteria in aquafeeds to facilitate SBP digestion and assimilation could be a sustainable, safe, and economical solution for the aquaculture industry.
Bacillus subtilis is a spore-forming bacteria with the capacity to increase the assimilation of vegetable ingredients by producing exogenous enzymes such as proteases, lipases, and carbohydrases. This bacterium can inhibit pathogen development and stimulate the host’s immune system by producing secondary metabolites such as bacteriocin, and modulating the gut microbiota [18,19,20]. B. subtilis has been classified as GRAS by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), making it safe to use in humans and animals. The addition of Bacillus in animals fed with SBP has shown growth and health improvement in Epinephelus coioides [21], L. vannamei [22,23], and Lithobates catesbeianus [24]. Thus, implementing Bacillus probiotic strains to feed economically attractive fishes such as T. macdonaldi could help solve problems caused by SBP.
T. macdonaldi is a carnivorous species endemic to the Gulf of California and is considered the largest member of the Sciaenidae family [25]. This fish reduced its population in the last decades due to sport and illegal fishing [26]. By 1986, T. macdonaldi was included in the list of endangered species by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species [27]. In the 1990s, research began to establish the bases of its cultivation and understanding its reproductive cycle in captivity [28]. Results in T. macdonaldi production have attracted the attention of the aquaculture industry [29]. Therefore, improving feed assimilation and feed price optimization are required to increase productivity and sustainability.
T. macdonaldi tolerates around 20% SBM and 30% SPC substitution without suffering severe health problems [30,31,32,33]. Thus, implementing probiotics such as B. subtilis in T. macdonaldi aquafeeds could improve tolerance and reduce adverse effects induced by SBP. Therefore, this study focused on Bacillus subtilis 9b strain addition in T. macdonaldi feeds formulated with 30% and 60% of FM substitution by SPC and evaluated its effect on growth performance, health status, and intestinal microbiota modulation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Feeds Preparation

B. subtilis 9b was obtained from the molecular microbiology laboratory at Ensenada Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education (CICESE; Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico). The enzymatic capacity of this strain was described previously by Ochoa-Solano and Olmos-Soto [20]. Four isonitrogenous (42%) and isolipidic (7%) feeds were formulated to contain 30% (SPC30C; SPC30Pro), and 60% (SPC60C; SPC60Pro) FM substitution with SPC (Table 1). DCML feed from Skretting© (Product Number 12143085) was used as commercial control (Crude Protein 46%, Crude Fat 12%, Ash 12%, Moisture 8%, Crude Fiber 3%, Phosphorus 1.5% NFE 17%, and Sodium 1%). For feed preparation, macro ingredients were thoroughly mixed, vitamins and minerals were then incorporated gradually. Oil-based ingredients and water were added to obtain the final consistency. B. subtilis 9b strain was supplemented at 0.1% (1 g/kg) before pellets formation and drying at 60 °C for 24 h.

2.2. Organisms and Growth Conditions

Juveniles of T. macdonaldi were provided by the marine finfish hatchery of Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, FCM, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (Ensenada, Baja California, México). Fish were fed with a feed containing 46% protein and 12% lipids and acclimated to experimental facility for two weeks at FCM. A total of 180 fish with an average weight of 153 ± 0.84 g were randomly selected and stocked in 15 tanks of 1100 L. Tanks with 12 fish were connected to a water recirculation system and the flow rate was adjusted to allow 10% of water exchange per day per tank. Water parameters were monitored daily to maintain stable experimental conditions. Temperature was kept at 25 ± 1 °C with thermo-controlled chillers. Salinity was measured with a refractometer and maintained at 35.0 ± 0.5%o. Photoperiod was kept at 12:12 h light:dark. Oxygen concentration was measured with a YSI Pro 20l oximeter and kept above 6 mg/L. Total ammonia-nitrogen (NH4+-N) and total nitrite-nitrogen (NO2-N) were measured daily before the first meal of the day with colorimetric test kits (Aquarium Pharmaceutical, Mars, PA, USA). The level of pH was measured using an Oakton pHTestr10 pH meter with an accuracy of 0.01 pH units.
Experiments were performed in triplicate, and fish were fed to apparent satiety twice a day (08:00 and 16:00 h), seven days a week for three months. Feed leftovers were re-weighted to measure feed intake. Experimental procedures related to fish husbandry were approved by the Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries, and Food (Mexican Official Standard NOM-062-ZOO-1999).

2.3. Growth Performance

Fish were anesthetized using clove oil at 0.01% (v/v) and weighed individually at the beginning and end of the experiment (24 h fasting before body weight measurement). The following equations were used to evaluate fish growth parameters [22,30]:
  • Weight gain (WG)
W G = F W I W F I W 100
  • Specific growth rate (SGR)
S G R = L n F W L n I W t 100
  • Thermal growth coefficient (TGC)
T G C = F W 3 I W 3 t e m p e r a t u r e   ° C   x   t   1000
  • Daily feed intake (DFI)
D F I = i   n   t o t a l   f e e d   c o n s u m e d   g   n u m b e r   o f   f i s h ÷ t
  • Survival rate
S = f i n a l   N o .   f i s h   i n i t i a l   N o .   f i s h 100
where: FW = Average final weight (g); IW = Average initial weight (g), FIW: Fish initial weight (g); LnFW = Ln final weight; LnIW = Ln initial weight; t = time (days).

2.4. Intestine Recollection and Organs Observation

At the end of the bioassay, two fish per treatment were overdosed with clove oil and sacrificed to observe visceral fat content, liver, spleen, distal intestine condition, fillet firmness by tactile and visual assessment and collect samples of the distal intestine to perform a fluorescent in situ hybridization procedure (FISH).

2.5. Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization

To analyze bacterial communities in the totoaba distal intestine, fluorescent in situ hybridization was performed following the methodology described by Hernandez & Olmos [34] with slight modifications in control and sample preparation.

2.5.1. Probes

Probes for low G + C Gram-positive bacteria labeled with Carboxy-X-rhodamine [5-(6)-ROX] and γ-Proteobacteria labeled with isothiocyanate (5-FITC) previously described by Hernandez & Olmos were used [34].

2.5.2. Control Preparation

Bacterial samples of B. subtilis 9b and V. harveyi (ATCC 14126) were used as low G + C and γ-Proteobacteria controls, respectively. The strains were grown in specialized media until they reached the mid-exponential growth phase at 600 nm. Samples were fixed by adding 37% (v/v) filtered formaldehyde to a final concentration of 6% (v/v) and incubated at 4 °C for 1 h. A total of 1 mL of cells were collected by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 3 min. Pellets were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 120 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM phosphate, pH 7,4), suspended in 1 mL of PBS and stored at −20 °C for future use; no longer than 2 months.

2.5.3. Samples Preparation

Intestine tissue samples were taken at the beginning and end of the experiment; 1 g of distal intestine was collected from five fish at the beginning of the study and from two per treatment at the end of the experiment, suspended in 5 mL of formaldehyde (10%) and mechanically homogenized. Aliquots of 500 µL were centrifuged at 19,800× g for 8 min; tissue pellets were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and suspended in 1 mL of PBS.
Samples and controls were serially diluted and 15 µL aliquots were spread onto 12-wells Teflon slides. Autofluorescence control was carried out by inoculating wells with reference strains without probes. Slides were allowed to dry at 37 °C, treated with ethanol/formaldehyde solution (90:10 v/v) for 5 min, rinsed twice in distilled water and dried again at 37 °C.

2.5.4. Sample Fixation

In situ hybridization of the controls and tissue samples was performed as described previously [34]. Briefly, 40µL of hybridization mixture [10X SET buffer (1× SET: 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7,8), 1 mM EDTA), 0.2% bovine serum albumin (w/v), 0.01% polyadenylic acid (w/v), and 11% of dextran sulfate (w/v)] containing 1 ng/l of probes were added to samples immobilized on slides, avoiding bubble formation. The slides were placed into a humidified chamber with pieces of 1X SET-saturated paper and incubated overnight in the dark at 37 °C. After hybridization, the slides were washed twice with 1X SET buffer for 20 min each. Slides were dried at 37 °C in the dark, and each well was overlaid with 5 µL of mounting fluid (10× SET buffer, 50% glycerol, 0.1% p-phenylenediamine HCl). Finally, a cover slip was placed, and samples were analyzed.

2.5.5. Microscopy

Fluorescence signals were analyzed using an Olympus microscope with MF filters (400–700 nm: 5FITC or 5(6)-ROX) and Plan Fluorite Universal objectives. The excitation source was a 50-W high-pressure mercury bulb. Digital images were processed with image Fiji/Image J software (version 1.52g, Java 1.80_172, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA).
Bacterial density from the distal intestine was estimated by digital image count, checked for normality, and when appropriate, transformed. For cell quantification, means were calculated from 10 randomly chosen fields for each sample [35].

2.5.6. Bacterial Quantification by FISH

Quantification was conducted by considering the well area, area of the picture, and volume and dilution of the sample:
B a c t e r i a / m L = b a c t e r i a   c o u n t f i e l s   p e r   w e l l 1000   µ L   P B S 15   µ L   o f   d i l u t i o n   a p p l i e d   t o   t h e   s l i d e
F i e l d s   p e r   w e l l = w e l l   a r e a   p i c t u r e   a r e a
where: well area = 19,635,000 µm; picture area = 203,970 µm.

2.6. Pathogens Resistance Assay

After completing the feeding trials, six fish from DCML, SPC30C, and SPC30Pro treatments were placed in tanks isolated from the system and half-filled with water. V. harveyi CAIM1508 pathogenic strain was grown in specialized media until reaching stationary growth phase at 600 nm. An amount of 10 mL were centrifuged at 12,000× g for 10 min, washed twice with cold PBS, and suspended in PBS to obtain a final concentration of 107 cells/mL. Clove oil was used as an anesthetic; fish were inoculated intraperitoneally with V. harveyi solution. Fish were placed in their tanks, and recovery was recorded by visualizing the swimming fish activity and feed intake post-infection.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Collected data from growth performance were analyzed through a normality and homoscedasticity test. One way-analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to observe differences between treatments and their respective controls without probiotics. p-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Tukey’s post hoc test was applied for data presenting normality, and for those data that did not present normality, analysis of multiple comparisons by Kruskal–Wallis was applied.

3. Results

3.1. Feeding Trials

Table 2 describes the growth performance of fish fed with DCML, SPC30C, and SPC30Pro treatments, as well as with SPC60C and SPC60Pro. Results show 100% survival rate for diets with 30% substitution and 61.11% and 83.33% for diets with 60% substitution, respectively. Although fish fed with SPC30C and SPC30Pro do not show significant differences in their growth performance, SPC30Pro treatment supplemented with B. subtilis 9b probiotic strain produced higher FW, WG, SGR, TGC, and DFI values than SPC30C formulation (Table 2). Fish fed with 60% substitution diets presented lower growth performance than DCML and 30% substitution diets (Table 2); however, significant differences in most parameters were obtained when B. subtilis 9b probiotic strain was included in SPC60Pro formulation, compared to SPC60C without probiotic addition.

3.2. Treatment Effect on Organ Conditions

At the end of the feeding trial, three animals of each treatment were sacrificed, and their muscle condition, visceral fat content, as well as their liver, spleen, and distal intestine were measured and analyzed (Table 3).
Fish fed with SPC30C and SPC30Pro diets produced firmer fillets than fish fed with DCLM, SPC60C, and SPC60Pro. In this sense, fish fed with SPC60C diet showed worse muscular conditions in the study; however, fish fed with SPC60Pro produced muscular conditions similar to animals fed with DCML commercial diet (Table 3).
The visceral fat content was lower in diets with 30 and 60% substitution than in DCML commercial diets. In addition, the liver, spleen, and intestine were larger in fish fed with 30% substitution diets than in 60% substitution diets and DCML commercial diets (Table 3). Moreover, bigger spleen and intestine can be observed in fish fed with SPC60Pro than in fish fed with SPC60C treatment without B. subtilis 9b strain (Table 3).

3.3. Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Evaluation

Intestinal samples were taken from fish at the beginning and end of the feeding trial to evaluate the capacity of B. subtilis 9b strain to modulate the intestinal microbiota; increasing low G + C Gram-positive bacteria and reducing γ-proteobacteria that include Vibrio species.
Figure 1 shows bacilli-like structures attached to an intestine fragment taken at the end of the assay from a fish fed with SPC30Pro diet.
To know the modulation effect of B. subtilis 9b in T. macdonaldi intestinal microbiota throughout the trial, fluorescent in situ hybridization was carried out in fish fed with SPC30Pro, SPC30C, and DCML (Figure 2). A low G + C Gram-positive bacteria increment is observed in fish fed SPC30Pro compared to DCML and SPC30C. However, in SPC30Pro treatment γ-Proteobacteria decreased in number at the end of the trial. On the other hand, treatment with SPC30C without B. subtilis could not reduce the number of γ-Proteobacteria at the end of the experiment as SPC30Pro did. DCML commercial diets showed the lowest bacterial numbers at the end of the feeding trial (Figure 2).
Intestinal microbiota modulation by B. subtilis 9b in T. macdonaldi fed with SPC30Pro diet can be observed in Figure 3. An increase in low G + C Gram-positive bacterial number can be observed at the end of the feeding trial (Figure 3b,c). However, γ-Proteobacteria number was reduced in the same treatment (Figure 3e,f). Thus, B. subtilis 9b can modulate intestinal microbiota of T. macdonaldi, which could induce beneficial effects observed in totoaba fed SPC30Pro treatment (Table 2 and Table 3).

3.4. T. macdonaldi Behavior after V. harveyi Infection

A total of six fish from DCML, SPC30C, and SPC30Pro treatments were infected with V. harveyi to evaluate T. macdonaldi behavior after pathogen inoculation. In the first two days, all fish showed reduced and erratic swimming, however, after the third day, fish fed with SPC30Pro showed a recovery, presenting more motility than the SPC30C control diet and DCML commercial diet (Table 4). Additionally, DCML and SPC30Pro treatments similarly improved feed intake after the third day; however, SPC30C showed delayed feed intake (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

Bacillus species have attracted great attention lately due to their capacity to improve growth performance and health status in aquacultured animals such as orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides) [21], shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) [22,23], bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) [24], Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) [36,37], parrot fish (Oplegnathus fasciatus) [38], cobia (Rachycentron canadum) [39], Indian major carp (Labeo rohita) [40], red sea bream (Pagrus Major) [41], and sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) [42].
SBP addition in feed formulations of carnivorous species such as T. macdonaldi have already been studied. In this sense, Fuentes-Quesada and collaborators [30] found that substitutions of up to 23% of SBM induce adverse effects in fish. In addition, Trejo-Escamilla and collaborators [31] found that T. macdonaldi can tolerate up to 34.17% of SPC before developing adverse effects. Therefore, authors reported that T. macdonaldi’s low tolerance to SBP was mainly due to non-digestible carbohydrates and enzyme inhibitors present in SBM and SPC, respectively [30,31].
In this work, T. macdonaldi fed with SPC30Pro diet presented better growth performance and less visceral fat content than DCML commercial diet (Table 2 and Table 3). Thus, considering the health status of animals fed with SPC30Pro, this formulation seems to be an alternative to the Skretting© formulation used in this work (Table 3 and Table 4). Taking into account the larger visceral fat content found in animals fed with DCML diet, we speculate that the lipid concentration (12%) used to formulate this aquafeed could be responsible. In this sense, some reports indicate that high lipid concentration in aquafeeds could affect feed intake in carnivorous species [43]. High lipid concentration is principally used to feed cold water fish. Nevertheless, experiments with totoaba were developed at 25 °C; therefore, non-metabolized lipids were accumulated around the viscera. In addition, a 7% lipids concentration used in experimental diets was based on lipid content found in T. macdonaldi [44].
Fish fed with SPC60C and SPC60Pro presented lower growth and a decreased survival rate than SPC30C and SPC30Pro, respectively (Table 2). However, fish fed with SPC60Pro formulation showed 20% more survival and doubled weight gain than SPC60C without B. subtilis 9b strain; results that were not observed with SPC30C and SPC30Pro (Table 2). Therefore, we suggest that FM levels in SPC30Pro could be affecting B. subtilis behavior; maybe high levels of free nitrogen could be inhibiting Bacillus enzymes activity in SPC30Pro treatment [45,46]. In experiments developed with 100% of FM and B. subtilis 9b, T. macdonaldi presented less growth than its control without B. subtilis [32]. On the other hand, the increment of enzyme inhibitors in SPC60 formulations due to an increase in SPC could be affecting T. macdonaldi growth and survival (Table 2) [31]. These results suggest that B. subtilis 9b can degrade carbohydrates, lipids, and partially the proteins from SPC60Pro diet, however, it cannot eliminate all the enzyme inhibitors present in SPC60Pro formulation (Table 2). Thus, high levels of FM and SPC could be affecting B. subtilis 9b nitrogen homeostasis and T. macdonaldi proteases activity, respectively. Therefore, a new or complementary Bacillus strain with higher protease inhibitors degradation capacity must be found to obtain betters yields with 60% SPC substitutions. However, it is important to mention that SPC30Pro treatment produced the best results in this work.
Probiotics can affect muscle quality and the internal organs’ conditions. Some authors found that Pengze crucian carps (Carassius auratus var. Pengze) fed with formulations supplemented with B. subtilis or B. cereus produced a firmer, chewy, cohesive, and adhesive meat compared to fish fed with basal feed without Bacillus inclusion [47,48]. In this work, fish fed with SPC30Pro showed firmer and chewy fillets than most diets tested. In addition, fish fed with SPC30Pro showed bigger and larger organs compared with other treatments. These results suggest that B. subtilis 9b could be inducing benefits in T. macdonaldi muscle consistency and in organ health status (Table 3).
Probiotics also can modulate the host microbiota and, in this way, improve their health status. Totoaba autochthonous microbiota mainly comprises Proteobacteria from the Vibrionaceae family [49]. In this work, using FISH methodology, metabolically active γ-Proteobacteria and low G + C Gram-positive bacteria were evaluated in T. macdonaldi treated with SPC30Pro, SPC30C, and DCML diets (Figure 2). In this sense, B. subtilis 9b modulated T. macdonaldi intestinal microbiota by increasing low G + C Gram-positive bacteria amount and at the same time, it reduced the γ-Proteobacteria population (Figure 2). These results agree with results obtained by Tachibana and collaborators, who reported that B. subtilis and B. licheniformis added to Nile tilapia diets modulated intestinal microbiota; reducing Proteobacteria and increasing Firmicutes population [50]. However, DCML treatment reduced the bacterial number at the end of the experiment, indicating that DCML formulations contain compounds that inhibit the development of both groups (Figure 2).
Bacillus species produce antimicrobial peptides against many gram-positive and gram-negative pathogen bacteria [51]. These AMP can directly kill pathogens or induce the host immune system to respond against microbial infections. In this work, fish fed with SPC30Pro diet produced a faster recovery against V. harveyi infection. However, fish fed with DCML and SPC30C presented a slower recovery (Table 4 and Figure 4). Challenges with B. subtilis 9b and V. harveyi using agar plates with marine medium, showed that B. subtilis has the capacity to limit V. harveyi growth (data not shown). Therefore, higher resistance observed in fish fed with SPC30Pro could be related to in vitro antimicrobial capacity showed by B. subtilis 9b strain. B. subtilis 9b fish immune system stimulation requires more research before any assumption. However, Bacillus has been shown to boost different aquatic organisms’ immune system [22,38,52,53,54].

5. Conclusions

T. macdonaldi fed with SPC30CPro and SPC60CPro feeds containing high levels of SPC and B. subtilis 9b for ninety days improved growth performance and enhanced health status compared with SPC30C and SPC60C treatments without B. subtilis 9b. Therefore, B. subtilis 9b probiotic strain had the capacity to increase tolerance to ingredients such as corn starch and SPC present in these formulations. Furthermore, B. subtilis 9b showed the capacity to modulate intestinal microbiota increasing low G + C Gram positive bacteria and lowering γ-Proteobacteria, which seems to increase V. harveyi resistance. Moreover, muscle and organ characteristics were also improved in treatments containing B. subtilis 9b strain. Therefore, these results open the possibility to formulate functional feeds with alternative and economical vegetable ingredients and B. subtilis 9b, without generating animal health problems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.O., A.G. and L.M.L.; methodology, J.O., L.M.L., A.G., M.A.G. and V.M.; software, A.G.; validation, J.O. and L.M.L.; formal analysis, A.G.; investigation, J.O. and A.G.; resources, J.O. and L.M.L.; data curation, J.O. and A.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G. and V.M.; review and editing, J.O., L.M.L. and V.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Fish were handled and treated following the technical specifications for the production, care, and use of laboratory animals issued in the Official Mexican Standards (NOM-062-ZOO-1999) and according to the Research Ethics Committee (CEI-UABC-GU2010) of the Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexico, based on international guidelines. In addition, all procedures and experimentations conducted with organisms produced at the marine finfish hatchery (Reistration Number: DGVS-CR-IN-1084-B.C./09) are reported and evaluated by the DGVS Direccion General de Vida Silvestre, in Spanish (General Management for Wildlife) on an annual basis.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Olmos, J.; Acosta, M.; Mendoza, G.; Pitones, V. Bacillus subtilis, an ideal probiotic bacterium to shrimp and fish aquaculture that increase feed digestibility, prevent microbial diseases, and avoid water pollution. Arch. Microbiol. 2019, 202, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fishmeal. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/x5926e/x5926e01.htm (accessed on 9 August 2022).
  3. Klinger, D.; Naylor, R. Searching for solutions in aquaculture: Charting a sustainable course. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2012, 37, 247–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Olmos-Soto, J.; Paniagua-Michel, J.J.; Lopez, L.; Ochoa, L. Functional feeds in aquaculture. In Springer Handbook of Marine Biotechnology, 1st ed.; Kim, S., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 1303–1319. [Google Scholar]
  5. Olmos, J.; Mercado, V. Use of alternative ingredients and probiotic in aquafeeds formulations. In Sustainable Aquafeeds, 1st ed.; Lorenzo, M.J., Simal-Gandara, J., Eds.; CRC Press: London, UK, 2021; Volume 1, pp. 21–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Medic, J.; Atkinson, C.; Hurburgh, C.R., Jr. Current Knowledge in Soybean Composition. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2014, 91, 363–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sinha, A.K.; Kumar, V.; Makkar, H.P.S.; De Boeck, G.; Becker, K. Non-starch polysaccharides and their role in fish nutrition—A review. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 1409–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mohan, V.R.; Tresina, P.S.; Daffodil, E.D. Antinutritional factors in legume seeds: Characteristics and determination. In Encyclopedia of Food and Health, 1st ed.; Caballero, B., Finglas, P.M., Toldrá, F., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, UK, 2015; Volume 1, pp. 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Becker-Ritt, A.B.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Carlini, C.R. Antinutritional and/or toxic factors in soybean (Glycine max (l) Merril) seeds: Comparison of different cultivars adapted to the southern region of Brazil. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2004, 84, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Grant, G. Antinutritional effects of soyabean: A review. Prog. Food. Nutr. Sci. 1989, 13, 317–348. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gyan, W.R.; Yang, Q. Effect of replacing fishmeal with soybean products in fish and crustacean performance. J. Aquac. Res. Dev. 2019, 10, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Huang, F.; Wang, L.; Zhang, C.; Song, K. Replacement of fishmeal with soybean meal and mineral supplements in diets of Litopenaeus vannamei reared in low-salinity water. Aquaculture 2017, 473, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cruz, C.C.A.; Hernández, H.L.H.; Fernández, A.M.A.; Ramírez, P.T.; Angeles, L.O. Effects of diets with soybean meal on the growth, digestibility, phosphorus and nitrogen excretion of juvenile rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Hidrobiologica 2011, 21, 118–125. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hernández, M.D.; Martínez, F.J.; Jover, M.; García, G.B. Effect of partial replacement of fish meal by soybean meal in sharpsnout seabream (Diplodus puntazzo) diet. Aquaculture 2007, 263, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Øverland, M.; Sørensen, M.; Storebakken, T.; Krogdahl, Å.; Skrede, A. Pea protein concentrate substituting fish meal or soybean meal in diets for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)–effect on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass composition, gut health, and physical feed quality. Aquaculture 2009, 288, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Monzer, S.; Nasser, N.; Babikian, J.; Saoud, P.I. Substitution of fishmeal by soybean meal in diets for juvenile marbled spinefoot, Siganus rivulatus. J. Appl. Aquac. 2017, 29, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Colombo, S.M. Physiological considerations in shifting carnivorous fishes to plant-based diets. In Fish Physiology; Benfey, T.J., Farrell, P.A., Brauner, C.J., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, UK, 2020; pp. 53–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Olmos, J.; Paniagua-Michel, J. Bacillus subtilis a potential probiotic bacterium to formulate functional feeds for aquaculture. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2014, 6, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Olmos, S.J. Feed intake improvement, gut microbiota modulation and pathogens control by using Bacillus species in shrimp aquaculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ochoa-Solano, J.L.; Olmos-Soto, J. The functional property of Bacillus for shrimp feeds. Food Microbiol. 2006, 23, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shiu, Y.L.; Hsieh, S.L.; Guei, W.C.; Tsai, Y.T.; Chiu, C.H.; Liu, C.H. Using Bacillus subtilis E20-fermented soybean meal as replacement for fish meal in the diet of orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides, Hamilton). Aquac. Res. 2013, 46, 1403–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Olmos, J.; Ochoa, L.; Paniagua-Michel, J.; Contreras, R. Functional feed assessment on Litopenaeus vannamei using 100% fish meal replacement by soybean meal. High levels of complex carbohydrates and Bacillus probiotic strains. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 1119–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Cheng, A.C.; Yeh, S.P.; Hu, S.Y.; Lin, H.L.; Liu, C.H. Intestinal microbiota of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, fed diets containing Bacillus subtilis E20-fermented soybean meal (FSBM) or an antimicrobial peptide derived from B. subtilis E20-FSBM. Aquac. Res. 2019, 51, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Z.; Yang, M.; Wang, L.; Lu, K.; Song, K.; Zhang, C. Bacillus subtilis LCBS1 supplementation and replacement of fish meal with fermented soybean meal in bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) diets: Effect on growth performance, feed digestibility and gut health. Aquaculture 2021, 545, 737217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cisneros-Mata, M.A.; Montemayor-Lopez, G.; Roman-Rodriguez, M.J. Life history and conservation of Totoaba macdonaldi. Conserv. Biol. 1995, 9, 806–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rodriguez, M.J.R.; Hammann, M.G. Age and growth of totoaba Totoaba macdonaldi (Scianidae), in the upper gulf of California. Fish. Bull. 1981, 95, 620–628. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cisneros-Mata, M.Á.; True, C.; Enriquez-Paredes, L.M.; Sadovy, Y.; Liu, M. Totoaba macdonaldi. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2021. E.T22003A2780880. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22003/2780880 (accessed on 15 August 2022).
  28. True, C. Desarrollo de la biotecnia de cultivo de Totoaba macdonaldi. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12930/220 (accessed on 15 August 2022).
  29. Juarez, L.M.; Konietzko, P.A. Totoaba aquaculture and conservation: Hope for an endangered fish from Mexico’s sea of Cortez. JWAS 2016, 47, 30–38. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fuentes-Quesada, J.P.; Viana, V.M.; Rombenso, A.N.; Guerrero-Renteria, Y.; Nomumra-Solis, M.; Gomez-Calle, V.; Lazo, P.J.; Mata-Sotres, J.A. Enteritis induction by soybean meal in Totoaba macdonaldi diets: Effects on growth performance, digestive capacity, immune response and distal intestine integrity. Aquaculture 2018, 495, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Trejo-Escamilla, I.; López, L.M.; Gisbert, E.; Sanchez, S.; Rodarte-Venegas, D.; Alvarez, C.A.; Galaviz, M.A. Soybean protein concentrate as a protein source for totoaba (Totoaba macdonaldi) juveniles: Effect on intermediary metabolism and liver histological organization. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2021, 262, 111062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gorriño, A.A. Inducción de la Microbiota Benéfica en Totoaba macdonaldi Utilizando Probióticos del Género Bacillus y su Efecto en el Estatus de Salud y en el Crecimiento. Master’s Thesis, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Ensenada, Mexico, 2022. Available online: http://cicese.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1007/3710 (accessed on 18 August 2022).
  33. Fuentes-Quesada, J.P.; Cornejo-Granados, F.; Mata-Sotres, J.A.; Ochoa-Romo, J.P.; Rombenso, A.N.; Guerrero-Renteria, Y.; Lazo, J.P.; Pohlenz, C.; Ochoa-Leyva, A.; Viana, M.T. Prebiotic agavin in juvenile totoaba, Totoaba macdonaldi diets, to relieve soybean meal-induced enteritis: Growth performance, gut histology and microbiota. Aquac. Nutr. 2020, 26, 2115–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hernández, Z.G.; Olmos, S.J. Identification of bacterial diversity in the oyster Crassotrea gigas by fluorescent in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 100, 664–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Garcia, A.T.; Olmos, J.S. Quantification by fluorescent in situ hybridization of bacteria associated with Litopenaeus vannamei larvae in Mexican shrimp hatchery. Aquaculture 2007, 262, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abarike, E.D.; Cai, J.; Lu, Y.; Yu, H.; Chen, L.; Jian, J.; Tang, J.; Jun, L.; Kuebutornye, F.K.A. Effect of a commercial probiotic BS containing Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis on growth, immune response and disease resistance in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 82, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Won, S.; Hamidoghli, A.; Choi, W.; Park, Y.; Jang, W.J.; Kong, I.S.; Bai, S.C. Effect of Bacillus subtilis WB60 and Lactococcus lactis on growth, immune responses, histology and gene expression in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Liu, C.H.; Wu, K.; Chu, T.W.; Wu, T.M. Dietary supplementation of probiotic, Bacillus subtilis E20, enhances the growth performance and disease resistance against Vibrio alginolyticus in parrot fish (Oplegnathus fasciatus). Aquacult. Int. 2018, 26, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Geng, X.; Dong, X.H.; Tan, B.P.; Yang, Q.P.; Chi, S.Y.; Liu, H.Y.; Liu, X.Q. Effects of dietary chitosan and Bacillus subtilis on the growth performance, non-specific immunity and disease resistance of cobia, Rachycentron canadum. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011, 31, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kumar, R.; Mukherjee, S.C.; Prasad, K.P.; Pal, A.K. Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis as a probiotic to Indian major carp Labeo rohita (Ham.). Aquac. Res. 2006, 37, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zaineldin, A.I.; Hegazi, S.; Koshio, S.; Ishikawa, M.; Mahmoud, A.O.D.; Dossou, S.; Yukun, Z.; Mzengereza, K. Singular effects of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 or Saccharomyces cerevisiae type 1 on the growth, gut morphology, immunity, and stress resistance of red sea bream (Pagrus major). Ann. Anim. Sci. 2021, 21, 589–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cerezuela, R.; Guardiola, F.A.; Gonzales, P.; Mesenguer, J.; Esteban, M.A. Effects of dietary Bacillus subtilis, Tetraselmis chuii, and Phaeodactylum tricornutum, singularly or in combination, on the immune response and disease resistance of sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012, 33, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Perez-Velazquez, M.; Minjarez-Osorio, C.; González-Félix, M.L. Effect of dietary lipid level on growth performance, feed utilization and body composition of totoaba, Totoaba macdonaldi (Gilbert, 1890). Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 2607–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lopez, L.M.; Durazo, E.; Rodríguez-Gómez, A.; True, C.D.; Viana, M.T. Proximate composition and fatty acid profile of wild and cultured juvenile Totoaba macdonaldi. Cienc. Mar. 2006, 32, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Schumacher, M.A.; Chinman, N.; Cuthbert, B.; Tonthat, N.K.; Whitfill, T. Structures of regulatory machinery reveal novel molecular mechanisms controlling B. subtilis nitrogen homeostasis. Genes Dev. 2015, 29, 451–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Deshpande, K.L.; Katze, J.R.; Kane, J.F. Effect of glutamine on enzymes of nitrogen metabolism in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 1981, 145, 768–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Cao, H.; Yu, R.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, B.; Jian, S.; Wen, C.; Kajbaf, K.; Kumar, V.; Yang, G. Effect of dietary supplementation with β-glucan and Bacillus subtilis on growth, fillet quality, immune capacity, and antioxidant status of Pengze crucian carp (Carassius auratus var. Pengze). Aquaculture 2019, 508, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, G.; Cao, H.; Jiang, W.; Hu, B.; Jian, S.; Wen, C.; Kajbaf, K.; Kumar, V.; Tao, Z.; Peng, M. Dietary supplementation of Bacillus cereus as probiotics in Pengze crucian carp (Carassius auratus var. Pengze): Effects on growth performance, fillet quality, serum biochemical parameters and intestinal histology. Aquac. Res. 2019, 50, 2207–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gonzales-Felix, M.L.; Gatlin III, D.M.; Urquidez-Bejarano, P.; Reé-Rodríguez, C.; Duarte-Rodríguez, L.; Sánchez, F.; Casas-Reyes, A.; Yamamoto, F.Y.; Ochoa-Leyva, A.; Perez-Velazquez, M. Effects of commercial dietary prebiotic and probiotic supplements on growth, innate immune responses, and intestinal microbiota and histology of Totoaba macdonaldi. Aquaculture 2018, 491, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tachibana, L.; Telli, G.S.; Dias, D.C.; Gonçalves, G.S.; Guimarães, M.C.; Ishikawa, C.M.; Cavalcante, R.B.; Natori, M.M.; Fernandez-Alarcon, M.F.; Tapia-Paniagua, S.; et al. Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis in diets for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): Effects on growth performance, gut microbiota modulation and innate immunology. Aquac. Res. 2021, 52, 1630–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mercado, V.; Olmos, S.J. Bacteriocin production by Bacillus species: Isolation, characterization, and application. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2022, 26, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Xu, W.; Mai, K.; Zhang, Y.; Liufu, Z. Effects of potential probiotic Bacillus subtilis T13 on growth, immunity and disease resistance against Vibrio splendidus infection in juvenile sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012, 32, 750–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Das, A.; Nakhro, K.; Chowdhurry, S.; Kamylya, D. Effects of potential probiotic Bacillus amyloliquifaciens FPTB16 on systemic and cutaneous mucosal immune responses and disease resistance of catla (Catla catla). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013, 35, 1547–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Aderaldo-Vidal, J.M.; Cruz-Pessoa, M.N.; Dos-Santos, F.L.; Mendes, P.P.; Mendes, M.S. Probiotic potential of Bacillus cereus against Vibrio spp. In post-larvae shrimps. Rev. Caatinga 2018, 31, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Black arrows point to some bacilli-like structures in fish intestine fed with SPC30Pro diet.
Figure 1. Black arrows point to some bacilli-like structures in fish intestine fed with SPC30Pro diet.
Animals 12 03422 g001
Figure 2. Bacterial count in intestinal samples of fish fed with SPC30Pro, SPC30C, and DCML at the beginning and end of the trial.
Figure 2. Bacterial count in intestinal samples of fish fed with SPC30Pro, SPC30C, and DCML at the beginning and end of the trial.
Animals 12 03422 g002
Figure 3. FISH of intestinal samples taken from totoaba fed with SPC30Pro diet at the beginning and end of the trial; (a) low G + C Gram-positive control strain (Bacillus subtilis 9b); (b) Low G + C Gram-positive bacteria from intestine samples at the beginning of the study; (c) Low G + C Gram-positive bacteria from intestine samples at the end of the study; (d) γ-Proteobacteria control strain (Vibrio harveyi ATCC14126); (e) γ-Proteobacteria from intestine samples at the beginning of the study; (f) γ-Proteobacteria from intestine samples at the end of the study.
Figure 3. FISH of intestinal samples taken from totoaba fed with SPC30Pro diet at the beginning and end of the trial; (a) low G + C Gram-positive control strain (Bacillus subtilis 9b); (b) Low G + C Gram-positive bacteria from intestine samples at the beginning of the study; (c) Low G + C Gram-positive bacteria from intestine samples at the end of the study; (d) γ-Proteobacteria control strain (Vibrio harveyi ATCC14126); (e) γ-Proteobacteria from intestine samples at the beginning of the study; (f) γ-Proteobacteria from intestine samples at the end of the study.
Animals 12 03422 g003
Figure 4. Totoaba macdonaldi feed intake behavior after Vibrio harveyi infection.
Figure 4. Totoaba macdonaldi feed intake behavior after Vibrio harveyi infection.
Animals 12 03422 g004
Table 1. Ingredients (%) of feeds containing 30% and 60% of SPC substitution for juvenile Totoaba macdonaldi.
Table 1. Ingredients (%) of feeds containing 30% and 60% of SPC substitution for juvenile Totoaba macdonaldi.
IngredientsSPC30CSPC30ProSPC60CSPC60Pro
FM42.0542.0525.3125.31
SPC20.2620.263939
Corn starch17171515
Wheat flour4444
Corn flour4444
Gelatin2.52.52.52.5
Fish Oil3333
Cellulose2.122.12
Mineral mix3.53.53.53.5
Vitamin mix1.591.591.591.59
B. subtilis 9b00.100.1
Table 2. Growth performance of Totoaba macdonaldi fed with two levels of SPC and Bacillus subtilis 9b.
Table 2. Growth performance of Totoaba macdonaldi fed with two levels of SPC and Bacillus subtilis 9b.
DCML A*SPC30C B*SPC30Pro C*SPC60C D*SPC60Pro E*
IW152.6 ± 1.77152 ± 1.9153 ± 1.87154.3 ± 2.068153.1 ± 1.632
FW618.4 ± 20.13 DE624.4 ± 16.97 DE645.4 ± 17.49 DE260.1 ± 57.65 ABCE406.2 ± 45 ABCD
WG306.1 ± 3.59 CDE312.5 ± 3.83 ED323.5 ± 3.86 ADE68.84 ± 0.94 ABCE165.9 ± 1.76 ABCD
SGR1.631 ± 0.03 DE1.637 ± 0.02 DE1.682 ± 0.02 DE0.360 ± 0.22 ABC1.002 ± 0.14 ABC
TGC1.508 ± 0.03 DE1.515 ± 0.03 DE1.567 ± 0.03 DE0.3445 ± 0.19 ABC0.9079 ± 0.13 ABC
DFI4.315.024.931.022.36
S (%)10010010061.1183.33
IIW4.054.114.221.692.65
*A (DCML), B (SPC30C), C (SP30Pro), D (SPC60C), and E (SPC60Pro) superscripts indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05); IW: initial weight; FW: final weight; WG: weight gained; SGR: specific growth rate; TGC: thermal growth coefficient; DFI: daily feed intake; S: survival; IIW: increase in initial weight.
Table 3. Organs condition in fish fed with SPC treatments and Bacillus subtilis 9b strain.
Table 3. Organs condition in fish fed with SPC treatments and Bacillus subtilis 9b strain.
FeedMuscular Firmness 1Visceral Fat 1Organ’s Condition
Liver Color and Size (cm)Spleen Size (cm)Intestine Length (cm)Bile
DCML+++++Pink (12.7)1.0518.7Yellow
SPC30C+++++Pink (12.35)1.5722.47Yellow
SPC30Pro+++++Pink (12.68)1.7624.74Greenish
SPC60C+++Pale (11.16)1.0420.9Yellow
SPC60Pro++++Pale (10.4)1.1223.61Yellow
1 +: low; ++: moderate; +++: high.
Table 4. Totoaba macdonaldi motility after Vibrio harveyi infection.
Table 4. Totoaba macdonaldi motility after Vibrio harveyi infection.
Days Post-InfectionDCMLSPC30CSPC30Pro
1°°°
2°°°
3°°°°°°
4°°°°°°
5°°°°°°°
6°°°°°°°°°
7°°°°°°°°°
8°°°°°°°°°
9°°°°°°°°°
°°° High motility; °° Medium motility; ° Low motility.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Olmos, J.; López, L.M.; Gorriño, A.; Galaviz, M.A.; Mercado, V. Bacillus subtilis Effects on Growth Performance and Health Status of Totoaba macdonaldi Fed with High Levels of Soy Protein Concentrate. Animals 2022, 12, 3422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233422

AMA Style

Olmos J, López LM, Gorriño A, Galaviz MA, Mercado V. Bacillus subtilis Effects on Growth Performance and Health Status of Totoaba macdonaldi Fed with High Levels of Soy Protein Concentrate. Animals. 2022; 12(23):3422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233422

Chicago/Turabian Style

Olmos, Jorge, Lus M. López, Antonio Gorriño, Mario A. Galaviz, and Victor Mercado. 2022. "Bacillus subtilis Effects on Growth Performance and Health Status of Totoaba macdonaldi Fed with High Levels of Soy Protein Concentrate" Animals 12, no. 23: 3422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233422

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop