Next Article in Journal
Glycine Alleviated Intestinal Injury by Inhibiting Ferroptosis in Piglets Challenged with Diquat
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Effect of Allicin and Alcoholic Garlic Extract on the Morphology and Infectivity of Eimeria tenella Oocysts in Chickens
Previous Article in Journal
Interferon Tau (IFNt) and Interferon-Stimulated Genes (ISGs) Expression in Peripheral Blood Leukocytes and Correlation with Circulating Pregnancy-Associated Glycoproteins (PAGs) during Peri-Implantation and Early Pregnancy in Buffalo Cows
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Wheat Germ Oil and Propolis Decrease Parasite Burden and Restore Marked Histopathological Changes in Liver and Lung in Mice with Chronic Toxoplasmosis

by
Ashraf Mohamed Barakat
1,
Hassan Ali Mohamed El Fadaly
1,
Ahmed Gareh
2,
Khaled A. Abd El-Razik
3,
Fatma Abo Zakaib Ali
4,
Amira A. Saleh
5,
Sabry A. S. Sadek
1,
Naief Dahran
6,
Abd El-Nasser G. El-Gendy
7,
Manal F. El-Khadragy
8 and
Ehab Kotb Elmahallawy
9,*
1
Department of Zoonotic Diseases, National Research Centre, El Buhouth St., Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt
2
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan 24101, Egypt
3
Department of Animal Reproduction, Veterinary Research Institute, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt
4
Department of Pathology and Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag 82524, Egypt
5
Department of Human Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
6
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21959, Saudi Arabia
7
Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research Department, Pharmaceutical and Drug Industries Research Institute, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt
8
Department of biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
9
Department of Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag 82524, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(22), 3069; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12223069
Submission received: 21 September 2022 / Revised: 26 October 2022 / Accepted: 3 November 2022 / Published: 8 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protozoosis in Animals: Antiprotozoal Drugs and Pharmacokinetics)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Toxoplasmosis is a major parasitic zoonotic disease with worldwide distribution. It has a wide range of reservoirs and can result in abortion and permanent congenital anomalies in fetuses. Several studies have reported an alarming increase in parasite resistance to available drugs, making treatment of infection a major challenge, especially in the chronic stage of the disease. The present study investigated the antiparasitic effect of wheat germ oil and propolis on the chronic stage of Toxoplasma gondii in experimentally infected mice. The parasitological load in the liver and lungs of treated animals was quantified and compared with positive control animals by parasitological methods and molecular techniques. Histopathological changes as a result of infection were also investigated. The results demonstrate promising ameliorative effects of the combination of wheat germ oil and propolis against parasite burden and restoration of histopathological lesions in the liver and lungs during chronic toxoplasmosis infection.

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis is a parasitic zoonotic disease with a worldwide distribution. Its effects can be critical in immunocompromised patients. However, there is a limited availability of effective, low-toxicity drugs against this disease, particularly in its chronic form. The present study evaluated the effect of propolis and wheat germ oil (WGO) as safe, natural products to reduce Toxoplasma cysts in experimentally infected mice. For the experiment, five groups (10 mice per group) were examined: Group 1: negative control (noninfected, nontreated); Group 2: positive control (infected, nontreated); Group 3: infected and treated with WGO at a dose of 0.2 mg/1.5 mL per kg body weight/day; Group 4: infected and treated with 0.1 mL propolis extract/day; and Group 5: infected and treated with a combination of WGO and propolis at the same doses as Group 3 and 4. After the mice were sacrificed, liver and lung specimens underwent histopathological examination, and the parasite burden was investigated by parasitological methods and quantified using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Notably, the results showed a substantial decrease in parasitic burden in Group 5 compared to the control group. These results were further confirmed by molecular analysis and quantification of the DNA concentration of the Toxoplasma P29 gene after treatment in all tested samples. Furthermore, the combination of propolis and WGO restored all histopathological changes in the liver and lungs. Taken together, these findings provide remarkably promising evidence of the effects of the combination of WGO and propolis against chronic toxoplasmosis in mice.

1. Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii is one of the most common coccidian parasites of man and other animals and is considered an important zoonotic parasite with a worldwide distribution [1]. This parasite infects herbivorous, omnivorous, and carnivorous animals, and approximately one-third of humanity has been exposed to it [2,3]. T. gondii is a heterogeneous parasite that requires both final (feline) and intermediate (any warm-blooded animal or human) hosts to complete its sexual and asexual life cycles [4]. The asexual phase of development takes place in different tissues of herbivorous or omnivorous intermediate hosts, whereas the sexual phase occurs in the intestine of definitive hosts [5]. Definitive hosts are members of the family Felidae, such as domestic cats [6]. Three infective stages of T. gondii are known, namely tachyzoites, bradyzoites (in tissue cysts), and sporozoites. Tachyzoites are typically crescent-shaped and invade host cells, where they proliferate asexually by repetitive division, resulting in tissue cysts that persist intracellularly [7]. Each tissue cyst has a thin, flexible wall that encircles hundreds of small, crescent-shaped bradyzoites. After the digestion of tissue cysts by cats, the wall is dissolved by proteolytic enzymes, and the free bradyzoites enter the epithelial cells of the small intestine, where they develop into schizonts. Oocysts of T. gondii are formed only in felids after consumption of any of the infective stages of T. gondii, and sporulation occurs outside of the cat within 1–5 days, dependent on airing and temperature [1]. Hosts may acquire T. gondii infection horizontally via oral ingestion of infectious oocysts from the environment and consumption of tissue cysts in undercooked meat or vertically by transplacental transmission of tachyzoites, spread via milk from mother to offspring or congenitally [8,9]. Recent studies have reported that water contaminated with oocysts is another probable source of Toxoplasma infection in humans and animals [10,11]. However, transmission by organ transplantation and blood transfusion is less common [12]. While T. gondii infection in immunocompetent humans is typically asymptomatic, there may be mild symptoms, including lymphadenopathy associated with fever, fatigue, muscle pain, sore throat, and headache [13]. Severe manifestations rarely occur in immunocompetent humans but include encephalitis, sepsis disorder, shock, myocarditis, and hepatitis [14]. There are also reports of spontaneous abortion or congenital defects if contracted for the first time during pregnancy [15]. Immunocompromised patients severely affected with T. gondii may experience reactivation of latent infection, leading to symptomatic disease [16,17,18]. Toxoplasmic encephalitis is a mutual sequela among AIDS patients infected with toxoplasmosis and is usually the result of the reactivation of latent tissue cysts [2]. T. gondii is capable of initiating severe disease in animals other than humans [1]. In the definitive host, cats infected with T. gondii appear depressed and anorexic and may die abruptly without noticeable clinical signs. Toxoplasmosis in sheep and goats can lead to great harm via embryonic loss and resorption, fetal death and mummification, abortion, stillbirth, and neonatal death. As the clinical signs of toxoplasmosis are non-specific and insufficiently distinctive, T. gondii infection must be diagnosed by biological, serological, histological, or molecular methods. Molecular methods, such as using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect T. gondii DNA, have proved to be simple, sensitive, reproducible, and cost-effective and have been applied in diverse clinical trials, including on animals and humans [19]. The number of tachyzoites and proportional parasite burden is much higher during Toxoplasma infection in peripheral organs, such as the lung parenchyma and liver parenchyma, compared with parenchymal organs [20]. The most common treatments for acute toxoplasmosis are sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine (Daraprim). However, these drugs are believed to have little effect on subclinical infection. Difficult cases may be treated with diaminodiphenylsulfone, atovaquone, spiramycin, and clindamycin [21]. However, there are currently no available therapies to eliminate cysts that develop in the central nervous system of immunocompromised patients infected with chronic toxoplasmosis [22]. Natural medications extracted from plants, microbes, and animals play a substantial role in traditional medicine and provide new organic compounds for drug discovery research [23]. Thus, such compounds may provide new antiprotozoal drugs with high efficacy and low toxicity, which are urgently needed [24]. Wheat germ and propolis have been previously used as natural products to treat protozoal diseases [25,26]. Wheat germ (Triticum aestivum or Ganin Habit Al-Kamh), and its active component, lectin, are concentrated sources of vitamin E, folic acid, phosphorus, thiamin, zinc, magnesium, and essential fatty acids [27]. Clinically, wheat germ is beneficial for the treatment of Giardiasis, Acanthamoeba, Trichomonas Vaginalis, and the acute and chronic stages of infection with Entamoeba histolyica [24,26,28]. Wheat germ has also been shown to reduce the excretion of oocysts when used experimentally in immunosuppressed mice infected with Cryptosporidium oocysts [29]. Furthermore, combined therapy of nitazoxanide (NTZ) and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) has shown therapeutic value against cryptosporidial infection [29]. Propolis, also known as bee gum, is created by honeybees from plant liquids as resins and adhesive exudates on leaf buds and plant wounds. Propolis has a long history of use as a natural medication for various disorders [30]. The essential components of propolis are phenolics, flavonoids, aromatic acids, caffeic acid and its esters, and cinnamic acids [31,32]. In in vitro studies, propolis extracts have shown antiparasitic activity against T. gondii, T. vaginalis, Cryptosporidium, Leishmania donovani, Plasmodium falciparum, and Crithidia fasciculata, and Trypanosoma cruzi [33,34,35,36,37,38]. However, few studies have investigated the potential effects of wheat germ oil (WGO) and propolis on Toxoplasma infection. Given prior findings of the value of WGO and propolis as antiprotozoal treatments, the present study evaluated the effect of combined WGO and propolis on mice experimentally infected with Toxoplasma, including effects on parasite burden and histopathological changes in the liver and lung during chronic toxoplasmosis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Considerations

This study was approved by the research ethics committee of the Veterinary Research Institute, National Research Centre, Egypt (institutional approval board number 19/139/2020).

2.2. Materials

WGO and propolis were obtained from local Egyptian markets selling medicinal plants and herbs. Characterization of silylated primary metabolites and metabolite identification, including WGO and propolis, was performed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry GC-MS analysis [39,40,41], as performed in a previous study (unpublished data). Tachyzoites of Toxoplasma gondii (ME49 or Avirulent strain) were provided by the Department of Zoonoses, Veterinary Research Institute, National Research Center, Egypt. Mice underwent intraperitoneal inoculation with parasite materials. Tachyzoites were collected from the peritoneal cavity of infected mice 72 h after inoculation. The number of parasites was calculated using a hemocytometer, and the number was adjusted to 103/mL by attenuation in the applicable volume of saline [42].

2.3. Experimental Procedure

The overall design of the experiment is shown in Figure 1. A total of 50 6-week-old female Swiss albino laboratory mice (weighing 25–30 g) were acclimatized for one week before the experiment. Animals were kept in well-ventilated cages with ad libitum access to a standard diet and water [43]. The mice were experimentally infected by repeated intraperitoneal injection of mice every 8 weeks with the ME49 parasite strain (Avirulent strain) using 0.1 mL of brain suspension containing 103 cysts of previously infected mice [25]. Six weeks post-infection, herbal ingredients were orally administered to mice daily using a stomach tube for 10 days [44]. The mice were divided into the following five groups (10 mice per group): Group 1 (G1), negative control: noninfected, nontreated mice; Group 2 (G2), positive control: infected, nontreated mice; Group 3 (G3): infected and treated with 0.1 mL propolis extract/day [45]; Group 4 (G4): infected and treated with WGO at a dose of 0.2 mg/1.5 mL/per kg body weight/day [46]; and Group 5 (G5): infected and treated with a combination of WGO and propolis using the same dose in G3 and G4. Mice were assessed daily for any clinical signs.

2.4. Parasitological Assessment

Mice from all groups were sacrificed, and their livers and lungs were dissected and examined for gross lesions. Liver suspensions from G2, G3, G4 and G5 were prepared with 1 mL saline in a tissue homogenizer. Next, 0.1 mL of suspension was placed on a slide to identify tissue cysts under 10× magnification. The parasite load was then calculated for each group [42].

2.5. Molecular Identification

Liver tissue specimens (20–25 mg) from sacrificed animals were washed three times using sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4). Next, DNA was extracted from tissue samples from all groups using a GF-1 Tissue DNA extraction kit (Cat.-No.GF-TD-050, Vivantis Co., Malaysia) according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR) was performed using ViPrime PLUS Taq qPCR Green Master Mix I (SYBR Green Dye, Cat QLMM12 Vivantis Co., Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia). The PCR reaction and conditions (40 cycles) were based on a previously described protocol [47] using a set of primers designated with Laser gene DNA star software V15 (Table 1).

2.6. Histopathological Examination

Samples from liver and lung tissues were fixed in neutral buffered formalin (10%), dehydrated in an ethyl alcohol series, cleared with xylol, and then embedded in paraffin. Slices of 3–5 μm thickness were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) [48]. The stained sections were then examined for histopathological changes and the presence of parasite cysts within the tissue.

2.7. Histopathologic Scoring

Each animal was scored based on the tissue histopathological examination results [49]. Samples were scored quantitatively and semiquantitatively based on visual inspection of a minimum of 10 sections from each group. Photographs were taken at a magnification of 40×. Tissue alterations were scored according to set criteria: 0 = (absence of lesions), 1 = (1–10% extent of lesions), 2 = (11–40% extent of lesions), 3 = (41–50% extent of lesions), and 4 = (51–100% extent of lesions) [50]. Liver sections were analyzed for the number of parasites present and the number of inflammatory foci present according to a previously described method with minor modifications [51]. Lung tissue sections were scored according to the number of parasites, alterations in bronchioles, alveolar structure changes, and vascular changes. The nature and extent of the lesions and their frequency in the tissue were assessed [47,52]. All analyses were performed by two pathologists.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data (mean ± standard deviation) were compared between groups using a t-test performed with the Statistical Program for Social Science version 2. Histopathological scoring data were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison test with GraphPad Prism, version 5 (San Diego, California, CA, USA) [53]. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

3. Results

3.1. Parasitic Load

Figure 2 presents the variation in parasite load in the liver tissues of the different groups. As shown, there was a substantial decrease in parasitic burden in the group treated with the combination of WGO and propolis (G5) compared with the positive control and the other treated groups.

3.2. Molecular Results

The DNA concentration of the Toxoplasma P29 gene (GRA7) was quantified after treatment in all groups. As shown in Table 2, all samples gave positive results with clear variations in the product quantities. However, there was only a statistically significant difference between the untreated control group (G2) and the group treated with a combination of WGO and propolis (G5). A melting curve analysis was performed to rule out the presence of non-specific PCR.

3.3. Histopathological Findings

To investigate the effects of propolis, WGO, or the combination of both substances on T. gondii-induced infection, liver (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6) and lung (Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9) tissues from different groups were examined histopathologically. Liver sections (Figure 3A,B) from control noninfected mice (G1) demonstrated normal hepatic architecture, comprising a normal central vein and normal sinusoids between hepatic cellular cords. Normal portal triad structures (hepatic artery, portal vein, and bile duct) were also observed. In contrast, severe damage, multiple tissue cysts, congested vessels, obvious inflammation, coagulative necrotic foci, and numerous tissue cysts were observed in the liver (Figure 3C–F) of T. gondii-infected untreated mice (G2). Attenuated or moderate histological evidence (moderate inflammation and fewer necrosis foci) in hepatic tissues and a relatively high number of tachyzoites (Figure 4A–D) were observed in liver tissues of T. gondii-infected mice treated with propolis (G3). Treatment with WGO only (G4) ameliorated the histopathological changes (mild inflammation and normal hepatocellular structure), and a lower number of tachyzoites was observed (Figure 5A). Notably, liver tissue sections from T. gondii-infected mice treated with a combination of propolis and WGO appeared morphologically indistinguishable from uninfected controls (Figure 5B,C). Quantitative and semiquantitative analysis of the severity of inflammation, necrosis of liver sections, and the number of parasites present in tissue fields of different groups was performed (Figure 6). The results showed a significant increase in pathological lesions in T. gondii-infected untreated mice (G2) compared with the control group, whereas significantly reduced pathologic alterations were observed in the propolis (G3), WGO (G4), and combination treatment (G5) groups.
Microscopic examination of lung tissues obtained from the negative control group (G1) (Figure 7A,B) revealed a normal bronchiolar structure and normal alveolar tissue. In contrast, lung tissue obtained from the positive control group (G2) showed severe damage, congested blood vessels, collapsed alveoli, multiple focal lymphoid hyperplasia, the presence of multiple tissue cysts containing bradyzoites, and multiple diffuse bradyzoites in the infected alveolar tissue (Figure 7C–F). Lung tissue sections obtained from infected animals treated with propolis (G3) exhibited moderate damage, alveolar emphysema, interstitial hemorrhage, infestation with multiple bradyzoites, and multiple tachyzoites (Figure 8A,B), while normal bronchiolar structure, mild damage, congested blood vessels, hemorrhage, and collapsed alveoli were observed in lung tissue specimens from animals treated with WGO (G4) (Figure 9A,B). Lung tissue from the G5 group showed normal histology and bronchiolar structure, normal alveolar tissue, and normal peribranchial lymphoid cellular structure (Figure 9C,D). Based on histopathology scoring (Figure 10), the severity of parasitic tissue cyst number, interstitial hemorrhage, blood vessel congestion, and bronchiolar epithelium structure were significantly improved (p ≤ 0.05) in all experimental treatment groups (G3, G4, and G5) compared with the positive control group (G2).

4. Discussion

Treatment of the chronic stage of toxoplasmosis remains challenging due to a lack of effective drugs; of the available drugs, many cause hematologic and renal toxicity and have poor diffusion [54]. Furthermore, many chemotherapeutics lead to severe side effects and are not well tolerated by humans and animals. Clinical failure and drug resistance are also issues. As effective, nontoxic novel drugs against chronic toxoplasmosis are still out of reach, many studies have tried to identify natural alternatives [55]. The current study explored the benefits of propolis, WGO, and a combination of both against chronic toxoplasmosis in mice as assessed by parasitic load and histopathological changes to the liver and lungs following treatment. In a previous study [56], we reported the ameliorative effects of WGO and propolis on the parasite burden in the uterus, brain, and kidney during chronic toxoplasmosis in mice. However, the potential influence of this combination on the parasite burden and histopathological changes in liver and lung tissues were not examined. The use of these drugs during the chronic stage of infection is essential to reduce cyst load in the host.
The present work found a substantial drop in parasitic burden in mice treated with propolis (G3) versus the untreated control group (G2). It should be stressed that several previous studies have reported the antiparasitic action of propolis against various intracellular and extracellular pathogenic protozoa, principally owing to its plant secondary metabolite content (phenolics and terpenoids), through various mechanisms of action, including induction of cell lysis, disruption of phospholipid metabolism, and reduction of essential lipids of pathogens such as phosphatidyl glycerol and phosphatidyl inositol (PI) [33,55]. Propolis has also been shown to have antiparasitic effects against protozoan parasites. The present findings are consistent with a previous study [57] reporting the obvious effect of propolis in reducing the number of cysts in rats experimentally infected with chronic toxoplasmosis. Furthermore, these results highlight the capability of propolis to restore the histological structure of the studied organs and suppress the multiplication of T. gondii tachyzoites, which is consistent with the findings of a prior study [57]. A previous in vitro report demonstrated the antitoxoplasma activity of an ethanolic extract of propolis [58]. Higher concentrations of propolis could directly increase the in vitro precipitating factor and trap heavier compounds that effectively destroy the tachyzoite stage of the parasite. Another study reported a significant increase in specific antibody titers (IgM and IgG) and decreased serum cytokine levels (IFN-γ, IL-1, and IL-6) in rats infected with T. gondii treated with propolis [59]. Propolis typically contains several phenolics, including rosmarinic acid and apigenin, that induce physical injury via cell lysis and cytoplasmic condensation [60]. Propolis also influences hydrogenosome metabolism, which is responsible for energy production in eukaryotes such as protozoa [61]. Other chemical compounds, including lupane, maslinic acid, ursolic acid, and limonene, identified in propolis are known to induce morphological deviations, promote apoptosis, and inhibit critical metabolic proteases and enzymes [37].
The current study is a pioneering work in exploring the antiparasitic activity of WGO against T. gondii in experimentally infected mice. As shown, there was a substantial decline in the liver parasite burden in mice treated with GWO (G4) compared to the untreated positive control group (G2) and the propolis-treated group (G3). The phytochemical mechanisms of wheat involve alkaloids, flavonoids, steroids, and saponins. Wheat kernels contain 2–4% germ, which is the richest natural source of tocopherol, B vitamins, and protein and, thus, of great biological value [62]. The antioxidant constituents of wheat germ extracts show antitrypanocidal effects, as represented by the ability to reduce parasitemia and the severity of disease [63]. Fermented wheat extract also has an antiproliferative action that targets nucleic acid synthesis enzymes and has analgesic, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and immunological effects [64]. According to the available literature, WGA exhibits a notable inhibitory effect against trophozoites of Trichomonas vaginalis. It also interferes with the function of surface glycoproteins involved in Giardia attachment [24]. Given the above-mentioned properties, WGO is a promising candidate for the treatment of chronic toxoplasmosis.
Molecular methods are considered effective for the identification and quantitation of parasitic loads in infected tissues [65,66]. The current study estimated the effects of herbal treatment on the growth and replication of T. gondii using real-time PCR through targeting detection and quantification of the p29 (GRA7) gene. A previous study [47] revealed that this gene is present in the compact pellets of the parasite and secreted by bradyzoites and is thus likely valuable for detecting that specific phase of infection [67]. As shown in Figure 2, the untreated control group (G2) had the highest parasitic burden, while animals treated with the combination of propolis and WGO (G5) had the lowest parasite load, confirming the parasitological and histopathological findings.
The histological findings in the liver and lung tissue from infected untreated animals were in line with several previous studies. For example, liver tissue from Toxoplasma-infected mice showed disturbed architecture, extracellular tachyzoite collection, Kupffer cell hyperplasia, and diffuse hepatocyte ballooning with focal fatty degeneration, in addition to various other histopathological lesions [25]. A previous study [57] reported that hepatic tissues of animals infected with Toxoplasma gondii showed massive edema of the liver capsule. Furthermore, all portal tracts showed moderate to severe inflammatory infiltration with lymphocytes and plasma cells. Marked vascular dilatation and congestion were seen in all hepatic vessels, including central and portal veins as well as sinusoids. Infected humans and naturally occurring animal cases of pulmonary toxoplasmosis have also been documented [68,69]. In the present work, histopathological examination of liver and lung tissues of all studied groups aimed to verify the results of parasitological and molecular analyses. Our histological analysis of liver and lung tissues showed that treatment with propolis and WGO significantly reduced histopathological alterations and inflammation brought on by T. gondii infection. Interestingly, improvement was more significant in the combination group than in the groups treated with WGO or propolis alone.

5. Conclusions

Taken together, the findings of this study have demonstrated the promising effects of WGO and propolis against chronic toxoplasmosis in infected mice. Specifically, treatment restored histopathological changes in the liver and lungs. Further research is warranted to explore the immunological mechanisms and mechanistic pathways underlying these effects and the potential role of melatonin receptors in the antitoxoplasmal effects of WGO and propolis.

Author Contributions

A.M.B., H.A.M.E.F., K.A.A.E.-R., F.A.Z.A., S.A.S.S. and E.K.E. were involved in the conception of the research idea and methodology design, supervision, data analysis, and interpretation. A.G., A.A.S., N.D., A.E.-N.G.E.-G., M.F.E.-K. and E.K.E. participated in methodology, data analysis, and contributed scientific advice. A.M.B., A.G., K.A.A.E.-R., F.A.Z.A. and E.K.E. drafted and prepared the manuscript for publication and revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R23), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of the Veterinary Research Institute, National Research Centre, Egypt. The institutional approval board number is 19/139/2020.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hill, D.E.; Chirukandoth, S.; Dubey, J.P. Biology and epidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii in man and animals. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2005, 6, 41–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dubey, J.P.; Jones, J.L. Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans and animals in the United States. Int. J. Parasitol. 2008, 38, 1257–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hill, D.; Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasma gondii: Transmission, diagnosis, and prevention. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2002, 8, 634–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zhou, P.; Chen, Z.; Li, H.L.; Zheng, H.; He, S.; Lin, R.Q.; Zhu, X.Q. Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans in China. Parasit. Vectors 2011, 4, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Levine, N.D. The Protozoan Phylum Apicomplexa; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  6. Frenkel, J.K. Biology of Toxoplasma gondii. In Congenital Toxoplasmosis; Springer: Paris, France, 2000; pp. 9–25. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dubey, J.P.; Lindsay, D.S.; Speer, C.A. Structures of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites, bradyzoites, and sporozoites and biology and development of tissue cysts. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 11, 267–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Belluco, S.; Simonato, G.; Mancin, M.; Pietrobelli, M.; Ricci, A. Toxoplasma gondii infection and food consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-controlled studies. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 3085–3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Evans, R. Life cycle and animal infection. In Human Toxoplasmosis; Ho-Yen, D.O., Joss, A.W.L., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1992; pp. 26–55. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shapiro, K.; Bahia-Oliveira, L.; Dixon, B.; Dumètre, A.; de Wit, L.A.; VanWormer, E.; Villena, I. Environmental transmission of Toxoplasma gondii: Oocysts in water, soil and food. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019, 15, e00049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lass, A.; Kontogeorgos, I.; Ma, L.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Karanis, P. Investigation of Toxoplasma gondii in wastewater and surface water in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China using real-time PCR and multilocus genotyping. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 5428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Matignon, M.; Bonnefoy, F.; Lang, P.; Grimbert, P. Organ transplantation and blood transfusion. Transfus. Clin. Biol. 2011, 18, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bowie, W.R.; King, A.S.; Werker, D.H.; Isaac-Renton, J.L.; Bell, A.; Eng, S.B.; Marion, S.A. Outbreak of toxoplasmosis associated with municipal drinking water. Lancet 1997, 350, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ho-Yen, D.O.; Joss, A.W. Human Toxoplasmosis; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller, C.M.; Boulter, N.R.; Ikin, R.J.; Smith, N.C. The immunobiology of the innate response to Toxoplasma gondii. Int. J. Parasitol. 2009, 39, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Montoya, J.G.; Boothroyd, J.C.; Kovacs, J.A. Toxoplasma gondii. In Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 3122–3153.e3127. [Google Scholar]
  17. Goldstein, E.J.; Montoya, J.G.; Remington, J.S. Management of Toxoplasma gondii infection during pregnancy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 47, 554–566. [Google Scholar]
  18. Montoya, J.G.; Bennett, J.E.; Dolin, R.F. (Eds.) Toxoplasma gondii, 5th ed.; Churchill Livingstone: London, UK, 2000; pp. 2858–2888. [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu, Q.; Wang, Z.-D.; Huang, S.-Y.; Zhu, X.-Q. Diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and typing of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Ross, E.C.; Olivera, G.C.; Barragan, A. Early passage of Toxoplasma gondii across the blood–brain barrier. Trends Parasitol. 2022, 38, 450–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hill, D.E.; Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasma gondii as a parasite in food: Analysis and control. In Preharvest Food Safety; Microbiol Spectrum 4: PFS-0011-2015; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guevara, R.B.; Fox, B.A.; Falla, A.; Bzik, D.J. Toxoplasma gondii intravacuolar-network-associated dense granule proteins regulate maturation of the cyst matrix and cyst wall. MSphere 2019, 4, e00487-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 629–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Tonkal, A. In vitro antitrichomonal effect of Nigella sativa aqueous extract and wheat germ agglutinin. J. Med. Sci 2009, 16, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Etewa, S.E.; El-Maaty, D.A.A.; Hamza, R.S.; Metwaly, A.S.; Sarhan, M.H.; Abdel-Rahman, S.A.; Fathy, G.M.; El-Shafey, M.A. Assessment of spiramycin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles treatment on acute and chronic toxoplasmosis in mice. J. Parasit. Dis. 2018, 42, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Grant, J.; Mahanty, S.; Khadir, A.; MacLean, J.; Kokoskin, E.; Yeager, B.; Joseph, L.; Diaz, J.; Gotuzzo, E.; Mainville, N.; et al. Wheat germ supplement reduces cyst and trophozoite passage in people with giardiasis. Am. J. Trop. Med. 2001, 65, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Blumenthal, C.; Stone, P.; Gras, P.; Bekes, F.; Clarke, B.; Barlow, E.; Appels, R.; Wrigley, C. Heat-shock protein 70 and dough-quality changes resulting from heat stress during grain filling in wheat. Cereal Chem. 1998, 75, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ismail, K.; El Kadery, A.; Sabry, N.; Mohammad, O. A study on the Amoebicidal effect of Nigella sativa aqueous and alcoholic extracts and wheat germ agglutinin on pathogenic Acanthamoeba. J. Clin. Med. Ther. 2018, 3, 12. [Google Scholar]
  29. Moustafa, M.A. Role of wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) in treatment of experimental cryptosporidiosis. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. 2003, 33, 443–456. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Silva-Carvalho, R.; Baltazar, F.; Almeida-Aguiar, C. Propolis: A Complex Natural Product with a Plethora of Biological Activities That Can Be Explored for Drug Development. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 206439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Salonen, A.; Saarnio, S.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Phenolic Compounds of Propolis from the Boreal Coniferous Zone. J. Apic. Sci. 2012, 56, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Marcucci, M.C.; Ferreres, F.; García-Viguera, C.; Bankova, V.S.; De Castro, S.L.; Dantas, A.P.; Valente, P.H.; Paulino, N. Phenolic compounds from Brazilian propolis with pharmacological activities. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 74, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Siheri, W.; Ebiloma, G.; Igoli, J.; Gray, A.; Biddau, M.; Akrachalanont, P.; Alenezi, S.; Alwashih, M.; Edrada-Ebel, R.; Muller, S.; et al. Isolation of a Novel Flavanonol and an Alkylresorcinol with Highly Potent Anti-Trypanosomal Activity from Libyan propolis. Molecules 2019, 24, 1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. De L Paula, L.A.; Cândido, A.; Santos, M.F.C.; Caffrey, C.R.; Bastos, J.K.; Ambrósio, S.R.; Magalhães, L.G. Antiparasitic Properties of Propolis Extracts and Their Compounds. Chem Biodivers 2021, 18, e2100310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rebouças-Silva, J.; Celes, F.S.; Lima, J.B.; Barud, H.S.; de Oliveira, C.I.; Berretta, A.A.; Borges, V.M. Parasite Killing of Leishmania (V) braziliensis by Standardized Propolis Extracts. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 6067172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Alotaibi, A.; Ebiloma, G.; Williams, R.; Alenezi, S.; Donachie, A.; Guillaume, S.; Igoli, J.; Fearnley, J.; De Koning, H.; Watson, D. European propolis is highly active against trypanosomatids including Crithidia fasciculata. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zulhendri, F.; Chandrasekaran, K. Antiviral, Antibacterial, Antifungal, and Antiparasitic Properties of Propolis: A Review. Foods 2021, 10, 1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Soufy, H.; El-Beih, N.M.; Nasr, S.M.; Abd El-Aziz, T.H.; Khalil, F.A.M.; Ahmed, Y.F.; Abou Zeina, H.A.A. Effect of Egyptian propolis on cryptosporidiosis in immunosuppressed rats with special emphasis on oocysts shedding, leukogram, protein profile and ileum histopathology. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2017, 10, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Farag, M.A.; Mohsen, E.; Abd El Nasser, G. Sensory metabolites profiling in Myristica fragrans (Nutmeg) organs and in response to roasting as analyzed via chemometric tools. Lwt 2018, 97, 684–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Farag, M.A.; Ammar, N.M.; El Gendy, A.N.; Mohsen, E. Effect of grilling as processing method on Zea mays (corn) metabolites composition as analyzed via SPME GC-MS and chemometrics. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2019, 43, e14165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. El Gendy, A.N.G.; Tavarini, S.; Conte, G.; Pistelli, L.; Hendawy, S.F.; Omer, E.A.; Angelini, L.G. Yield and qualitative characterisation of seeds of Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. and Amaranthus cruentus L. grown in central Italy. Ital. J. Agron. 2018, 13, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Selem, R.F.; Rashed, G.A.; Barakat, A.M.A.; Elfadaly, H.M.A.; Hussien, B.E.-S.T.; Mohamed, H.M.; Nageeb, M.M.; Moharm, A.F. Effect of the anticancer drug tamoxifen on chronic toxoplasmosis in experimentally infected rats. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2019, 13, 259–265. [Google Scholar]
  43. El Fakhry, Y.; Achbarou, A.; Desportes-Livage, I.; Mazier, D. Encephalitozoon intestinalis: Humoral responses in interferon-γ receptor knockout mice infected with a microsporidium pathogenic in AIDS patients. Exp. Parasitol. 1998, 89, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. El-Shafey, A.A.; Hegab, M.; Seliem, M.M.; Barakat, A.; Mostafa, N.E.; Abdel-Maksoud, H.A.; Abdelhameed, R.M. Curcumin@ metal organic frameworks nano-composite for treatment of chronic toxoplasmosis. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2020, 31, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hegazi, A.; Toaleb, N.; El Fadaly, H.; Abdel-Rahman, E.; Barakat, A. In vivo-cellular and humoral immune response for evaluation of propolis effect on chronic toxoplasmosis in rats. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2021, 9, 1045–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Karabacak, M.; Kanbur, M.; Eraslan, G.; Sarıca, Z.S. The antioxidant effect of wheat germ oil on subchronic coumaphos exposure in mice. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2011, 74, 2119–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Barakat, A.M.; Elfadaly, H.A.M.; Selem, R.F.; Madboli, A.E.-N.A.; El-Razik, A.; Abd El-Hamid, K.; Hassan, E.A.; Alghamdi, A.H.; Elmahallawy, E.K. Tamoxifen increased the parasite burden and induced a series of histopathological and immunohistocehmical changes during chronic toxoplasmosis in experimentally infected Mice. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 13, 1648. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bancroft, J.D.; Gamble, M. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  49. Gibson-Corley, K.N.; Olivier, A.K.; Meyerholz, D.K. Principles for valid histopathologic scoring in research. Vet. Pathol. 2013, 50, 1007–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Wu, B.; Huang, B.; Chen, Y.; Li, S.; Yan, J.; Zheng, H.; Huang, S.; Shen, J.; Lun, Z.-R.; Wang, Y. Upregulated expression of Tim-3 involved in the process of toxoplasmic encephalitis in mouse model. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 2511–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. James, P.M.; Coltman, D.W.; Murray, B.W.; Hamelin, R.C.; Sperling, F.A. Spatial genetic structure of a symbiotic beetle-fungal system: Toward multi-taxa integrated landscape genetics. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e25359. [Google Scholar]
  52. Shackelford, C.; Long, G.; Wolf, J.; Okerberg, C.; Herbert, R. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of nonneoplastic lesions in toxicology studies. Toxicol. Pathol. 2002, 30, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Salman, K.H.; Ali, F.A.Z.; Elhanbaly, R. Effect of cultured white soft cheese on the histopathological changes in the kidneys and liver of albino rats. Sci Rep 2022, 12, 2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chew, W.K.; Segarra, I.; Ambu, S.; Mak, J.W. Significant reduction of brain cysts caused by Toxoplasma gondii after treatment with spiramycin coadministered with metronidazole in a mouse model of chronic toxoplasmosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 1762–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Al-Ghandour, A.M.F.; Ahmed, H.K.; Salem, A.E.; Tealeb, A.-S.M.; Mohamed, R.M.; Yousef, A.M. Efficacy of olibanum and propolis medicinal extracts versus metronidazole in Giardia lamblia experimentally infected mice. Microbes Infect. Dis. 2020, 1, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Elmahallawy, E.K.; El Fadaly, H.A.M.; Soror, A.H.; Ali, F.A.Z.; Abd El-Razik, K.A.; Soliman, Y.A.; Alkhaldi, A.A.M.; Albezrah, N.K.A.; Barakat, A.M. Novel insights on the potential activity of propolis and wheat germ oil against chronic toxoplasmosis in experimentally infected mice. Biomed. Pharm. 2022, 156, 113811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hagras, N.A.-e.; Mogahed, N.M.F.H.; Sheta, E.; Darwish, A.A.-e.; El-Hawary, M.A.; Hamed, M.T.; Elwakil, B.H. The powerful synergistic effect of spiramycin/propolis loaded chitosan/alginate nanoparticles on acute murine toxoplasmosis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Touzani, S.; Embaslat, W.; Imtara, H. In Vitro Evaluation of the Potential Use of Propolis as a Multitarget Therapeutic Product: Physicochemical Properties, Chemical Composition, and Immunomodulatory, Antibacterial, and Anticancer Properties. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 4836378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Asfaram, S.; Fakhar, M.; Keighobadi, M.; Akhtari, J. Promising anti-protozoan activities of propolis (bee glue) as natural product: A review. Acta Parasitol. 2021, 66, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Antwi, C.A.; Amisigo, C.M.; Adjimani, J.P.; Gwira, T.M. In vitro activity and mode of action of phenolic compounds on Leishmania donovani. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Embley, M.; der Giezen, M.v.; Horner, D.S.; Dyal, P.L.; Foster, P. Mitochondria and hydrogenosomes are two forms of the same fundamental organelle. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2003, 358, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Tsen, C.C. Amino acid composition and biological value of cereal germs. In Amino Acid Composition and Biological Value of Cereal Proteins; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1985; pp. 453–466. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lee, Y.-L.; Cesario, T.; Wang, Y.; Shanbrom, E.; Thrupp, L. Antibacterial activity of vegetables and juices. Nutrition 2003, 19, 994–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Oluwatosin, K.Y.; Justine, T.E. Studies of phytochemical constituents and anti-trypanosomal properties of fermented wheat germ and garlic bulbs extract on Trypanosoma brucei –infected rats. J. Med. Plant Res. 2010, 4, 2016–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Elmahallawy, E.K.; Martínez, A.S.; Rodriguez-Granger, J.; Hoyos-Mallecot, Y.; Agil, A.; Mari, J.M.N.; Fernández, J.G. Diagnosis of leishmaniasis. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2014, 8, 961–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. El-Newishy, A.M.A.; Salem, L.M.A.; Barakat, A.M.; Elmahallawy, E.K.A. Zoonotic Importance of Toxoplasma gondii Tissue Cysts in Chickens. Benha Vet. Med. J. 2012, 23, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  67. Dunn, J.D.; Ravindran, S.; Kim, S.-K.; Boothroyd, J.C. The Toxoplasma gondii dense granule protein GRA7 is phosphorylated upon invasion and forms an unexpected association with the rhoptry proteins ROP2 and ROP4. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 5853–5861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Garg, D.; Madan, N.; Qaqish, O.; Nagarakanti, S.; Patel, V. Pulmonary toxoplasmosis diagnosed on transbronchial lung biopsy in a mechanically ventilated patient. Case Rep. Infect. Dis. 2020, 2020, 9710182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Desoubeaux, G.; Cabanne, É.; Franck-Martel, C.; Gombert, M.; Gyan, E.; Lissandre, S.; Renaud, M.; Monjanel, H.; Dartigeas, C.; Bailly, É. Pulmonary toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients with interstitial pneumonia: A single-centre prospective study assessing PCR-based diagnosis. J. Clin. Pathol. 2016, 69, 726–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental protocol of the present study.
Figure 1. Experimental protocol of the present study.
Animals 12 03069 g001
Figure 2. Average liver tissue cysts of the different experimental groups. Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations. Significant differences (G2 vs. other groups are marked by asterisks), (G3 vs. G4 and G5 are marked by #), ((G4 vs. G5 are marked by &) all through one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test: ***, ###, &&& p ≤ 0.001).
Figure 2. Average liver tissue cysts of the different experimental groups. Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations. Significant differences (G2 vs. other groups are marked by asterisks), (G3 vs. G4 and G5 are marked by #), ((G4 vs. G5 are marked by &) all through one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test: ***, ###, &&& p ≤ 0.001).
Animals 12 03069 g002
Figure 3. Photomicrograph of H&E-stained liver tissue sections from mice in the experimental groups: (A,B): Liver sections from the negative control group (G1) demonstrating: (A): normal hepatic architecture comprising a normal central vein (C.V), sinusoids (S), and hepatocytes (H); and (B): normal portal triad structures: hepatic artery (arrowhead), portal vein (P.V), and bile duct (zigzag arrow). (CF): Liver tissue sections from mice in the Toxoplasma gondii-infected positive control group (G2) showing: (C): severe vascular congestion (stars), focal mononuclear cellular aggregations (selected squares), and coagulative necrosis in hepatocytes; (D): dilated and congested PV, longitudinal fibrous tracts connected between P.V (arrows); (E,F): congested C.V, multiple bradyzoites (zigzag arrows), tissue cyst (arrowhead), and marked Kupffer cell reactions (E, arrowheads). The scale bar is provided below each image.
Figure 3. Photomicrograph of H&E-stained liver tissue sections from mice in the experimental groups: (A,B): Liver sections from the negative control group (G1) demonstrating: (A): normal hepatic architecture comprising a normal central vein (C.V), sinusoids (S), and hepatocytes (H); and (B): normal portal triad structures: hepatic artery (arrowhead), portal vein (P.V), and bile duct (zigzag arrow). (CF): Liver tissue sections from mice in the Toxoplasma gondii-infected positive control group (G2) showing: (C): severe vascular congestion (stars), focal mononuclear cellular aggregations (selected squares), and coagulative necrosis in hepatocytes; (D): dilated and congested PV, longitudinal fibrous tracts connected between P.V (arrows); (E,F): congested C.V, multiple bradyzoites (zigzag arrows), tissue cyst (arrowhead), and marked Kupffer cell reactions (E, arrowheads). The scale bar is provided below each image.
Animals 12 03069 g003
Figure 4. Photomicrograph of H&E-stained liver tissue sections from Toxoplasma gondii-infected animals treated with propolis (G3) showing: (A,B): severe vascular congestion in the portal vein (P.V) infiltrated with inflammatory cells (stars), more or less normal hepatocytes (H); and (B): aggregated bradyzoites (arrows) at portal area. (A,C): Focal area of mononuclear cellular infiltration (circles). (D): Multiple bradyzoites present in Gilson capsule (arrowheads) and bradyzoites in hepatocytes (arrows). The scale bar is provided below each image.
Figure 4. Photomicrograph of H&E-stained liver tissue sections from Toxoplasma gondii-infected animals treated with propolis (G3) showing: (A,B): severe vascular congestion in the portal vein (P.V) infiltrated with inflammatory cells (stars), more or less normal hepatocytes (H); and (B): aggregated bradyzoites (arrows) at portal area. (A,C): Focal area of mononuclear cellular infiltration (circles). (D): Multiple bradyzoites present in Gilson capsule (arrowheads) and bradyzoites in hepatocytes (arrows). The scale bar is provided below each image.
Animals 12 03069 g004
Figure 5. Photomicrograph of H&E-stained liver tissue sections from mice in the experimental groups: (A): liver tissue sections from mice in the Toxoplasma gondii-infected group treated with wheat germ oil (G4) showing normal hepatocellular structure (H); parasitic tissue cyst contains bradyzoites (arrows). (B,C): Liver tissue sections from mice in the combined propolis and wheat germ oil treatment group (G5) showing: (B): normal portal structure with normal portal vein (P.V), normal central vein (C.V), and normal hepatocytes (H). The scale bar is provided below each image.
Figure 5. Photomicrograph of H&E-stained liver tissue sections from mice in the experimental groups: (A): liver tissue sections from mice in the Toxoplasma gondii-infected group treated with wheat germ oil (G4) showing normal hepatocellular structure (H); parasitic tissue cyst contains bradyzoites (arrows). (B,C): Liver tissue sections from mice in the combined propolis and wheat germ oil treatment group (G5) showing: (B): normal portal structure with normal portal vein (P.V), normal central vein (C.V), and normal hepatocytes (H). The scale bar is provided below each image.
Animals 12 03069 g005
Figure 6. Quantitative and semiquantitative measurements of total lesion scores in liver tissue sections in the experimental groups. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Significant differences (control group vs. other groups) are indicated by asterisks *, G2 vs. G3, G4, and G5 are marked by #, and G3 vs. G4 and G5 are marked by &. All tests were one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test ns: non-significant && p ≤ 0.01, ***, ###, &&& p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 6. Quantitative and semiquantitative measurements of total lesion scores in liver tissue sections in the experimental groups. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Significant differences (control group vs. other groups) are indicated by asterisks *, G2 vs. G3, G4, and G5 are marked by #, and G3 vs. G4 and G5 are marked by &. All tests were one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test ns: non-significant && p ≤ 0.01, ***, ###, &&& p ≤ 0.001.
Animals 12 03069 g006
Figure 7. Photomicrograph of H&E-stained lung tissue sections from mice in the experimental groups: (A,B): lung tissue sections from the negative control group (G1) showing: normal bronchiolar structure (arrow heads), normal alveolar tissue (arrows). (CF): Lung tissue sections from the T. gondii-infected positive group (G2): (C,D): collapsed alveoli (white arrows), multiple focal lymphoid hyperplasia (black arrows), and severe vascular congestion (stars). (E,F): Multiple tissue cysts containing bradyzoites (circles) and multiple diffuse bradyzoites (arrows). The scale bar is provided below each image.
Figure 7. Photomicrograph of H&E-stained lung tissue sections from mice in the experimental groups: (A,B): lung tissue sections from the negative control group (G1) showing: normal bronchiolar structure (arrow heads), normal alveolar tissue (arrows). (CF): Lung tissue sections from the T. gondii-infected positive group (G2): (C,D): collapsed alveoli (white arrows), multiple focal lymphoid hyperplasia (black arrows), and severe vascular congestion (stars). (E,F): Multiple tissue cysts containing bradyzoites (circles) and multiple diffuse bradyzoites (arrows). The scale bar is provided below each image.
Animals 12 03069 g007
Figure 8. Photomicrograph of H&E-stained lung tissue sections from T. gondii-infected animals treated with propolis (G3) showing: (A): alveolar emphysema (arrows), interstitial hemorrhage (stars), and (B) infestation with multiple tissue cysts (arrows). The scale bar is provided below each image.
Figure 8. Photomicrograph of H&E-stained lung tissue sections from T. gondii-infected animals treated with propolis (G3) showing: (A): alveolar emphysema (arrows), interstitial hemorrhage (stars), and (B) infestation with multiple tissue cysts (arrows). The scale bar is provided below each image.
Animals 12 03069 g008
Figure 9. Photomicrograph of H&E-stained lung tissue sections from mice in the experimental groups: (A,B): lung tissue sections from T. gondii-infected mice treated with wheat germ oil (G4) showing: normal bronchiolar structure (arrowheads), congested blood vessel (stars), hemorrhage (H), and collapsed alveoli (arrows). (C,D): Lung tissue sections from the group treated with the combination of propolis and wheat germ oil (G5) showing: normal alveolar tissue (arrows), normal bronchiolar structure (arrowheads), and vascular congestion (stars). The scale bar is provided below each image.
Figure 9. Photomicrograph of H&E-stained lung tissue sections from mice in the experimental groups: (A,B): lung tissue sections from T. gondii-infected mice treated with wheat germ oil (G4) showing: normal bronchiolar structure (arrowheads), congested blood vessel (stars), hemorrhage (H), and collapsed alveoli (arrows). (C,D): Lung tissue sections from the group treated with the combination of propolis and wheat germ oil (G5) showing: normal alveolar tissue (arrows), normal bronchiolar structure (arrowheads), and vascular congestion (stars). The scale bar is provided below each image.
Animals 12 03069 g009
Figure 10. Quantitative and semiquantitative measurements of total lesion scores in lung tissue sections among the experimental groups. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Significant differences (control group vs. other groups) are indicated by asterisks *, G2 vs. G3, G4, and G5 are marked by #, and G3 vs. G4 and G5 are marked by &. All tests were one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test: ns: non-significant,**, ##, p ≤ 0.01, ***, &&& p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 10. Quantitative and semiquantitative measurements of total lesion scores in lung tissue sections among the experimental groups. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Significant differences (control group vs. other groups) are indicated by asterisks *, G2 vs. G3, G4, and G5 are marked by #, and G3 vs. G4 and G5 are marked by &. All tests were one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test: ns: non-significant,**, ##, p ≤ 0.01, ***, &&& p ≤ 0.001.
Animals 12 03069 g010
Table 1. Primer set used for real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in the present study.
Table 1. Primer set used for real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in the present study.
P29 Q-fCAGCATGGATAAGGCATCTG
P29 Q-rGTTGCTCCTCTGTTAGTTCC
Table 2. Mean CT value and concentration of the parasite in the liver tissues of experimental groups.
Table 2. Mean CT value and concentration of the parasite in the liver tissues of experimental groups.
GroupsSample NumberCT ValueConcentration (µg/µL) Significance
G1 (noninfected, nontreated)C-No CtNone-
G2 (infected, nontreated)123.220.0284-
219.110.0361
320.060.0069
G3425.280.1459Nonsignificant
526.550.0106
628.540.0553
G4729.250.1740Nonsignificant
832.130.1126
931.340.1330
G51033.370.1568Significant (p < 0.05)
1136.130.1056
1236.260.2080
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barakat, A.M.; Fadaly, H.A.M.E.; Gareh, A.; Abd El-Razik, K.A.; Ali, F.A.Z.; Saleh, A.A.; Sadek, S.A.S.; Dahran, N.; El-Gendy, A.E.-N.G.; El-Khadragy, M.F.; et al. Wheat Germ Oil and Propolis Decrease Parasite Burden and Restore Marked Histopathological Changes in Liver and Lung in Mice with Chronic Toxoplasmosis. Animals 2022, 12, 3069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12223069

AMA Style

Barakat AM, Fadaly HAME, Gareh A, Abd El-Razik KA, Ali FAZ, Saleh AA, Sadek SAS, Dahran N, El-Gendy AE-NG, El-Khadragy MF, et al. Wheat Germ Oil and Propolis Decrease Parasite Burden and Restore Marked Histopathological Changes in Liver and Lung in Mice with Chronic Toxoplasmosis. Animals. 2022; 12(22):3069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12223069

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barakat, Ashraf Mohamed, Hassan Ali Mohamed El Fadaly, Ahmed Gareh, Khaled A. Abd El-Razik, Fatma Abo Zakaib Ali, Amira A. Saleh, Sabry A. S. Sadek, Naief Dahran, Abd El-Nasser G. El-Gendy, Manal F. El-Khadragy, and et al. 2022. "Wheat Germ Oil and Propolis Decrease Parasite Burden and Restore Marked Histopathological Changes in Liver and Lung in Mice with Chronic Toxoplasmosis" Animals 12, no. 22: 3069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12223069

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop