Not Its Own Meaning: A Hermeneutic of the World
AbstractThe contemporary cultural mindset posits that the world has no intrinsic semantic value. The meaning we see in it is supposedly projected onto the world by ourselves. Underpinning this view is the mainstream physicalist ontology, according to which mind is an emergent property or epiphenomenon of brains. As such, since the world beyond brains isn’t mental, it cannot a priori evoke anything beyond itself. But a consistent series of recent experimental results suggests strongly that the world may in fact be mental in nature, a hypothesis openly discussed in the field of foundations of physics. In this essay, these experimental results are reviewed and their hermeneutic implications discussed. If the world is mental, it points to something beyond its face-value appearances and is amenable to interpretation, just as ordinary dreams. In this case, the project of a Hermeneutic of Everything is metaphysically justifiable. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Kastrup, B. Not Its Own Meaning: A Hermeneutic of the World. Humanities 2017, 6, 55.
Kastrup B. Not Its Own Meaning: A Hermeneutic of the World. Humanities. 2017; 6(3):55.Chicago/Turabian Style
Kastrup, Bernardo. 2017. "Not Its Own Meaning: A Hermeneutic of the World." Humanities 6, no. 3: 55.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.