Next Article in Journal
Converging Ideologies in William Fowler’s Hybrid Translation of Machiavelli’s Il Principe
Previous Article in Journal
The Challenges of the Humanities, Past, Present, and Future: Why the Middle Ages Mean So Much for Us Today and Tomorrow
Humanities 2014, 3(1), 19-41; doi:10.3390/h3010019
Article

Democracy versus the Domination of Instrumental Rationality: Defending Dewey’s Argument for Democracy as an Ethical Way of Life

Received: 8 November 2013; in revised form: 11 December 2013 / Accepted: 13 December 2013 / Published: 2 January 2014
Download PDF [147 KB, uploaded 2 January 2014]
Abstract: For some, the problem with the domination of instrumental rationality is the tendency towards anomie. However, this fails to recognise the instrumental use of norms by elite groups to manipulate public opinion. Such manipulation can then allow elite groups to treat the citizenry as a means for the pursuit of their self-interest. Horkheimer was one of the first to recognise the problem in this form, but was unable to offer any solution because he conceptualised the citizenry as passive. By contrast, Dewey argued for an active citizenry to value participation in public life as good in, and of, itself. This is associated with his conception of democracy as an ethical way of life offering the possibility for the domination of instrumental rationality to be transcended. In this article Dewey’s resolution of the problem is addressed in the light of the weaknesses attributed here to Horkheimer and to later developments by Bellah, Bernstein, Gellner, Habermas and Honneth.
Keywords: Bellah; Bernstein; Dewey; Gellner; Honneth; Horkheimer; instrumental rationality Bellah; Bernstein; Dewey; Gellner; Honneth; Horkheimer; instrumental rationality
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Cruickshank, J. Democracy versus the Domination of Instrumental Rationality: Defending Dewey’s Argument for Democracy as an Ethical Way of Life. Humanities 2014, 3, 19-41.

AMA Style

Cruickshank J. Democracy versus the Domination of Instrumental Rationality: Defending Dewey’s Argument for Democracy as an Ethical Way of Life. Humanities. 2014; 3(1):19-41.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cruickshank, Justin. 2014. "Democracy versus the Domination of Instrumental Rationality: Defending Dewey’s Argument for Democracy as an Ethical Way of Life." Humanities 3, no. 1: 19-41.


Humanities EISSN 2076-0787 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert