War Trauma, Politics of Recognition and Purple Heart: PTSD or PTSI?
AbstractThis paper discusses the exclusion of veterans with combat PTSD (CPTSD) from eligibility for the Purple Heart (PH). The main argument is that this exclusion is unjustified and that it strengthens the stigma attached to the traumatized veterans, with detrimental implications to their wellbeing. In the context of the politics of recognition, the history of the term PTSD, and with support evidence from brain studies, the paper contends that in the case of combat veterans, posttraumatic stress should be termed PTSI (posttraumatic stress injury) rather than PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder). The proposed alteration in terminology may enable eligibility of posttraumatic combat veterans’ for the Purple Heart, and consequently mitigate the stigma of their wounds, help to deconstruct their misrecognition as inferior to physiologically wounded, increase their willingness to seek aid, and improve their chances to heal. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Keynan, I.; Keynan, J.N. War Trauma, Politics of Recognition and Purple Heart: PTSD or PTSI? Soc. Sci. 2016, 5, 57.
Keynan I, Keynan JN. War Trauma, Politics of Recognition and Purple Heart: PTSD or PTSI? Social Sciences. 2016; 5(4):57.Chicago/Turabian Style
Keynan, Irit; Keynan, Jackob N. 2016. "War Trauma, Politics of Recognition and Purple Heart: PTSD or PTSI?" Soc. Sci. 5, no. 4: 57.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.