Next Article in Journal
Language in the Wild—Living the Carnival in Social Media
Next Article in Special Issue
Practicing from Theory: Thinking and Knowing to “Do” Child Protection Work
Previous Article in Journal
Yahoo! Answers as a Space for Informal Language Learning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Child Welfare and Successful Reunification through the Socio-Educative Process: Training Needs among Biological Families in Spain
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Soc. Sci. 2014, 3(4), 854-870; doi:10.3390/socsci3040854

Who Owns Child Abuse?

Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Criminology, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Ave., Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
Received: 16 July 2014 / Revised: 8 October 2014 / Accepted: 20 October 2014 / Published: 6 November 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Contemporary Developments in Child Protection)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [207 KB, uploaded 6 November 2014]

Abstract

Expectations of contemporary child protection apparatuses are strongly influenced by beliefs inherited from the nineteenth century child rescue movement. In particular, the belief that child abuse determination is obvious. However, this assumption fails to make a distinction between nineteenth century’s emphasis on impoverished environments and the twentieth century introduction of the pathological child abuser. Moreover, the proliferation of kinds of child abuse, and the need to distinguish child abusers from non-abusers, means knowledge is now spread across an array of disciplines and professions, which necessarily destabilizes the definition of child abuse. The increasing exposure of alternate care systems as potentially abusive has similarly destabilized the old common sense solution to neglected children—namely removal. Finally, as uncertainty increases, and definitions become more divergent, the question of what child abuse is, and what should be done about it, becomes increasingly politicized. View Full-Text
Keywords: child abuse; uncertainty; alternative care; risk assessment; child rescue; child protection child abuse; uncertainty; alternative care; risk assessment; child rescue; child protection
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Cradock, G. Who Owns Child Abuse? Soc. Sci. 2014, 3, 854-870.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top