Next Article in Journal
Correction: Bouvet F., et al., Debt Contagion in Europe: A Panel-Vector Autoregressive (VAR) Analysis. Soc. Sci. 2013, 2, 318–340
Next Article in Special Issue
Governing Through Resilience? Exploring Flood Protection in Dresden, Germany
Previous Article in Journal
The Eurozone Crisis: Psychological Mechanisms Undermining and Supporting European Solidarity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Local Constructions of Vulnerability and Resilience in the Context of Climate Change. A Comparison of Lübeck and Rostock
Soc. Sci. 2014, 3(1), 172-192; doi:10.3390/socsci3010172
Article

Your Resilience is My Vulnerability: ‘Rules in Use’ in a Local Water Conflict

*  and *
Received: 12 September 2013; in revised form: 14 February 2014 / Accepted: 3 March 2014 / Published: 11 March 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Constructing Resilience, Negotiating Vulnerability)
Download PDF [262 KB, updated 13 March 2014; original version uploaded 11 March 2014]
Abstract: This paper uses an empirical analysis of a water conflict in the German state of Brandenburg to explore diverse constructions of vulnerability to water scarcity by local stakeholders. It demonstrates how, in the absence of effective formal institutions, these constructions are getting translated into conflictual resilience strategies practiced by these stakeholders, creating situations in which “your resilience is my vulnerability”. The novel contribution of the paper to resilience research is threefold. Firstly, it illustrates how the vulnerability and resilience of a socio-ecological system—such as small catchment—are socially constructed; that is, how they are not given but rather the product of stakeholders’ perceptions of threats and suitable responses to them. Secondly, the paper emphasizes the role of institutions—both formal and informal—in framing these vulnerability constructions and resilience strategies. Particular attention is paid to the importance of informal ‘rules in use’ emerging in the wake of (formal) ‘institutional voids’ and how they work against collective solutions. Thirdly, by choosing a small-scale, commonplace dispute to study vulnerability and resilience, the paper seeks to redress the imbalance of resilience research (and policy) on dramatic disaster events by revealing the relevance of everyday vulnerabilities, which may be less eye-catching but are far more widespread.
Keywords: resilience; vulnerability; rules in use; water conflict; water scarcity; institutions resilience; vulnerability; rules in use; water conflict; water scarcity; institutions
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Sondershaus, F.; Moss, T. Your Resilience is My Vulnerability: ‘Rules in Use’ in a Local Water Conflict. Soc. Sci. 2014, 3, 172-192.

AMA Style

Sondershaus F, Moss T. Your Resilience is My Vulnerability: ‘Rules in Use’ in a Local Water Conflict. Social Sciences. 2014; 3(1):172-192.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sondershaus, Frank; Moss, Timothy. 2014. "Your Resilience is My Vulnerability: ‘Rules in Use’ in a Local Water Conflict." Soc. Sci. 3, no. 1: 172-192.


Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert