Next Article in Journal
Comparing Designers’ Problem-Solving Behavior in a Parametric Design Environment and a Geometric Modeling Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Fudo: An East Asian Notion of Climate and Sustainability
Buildings 2013, 3(3), 598-620; doi:10.3390/buildings3030598

Approaches to Delay Claims Assessment Employed in the UK Construction Industry

Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, UK
Received: 17 July 2013 / Revised: 6 August 2013 / Accepted: 21 August 2013 / Published: 11 September 2013
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [282 KB, uploaded 11 September 2013]   |   Browse Figures


Construction project delays emanates from multiplicity of different sources of risk events. This, combined with high uncertainty in cause-effect relationships between the events and their impacts on project completion dates, have created immense difficulties in apportioning project delay responsibilities amongst contracting parties. This challenge is now dealt with by various delay analysis approaches, yet delay claims settlement continues to be a troublesome undertaking. Empirical research on these approaches as to their application in practice is limited, although such studies provide important reference sources to practitioners and researchers. As a contribution to addressing this gap, this paper reports on practitioners’ views on the approaches based on a UK nation-wide questionnaire survey of construction and consulting companies. The key findings of the study include: (1) delay claims are often resolved late and not close in time of occurrence of the delay events, creating more difficulties; (2) simplistic delay analysis approaches are widely used in practice and form the basis of successful claim resolutions, although they have major weaknesses; (3) the sophisticated approaches, although are more robust, are generally not popular in practice. To promote the use of these reliable approaches and help reduce or avoid disputes amongst claims parties, programming and record keeping practices must be improved as they do not facilitate the use of the approaches.
Keywords: claims; delay and disruption; extensions of time; planning and programming claims; delay and disruption; extensions of time; planning and programming
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Share & Cite This Article

Further Mendeley | CiteULike
Export to BibTeX |
MDPI and ACS Style

Braimah, N. Approaches to Delay Claims Assessment Employed in the UK Construction Industry. Buildings 2013, 3, 598-620.

View more citation formats

Article Metrics

For more information on the journal, click here


Cited By

[Return to top]
Buildings EISSN 2075-5309 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert