Next Article in Journal
Harmonisation and Cross-Fertilisation of Socio-Economic Rights in the Human Rights Treaty Bodies: Disability and the Reasonableness Review Case Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Liberal or Conservative? Genetic Rhetoric, Disability, and Human Species Modification
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Precision Medicine and Advancing Genetic Technologies—Disability and Human Rights Perspectives
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Laws 2016, 5(3), 37; doi:10.3390/laws5030037

The Discussions around Precision Genetic Engineering: Role of and Impact on Disabled People

Department of Community Health Sciences, Stream of Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Maya Sabatello
Received: 19 February 2016 / Revised: 16 July 2016 / Accepted: 5 September 2016 / Published: 9 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Medicine, Law & Disability)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [270 KB, uploaded 9 September 2016]

Abstract

Genetic researchers are advancing in their abilities to extract precise genetic information from biological and human entities bringing genetic research steps closer to accurately modifying genes of biological entities, including that of humans. In this analytical essay, we focus on the discussions about precision genetic intervention that have taken place since March 2015 as they pertain to disabled people. We focus on two areas; one being the role of disabled people in the recent gene editing discussions and the second being the utility of existing legal instruments. Within our first focus we address the following questions: (a) What is the visibility of disabled people in the gene-editing discussions that have taken place since March 2015? (b) What has been the impact of those discussions on disabled people? (c) Were social problems which disabled people face taken into account in those discussions; (d) How does the reality of engagement with disabled people in these discussions fit with science, technology and innovation governance discourses that ask for more stakeholder, bottom up and anticipatory involvement? Within our second focus we address the following questions: (a) What is the utility of the United Nations Convention on the Right of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD); and (b) What is the utility of existing legal instruments covering genetic interventions: for preventing negative social consequences of genetic engineering developments for disabled people. We argue that (a) the genetic engineering debates since March 2015 have portrayed disabled people dominantly through a medical lens; (b) that the governance of science, technology and innovation of genetic engineering including anticipatory governance and responsible innovation discourses has not yet engaged with the social impact of gene editing on disabled people; (c) that few scholars that focus on the social situation of disabled people are visible in the governance discussions of gene editing; and (d) that the utility of the UNCRPD and the investigated genetic-related legal instruments and international agreements to protect disabled people from negative consequences coming out of the gene editing discussions is unclear at the least. View Full-Text
Keywords: law; disabled people; people with disabilities; genetic engineering; gene-editing; genetic enhancement; somatic; germline; United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; governance law; disabled people; people with disabilities; genetic engineering; gene-editing; genetic enhancement; somatic; germline; United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; governance
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Wolbring, G.; Diep, L. The Discussions around Precision Genetic Engineering: Role of and Impact on Disabled People. Laws 2016, 5, 37.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Laws EISSN 2075-471X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top