Next Article in Journal
First-Principles Study on the Structural Stability and Segregation Behavior of γ-Fe/Cr2N Interface with Alloying Additives M (M = Mn, V, Ti, Mo, and Ni)
Previous Article in Journal
Gas Metal Arc Welding Using Novel CaO-Added Mg Alloy Filler Wire
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metals
Volume 6
Issue 7
10.3390/met6070154
metals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cobalt-Nickel-Boron Supported over Polypyrrole-Derived Activated Carbon for Hydrolysis of Ammonia Borane

by
Yongjin Zou
1,2,*,
Yubo Gao
1,2,
Cuili Xiang
1,2,
Hailiang Chu
1,2,
Shujun Qiu
1,2,
Erhu Yan
1,2,
Fen Xu
1,2,
Chengying Tang
1,2 and
Lixian Sun
1,2,*
1
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Information Materials, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
2
Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center of Structure and Property for New Energy Materials, Guilin 541004, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2016, 6(7), 154; https://doi.org/10.3390/met6070154
Submission received: 8 May 2016 / Revised: 21 June 2016 / Accepted: 27 June 2016 / Published: 8 July 2016
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, polypyrrole (PPy) nanofibers were used to synthesize a super-activated carbon material. A highly-dispersed Co-Ni-B catalyst was supported on PPy nanofiber-derived activated carbon (PAC) by chemical reduction. The Co-Ni-B/PAC hybrid catalyst exhibited excellent catalytic performance for the decomposition of ammonia borane (AB) in an aqueous alkaline solution at room temperature. The size of the metal particles, morphology of Co-Ni-B/PAC, and catalytic activity of the supported catalyst were investigated. Ni-B, Co-B, and Co-Ni-B catalysts were also synthesized in the absence of PAC under similar conditions for comparison. The maximum hydrogen generation rate (1451.2 mL−1·min−1·g−1 at 25 °C) was obtained with Co-Ni-B/PAC. Kinetic studies indicated that the hydrolysis reaction of AB was first order with respect to Co-Ni-B/PAC, and the activation energy was 30.2 kJ·mol−1. Even after ten recycling experiments, the catalyst showed good stability owing to the synergistic effect of Co-Ni-B and PAC.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The development of clean and renewable energy materials that can be used in automotive applications is an important issue, given the increasing worldwide demand for clean energy sources [1]. Hydrogen is considered a promising candidate to replace traditional fossil fuels because of its high energy efficiency and zero emissions [2]. However, the safe and proficient use of hydrogen is still a major technical barrier that prevents its on-board application. Catalyst-assisted hydrogen generation (HG) via decomposition of complex hydrides is the most studied approach for moving toward a hydrogen-powered society. Among these hydrides, ammonia borane (AB, NH3BH3) is a practical choice because it has a high hydrogen content (19.6 wt. %), is soluble in water, can be safely stored, and is non-toxic. However, AB decomposition is sluggish without a catalyst [3,4,5]. Thus, it is necessary to choose suitable materials to accelerate the AB hydrolysis reaction; noble metal-based catalysts, such as Ru, Pd, and Pt, are commonly chosen [6,7,8]. However, limited resources and high cost hinder their widespread application, so considerable effort has been devoted to the exploration of efficient alternatives based on non-noble transition metals. For example, Co-B, Cu-Co, and Ni-Co nanoparticles were reported as active catalysts for AB hydrolysis [9,10,11,12,13,14]. However, metal nanoparticles easily aggregate due to their high surface energy, which reduces their surface area and the number of accessible active sites available for catalytic reactions [15].
To improve the stability and dispersity of metal nanoparticles, several routes have been adopted, mainly involving the introduction of transition metals during reduction or the use of supports with high specific surface area [16,17]. Compared to conventional support materials (e.g., SBA-15 [14], carbon black [18], Al2O3 [19], SiO2 [20], and TiO2 [21]), porous carbon materials are widely used in industrial applications due to their high surface area, good thermal and mechanical stabilities, chemical inertness, and high physisorption capacity [22,23,24]. Porous carbon materials have attracted attention in materials science and catalysis, and they have emerged as potential supports for growing and anchoring metal nanoparticles. Their mesoporous structure and unique nanoscale morphology could provide a high surface area for a high dispersion of catalyst nanoparticles and efficient transport of reactants. The performance of activated carbon is dependent on the selection of carbon source and activation conditions. Activated carbons prepared with petroleum coke, sawdust, bamboo, or leaves offer good performance as supporting catalysts [4]. However, polymer-derived porous carbon has not been well-studied as a support for non-noble metal catalysts for the hydrolysis of AB. On the other hand, the N dopant atom unavoidably modifies the local electronic structure and affects the physical and chemical properties of a new N-doped carbon material. To date, it has been shown that the modification of carbon material by N-doping alters the catalytic properties. Carbonization of N-containing aromatic polymer materials, such as polyaniline (PANI) and polypyrrole (PPY), is considered to be an efficient way to prepare N-containing carbon materials/nanomaterials, most frequently with the preserved morphology of the PANI and PPY precursors. Compared with lignocellulosic biomass, the polymeric precursor can be more easily prepared under moderate and well-controlled conditions by using both template-based and template-free methods [25].
In this study, a polypyrrole (PPy) nanofiber-derived activated carbon (PAC)-supported Co-Ni-B catalyst was successfully synthesized by a chemical reduction method. Co-Ni-B supported on PAC has a high surface area with many active sites, thus showing excellent catalytic performance for HG via hydrolysis of AB. Co-Ni-B/PAC is a remarkable catalyst that provides lower activation energy and improves the rate of the HG reaction. This low-cost and highly-efficient catalyst can be used as a potential hydrogen-storage material toward the application of AB.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Pyrrole (98%), ammonium persulfate (APS) (99%), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) (>98%), ammonia borane (AB, 97%), sodium borohydride (NaBH4, ≥99%), cobalt sulfate heptahydrate (CoSO4·7H2O, ≥99%), and nickel sulfate hexahydrate (NiSO4·6H2O, ≥99%) were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co., USA. All chemicals and reagents were used without further purification, except for pyrrole, which was distilled under reduced pressure before use. A Millipore Milli-Q deionizing system was used to obtain high purity water.

2.2. Synthesis of the Catalyst

The PPy nanofibers were synthesized according to a typical procedure previously reported in the literature [26]. CTAB (1.82 g), oxalic acid dehydrate (0.63 g), and pyrrole (0.55 mL) were dissolved in 250 mL deionized water at 25 °C for 3 h under stirring. Next, 2 g APS was dissolved in 20 mL deionized water and slowly added dropwise to the prepared suspension using a burette. After stirring for 4 h, the solution was filtered and washed thoroughly with deionized water and methanol, and dried under vacuum at 60 °C.
The obtained PPy nanofibers were further carbonized to fabricate carbonaceous nanoparticles in a quartz tubular furnace under a N2 atmosphere. The sample was gradually heated to 800 °C at a heating rate of 3 °C·min−1, held at 800 °C for 5 h, and then cooled to room temperature. PAC was chemically activated by heating a PAC-KOH mixture (KOH/PAC at a weight ratio of 2:1) to 600 °C for 1 h under a N2 atmosphere.
The Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite was prepared as follows. Typically, 5 g CoSO4·7H2O and 1 g NiSO4·6H2O were dissolved in 100 mL deionized water, followed by addition of 0.1 g PAC, and the mixture was sonicated for 1 h. The suspension was stirred vigorously in a 0 °C ice bath while 20 mL 10 wt. % NaBH4 solution was added dropwise. A strong dark color was observed immediately after the addition of NaBH4. A schematic diagram of the process is shown in Figure 1. The black products were washed with distilled water and absolute ethanol three times successively by filtration, and then left to dry in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 24 h. For comparison, Ni-B, Co-B, and Co-Ni-B catalysts were synthesized in the absence of PAC under similar conditions.

2.3. Characterization of the Catalyst

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used to characterize the morphology of the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. The morphologies and sizes of the catalysts were observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JSM-200CX, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). TEM samples were prepared by depositing one or two droplets of the synthesized catalyst suspensions onto copper grids. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed at room temperature (25 °C) using a diffractometer (1820, Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using a SCIENTA ESCA250 instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα (1486.6 eV) X-ray source and a hemispherical analyzer. The specific surface areas of the catalysts were measured by N2 adsorption at −196 °C using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method (Autosorb iQ2, Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). The samples were degassed at 150 °C until the vacuum pressure was below 10−4 Pa. The average value of three measurements was taken for each sample.

2.4. Hydrogen Generation Measurement

Hydrogen generated by the catalytic decomposition of the AB solution was collected by the drainage method and expressed under standard conditions (1 atm and 25 °C). The HG volume was measured by water displacement (the weight of displaced water was recorded by a balance) [2]. In a typical measurement, 0.1 g catalyst was placed at the bottom of a sealed flask and a 1.5 wt. % AB solution (10 mL) was injected into the flask. The temperature (25, 30, 35, or 40 °C) was controlled by immersing the flask in a water bath. The kinetics of AB hydrolysis catalyzed by Co-Ni-B/PAC were studied with respect to temperature, catalyst amount, and AB concentration. Changes to the HG rate determined the stability of the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite catalyst. After the HG reaction was complete, another equivalent of AB was added to the reaction system (each AB addition is considered as one test cycle).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of the Catalysts

An SEM image of the well-defined PPy nanofibers (Figure 2a) shows that their diameters were relatively uniform (average diameter = 50 nm). The carbonized PPy nanofibers appear as spherical particles with diameters of 20–30 nm (Figure 2b). The synthesized Co-Ni-B/PAC composite (Figure 2c) had a globular morphology with diameters of 50–60 nm, approximately two times larger than those of PAC, indicating growth of the Co-Ni-B catalyst on the surface of PAC. From the TEM image (Figure 2d), it can be observed that the Co-Ni-B/PAC composite was composed of uniform, spherical nanoparticles. It is clear that Co-Ni-B was coated onto PAC. In contrast, the unsupported Co-Ni-B catalyst formed large particles (Figure S1), which could be due to particle agglomeration (the reaction between cobalt ions, nickel ions, and borohydride is strongly exothermic).
The as-synthesized catalysts were analyzed by powder XRD (Figure 3). No distinct peaks were observed for Co-Ni-B/PAC, which indicates that it was amorphous (an amorphous structure is expected to enhance its catalytic activity). A strong and broad peak around 45° for Co-Ni-B can be assigned to the amorphous structure of the Co-Ni-B catalysts. The pattern of PAC shows two broad features centered at 2θ = 24° and 44°. These broad and low intensity diffraction bands are at positions where (002) and (101) diffraction peaks of graphitic carbon would occur [5].
XPS was performed to characterize the atomic composition of Co-Ni-B/PAC (Figure 4a). The XPS results confirm the presence of Ni, Co, B, C, N, and O in the Co-Ni-B/PAC composite. The binding energy at 398.8 eV was attributed to uncharged pyrrolic nitrogen (Figure 4b) [6], which indicates that PAC was successfully doped into the Co-Ni-B catalyst. Figure 4c shows the high-resolution XPS spectrum of Co 2p; the peaks at 780.1 and 795.8 eV correspond to Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2, respectively. The observed Ni 2p3/2 and Ni 2p1/2 peaks with binding energies of 852.8 and 870.2 eV, respectively, correspond to metallic Ni (Figure 4d). Additional peaks were present at slightly higher energies compared to the Co 2p and Ni 2p bands, which reveals the existence of different oxidation states for these elements (likely occurred during the sample preparation process for the XPS measurements). XPS analysis also demonstrated that the surface molar composition of Co-Ni-B was Co47.5Ni14.4B41.1.
The specific surface areas are assumed to be crucial for the heterogeneous catalytic reaction. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption measurements were performed to obtain textural parameters (Figure 5). Non-doped Co-Ni-B samples had a relatively low specific surface area of 72 cm2·g−1. The specific surface area drastically increased to 151 m2·g−1 after doping with PAC derived from PPy nanofibers. The increase in surface area has to be attributed to the presence of the porous PAC support. In the low relative pressure region (below P/P0 = 0.15), there was a large increase in the volume of adsorbed nitrogen, which indicates the development of microporosity. In addition, an obvious hysteresis loop emerged, providing evidence of a significant amount of mesopores in Co-Ni-B/PAC. These pores could provide reactants with access to the Co-Ni-B/PAC core, and products could easily exit through the pores [21].

3.2. Effect of Different Types of Catalysts on Hydrogen Generation

Alloy catalysts in the form of Co-P-B [27], Co-Mo-B [28], Co-W-B [29], and Co-Ni-B [30] exhibited better catalytic activity than Co-B. In the present study, Co-Ni-B was selected to coat PAC. The catalytic activity of the Co-Ni-B/PAC catalyst was tested for H2 production by hydrolysis of AB (1.5 wt. %). The hydrogen yield was measured as a function of time in the presence of different catalysts (0.1 g) at 25 °C. Figure 6 shows HG from the hydrolysis of AB catalyzed by Co-B, Ni-B, Co-Ni-B, and Co-Ni-B/PAC. Hydrogen was instantaneously produced when AB was exposed to each catalyst; 100% theoretical hydrogen yield was achieved for all catalysts. The HG rate decreased in the following order: Co-Ni-B/PAC > Co-Ni-B > Co-B > Ni-B. The Co-Ni-B/PAC catalyst powder yielded the highest HG rate of 1451.2 mL·min−1·g−1, which is about twice that obtained with the Co-Ni-B catalyst powder (720.8 mL·min−1·g−1). In addition, the HG rate was higher than for other known catalysts, such as Pd nanoparticles supported on MIL-101 (1008 mL·min−1·g−1) [31] and Pt3Ni (1388 mL·min−1·g−1) [32]. These results suggest that the synergistic interaction between Co-Ni-B and PAC may have contributed significantly to the hydrolysis of AB. The Co-Ni-B nanoparticles were likely deposited onto the PAC nanoparticles in the special structure, providing an increased number of active sites on the surface because of its preferable expansion. These active sites may have also played a key role in the enhanced catalytic activity of the nanocomposite in the hydrolysis of AB.

3.3. Effect of Co/Ni Molar Ratio on Hydrogen Generation

The effect of Co/Ni molar ratio on the activity of the catalyst was investigated by changing the amount of CoSO4·7H2O and NiSO4·6H2O in the precursor solution. The catalytic activity of the Co-Ni-B catalyst is found to be dependent on the Co/Ni ratio. As shown in Figure 7, the HG rate increased with respect to Co/Ni molar ratio and reached a maximum value around 5. Therefore, in the following sections, our investigation will focus on this Co-Ni-B catalyst with the optimized composition.

3.4. Effect of PAC Concentration on Hydrogen Generation

The effect of PAC on the activity of the catalyst was investigated by changing the amount of PAC in the Co-Ni-B precursor solution in order to identify the effect of the supporting material on HG from hydrolysis. As shown in Figure 8, the HG rate increased with respect to PAC loading and reached a maximum value at 0.1 g PAC, above which the HG rate decreased. The surface of PAC was likely not completely coated by the Co-Ni-B catalyst when too much PAC was added or when PAC agglomerated in solution. Therefore, samples of the Co-Ni-B/PAC catalyst doped with 0.1 g PAC were used for all subsequent reactions performed in this study.

3.5. Effect of the Amount of Catalyst on Hydrogen Generation

A series of experiments was performed to study the kinetics of AB hydrolysis catalyzed by Co-Ni-B/PAC. Figure 9a shows HG versus reaction time during the hydrolysis of AB for different catalyst concentrations. HG proceeded at a rate that increased linearly with respect to the amount of catalyst (Figure 9b), demonstrating that the catalytic hydrolysis of AB in the presence of the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite had a first-order relationship with respect to catalyst concentration.

3.6. Effect of AB Concentration on Hydrogen Generation

The effect of AB concentration on the HG rate was studied by varying the initial concentration of the substrate (catalyst amount = 0.1 g). Figure 10 shows the HG volume versus time for various initial concentrations of AB. The HG rates remained almost constant with increasing AB concentration, indicating that the catalytic hydrolysis of AB was zeroth-order with respect to AB concentration.

3.7. Kinetics of Hydrolysis Using Co-Ni-B/PAC

The hydrolysis reaction was performed at different temperatures to determine the activation energy (Ea) for AB hydrolysis catalyzed by the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite. Figure 11a shows the HG yield versus reaction time for the hydrolysis of AB (1.5 wt. %) catalyzed by the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite at temperatures between 25 and 40 °C. As expected, the HG rate increased with reaction temperature. The reaction rate constant, k, was calculated at each temperature from the slope of the linear part of each plot in Figure 10a. The Arrhenius plot of lnk versus 1/T for the catalyst is shown in Figure 11b. From the slope of the straight line, Ea for the hydrolysis of AB in the presence of the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite was determined to be approximately 30.2 kJ·mol−1, which is lower than most reported Ea values for a variety of other catalysts for the hydrolysis reaction (Table 1). These results indicate that the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite exhibits superior catalytic performance.

3.8. Stability of Co-Ni-B/PAC

Aside from the catalytic activity, the recyclability of a catalyst is the other important factor that determines its potential application in practical HG systems. The recyclability of the Co-Ni-B/PAC catalyst was tested and satisfactory durability was observed. As shown in Figure 12, the catalytic activity of Co-Ni-B/PAC in the hydrolysis of AB was retained at 86.7% of its initial value with complete release of hydrogen after 10 recover-and-reuse cycles. The stability of Co-Ni-B/PAC is higher than that of other catalysts, such as Ru-Rh@PVP (68% of its initial activity after five recover-and-reuse cycles) [34] and intrazeolite Co nanoclusters (31% activity loss in the fifth run) [42]. Thus, the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite exhibited high durability in the catalytic reactions. For powder-form Co or Co-containing catalysts, material loss is one of the most important factors during the process of separation and re-dispersion that causes a decrease in the subsequent activity of the catalysts [43]. In addition, the high surface energy and magnetic forces may cause fine powdery particles to aggregate during usage, isolation, and desiccation, which would result in a remarkable loss of long-term catalytic activity. In the present work, the Co-Ni-B nanoparticles were supported on the high surface area of PAC, which effectively hindered the loss of activity.

4. Conclusions

A Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite was synthesized by in situ reduction using PPy-derived activated carbon as a supporting material. The Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite showed significantly enhanced catalytic activity for HG via AB hydrolysis compared to the Co-Ni-B catalyst. The synergistic interaction between Co-Ni-B and PAC may have played a critical role in the enhanced catalytic activity. The Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite showed exceptional stability and long-term stability for HG via AB hydrolysis. These results indicate that the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite has the potential to be used as a reliable catalyst for the hydrolysis of AB.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/6/7/154/s1, Figure S1: TEM image of the Co-Ni-B catalyst.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude and appreciation for the National Science Foundation of China (51561006, 51461011, 51261005, 51461010, 51401059, 51361005, 51371060, and U1501242), the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (2014GXNSFAA118318, 2014GXNSFBA118240, 2015GXNSFBA139208 and 2015GXNSFAA139282), the Special Program of GUET Graduate Education Innovation Project for Reform and Development of Degrees and Graduate Education (JGY2015073) and the Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education (YCSZ2015153).

Author Contributions

Y.Z. initiated the project. Y.Z. and L.S. designed and supervised the experimental work, which was performed by Y.G., C.L. and H.C. collected and analyzed the data. S.Q. and E.Y. participated in the data analysis. F.X. and C.T. were in charge of writing and checking the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Z.; Lu, Z.H.; Chen, X. Ultrafine Ni-Pt alloy nanoparticles grown on graphene as highly efficient catalyst for complete hydrogen generation from hydrazine borane. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 1255–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xiang, C.; Jiang, D.; She, Z.; Zou, Y.; Chu, H.; Qiu, S.; Zhang, H.; Xu, F.; Tang, C.; Sun, L. Hydrogen generation by hydrolysis of alkaline sodium borohydride using a cobaltezinceboron/graphene nanocomposite treated with sodium hydroxide. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40, 4111–4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hu, L.; Zheng, B.; Lai, Z.; Huang, K.W. Room temperature hydrogen generation from hydrolysis of ammonia-borane over an efficient NiAgPd/C catalyst. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 20031–20037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Qiu, F.; Dai, Y.; Li, L.; Xu, C.; Huang, Y.; Chen, C.; Wang, Y.; Jiao, L.; Yuan, H. Synthesis of Cu@FeCo core-shell nanoparticles for the catalytic hydrolysis of ammonia borane. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shan, X.; Du, J.; Cheng, F.; Liang, J.; Tao, Z.; Chen, J. Carbon-supported Ni3B nanoparticles as catalysts for hydrogen generation from hydrolysis of ammonia borane. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 6987–6994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, H.; Na, C. Isokinetic temperature and size-controlled activation of ruthenium-catalyzed ammonia borane hydrolysis. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1726–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, Y.; Dai, Y.; Tian, X.K. Controlled synthesis of monodisperse PdxSn100-x nanoparticles and their catalytic activity for hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of ammonia-borane. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40, 9235–9243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rakap, M. Poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone)-stabilized palladium-platinum nanoparticles-catalyzed hydrolysis of ammonia borane for hydrogen generation. J. Power Sources 2015, 276, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chou, C.C.; Chen, B.H. Hydrogen generation from deliquescence of ammonia borane using Ni-Co/r-GO catalyst. J. Power Sources 2015, 293, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zou, Y.; Cheng, J.; Wang, Q.; Xiang, C.; Chu, H.; Qiu, S.; Zhang, H.; Xu, F.; Liu, S.; Tang, C.; et al. Cobalt-boron/nickel-boron nanocomposite with improved catalytic performance for the hydrolysis of ammonia borane. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40, 13423–13430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yao, Q.; Lu, Z.H.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Feng, G. Synergetic catalysis of non-noble bimetallic Cu-Co nanoparticles embedded in SiO2 nanospheres in hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 14167–14174. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chandra, M.; Xu, Q. A high-performance hydrogen generation system: Transition metal-catalyzed dissociation and hydrolysis of ammonia-borane. J. Power Sources 2006, 156, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, Q.; Chandra, M. Catalytic activities of non-noble metals for hydrogen generation from aqueous ammonia-borane at room temperature. J. Power Sources 2006, 163, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, Q.L.; Xu, Q. Liquid organic and inorganic chemical hydrides for high-capacity hydrogen storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 478–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yen, H.; Seo, Y.; Kaliaguine, S.; Kleitz, F. Role of metal-support interactions, particle size, and metal-metal synergy in CuNi nanocatalysts for H2 generation. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 5505–5511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fernandes, R.; Patel, N.; Miotello, A.; Jaiswal, R.; Kothari, D.C. Dehydrogenation of ammonia borane with transition metal-doped Co-B alloy catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 2397–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lai, S.W.; Lin, H.L.; Lin, Y.P.; Yu, T.L. Hydrolysis of ammonia-borane catalyzed by an iron-nickel alloy on an SBA-15 support. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 4636–4647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liang, H.; Chen, G.; Desinan, S.; Rosei, R.; Rosei, F.; Ma, D. In situ facile synthesis of ruthenium nanocluster catalyst supported on carbon black for hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of ammonia-borane. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 17921–17927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rachiero, G.P.; Demirci, U.B.; Miele, P. Bimetallic RuCo and RuCu catalysts supported on gamma-Al2O3. A comparative study of their activity in hydrolysis of ammonia-borane. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2011, 36, 7051–7065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yao, Q.; Shi, W.; Feng, G.; Lu, Z.H.; Zhang, X.; Tao, D.; Kong, D.; Chen, X. Ultrafine Ru nanoparticles embedded in SiO2 nanospheres: Highly efficient catalysts for hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane. J. Power Sources 2014, 257, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cheng, J.; Xiang, C.; Zou, Y.; Chu, H.; Qiu, S.; Zhang, H.; Sun, L.; Xu, F. Highly active nanoporous Co-B-TiO2 framework for hydrolysis of NaBH4. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 899–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yao, Q.; Lu, Z.H.; Yang, K.; Che, X.; Zhu, M. Ruthenium nanoparticles confined in SBA-15 as highly efficient catalyst for hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane and hydrazine borane. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Deng, S.; Hu, B.; Chen, T.; Wang, B.; Huang, J.; Wang, Y.; Yu, G. Activated carbons prepared from peanut shell and sunflower seed shell for high CO2 adsorption. Adsorption 2015, 21, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Almasoudi, A.; Mokaya, R. Preparation and hydrogen storage capacity of templated and activated carbons nanocast from commercially available zeolitic imidazolate framework. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ćirić-Marjanović, G.; Pašti, I.; Gavrilov, N.; Janošević, A.; Mentus, S. Carbonised polyaniline and polypyrrole: Towards advanced nitrogen-containing carbon materials. Chem. Pap. 2013, 67, 781–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zou, Y.; Pisciotta, J.; Baskakov, I.V. Nanostructured polypyrrole-coated anode for sun-powered microbial fuel cells. Bioelectrochemistry 2010, 79, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Patel, N.; Kale, A.; Miotello, A. Improved dehydrogenation of ammonia borane over Co-P-B coating on Ni: A single catalyst for both hydrolysis and thermolysis. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 111–112, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dai, H.B.; Gao, L.L.; Liang, Y.; Kang, X.D.; Wang, P. Promoted hydrogen generation from ammonia borane aqueous solution using cobalt-molybdenum-boron/nickel foam catalyst. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dai, H.B.; Liang, Y.; Wang, P.; Yao, X.D.; Rufford, T.; Lu, M.; Cheng, H.M. High-performance cobalt-tungsten-boron catalyst supported on Ni foam for hydrogen generation from alkaline sodium borohydride solution. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2008, 33, 4405–4412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, D.; Wang, H.; Guo, Q.; Ji, S. Catalytic behavior of carbon supported Ni-B, Co-B and Co-Ni-B in hydrogen generation by hydrolysis of KBH4. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011, 92, 1606–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dai, H.M.; Su, J.; Hu, K.; Luo, W.; Cheng, G.Z. Pd nanoparticles supported on MIL-101 as high-performance catalysts for catalytic hydrolysis of ammonia borane. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 4947–4953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yao, C.F.; Zhuang, L.; Cao, Y.L.; Ai, X.P.; Yang, H.X. Hydrogen release from hydrolysis of borazane on Pt- and Ni-based alloy catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2008, 33, 2462–2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Park, J.W.; Lai, S.W.; Cho, S.O. Catalytic hydrogen generation from hydrolysis of ammonia borane using octahedral Au@Pt nanoparticles. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40, 16316–16322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rakap, M. PVP-stabilized Ru-Rh nanoparticles as highly efficient catalysts for hydrogen generation from hydrolysis of ammonia borane. J. Alloy. Compd. 2015, 649, 1025–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, H.; Zhou, L.; Han, M.; Tao, Z.; Cheng, F.; Chen, J. CuCo nanoparticles supported on hierarchically porous carbon as catalysts for hydrolysis of ammonia borane. J. Alloy. Compd. 2015, 651, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yao, Q.; Lu, Z.H.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, X.; Lan, Y. One-pot synthesis of core-shell Cu@SiO2 nanospheres and their catalysis for hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane and hydrazine borane. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yao, Q.; Lu, Z.H.; Jia, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, X. In situ facile synthesis of Rh nanoparticles supported on carbon nanotubes as highly active catalysts for H2 generation from NH3BH3 hydrolysis. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40, 2207–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yurderi, M.; Bulut, A.; Ertas, İ.E.; Zahmakiran, M.; Kaya, M. Supported copper-copper oxide nanoparticles as active, stable and low-cost catalyst in the methanolysis of ammonia-borane for chemical hydrogen storage. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 165, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, X.; Li, H.; Luo, H.; Qiao, M. Liquid phase hydrogenation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol over Mo-doped Co-B amorphous alloy catalysts. App. Catal. A Gen. 2002, 233, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wen, M.; Zhou, S.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Q.; Wang, C.; Sun, Y. Construction of NiCo-Pt nanopolyhedron inlay-structures and their highly efficient catalysis hydrolytic dehydrogenation toward ammonia borane. J. Power Sources 2013, 232, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Figen, A.K.; Coşkuner, B. A novel perspective for hydrogen generation from ammonia borane (NH3BH3) with Co-B catalysts: “Ultrasonic Hydrolysis”. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 2824–2835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rakap, M.; Özkar, S. Hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of ammonia-borane using intrazeolite cobalt(0) nanoclusters catalyst. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35, 3341–3346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liao, J.; Li, H.; Zhang, X. Preparation of Ti supported Co film composed of Co nanofibers as catalyst for the hydrolysis of ammonia borane. Catal. Commun. 2015, 67, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metals 06 00154 g001 1024
Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing the preparation of the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing the preparation of the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite.
Metals 06 00154 g001
Metals 06 00154 g002 1024
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) PPy (polypyrrole) nanofibers, (b) PAC (polypyrrole nanofiber-derived activated carbon) derived from PPy (polypyrrole), and (c) the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite; and (d) TEM image of the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) PPy (polypyrrole) nanofibers, (b) PAC (polypyrrole nanofiber-derived activated carbon) derived from PPy (polypyrrole), and (c) the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite; and (d) TEM image of the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite.
Metals 06 00154 g002
Metals 06 00154 g003 1024
Figure 3. XRD patterns of PAC, Co-Ni-B, and Co-Ni-B/PAC powders.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of PAC, Co-Ni-B, and Co-Ni-B/PAC powders.
Metals 06 00154 g003
Metals 06 00154 g004 1024
Figure 4. (a) Full XPS spectra of Co-Ni-B/PAC. XPS spectra of (b) N1s, (c) Co 2p, and (d) Ni 2p.
Figure 4. (a) Full XPS spectra of Co-Ni-B/PAC. XPS spectra of (b) N1s, (c) Co 2p, and (d) Ni 2p.
Metals 06 00154 g004
Metals 06 00154 g005 1024
Figure 5. N2 adsorption and desorption isotherms of Co-Ni-B and Co-Ni-B/PAC powders.
Figure 5. N2 adsorption and desorption isotherms of Co-Ni-B and Co-Ni-B/PAC powders.
Metals 06 00154 g005
Metals 06 00154 g006 1024
Figure 6. Hydrogen generation (HG) from hydrolysis of AB (ammonia borane) using the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite catalyst. (Batch system, 25 °C, 1.5 wt. % AB, 0.1 g catalyst).
Figure 6. Hydrogen generation (HG) from hydrolysis of AB (ammonia borane) using the Co-Ni-B/PAC nanocomposite catalyst. (Batch system, 25 °C, 1.5 wt. % AB, 0.1 g catalyst).
Metals 06 00154 g006
Metals 06 00154 g007 1024
Figure 7. Effect of Co/Ni molar ratio on the hydrogen generation (HG) rate. (Batch system, 25 °C, 1.5 wt. % AB, 0.1 g catalyst).
Figure 7. Effect of Co/Ni molar ratio on the hydrogen generation (HG) rate. (Batch system, 25 °C, 1.5 wt. % AB, 0.1 g catalyst).
Metals 06 00154 g007
Metals 06 00154 g008 1024
Figure 8. Effect of varying PAC concentration on the hydrogen generation (HG) rate. (Batch system, 25 °C, 1.5 wt. % AB, 0.1 g catalyst).
Figure 8. Effect of varying PAC concentration on the hydrogen generation (HG) rate. (Batch system, 25 °C, 1.5 wt. % AB, 0.1 g catalyst).
Metals 06 00154 g008
Metals 06 00154 g009 1024
Figure 9. (a) Effect of reaction time on the hydrogen generation (HG) rate. (b) HG rate versus catalyst amount. (Batch system, 25 °C, 1.5 wt. % AB).
Figure 9. (a) Effect of reaction time on the hydrogen generation (HG) rate. (b) HG rate versus catalyst amount. (Batch system, 25 °C, 1.5 wt. % AB).
Metals 06 00154 g009
Metals 06 00154 g010 1024
Figure 10. Effect of varying AB concentration on the hydrogen generation rate. (Batch system, 25 °C, 0.1 g catalyst).
Figure 10. Effect of varying AB concentration on the hydrogen generation rate. (Batch system, 25 °C, 0.1 g catalyst).
Metals 06 00154 g010
Metals 06 00154 g011 1024
Figure 11. (a) HG kinetic curves at the initial stage of hydrolysis using 1.5 wt. % AB solution and the Co-Ni-B/PAC catalyst at different solution temperatures. (b) Arrhenius plot of lnk (initial HG rate) versus the reciprocal of the absolute temperature (1/T).
Figure 11. (a) HG kinetic curves at the initial stage of hydrolysis using 1.5 wt. % AB solution and the Co-Ni-B/PAC catalyst at different solution temperatures. (b) Arrhenius plot of lnk (initial HG rate) versus the reciprocal of the absolute temperature (1/T).
Metals 06 00154 g011
Metals 06 00154 g012 1024
Figure 12. Multicycle operation of the Co-Ni-B/PAC catalyst employing a 1.5 wt. % AB solution at 25 °C.
Figure 12. Multicycle operation of the Co-Ni-B/PAC catalyst employing a 1.5 wt. % AB solution at 25 °C.
Metals 06 00154 g012
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the activation energy (Ea) for the hydrolysis of AB (ammonia borane) with various catalysts.
Table 1. Comparison of the activation energy (Ea) for the hydrolysis of AB (ammonia borane) with various catalysts.
Catalyst SampleEa (kJ·mol−1)Ref.
Cu@FeCo38.75[4]
Fe-Ni/SBA-1575[17]
Au@Pt44.28[33]
Ru-Rh@PVP a47.4 ± 2.1[34]
Cu0.2Co0.8/HPC b41.7[35]
Cu@SiO236 ± 1[36]
Rh/CNTs c32 ± 1[37]
Cu-Cu2O-CuO/C67.9[38]
Co-Mo-B/Ni44[39]
NiCo-Pt45.72[40]
Co-B47.5[41]
Co-Ni-B/PAC30.2This work
a PVP: polyvinylpyrrolidone; b HPC: hierarchically porous carbon; c CNTs: carbon nanotubes.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zou, Y.; Gao, Y.; Xiang, C.; Chu, H.; Qiu, S.; Yan, E.; Xu, F.; Tang, C.; Sun, L. Cobalt-Nickel-Boron Supported over Polypyrrole-Derived Activated Carbon for Hydrolysis of Ammonia Borane. Metals 2016, 6, 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/met6070154

AMA Style

Zou Y, Gao Y, Xiang C, Chu H, Qiu S, Yan E, Xu F, Tang C, Sun L. Cobalt-Nickel-Boron Supported over Polypyrrole-Derived Activated Carbon for Hydrolysis of Ammonia Borane. Metals. 2016; 6(7):154. https://doi.org/10.3390/met6070154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zou, Yongjin, Yubo Gao, Cuili Xiang, Hailiang Chu, Shujun Qiu, Erhu Yan, Fen Xu, Chengying Tang, and Lixian Sun. 2016. "Cobalt-Nickel-Boron Supported over Polypyrrole-Derived Activated Carbon for Hydrolysis of Ammonia Borane" Metals 6, no. 7: 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/met6070154

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop