Next Article in Journal
Empowering Domestic Workers: A Critical Analysis of the Belgian Service Voucher System
Previous Article in Journal
Political Consumerism as a Neoliberal Response to Youth Political Disengagement
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Societies 2017, 7(4), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7040035

From Differentiation to Concretisation: Integrative Experiments in Sustainable Architecture

School of Architecture Planning and Landscape, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
Received: 24 October 2017 / Revised: 6 December 2017 / Accepted: 11 December 2017 / Published: 19 December 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [11402 KB, uploaded 19 December 2017]   |  

Abstract

It is widely recognised that the achievement of a sustainable built environment requires holistic design practices and approaches that are capable of balancing the varied, and often conflicting, demands of environmental, social and economic concerns. However, academics and practitioners have recently highlighted, and expressed concerns about the knowledge gap that currently exists within environmental policy, research and practice between understandings of the technical performance of buildings and their social meaning and relevance. This paper acknowledges these concerns and is developed from the author’s own direct experiences of practice-led research and active participation in design-build projects. It argues for a theoretically-informed and socially-engaged approach to built environment research, pedagogy and practice that seeks to encourage an integrative understanding of the design, realisation and use of sustainable architecture. The paper draws on the Philosophy of Technology and in particular the work of Andrew Feenberg to analyse the buildings and to propose an integrated and inclusive framework for understanding sustainable design that acknowledges not just what the built environment does, but also what it means. It also suggests that what a building means also informs what it can do, and for whom. Although the technical and social dimensions of design can be interpreted as distinct practices and are often institutionally separated, this paper argues that the realisation of sustainable design must seek a conscious interaction and interchange between these two differentiated dimensions. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable architecture; sustainable design; philosophy of technology; Feenberg; instrumentalisation theory; concretisation; socio-technical design sustainable architecture; sustainable design; philosophy of technology; Feenberg; instrumentalisation theory; concretisation; socio-technical design
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Farmer, G. From Differentiation to Concretisation: Integrative Experiments in Sustainable Architecture. Societies 2017, 7, 35.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Societies EISSN 2075-4698 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top