Next Article in Journal
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Societies in 2014
Next Article in Special Issue
Eating Serial: Beatrice Lindsay, Vegetarianism, and the Tactics of Everyday Life in the Late Nineteenth Century
Previous Article in Journal
Let the Weakest Link Go! Empirical Explorations on the Relative Importance of Weak and Strong Ties on Social Networking Sites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Eating Animals to Build Rapport: Conducting Research as Vegans or Vegetarians
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Societies 2015, 5(1), 1-11; doi:10.3390/soc5010001

Animal Bodies, Colonial Subjects: (Re)Locating Animality in Decolonial Thought

Department of Modern Languages and Cultural Studies, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
Academic Editor: Chloë Taylor
Received: 10 November 2014 / Accepted: 23 December 2014 / Published: 24 December 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alimentary Relations, Animal Relations)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [94 KB, uploaded 4 February 2015]

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that animal domestication, speciesism, and other modern human-animal interactions in North America are possible because of and through the erasure of Indigenous bodies and the emptying of Indigenous lands for settler-colonial expansion. That is, we cannot address animal oppression or talk about animal liberation without naming and subsequently dismantling settler colonialism and white supremacy as political machinations that require the simultaneous exploitation and/or erasure of animal and Indigenous bodies. I begin by re-framing animality as a politics of space to suggest that animal bodies are made intelligible in the settler imagination on stolen, colonized, and re-settled Indigenous lands. Thinking through Andrea Smith’s logics of white supremacy, I then re-center anthropocentrism as a racialized and speciesist site of settler coloniality to re-orient decolonial thought toward animality. To critique the ways in which Indigenous bodies and epistemologies are at stake in neoliberal re-figurings of animals as settler citizens, I reject the colonial politics of recognition developed in Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka’s recent monograph, Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights (Oxford University Press 2011) because it militarizes settler-colonial infrastructures of subjecthood and governmentality. I then propose a decolonized animal ethic that finds legitimacy in Indigenous cosmologies to argue that decolonization can only be reified through a totalizing disruption of those power apparatuses (i.e., settler colonialism, anthropocentrism, white supremacy, and neoliberal pluralism) that lend the settler state sovereignty, normalcy, and futurity insofar as animality is a settler-colonial particularity. View Full-Text
Keywords: decolonization; animal ethics; settler colonialism; white supremacy; neoliberalism decolonization; animal ethics; settler colonialism; white supremacy; neoliberalism
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Belcourt, B.-R. Animal Bodies, Colonial Subjects: (Re)Locating Animality in Decolonial Thought. Societies 2015, 5, 1-11.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Societies EISSN 2075-4698 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top