Next Article in Journal
Animal Personhood in Mi’kmaq Perspective
Next Article in Special Issue
Transmitting Health Philosophies through the Traditionalist Chinese Martial Arts in the UK
Previous Article in Journal
Social Network Site Usage and Personal Relations of Migrants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards the “Undoing” of Gender in Mixed-Sex Martial Arts and Combat Sports
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Societies 2014, 4(4), 654-671; doi:10.3390/soc4040654

The Organization and Regulation of Full Contact Martial Arts: A Case Study of Flanders

Department of Sports Policy and Management, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 29 April 2014 / Revised: 15 November 2014 / Accepted: 24 November 2014 / Published: 28 November 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Martial Arts and Society: Developing Co-Constituting Perspectives)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [124 KB, uploaded 28 November 2014]

Abstract

To date, martial arts involvement is often described in controversial terms. While some studies report increased anti-social behavior as a result of martial arts involvement, other findings refer to a more positive social and personal development. This paradox has resulted in an ambiguous public discourse on their value and legitimacy as socially accepted sports, often leading to a dichotomization between “good” and “bad” styles of martial arts. Up until now however, there has been a lack of empirical proof that this “good versus bad” perspective divides along the lines of specific martial arts styles. Consequently, the distinct moral and medical concerns regarding the effects of involvement in harder martial arts—combined with their increased popularity, as well as their perceived positive outcomes for specific target groups—have resulted in a growing demand among policy makers to develop (or rethink) their strategy towards the regulation and support of these sports. By means of a case-study approach, the present paper discusses some of the key issues regarding the regulation of a number of full contact martial arts (e.g., kickboxing, Muay Thai, MMA), which are considered to be problematic for (sport) authorities, and which confront sports policy makers in Flanders. In describing the Flemish case, this paper aims to highlight the need to develop a sound martial arts policy that can provide a legitimation base for the provision and organization of full contact martial arts, which have become increasingly popular in recent years. View Full-Text
Keywords: full contact martial arts; governance; organization; policy full contact martial arts; governance; organization; policy
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Vertonghen, J.; Theeboom, M.; Dom, E.; Bosscher, V.D.; Haudenhuyse, R. The Organization and Regulation of Full Contact Martial Arts: A Case Study of Flanders. Societies 2014, 4, 654-671.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Societies EISSN 2075-4698 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top