Fear, Sovereignty, and the Right to Die
AbstractThis paper addresses the “right to die” through the lens of Derrida’s The Beast and the Sovereign, Volume One. Specifically focusing on the case of Tony Nicklinson v. Ministry of Justice, 2012, the essay posits two things. First, Derrida’s insight helps us understand how a “fear of death” is a fundamental performative feature of sovereignty politics. Second, in order to maintain its performative role, sovereignty must perpetuate the belief that “man is wolf to man.” I argue that, in right-to-die cases, this has the effect of precluding compassionate reasons for taking the life of another. Thus, I posit that these two points, in part, explain how right-to-die cases fail on appeal. All is not lost, however, as this essay advances Derrida’s position that these performative workings of sovereignty, which currently preclude the right to die, are entirely deconstructable. As such, exploring how right-to-die cases are articulated in law permits a deconstruction of sovereignty politics and allows us to open up other ways of thinking about the relation between sovereignty, life, death, and our relationships with “others”. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Hardes, J.J. Fear, Sovereignty, and the Right to Die. Societies 2013, 3, 66-79.
Hardes JJ. Fear, Sovereignty, and the Right to Die. Societies. 2013; 3(1):66-79.Chicago/Turabian Style
Hardes, Jennifer J. 2013. "Fear, Sovereignty, and the Right to Die." Societies 3, no. 1: 66-79.