Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Body Composition Evaluation Issue among Young Elite Football Players: DXA Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
Between-Session Reliability of Common Strength- and Power-Related Measures in Adolescent Athletes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Differences in the Dominant and Non-Dominant Knee Valgus Angle in Junior Elite and Amateur Soccer Players after Unilateral Landing
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sports 2017, 5(1), 16; doi:10.3390/sports5010016

Functional Movement Screen Scores and Physical Performance among Youth Elite Soccer Players

1
Escola Superior de Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4960-320 Viana do Castelo, Portugal
2
Delegação da Covilhã, Instituto de Telecomunicações, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
3
Centro de Investigação em Desporto, Saúde e Desenvolvimento Humano, CIDESD, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Eling Douwe de Bruin
Received: 2 November 2016 / Revised: 2 February 2017 / Accepted: 7 February 2017 / Published: 21 February 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Performance in Soccer)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [250 KB, uploaded 21 February 2017]

Abstract

This study had two main objectives: (1) to determine if differences in Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scores exist between two levels of competition; and (2) to analyze the association between FMS individual and overall scores and physical performance variables of lower-limb power (jumps), repeated sprint ability and shot speed. Twenty-two Under 16 (U16) and twenty-six Under 19 (U19) national competitive soccer players participated in this study. All participants were evaluated according to anthropometrics, FMS, jump performance, instep kick speed and anaerobic performance. There were no significant differences in the individual FMS scores between competitive levels. There were significant negative correlations between hurdle step (right) and Running-based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST) power average ( ρ = −0.293; p = 0.043) and RAST fatigue index (RAST FatIndex) ( ρ = −0.340; p = 0.018). The hurdle step (left) had a significant negative correlation to squat jump (SJ) ( ρ = −0.369; p = 0.012). Rotary stability had a significant negative correlation to RAST fatigue index (Right: ρ = −0.311; p = 0.032. Left: ρ = −0.400; p = 0.005). The results suggest that individual FMS scores may be better discriminants of performance than FMS total score and established minimal association between FMS scores and physical variables. Based on that, FMS may be suitable for the purposes of determining physical function but not for discriminating physical performance. View Full-Text
Keywords: performance; football; FMS; power; sprint; jump; shot speed performance; football; FMS; power; sprint; jump; shot speed
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Silva, B.; Clemente, F.M.; Camões, M.; Bezerra, P. Functional Movement Screen Scores and Physical Performance among Youth Elite Soccer Players. Sports 2017, 5, 16.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sports EISSN 2075-4663 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top