Next Article in Journal
Friction Performance of Self-Emulsifying Esters and Organic Phosphate Esters Mixed Aqueous Solution on the Surface of TB6 Titanium Alloy
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on the Influence of Environmental Conditions on Road Friction Characteristics
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Study on Thin Film Lubrication Performance with Imperfect Coating under the Effect of the Electrical Double Layer in Point Contact
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Determination of Safety-Oriented Pavement-Friction Performance Ratings at Network Level Using a Hybrid Clustering Algorithm

Lubricants 2023, 11(7), 275; https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants11070275
by Jieyi Bao 1, Yi Jiang 1 and Shuo Li 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Lubricants 2023, 11(7), 275; https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants11070275
Submission received: 29 May 2023 / Revised: 19 June 2023 / Accepted: 21 June 2023 / Published: 24 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Friction Assessment in Pavement Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper investigated the determination of safety-oriented pavement friction performance ratings at the network level using a hybrid clustering algorithm. Here are some comments:

(1) The abstract should be improved. Please present the main results of the paper quantitatively.

(2) Why use "The Chi-square test"? How accurate is this method?

(3) On page 14, the lack of analysis for FNS ∈ (35, 50) and FNS > 70.

(4) The manuscript should be improved by adding critical discussions instead of briefly reporting the results of this study. This is an important issue and should be addressed effectively and thoroughly.

(5) In Table 5, why is the effect of surface material on FNS not significant when FNS > 70?

Author Response

please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

  1.In Table 5. Chi-square test results, p-value is 0.1301 is accepted. What is the range of values accepted.How? 2.Table 6 is meaningless, where are the results?Kindly change it. 3.Scientific depth of explanation relevant to literature is missing for figure 8 a-d. 4.Include numerical results in the conclusion part. 5.In fig.8d, 25<fn<35 more injured or fatal happened. Justify the reason. 6.In fig.8a-d y axis label is missing. Include. 7. Table 4 is similar to table 6. Kindly remove it 8.What basis clustering was done on Fig.5, Specify the K value of clustering. 9. Specify the training and testing data sets. 10. What is the learning rate used to optimize the parameters? 11.Table 1 compares your proposed model with existing literature.  12. Abstract includes some numerical values of the proposed model. --

 

Author Response

please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop