Next Article in Journal
Pillars and Gaps of S-Nitrosylation-Dependent Epigenetic Regulation in Physiology and Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Bilateral Optic Disc Swelling as a Plausible Common Ocular Sign of Autoinflammatory Diseases: Report of Three Patients with Blau Syndrome or Cryopyrin-Associated Periodic Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Activation of the Hippo Pathway in Rana sylvatica: Yapping Stops in Response to Anoxia
Previous Article in Special Issue
PPARα Modulation-Based Therapy in Central Nervous System Diseases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 11
Issue 12
10.3390/life11121421
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Decorin Concentrations in Aqueous Humor of Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy

by
Shermaine W. Y. Low
1,†,
Tanuja Vaidya
2,†,
Santosh G. K. Gadde
3,
Thirumalesh B. Mochi
3,
Devesh Kumar
1,
Iris S. Kassem
1,4,
Deborah M. Costakos
1,4,
Baseer Ahmad
1,5,
Swaminathan Sethu
2,
Arkasubhra Ghosh
2,* and
Shyam S. Chaurasia
1,*
1
Ocular Immunology and Angiogenesis Lab, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
2
GROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore 560099, India
3
Vitreo-Retina Services, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore 560010, India
4
Pediatric Ophthalmology, Eye Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
5
Vitreoretinal Surgery, Eye Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
The first two authors contributed equally.
Life 2021, 11(12), 1421; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11121421
Submission received: 3 November 2021 / Revised: 8 December 2021 / Accepted: 10 December 2021 / Published: 17 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Retinal Disease and Metabolism)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a microvascular complication of diabetes in the retina. Chronic hyperglycemia damages retinal microvasculature embedded into the extracellular matrix (ECM), causing fluid leakage and ischemic retinal neovascularization. Current treatment strategies include intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or steroidal injections, laser photocoagulation, or vitrectomy in severe cases. However, treatment may require multiple modalities or repeat treatments due to variable response. Though DR management has achieved great success, improved, long-lasting, and predictable treatments are needed, including new biomarkers and therapeutic approaches. Small-leucine rich proteoglycans, such as decorin, constitute an integral component of retinal endothelial ECM. Therefore, any damage to microvasculature can trigger its antifibrotic and antiangiogenic response against retinal vascular pathologies, including DR. We conducted a cross-sectional study to examine the association between aqueous humor (AH) decorin levels, if any, and severity of DR. A total of 82 subjects (26 control, 56 DR) were recruited. AH was collected and decorin concentrations were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Decorin was significantly increased in the AH of DR subjects compared to controls (p = 0.0034). AH decorin levels were increased in severe DR groups in ETDRS and Gloucestershire classifications. Decorin concentrations also displayed a significant association with visual acuity (LogMAR) measurements. In conclusion, aqueous humor decorin concentrations were found elevated in DR subjects, possibly due to a compensatory response to the retinal microvascular changes during hyperglycemia.

1. Introduction

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a sight-threatening microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), with a prevalence as high as 60% in patients with more than 10 years and 90–99% with 20 years of DM [1]. In 2020, the estimated number of adults suffering from DR worldwide was 103.12 million. These numbers are predicted to rise to 160.50 million by 2045 [2]. DR is a progressive disease divided into nonproliferative DR (NPDR) and proliferative DR (PDR). In NPDR, patients are in the early stages of the disease and display signs of increased vascular permeability, microaneurysms, hemorrhages, hard exudates, and sometimes macular edema. In the more advanced stage of DR, known as PDR, patients can also have severe vision impairment due to aberrant neovascularization with blood vessel episodic rupture that can cause vitreous hemorrhage and eventual retinal detachment. Tractional forces due to fibrosis may also result in retinal detachment. DR prediction tools rely on traditional DM risk factors: genetic factors, duration of diabetes, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and hemoglobin-A1c (HbA1c) concentrations [1,3,4]. These factors, however, remain insufficient as predictors for sight-threatening DR. Control of blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and blood pressure for preventing DR progression remains controversial, with several studies suggesting that optimal control reduces DR progression [5,6], whilst others report opposing findings [7,8]. Further analysis of the biochemical changes in human eyes during DR progression may uncover new predictors for the disease.
Current treatment strategies for DR focus on the later stages of the disease. Intravitreal injections of antiangiogenic and anti-inflammatory drugs are given to patients with DR. However, these drugs have high treatment burden [9] and pose a risk of endophthalmitis. Furthermore, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and intravitreal steroids usually require multiple injections, limiting their use due to financial burden and poor patient compliance. Traditional laser photocoagulation is used for the treatment of PDR and diabetic macular edema (DME). However, the procedure permanently damages the treated retina and results in loss of visual field [10]. The absence of early-stage DR treatment strategies presents a challenge for the management of disease progression. Moreover, recurrent DR remains rampant, with some patients responding poorly to current treatment options despite repeated intravitreal injections. A deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of DR is necessary to develop novel therapeutic options for the optimization of current treatment strategies.
Decorin may be a potential therapeutic agent as it is reported to be significantly upregulated during obesity and type 2 diabetes [11]. In addition, previous studies have described its protective role in other diabetes-related comorbidities, including diabetic cardiomyopathy [12] and nephropathy [13]. In chronic hyperglycemia, inflammatory and angiogenic factors play a crucial role in the advancement of DR pathophysiology. Decorin is a class I small leucine-rich proteoglycan (SLRP) that acts as a pan-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor [14,15,16] and regulates inflammatory, angiogenic, and fibrotic pathways. In the eye, decorin prevents retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) barrier disruption by reducing p38 MAPK phosphorylation, decreasing apical-basolateral permeability, and upregulating the expression of tight junction proteins, such as occludin and zonula occludens-1 [17]. Additionally, decorin can play a role in fibrillogenesis by inhibiting epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and fibrosis in spontaneously arising retinal pigment epithelium (ARPE-19) cells using an in vitro proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) model [18]. ARPE-19 cells treated with high concentrations of decorin reduced expression of basement-membrane-associated proteins, such as fibronectin, laminin, vimentin, collagen I, and α-smooth muscle actin. Moreover, intravitreal injection of decorin significantly reduces fibrosis in rabbits with experimentally induced PVR [19], suggesting its potential role in modulating the extracellular matrix to prevent DR-induced tractional retinal detachment. We hypothesize that decorin plays a regulatory role in modulating ocular inflammatory and angiogenic responses during DR progression. Therefore, this study aims to examine the correlation between aqueous humor decorin concentrations to the clinical severity of DR.

2. Materials and Methods

All protocols were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Narayana Nethralaya Institutional Ethics Board, as per the guidelines of Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India. Subjects were recruited for the study post informed written consent (EC no. C/2017/11/03).

2.1. Study Subjects

This cross-sectional study included subjects attending the Narayana Nethralaya Hospital, Bangalore, India, for cataract surgery. Detailed medical history was collected by trained medical professionals, including age and sex. Inclusion criteria for controls were cataract patients who had come to Narayana Nethralaya for cataract surgery with no retinal disorders. Exclusion criteria for control included: (i) subjects with diabetes mellitus, (ii) coexisting fibrovascular conditions, such as proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), epiretinal membrane (ERM), or retinal vessel occlusions (RVO), (iii) intraocular and inflammatory conditions, such as endophthalmitis or uveitis, and iv) degenerative conditions, such as glaucoma, or inherited diseases, such as retinitis pigmentosa or leber congenital amaurosis (LCA). Two control subjects had existing systemic hypertension.
Inclusion criteria for DR subjects included type 2 diabetic patients with clinically diagnosed DR which was confirmed with fundus imaging (TRC 50DX, Topcon, Japan). Exclusion criteria for DR patients included: (i) subjects with retinal edema caused by other retinal conditions, such as AMD, RVO, and other intraocular and inflammatory diseases, (ii) coexisting vitreoretinal interface issues, such as vitreomacular traction (VMT), ERM, and coexisting lamellar macular holes (MH), (iii) subjects who underwent vitrectomy or recent intraocular surgeries or procedures (<3 months), such as cataract or YAG capsulotomy, and (iv) degenerative conditions, such as glaucoma, and inherited diseases, such as retinitis pigmentosa, LCA, Stargardt disease, and cone–rod dystrophy. Twenty-six DR subjects had existing systemic hypertension, six had kidney problems, and four had heart problems.

2.2. Ocular Examinations

Ocular examinations, including slit lamp biomicroscopy, LogMAR chart for visual acuity, fundus photography, and optical coherence tomography, were performed on all subjects prior to aqueous humor extraction and cataract surgery.

2.3. Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy

DR grading was performed according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) classification system (Table 1A,B) [20,21] and the Gloucestershire Diabetic Eye Screening Program (Table 2).

2.4. Response to Treatment

Subjects were categorized based on the history of medication and disease resolution following ongoing therapy. Subjects with no prior treatment were grouped as treatment naïve (TN). Subjects who responded well to anti-VEGF/steroid treatment with respect to reduction in central sub-field thickness (CST) ≥ 100 µm from the baseline after 1 intravitreal injection and CST < 320 μm were grouped as treatment responders (TRes). Subjects that failed to achieve a CST of <320 μm and/or 10% reduction in CST after anti-VEGF/steroid treatment were grouped as treatment nonresponders (TnR). A recurring macular edema of >320 μm after a total resolution and injection-free period of ≥3 months and subjects who had further complications despite receiving therapy were categorized as treatment recurrent (TRec).

2.5. Aqueous Humor Collection

Aqueous humor was collected by anterior chamber paracentesis with a syringe with a 30-gauge needle to access the anterior chamber through the peripheral cornea to aspirate 50–100 μL of aqueous humor. Sample collection was performed before cataract surgery by the surgeons. All the samples were stored at −80 °C for a maximum of 11 months before further processing.

2.6. Decorin Measurements

Decorin concentrations were measured using Decorin Duoset ELISA kit from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA) following manufacturer’s instructions. Aqueous humor samples were diluted in 1:5 ratio with 4 °C 1X PBS. In brief, capture decorin antibody was coated to a 96-well microplate overnight. The next day (12–15 h), blocking agent (reagent diluent) was added for 1 h at room temperature, and then samples/standards were added for 2 h at room temperature. After incubation, the microplate was washed with wash buffer, and detection antibody was added for 2 h, followed by streptavidin–HRP for an additional 20 min at room temperature. The optical density at 450 nm with wavelength correction at 540 nm was measured after the addition of substrate solution for 20 min in the dark and the addition of stop solution. Aqueous humor concentrations were described in pg/mL.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Decorin concentrations have been transformed to log scale using GraphPad Prism 9.0 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Patient demographics were compared using Wilconxon rank-sum test and Chi-square test. Decorin levels between control and DR groups were compared using linear regression, Student’s t-test, and Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variants with Tukey’s test using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). All the data points, including outliers, were analyzed and violin plots were constructed using GraphPad to provide better distribution and density, as well as to plot the center, spread, and any outlier present in the data set. p < 0.05 was statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Study Cohort Subject Demographics

In this study, a total of 26 control subjects and 56 DR subjects were recruited based on the inclusion criteria mentioned above. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of demographics. Control subjects were 40 to 80 years of age (median = 61), and DR subjects were 42 to 89 years of age (median = 62). Sex distribution was 18/8 (M/F) in control subjects and 43/13 (M/F) in DR subjects (Table 3). An overall summary of sample numbers has been included in Supplementary Table S1.

3.2. Decorin Concentrations Are Increased in Subjects with Diabetic Retinopathy

Average decorin concentrations in the DR group were significantly high compared to the control group (Figure 1A; control, 3.592 pg/mL; DR, 3.840 pg/mL; p = 0.0034). Subjects were then divided based on sex, and decorin concentrations between control and DR subjects were analyzed (Figure 1B–D, Supplementary Table S2). No significant difference was observed between female DR and control subjects (Figure 1B). Male DR subjects showed significantly increased concentrations of decorin compared to controls (Figure 1B; p = 0.0001). No significant difference was observed between female and male control subjects (Figure 1C). Male DR subjects had significantly higher decorin concentrations compared to female DR subjects (Figure 1D; p = 0.0003). Further analysis will be required with a larger sample size to determine if these changes are sex-driven.
The study cohort was divided into different DR groups based on ETDRS and Gloucestershire classifications. When DR subjects were separated into their ETDRS scores, no significant difference was observed between class 1–4. Post hoc Tukey’s analysis displayed a significant difference between controls and Class 4 subjects in ETDRS classification (Figure 2A, p = 0.0009). When divided based on the Gloucestershire classification system, no significant difference in decorin concentration between groups R1–R3 was observed. A significant difference was observed between the control and group R3M0 after Tukey’s analysis (Figure 2B, p = 0.0061). Tukey’s pairwise comparison data for ETDRS and Gloucestershire classifications can be found in Supplementary Tables S3 and S4, respectively.

3.3. Decorin Concentrations Are Increased in Diabetic Retinopathy Subjects Regardless of Their Response to Treatment

We further classified the subjects into different groups based on their response to DR treatment (Figure 3). DR subjects were split into four groups: treatment naïve (TN), treatment responders (TRes), treatment recurrent (TRec), and treatment nonresponders (TnR). No significant difference was observed between the four different DR treatment groups (p > 0.05; TN, TRes, Trec, TnR). Decorin concentrations between nonresponders and the control group were significantly different under Tukey’s post hoc analysis (p = 0.0038, Supplementary Table S5).

3.4. Decorin Concentrations Are Positively Correlated with Deteriorating Visual Acuity

Next, correlation between decorin concentration and visual acuity was examined using a simple linear regression with patient logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) measurements. The scatterplots show that decorin concentration and LogMAR have a statistically significant linear relationship that is positively correlated (Figure 4; Overall r = 0.24; p = 0.04).
Correlation between decorin concentration and LogMAR measurements were then divided based on the different sexes. Supplementary Figure S1 shows that the positive correlation between decorin concentrations and visual acuity in the overall correlation plot (Figure 4) are mainly driven by the male population. However, it is difficult to conclude if the changes in decorin concentrations are sex-driven due to the small sample size for the female population compared to males.

4. Discussion

This study demonstrates that the decorin concentrations in aqueous humor of DR patients were significantly elevated compared to the control subjects without DR. The presence of abnormal microvasculature in DR may be associated with increased concentrations of intraocular decorin (Figure 1A). When divided based on sex, the male DR population exhibited increased concentrations of decorin compared to controls (Figure 1B). Male DR decorin concentrations were also significantly higher than female DR decorin concentrations (Figure 1D). However, it is difficult to determine if these changes are sex-driven due to the small sample size of the female population. After post hoc analysis using Tukey’s adjustments, decorin concentrations were significantly increased in the more severe groups of DR classifications (Figure 2). Furthermore, late stages of DR correspond with worsening visual acuity due to retinal damage, floaters, and hemorrhage, where the association between aqueous humor decorin concentrations and patient visual acuity was observed. These results suggest that decorin concentrations were associated with the increase in DR severity. There was a correlation observed between visual acuity and decorin concentrations in control subjects. However, we can only speculate that this may be due to differences in cataract severity based on the limited data. Considering the proximity of the aqueous humor to the crystalline lens, cataract severity may be associated with changes in decorin concentrations. It will be interesting to study the relationship between decorin concentrations and severity of cataracts in future studies.
Decorin is known to play a critical role in regulating microvasculature during development and degenerative diseases in the retina [22,23,24]. Previous studies have shown that decorin can modulate VEGF and hypoxia-induced factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) expression by blocking the Met pathway to prevent angiogenesis in retinal cells [25]. In addition, decorin was reported as an antagonistic ligand for VEGF receptor 2 [26], the primary receptor involved in vascular differentiation, capillary-like tube formation, and angiogenesis in vascular endothelial cells [27,28,29]. Further, decorin treatment to ARPE-19 cells cultured in high glucose media could reverse RPE barrier disruptions and increase tight junction proteins, such as occludin and zonula occludens-1 [17]. In the anterior segment of the eye, decorin gene therapy to rabbit corneal tissues restricted corneal neovascularization and reduced the expression of proangiogenic VEGF and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) transcripts [30]. These studies suggest that decorin reduces cell permeability and microvascular leakage in the ocular tissues. Decorin concentrations have also been elevated in ischemic retinas with damaged inner retinal layers and in PVR [18,22,31], suggesting that decorin levels are elevated during retinal disease. The dynamic interaction and balance of decorin in the eye may, thus, be crucial in maintaining physiological retinal integrity and microvasculature, and the increase in decorin levels in the aqueous humor may be associated with DR pathology.
Decorin has been reported to exhibit antiangiogenetic properties [30,32,33,34]. Chronic inflammation and neovascularization increase with the severity of DR and play a vital role in DR pathogenesis. Growth factors and inflammatory and angiogenic cytokines, such as IL-1β, IL-6, and VEGF in aqueous humor [35,36], transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) in aqueous humor [37] and serum [38], and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in aqueous humor [39,40] and vitreous [41], have been significantly upregulated in diabetes and are associated with DR. TNFα induces disruption of the blood–retinal barrier and promotes endothelial cell permeability. TGF-β modulates the extracellular matrix by activating fibroblasts and preventing the synthesis of proteases, which help to degrade matrix components that are being overproduced [42]. Upregulation of these proinflammatory cytokines can result in vascular leakage commonly seen in PDR, and retinal fibrosis, which generates tractional forces on the delicate retina [43]. These tractional forces can ultimately lead to retinal detachment. Interestingly, intravitreal injection of decorin in a choroidal neovascularization (CNV) mouse model was able to suppress TGF-β, VEGF, and TNFα upregulation [44]. Decorin delivered intraperitoneally has also been reported to be able to reduce VEGF and TNFα immunoreactivity and the number of neovascular cell nuclei in an oxygen-induced retinopathy rat model [45]. In the present study, decorin concentrations were found to be significantly higher in the DR treatment nonresponder group after Tukey’s correction (Figure 3), suggesting that increased decorin concentrations are associated with DR pathology and could be a potential predictor for DR severity. Considering that decorin has been known to be an effective antagonist of TGF-β [46,47,48], and is able to reduce VEGF and TNFα expression in the retina, the elevated concentrations of decorin observed in the aqueous humor of DR patients could be a physiological compensatory response to combat inflammation and angiogenesis observed during DR progression.
Aqueous humor has been reported to be a good medium to study biochemical changes in the eye and has been directly correlated with vitreous humor biomarkers [49,50]. It is commonly used to determine intraocular changes associated with retinal pathology [51]. Decorin concentrations in the vitreous have been elevated in rhagmatogenous retinal detachment and PVR [18,31], suggesting that changes in aqueous decorin concetrations may be useful as a potential predictor for alterations that occur in the retina. Other studies have found vitreous concentrations of decorin to decline with age, irrespective of glaucoma or ocular hypertension in the eye [52]. This decline was suggested to be linked to increasing concentrations of active TGF-β2 during aging. However, diabetes is a multifactorial disease that influences multiple biochemical pathways. Further analysis will be needed to unveil the mechanistic and functional roles of decorin in various retinal diseases.
A limitation of this study is the sample size needed for the classification of DR groups. Future studies involving a larger sample size will be beneficial to understand the changes in decorin levels between different severities of DR. The study cohort was also unevenly divided in sex, limiting interpretation of the results. Additionally, routine collection of vitreous is highly contraindicated due to its invasiveness and access to vitreous sample is only possible as part of vitrectomy surgery. Therefore, decorin concentrations were only analyzed in aqueous humor samples. However, since aqueous humor has been reported to be directly correlated with vitreous humor biomarkers, collection and sampling of aqueous humor will be a more useful and feasible method for analysis of biochemical changes occurring in retinal diseases. Decorin’s expression and function in the retina have yet to be fully characterized. Previous studies have found decorin to be expressed in bovine aortic endothelial cells and human granulomatous tissue endothelial cells [53,54,55]. Further analysis to determine decorin-expressing retinal cells is required. Nonetheless, this study is the first to present associations between patient aqueous humor decorin concentrations and varying severities of DR classifications. The elevated concentrations of decorin in DR subjects suggest that decorin may play a role in modulating retinal extracellular matrix and microvascular integrity. Future studies are needed to characterize decorin’s functional roles in the maintenance of retinal microvasculature.

5. Conclusions

DR is a sight-threatening disease, which involves pathological modulation of the extracellular matrix and microvasculature, leading to multiple inflammatory and angiogenic responses during DR progression. This study reveals that decorin levels are elevated in subjects with DR, possibly due to a compensatory response to protect the retina against pathological remodeling in the extracellular matrix and retinal microvasculature. Our findings provide evidence for the importance of decorin in the retina. Further studies looking into decorin’s mechanisms of action will allow us to better understand its functional role in regulating retinal vasculature.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/life11121421/s1, Table S1: Sample numbers for each individual group, Table S2: Student’s t-test comparing decorin concentrations in control and DR groups based on sex, Table S3: Tukey’s pairwise comparison between ETDRS groups, Table S4: Tukey’s pairwise comparison between Gloucestershire groups, Table S5: Tukey’s pairwise comparison between treatment response groups, Figure S1: Correlation plot between decorin concentrations and patient visual acuity for the different sexes measured in LogMAR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.W.Y.L., S.S.C. and A.G.; methodology, S.W.Y.L., A.G., D.K. and S.S.; software, S.W.Y.L.; validation, S.W.Y.L. and S.S.C.; formal analysis, S.W.Y.L., D.K. and S.S.C.; investigation, S.W.Y.L.; resources and data collection, S.G.K.G., T.B.M., T.V., S.S. and A.G.; performed aqueous humor collection, S.G.K.G. and T.B.M.; data curation, S.W.Y.L., D.K. and S.S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.W.Y.L., T.V. and D.K.; writing—review and editing, S.W.Y.L., T.V., D.K., I.S.K., D.M.C., B.A., S.S., A.G. and S.S.C.; visualization, S.W.Y.L.; supervision, A.G. and S.S.C.; project administration, A.G. and S.S.C.; funding acquisition, S.S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Eye Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland grant number RO1EY029795 to S.S.C. The study was also supported by Narayana Nethralaya Foundation. This investigation was conducted in part in a facility constructed with support from a Research Facilities Improvement Program, grant number C06RR016511 from the National Center for Research Resources, NIH. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Narayana Nethralaya Ethics Committee Board (EC no. C/2017/11/03), Bangalore, KA 560099, India.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Huaying Dong and Aniko Szabo from Medical College of Wisconsin’s Division of Biostatistics for assistance with statistical analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fong, D.S.; Aiello, L.; Gardner, T.W.; King, G.L.; Blankenship, G.; Cavallerano, J.D.; Ferris, F.L.; Klein, R. Retinopathy in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004, 27, S84–S87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Teo, Z.L.; Tham, Y.C.; Yu, M.; Chee, M.L.; Rim, T.H.; Cheung, N.; Bikbov, M.M.; Wang, Y.X.; Tang, Y.; Lu, Y.; et al. Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Projection of Burden through 2045: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2021, 128, 1580–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Semeraro, F.; Parrinello, G.; Cancarini, A.; Pasquini, L.; Zarra, E.; Cimino, A.; Cancarini, G.; Valentini, U.; Costagliola, C. Predicting the risk of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetic patients. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2011, 25, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wat, N.; Wong, R.L.M.; Wong, I.Y.H. Associations between diabetic retinopathy and systemic risk factors. Hong Kong Med. J. 2016, 22, 589–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998, 352, 837–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stratton, I.M.; Adler, A.I.; Neil, H.A.W.; Matthews, D.R.; Manley, S.E.; Cull, C.A.; Hadden, D.; Turner, R.C.; Holman, R.R. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective observational study. BMJ 2000, 321, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Beulens, J.W.J.; Patel, A.; Vingerling, J.R.; Cruickshank, J.K.; Hughes, A.D.; Stanton, A.; Lu, J.; McG Thom, S.A.; Grobbee, D.E.; Stolk, R.P. Effects of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control on the incidence and progression of retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 2009, 52, 2027–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. The ADVANCE Collaborative Group. Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 2560–2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Elman, M.J.; Aiello, L.P.; Beck, R.W.; Bressler, N.M.; Bressler, S.B.; Edwards, A.R.; Ferris, F.L.; Friedman, S.M.; Glassman, A.R.; Miller, K.M.; et al. Randomized Trial Evaluating Ranibizumab Plus Prompt or Deferred Laser or Triamcinolone Plus Prompt Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophthalmology 2010, 117, 1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, W.; Lo, A.C.Y. Diabetic retinopathy: Pathophysiology and treatments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bolton, K.; Segal, D.; McMillan, J.; Jowett, J.; Heilbronn, L.; Abberton, K.; Zimmet, P.; Chisholm, D.; Collier, G.; Walder, K. Decorin is a secreted protein associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes. Int. J. Obes. 2008, 32, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chen, F.; Lai, J.; Zhu, Y.; He, M.; Hou, H.; Wang, J.; Chen, C.; Wang, D.W.; Tang, J. Cardioprotective Effect of Decorin in Type 2 Diabetes. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 479258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, Z.; Wu, F.; Zheng, F.; Li, H. Adenovirus-mediated decorin gene transfection has therapeutic effects in a streptozocin-induced diabetic rat model. Nephron Exp. Nephrol. 2010, 116, e11–e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Csordas, G.; Santra, M.; Reed, C.C.; Eichstetter, I.; McQuillan, D.J.; Gross, D.; Nugent, M.A.; Hajnoczky, G.; Iozzo, R.V. Sustained down-regulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor by decorin. A mechanism for controlling tumor growth in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 32879–32887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Iozzo, R.V.; Buraschi, S.; Genua, M.; Xu, S.Q.; Solomides, C.C.; Peiper, S.C.; Gomella, L.G.; Owens, R.C.; Morrione, A. Decorin antagonizes IGF receptor I (IGF-IR) function by interfering with IGF-IR activity and attenuating downstream signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 34712–34721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Goldoni, S.; Humphries, A.; Nyström, A.; Sattar, S.; Owens, R.T.; McQuillan, D.J.; Ireton, K.; Iozzo, R.V. Decorin is a novel antagonistic ligand of the Met receptor. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 185, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, S.; Du, S.; Wu, Q.; Hu, J.; Li, T. Decorin prevents retinal pigment epithelial barrier breakdown under diabetic conditions by suppressing P38 MAPK activation. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 2971–2979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Begum, G.; O’Neill, J.; Chaudhary, R.; Blachford, K.; Snead, D.R.J.; Berry, M.; Scott, R.A.H.; Logan, A.; Blanch, R.J. Altered decorin biology in proliferative vitreoretinopathy: A mechanistic and cohort study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 4929–4936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nassar, K.; Lüke, J.; Lüke, M.; Kamal, M.; Abd El-Nabi, E.; Soliman, M.; Rohrbach, M.; Grisanti, S. The novel use of decorin in prevention of the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2011, 249, 1649–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading Diabetic Retinopathy from Stereoscopic Color Fundus Photographs—An Extension of the Modified Airlie House Classification: ETDRS Report Number 10. Ophthalmology 2020, 127, S99–S119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Fraser, C.E.; D’Amico, D.J. Diabetic Retinopathy: Classification and Clinical Features. UpToDate. Available online: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/diabetic-retinopathy-classification-and-clinical-features?search=csme&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~2&usage_type=default&display_rank=1 (accessed on 4 October 2021).
  22. Inatani, M.; Tanihara, H.; Honjo, M.; Hangai, M.; Kresse, H.; Honda, Y. Expression of proteoglycan decorin in neural retina. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1999, 40, 1783–1791. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ali, S.A.M.; Hosaka, Y.Z.; Uehara, M. Expression of small leucine-rich proteoglycans in the developing retina and kainic acid-induced retinopathy in ICR mice. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2011, 73, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Low, S.W.Y.; Connor, T.B.; Kassem, I.S.; Costakos, D.M.; Chaurasia, S.S. Small leucine-rich proteoglycans (SLRPs) in the retina. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Du, S.; Wang, S.; Wu, Q.; Hu, J.; Li, T. Decorin inhibits angiogenic potential of choroid-retinal endothelial cells by downregulating hypoxia-induced Met, Rac1, HIF-1α and VEGF expression in cocultured retinal pigment epithelial cells. Exp. Eye Res. 2013, 116, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Khan, G.A.; Girish, G.V.; Lala, N.; di Guglielmo, G.M.; Lala, P.K. Decorin is a novel VEGFR-2-binding antagonist for the human extravillous trophoblast. Mol. Endocrinol. 2011, 25, 1431–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Holmes, K.; Roberts, O.L.; Thomas, A.M.; Cross, M.J. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2: Structure, function, intracellular signalling and therapeutic inhibition. Cell. Signal. 2007, 19, 2003–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yang, S.; Xin, X.; Zlot, C.; Ingle, G.; Fuh, G.; Li, B.; Moffat, B.; De Vos, A.M.; Gerritsen, M.E. Vascular endothelial cell growth factor-driven endothelial tube formation is mediated by vascular endothelial cell growth factor receptor-2, a kinase insert domain-containing receptor. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2001, 21, 1934–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, Z.; Neiva, K.G.; Lingen, M.W.; Ellis, L.M.; Nör, J.E. VEGF-dependent tumor angiogenesis requires inverse and reciprocal regulation of VEGFR1 and VEGFR2. Cell Death Differ. 2010, 17, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Mohan, R.R.; Tovey, J.C.K.; Sharma, A.; Schultz, G.S.; Cowden, J.W.; Tandon, A. Targeted decorin gene therapy delivered with adeno-associated virus effectively retards corneal neovascularization in vivo. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Abdullatif, A.M.; Macky, T.A.; Abdullatif, M.M.; Nassar, K.; Grisanti, S.; Mortada, H.A.; Soliman, M.M. Intravitreal decorin preventing proliferative vitreoretinopathy in perforating injuries: A pilot study. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2018, 256, 2473–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Balne, P.K.; Gupta, S.; Zhang, J.; Bristow, D.; Faubion, M.; Heil, S.D.; Sinha, P.R.; Green, S.L.; Iozzo, R.V.; Mohan, R.R. The functional role of decorin in corneal neovascularization in vivo. Exp. Eye Res. 2021, 207, 108610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Neill, T.; Painter, H.; Buraschi, S.; Owens, R.T.; Lisanti, M.P.; Schaefer, L.; Iozzo, R.V. Decorin antagonizes the angiogenic network: Concurrent inhibition of met, hypoxia inducible factor 1α, vascular endothelial growth factor A, and induction of thrombospondin-1 and tiMP3. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 5492–5506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Buraschi, S.; Neill, T.; Goyal, A.; Poluzzi, C.; Smythies, J.; Owens, R.T.; Schaefer, L.; Torres, A.; Iozzo, R.V. Decorin causes autophagy in endothelial cells via Peg3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E2582–E2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Cheung, C.M.G.; Vania, M.; Ang, M.; Chee, S.P.; Li, J. Comparison of aqueous humor cytokine and chemokine levels in diabetic patients with and without retinopathy. Mol. Vis. 2012, 18, 830–837. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dong, N.; Xu, B.; Wang, B.; Chu, L. Study of 27 aqueous humor cytokines in patients with type 2 diabetes with or without retinopathy. Mol. Vis. 2013, 19, 1734–1746. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rusnak, S.; Vrzalova, J.; Sobotova, M.; Hecova, L.; Ricarova, R.; Topolcan, O. The Measurement of Intraocular Biomarkers in Various Stages of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Using Multiplex xMAP Technology. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 2015, 424783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bonfiglio, V.; Platania, C.B.M.; Lazzara, F.; Conti, F.; Pizzo, C.; Reibaldi, M.; Russo, A.; Fallico, M.; Ortisi, E.; Pignatelli, F.; et al. TGF-β serum levels in diabetic retinopathy patients and the role of anti-VEGF therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, H.; Hwang, D.K.; Song, X.; Tao, Y. Association between Aqueous Cytokines and Diabetic Retinopathy Stage. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 2017, 9402198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Feng, S.; Yu, H.; Yu, Y.; Geng, Y.; Li, D.; Yang, C.; Lv, Q.; Lu, L.; Liu, T.; Li, G.; et al. Levels of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17A, and TNF-α in aqueous humour of patients with diabetic retinopathy. J. Diabetes Res. 2018, 2018, 8546423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Boss, J.D.; Singh, P.K.; Pandya, H.K.; Tosi, J.; Kim, C.; Tewari, A.; Juzych, M.S.; Abrams, G.W.; Kumar, A. Assessment of neurotrophins and inflammatory mediators in vitreous of patients with diabetic retinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017, 58, 5594–5603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, W.; Ge, Y.; Cheng, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Fang, L.; Zheng, J. Decorin is a pivotal effector in the extracellular matrix and tumour microenvironment. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 5480–5491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Roy, S.; Amin, S.; Roy, S. Retinal fibrosis in diabetic retinopathy. Exp. Eye Res. 2016, 142, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Wang, X.; Ma, W.; Han, S.; Meng, Z.; Zhao, L.; Yin, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, J. TGF-β participates choroid neovascularization through Smad2/3-VEGF/TNF-α signaling in mice with Laser-induced wet age-related macular degeneration. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Güler, S.D.; Balbaba, M.; Çolakoǧlu, N.; Bulmuş, Ö.; Ulaş, F.; Eröksüz, Y. Effect of Decorin and Bevacizumab on oxygen-induced retinopathy in rat models: A comparative study. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 69, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Järvinen, T.A.H.; Prince, S. Decorin: A Growth Factor Antagonist for Tumor Growth Inhibition. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 654765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Border, W.A.; Noble, N.A.; Yamamoto, T.; Harper, J.R.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Pierschbacher, M.D.; Ruoslahti, E. Natural inhibitor of transforming growth factor-β protects against scarring in experimental kidney disease. Nature 1992, 360, 361–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yamaguchi, Y.; Mann, D.M.; Ruoslahti, E. Negative regulation of transforming growth factor-β by the proteoglycan decorin. Nature 1990, 346, 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Midena, E.; Frizziero, L.; Midena, G.; Pilotto, E. Intraocular fluid biomarkers (liquid biopsy) in human diabetic retinopathy. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2021, 1, 3549–3560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sharma, R.K.; Rogojina, A.T.; Chalam, K.V. Multiplex immunoassay analysis of biomarkers in clinically accessible quantities of human aqueous humor. Mol. Vis. 2009, 15, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Kaštelan, S.; Orešković, I.; Bišćan, F.; Kaštelan, H.; Gverović Antunica, A. Inflammatory and angiogenic biomarkers in diabetic retinopathy. Biochem. Med. 2020, 30, 385–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. De Cogan, F.; O’Neill, J.; Blanch, R.J.; Scott, R.A.H.; Logan, A. The role of Decorin in ocular ageing and disease. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 400. [Google Scholar]
  53. Järveläinen, H.T.; Iruela-Arispe, M.L.; Kinsella, M.G.; Sandell, L.J.; Sage, E.H.; Wight, T.N. Expression of decorin by sprouting bovine aortic endothelial cells exhibiting angiogenesis in vitro. Exp. Cell Res. 1992, 203, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Kinsella, M.G.; Fischer, J.W.; Mason, D.P.; Wight, T.N. Retrovirally mediated expression of decorin by macrovascular endothelial cells. Effects on cellular migration and fibronectin fibrillogenesis in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 13924–13932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Schönherr, E.; O’Connell, B.C.; Schittny, J.; Robenek, H.; Fastermann, D.; Fisher, L.W.; Plenz, G.; Vischer, P.; Young, M.F.; Kresse, H. Paracrine or virus-mediated induction of decorin expression by endothelial cells contributes to tube formation and prevention of apoptosis in collagen lattices. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 78, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 11 01421 g001 550
Figure 1. Comparison of decorin concentrations between control (n = 26) and DR (n = 56) subjects. Mean decorin concentration was significantly increased in subjects with DR (A). When divided based on sex, decorin concentrations were significantly increased in male DR subjects (B). No significant difference in decorin concentration was observed between female and male control subjects (C). Decorin concentrations in male DR subjects were significantly higher than in female DR subjects (D). Decorin concentrations have been transformed to log scale and plotted on a linear axis. Violin plots were constructed for the optimal data distribution, density, and inclusion of outliers in the data sets. ** p = 0.0034; *** p = 0.0003; **** p = 0.0001; ns = not significant.
Figure 1. Comparison of decorin concentrations between control (n = 26) and DR (n = 56) subjects. Mean decorin concentration was significantly increased in subjects with DR (A). When divided based on sex, decorin concentrations were significantly increased in male DR subjects (B). No significant difference in decorin concentration was observed between female and male control subjects (C). Decorin concentrations in male DR subjects were significantly higher than in female DR subjects (D). Decorin concentrations have been transformed to log scale and plotted on a linear axis. Violin plots were constructed for the optimal data distribution, density, and inclusion of outliers in the data sets. ** p = 0.0034; *** p = 0.0003; **** p = 0.0001; ns = not significant.
Life 11 01421 g001
Life 11 01421 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparison of decorin concentrations between control and DR subjects after dividing them into their ETDRS and Gloucestershire classifications. Decorin concentrations were significantly higher following post hoc Tukey’s analysis in ETDRS Class 4 (A) and Gloucestershire R3M0 (B) groups compared to controls. Decorin concentrations have been transformed to log scale and plotted on a linear axis. Violin plots were constructed for the optimal data distribution, density, and inclusion of outliers in the data sets. ** p = 0.0061; *** p = 0.0009; ns = not significant. ETDRS Ctrl (n = 26), Class 1 (n = 3), Class 2 (n = 13), Class 3 (n = 9), Class 4 (n = 31). Gloucestershire R0M0 (n = 26), R1M1 (n = 15), R2M1 (n = 9), R3M0 (n = 10), R3M1 (n = 22).
Figure 2. Comparison of decorin concentrations between control and DR subjects after dividing them into their ETDRS and Gloucestershire classifications. Decorin concentrations were significantly higher following post hoc Tukey’s analysis in ETDRS Class 4 (A) and Gloucestershire R3M0 (B) groups compared to controls. Decorin concentrations have been transformed to log scale and plotted on a linear axis. Violin plots were constructed for the optimal data distribution, density, and inclusion of outliers in the data sets. ** p = 0.0061; *** p = 0.0009; ns = not significant. ETDRS Ctrl (n = 26), Class 1 (n = 3), Class 2 (n = 13), Class 3 (n = 9), Class 4 (n = 31). Gloucestershire R0M0 (n = 26), R1M1 (n = 15), R2M1 (n = 9), R3M0 (n = 10), R3M1 (n = 22).
Life 11 01421 g002
Life 11 01421 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of decorin levels between controls (n = 26) and four DR treatment groups: treatment naïve (TN; n = 28), treatment responders (TRes; n = 9), treatment recurrent (TRec; n = 8), and treatment nonresponders (TnR; n = 11). Decorin concentrations have been transformed to log scale and plotted on a linear axis. Violin plots were constructed for the optimal data distribution, density, and inclusion of outliers in the data sets. Decorin concentrations were significantly elevated in the TnR group compared to controls after post hoc Tukey’s analysis. ** p = 0.0038; ns = not significant.
Figure 3. Comparison of decorin levels between controls (n = 26) and four DR treatment groups: treatment naïve (TN; n = 28), treatment responders (TRes; n = 9), treatment recurrent (TRec; n = 8), and treatment nonresponders (TnR; n = 11). Decorin concentrations have been transformed to log scale and plotted on a linear axis. Violin plots were constructed for the optimal data distribution, density, and inclusion of outliers in the data sets. Decorin concentrations were significantly elevated in the TnR group compared to controls after post hoc Tukey’s analysis. ** p = 0.0038; ns = not significant.
Life 11 01421 g003
Life 11 01421 g004 550
Figure 4. Correlation plot between decorin concentrations and patient visual acuity measured in LogMAR. Controls (n = 21) are represented by black triangles whilst DR subjects (n = 54) are represented by pink circles in the scatterplot. The blue line represents the overall linear relationship for all subjects (r = 0.24). The magnitude of overall association is mild (0.3 < |r| < 0.5). The black line represents the linear relationship for the control group (r = 0.38). The pink line represents the linear relationship for the DR group (r = 0.14).
Figure 4. Correlation plot between decorin concentrations and patient visual acuity measured in LogMAR. Controls (n = 21) are represented by black triangles whilst DR subjects (n = 54) are represented by pink circles in the scatterplot. The blue line represents the overall linear relationship for all subjects (r = 0.24). The magnitude of overall association is mild (0.3 < |r| < 0.5). The black line represents the linear relationship for the control group (r = 0.38). The pink line represents the linear relationship for the DR group (r = 0.14).
Life 11 01421 g004
Table
Table 1. A. ETDRS classification. B. ETDRS definition of clinically significant macular edema (CSME).
Table 1. A. ETDRS classification. B. ETDRS definition of clinically significant macular edema (CSME).
A.
ETDRS ClassDR SeverityObservable Findings
ControlNo DR
  • No abnormalities
1Mild NPDR
  • At least 1 microaneurysm or hemorrhage
2Moderate NPDR
  • Microaneurysm or hemorrhage; or
  • Venous beading; or
  • Cotton wool spots; or
  • Intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMA)
3Severe NPDR
  • Microaneurysm and hemorrhage in 4 quadrants; or
  • Venous beading in 2 quadrants; or
  • Severe IRMA in 1 quadrant
4PDR
  • New vessel formation; or
  • Vitreous hemorrhage; or
  • Tractional retinal detachment
B.
CSME ClassObservable Findings
No CSME
  • No abnormalities
CSME
  • Retinal thickening within 500 µm of the fovea
  • Hard exudates within 500 µm of the fovea if associated with thickening of adjacent retina
  • One or more zones of retinal thickening larger than 1500 µm that is within one disc diameter (1DD; 1500 µm) of the fovea
Table
Table 2. Gloucestershire classification.
Table 2. Gloucestershire classification.
Gloucestershire ClassObservable Findings
Control
  • No abnormalities
R1
  • Non-proliferative DR
  • Microaneurysm(s)
  • Hemorrhage
  • Exudates
R2
  • Non-proliferative DR
  • Multiple microaneurysms and hemorrhages
  • Venous beading
  • Intraretinal microvascular abnormalities
R3
  • Proliferative DR
  • Vitreous hemorrhage
  • New vessel formation
  • Tractional retinal detachment
M0No maculopathy
M1Clinically significant macular edema, hemorrhage, or exudates within 1DD of the fovea
Table
Table 3. Patient demographics in the study.
Table 3. Patient demographics in the study.
Disease Category
VariablesTotal
N = 82 (col %)		Control
N = 26 (col %)		DR
N = 56 (col %)		p Value
Age (years) 0.881W
Median (min–max) 62.0 (40.0–89.0)61.5 (40.0–80.0)62.0 (42.0–89.0)
Mean ± SD62.5 ± 8.962.4 ± 9.162.5 ± 9.0
Sex 0.466C
Female21 (25.6)8 (30.8)13 (23.2)
Male61 (74.4)18 (69.2)43 (76.8)
W Wilcoxon rank-sum test; C Chi-square test.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Low, S.W.Y.; Vaidya, T.; Gadde, S.G.K.; Mochi, T.B.; Kumar, D.; Kassem, I.S.; Costakos, D.M.; Ahmad, B.; Sethu, S.; Ghosh, A.; et al. Decorin Concentrations in Aqueous Humor of Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy. Life 2021, 11, 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11121421

AMA Style

Low SWY, Vaidya T, Gadde SGK, Mochi TB, Kumar D, Kassem IS, Costakos DM, Ahmad B, Sethu S, Ghosh A, et al. Decorin Concentrations in Aqueous Humor of Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy. Life. 2021; 11(12):1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11121421

Chicago/Turabian Style

Low, Shermaine W. Y., Tanuja Vaidya, Santosh G. K. Gadde, Thirumalesh B. Mochi, Devesh Kumar, Iris S. Kassem, Deborah M. Costakos, Baseer Ahmad, Swaminathan Sethu, Arkasubhra Ghosh, and et al. 2021. "Decorin Concentrations in Aqueous Humor of Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy" Life 11, no. 12: 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11121421

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop