Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Regulatory B-Cells in Transplantation
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Communication between B-Cells and Microbiota for the Maintenance of Intestinal Homeostasis

Antibodies 2013, 2(4), 554-586; doi:10.3390/antib2040554

Review
Regulation of Germinal Center Reactions by B and T Cells
Young Uk Kim 1, Xindong Liu 2, Shinya Tanaka 3, Dat Quoc Tran 4 and Yeonseok Chung 1,*
1
Center for Immunology and Autoimmune Diseases, Institute of Molecular Medicine, the University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA; E-Mail: Young.Uk.Kim@uth.tmc.edu
2
Department of Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; E-Mail: XLiu5@mdanderson.org
3
Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; E-Mail: stanaka@ifrec.osaka-u.ac.jp
4
Department of Pediatrics, the University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA; E-Mail: Dat.Q.Tran@uth.tmc.edu
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: Yeonseok.Chung@uth.tmc.edu; Tel.: +1-713-500-3190; Fax: +1-713-500-2420.
Received: 9 September 2013; in revised form: 15 October 2013 / Accepted: 16 October 2013 /
Published: 23 October 2013

Abstract

: Break of B cell tolerance to self-antigens results in the development of autoantibodies and, thus, leads to autoimmunity. How B cell tolerance is maintained during active germinal center (GC) reactions is yet to be fully understood. Recent advances revealed several subsets of T cells and B cells that can positively or negatively regulate GC B cell responses in vivo. IL-21-producing CXCR5+ CD4+ T cells comprise a distinct lineage of helper T cells—termed follicular helper T cells (TFH)—that can provide help for the development of GC reactions where somatic hypermutation and affinity maturation take place. Although the function of TFH cells is beneficial in generating high affinity antibodies against infectious agents, aberrant activation of TFH cell or B cell to self-antigens results in autoimmunity. At least three subsets of immune cells have been proposed as regulatory cells that can limit such antibody-mediated autoimmunity, including follicular regulatory T cells (TFR), Qa-1 restricted CD8+ regulatory T cells (CD8+TREG), and regulatory B cells (BREG). In this review, we will discuss our current understanding of GC B cell regulation with specific emphasis on the newly identified immune cell subsets involved in this process.
Keywords:
TFH; TFR; BREG; Qa-1 restricted CD8+TREG; Germinal center; B cells; antibody

1. Introduction

Negative selection during the development of B cells in the bone marrow and T cells in the thymus leads to the deletion of self-reactive B and T cells. Although some of the self-reactive B cells can escape from negative selection in the bone marrow, they are seldom activated due to the lack of proper help from T cells, since most of self-reactive T cells in the periphery are in an anergic state. These processes—termed central and peripheral tolerance—represent a primary mechanism by which the immune system prevents the development of autoimmunity. During active immune responses in the periphery, antigen-specific T:B cell interaction induces somatic hypermutation of the B cells in the complementarity determining regions. Multiple rounds of somatic hypermutations not only enable the generation of high affinity antibodies, but also diversify the repertoire of B cell receptors. As a result, some of the newly generated B cells possibly acquire B cell receptors that recognize self-antigens. Hence, the somatic hypermutation process is a double-edged sword that may lead to the generation of high affinity antibodies, as well as auto-reactive B cells in the periphery. Importantly, this T: B interaction mainly occurs in a specialized region of B cell area, termed germinal center (GC). Thus, understanding the regulation of GC responses is crucial for vaccine development, as well as for the treatment of antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases.

Recent advances have clearly demonstrated the crucial role of CXCR5+ follicular helper T cells (TFH) in GC responses. TFH cells promote GC responses by providing developmental and survival signals, as well as factors important for B cells, which eventually become memory B cells and long-lived antibody secreting plasma cells [1]. However, unnecessary activation of TFH and B cells against self-antigens may induce autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Sjögren syndrome, and juvenile dermatomyositis [2].

The identity of cells that control TFH and GC B cell responses are not fully understood. Recent studies have simultaneously discovered at least three specialized immune cells that specifically suppress GC responses, namely follicular regulatory T cells (TFR), Qa-1 restricted CD8 regulatory T cells, and regulatory B cells (BREG) [3]. Despite the differences in their lineages, all three types of regulatory cells express CXCR5, just like TFH cells. Hence, the balance between TFH cells and the regulatory cells likely determine the magnitude and duration of GC B cell responses. Understanding how TFH cells and these regulatory cells control GC B cell responses will pave the way for the development of novel therapeutic targets in vaccine design, as well as for the treatment of antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases.

2. Follicular Helper T Cells

The help of CD4+ T cells is required for GC formation, Ig class-switching, and antigen specific memory B cell and plasma cell production [4]. The concept of TFH cells was first described in humans as CD4+ T cells in secondary lymphoid tissues (tonsil) that express CXCR5 and localize in B cell follicles, especially in germinal centers (GCs) [5,6,7]. GCs are histologically specialized structures that develop within B cell follicles of secondary lymphoid tissues where somatic hypermutation, selection of high affinity B cells, class switch recombination, as well as plasma cell and memory B cell differentiation mainly occur [1]. CXCR5 expression allows TFH cells to migrate into B cell follicles in response to a CXCL13 gradient [7,8], and thus it serves as a surface marker of this TH subset. In the past, CXCR5+ TH cells were thought to be a subpopulation of Th2 cells, since they were able to express IL-4 [9,10,11]. However, recent studies have shown that CXCR5+ TFH cell generation was intact in STAT6−/−, as well as IL-4−/− mice [9,12]. Moreover, TFH are normal in STAT4−/− and Rorc−/− mice. Hence, the differentiation of TFH cells is independent of the Th1, Th2 and Th17 lineage programs. More recently, B cell lymphoma 6 (Bcl-6) has been reported as an essential transcriptional repressor for TFH cell differentiation [13,14,15].

Differentiation of GC B cells and TFH cells is likely initiated in the interfollicular (IF) zone, where initially activated CD4+ T cells are further primed by CXCR5 expressing dendritic cells [16,17]. Interaction between antigen-specific T cells and B cells also occurs in the IF zone for the first two to three days after immunization, prior to their migration to the follicles to form GCs [16]. In the GCs, B cell division is restricted to the dark zone (DZ), while B–T interaction occurs in the light zone (LZ). B cell assistance from TFH cells in the LZ facilitates B cell return to the DZ, which is accompanied by clonal expansion of B cells in the DZ [18]. Unlike GC B cells, TFH cells have been shown to continually emigrate into follicles and neighboring GCs [19]. Moreover, newly differentiated TFH cells can migrate into preexisting GCs and augment ongoing GC responses [19]. These polyclonal colonization and invasive properties of TFH cells might be critical for prolonged GC B cell responses. TFH cells express CXCR5, inducible co-stimulator (ICOS), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), Bcl-6, basic leucin zipper transcription factor ATF-like (BATF), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), c-Maf and interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4), as well as cytokines IL-21, IL-4, and IL-10 [1,20,21]. Other surface molecules, such as CD40 ligand (CD40L), BTLA, CD84, and cytoplasmic adaptor protein SLAM-associated protein (SAP), are also expressed in TFH cells (Figure 1) [5,6,13,14,22,23,24,25,26,27].

2.1. Transcription Factors and Molecules Required for the Differentiation of TFH Cells

In the last five years, a number of studies have identified multiple transcription factors that are required for TFH differentiation. As mentioned above, Bcl-6 has been reported as a master transcriptional regulator for TFH lineage commitment [13,14,15]. As a transcriptional repressor, expression of Bcl-6 can inhibit Th1, Th2, and Th17 differentiation. Interestingly, some of these transcription factors, such as STAT3, BATF, and IRF4 are also necessary for Th17 cell commitment. In addition, IL-21 is the most important effector cytokine for TFH cells, and it is also expressed in Th17 cells. Therefore, TFH and Th17 cells share many common features including developmental requirements and effector cytokines.

Antibodies 02 00554 g001 1024
Figure 1. Schematic view of germinal center reactions. (a) Naïve CD4+ T cells interact with antigen-presenting dendritic cells (DCs) in the T cell zones. (b) Activated T cells transiently express CXCR5 and migrate to the T-B border. (c) Interaction of CXCR5+ T cells with Ag-specific B cells and follicular DCs further promote TFH differentiation, as well as the formation of germinal center (GC). (d) In GC, TFH cells induce clone expansion, somatic hypermutation, and class switching of B cells. (e) The interaction of TFH and B cells leads to the generation of memory B cells and long-lived antibody-producing plasma cells. Transcription factors, Bcl-6, c-Maf, BATF and IRF4, in TFH cells direct the expression of TFH signature genes, including CXCR5, ICOS, IL21, and PD1. Interactions of CD28:CD86, CD40L:CD40, PD-1:PD-1L, SLAM:SAP and ICOS: ICOSL between TFH and B cells are required for GC formation. (f) Follicular regulatory T cells (TFR), Qa-1 restricted CD8+ regulatory T cells, and IL-10 producing regulatory B (BREG) cells are known to suppress GC responses.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. Schematic view of germinal center reactions. (a) Naïve CD4+ T cells interact with antigen-presenting dendritic cells (DCs) in the T cell zones. (b) Activated T cells transiently express CXCR5 and migrate to the T-B border. (c) Interaction of CXCR5+ T cells with Ag-specific B cells and follicular DCs further promote TFH differentiation, as well as the formation of germinal center (GC). (d) In GC, TFH cells induce clone expansion, somatic hypermutation, and class switching of B cells. (e) The interaction of TFH and B cells leads to the generation of memory B cells and long-lived antibody-producing plasma cells. Transcription factors, Bcl-6, c-Maf, BATF and IRF4, in TFH cells direct the expression of TFH signature genes, including CXCR5, ICOS, IL21, and PD1. Interactions of CD28:CD86, CD40L:CD40, PD-1:PD-1L, SLAM:SAP and ICOS: ICOSL between TFH and B cells are required for GC formation. (f) Follicular regulatory T cells (TFR), Qa-1 restricted CD8+ regulatory T cells, and IL-10 producing regulatory B (BREG) cells are known to suppress GC responses.
Antibodies 02 00554 g001 1024

2.1.1. Bcl-6

Bcl-6 was first described in a subset of CD4+ T cells in GCs in human tonsils [28]. CD4+ T cells from Bcl-6 deficient mice failed to differentiate into TFH cells, while constitutive expression of Bcl-6 induced TFH cell generation in vivo [13,14,15]. Bcl-6 drives TFH cell differentiation by suppressing the differentiation of the other TH subsets. For instance, Bcl-6 suppresses GATA3 expression [29], and can directly bind to Tbx21 (encoding T-bet) and Rorc (encoding RORγt) promoter regions to suppress the transcription of these genes [15]. Moreover, Bcl-6 suppresses Blimp-1 and a cluster of microRNAs which suppress TFH generation [15]. Blimp-1 (encoded by Prdm1 gene) and its antagonist Bcl-6 are reciprocally expressed in TFH cells and other subsets of T helper cells [13,30,31,32]. Enforced Blimp-1 expression in CD4+ T cells suppresses Bcl-6 expression and generation of TFH cells [13]. However, over-expression of Bcl-6 is likely not sufficient to induce IL-21 and CXCR5 expression on T cells [1]. The mechanism of Bcl-6 induction during TFH differentiation remains unclear.

2.1.2. c-Maf

c-Maf plays an important role in Th2 and Th17 development [33]. c-Maf is induced by IL-6 and IL-27 [34] and triggers IL-4 and IL-21 in activated CD4+ T cells in vitro [27,34] and in vivo [35]. In addition, the expansion of TFH cells induced by IL-27 is c-Maf-dependent [27,35,36]. c-Maf directly binds to the IL-21 promoter region [34,36,37], and constitutive c-Maf expression is known to be sufficient to enforce IL-21 expression in activated CD4+ T cells [34]. With NFAT and JunB help, c-Maf induces IL-4 [38] in T cells in a GATA3-independent manner [10]. In naïve CD4+ T cells, co-expression of c-Maf and Bcl-6 significantly increases the expression of CXCR5, as well as ICOS and PD-1 [27].

2.1.3. BATF

BATF belongs to the activator protein 1 (AP-1) superfamily and is originally known to be required for Th17 differentiation [39]. Of note, BATF-deficient mice also show defects in TFH cells and GC responses [40,41]. During TFH cell differentiation, BATF directly regulates Bcl-6 and c-Maf expression by binding to the promoter regions of these genes [41]. Defective generation of TFH cells in BATF-deficient CD4+ T cells can be restored by simultaneous expression of Bcl-6 and c-Maf [41].

2.1.4. STAT3

STAT3 is the main transducer of IL-6R and IL-21R signals in T and B cells [42,43]. These two signaling pathways are important for TFH differentiation and affect Bcl-6 expression in stimulated CD4 T cells [12,14]. In TFH cells, STAT3 can bind to the Bcl-6 promoter and induce Bcl-6 expression [44,45,46]. On the other hand, STAT3 also induces Blimp-1, an antagonist of Bcl-6 in CD4+ T cells [45]. STAT3-deficient CD4+ T cells are shown to be defective in TFH cell differentiation [12], while another study showed normal population of CXCR5+CD4+ T cells in the absence of STAT3 [47,48]. In human T cells, STAT3 does not seem to be important for TFH cell differentiation and function [49,50]. Thus, it is likely that although STAT3 is generally required for optimal TFH differentiation, TFH cells can be generated in a STAT3-independent fashion.

2.1.5. IRF4

IRF4, like BATF and STAT3, is also known as a Th17 cell transcription factor [49,51,52]. IRF4 can bind to the Il21 promoter and play a crucial role during TFH cell development [45,53]. Defect in the TFH population has been reported in IRF4-deficient mice, however, it is not clear whether this was TFH cell specific, or due to a general defect in CD4+ T cells [45]. In cooperation with BATF, IRF4 binds to the AP1-IRF composite element and stimulates IL-21 expression during Th17 differentiation [54,55]. However, whether the same complex mediates the expression of TFH transcription factors, such as Bcl-6 and c-Maf, remains to be determined. A number of studies have also demonstrated that deregulation of IRF4 is associated with auto-reactive B cell responses. For instance, Pernis and colleagues have identified the IRF4-binding protein (IBP) as a negative regulator of IRF4. Mice deficient in IBP develop spontaneous autoimmune phenotypes associated with enhanced responsiveness of T cells to low levels of stimulation [56,57]. Mechanistically, IBP inhibits the binding of IRF4 to the transcriptional regulatory regions of IL-17 and IL-21, and thus, IBP-deficient T cells produce enhanced amounts of IL-17 and IL-21 [57]. The increased production of IL-21 in IBP deficient mice results in the increased expression of the Aicda gene (encoding AID) in B cells [58]. These results strongly suggest a crucial role for IRF4 in TFH cell differentiation and autoimmune B cell responses.

2.1.6. microRNAs

MicroRNAs of the miR-17~92 family have originally been reported as negative regulators of TFH differentiation [15]. On the contrary, two recent studies have demonstrated that the miR-17~92 family is essential for TFH differentiation. For instance, Kang et al. described that mice with T cell-specific deletion of miR-17~92 have a significantly diminished TFH population, while mice with T cell-specific transgenic expression of the same microRNA family developed a fatal immunopathology with spontaneous TFH responses [59]. Mechanistically, the miR-17~92 family has been shown to contribute to the migration of TFH cells into B cell follicles by suppressing the expression of phosphatase PHLPP2 [59]. In addition, Baumjohann et al. have demonstrated that miRNA-17~92 suppresses the expression of Rora, thus inhibiting the induction of Th17-related genes during TFH cell differentiation [60]. Collectively, these studies clearly demonstrate that the miR-17~92 cluster is necessary for TFH lineage specification in vivo.

2.1.7. Cytokines

In addition to its indispensable role in Th17 cell differentiation [61], IL-6 has also been shown to play a role in TFH cell differentiation through its capacity to induce IL-21 by T cells [12,47,62]. Both IL-6 and IL-21 signaling occurs through the activation of STAT3 and STAT3-deficient CD4+ T cells show defects in TFH differentiation [12]. An initial study showed that IL-6 induces the transcription of Bcl6 and CXCR5 [14], while other studies demonstrated normal development of TFH cells in the absence of IL-6 signaling [47,48,63]. In addition, it has recently been described that the increase of TFH cells and GC responses during the late stage of chronic LCMV infection requires IL-6, and that late blockade of IL-6 signaling delays viral clearance [64]. In the absence of IL-6 signaling, virus-specific CD4+ T cells express significantly decreased Bcl-6, indicating a crucial contribution of this cytokine to TFH lineage programming during viral infections [64]. Another study showed that the absence of either IL-6 or IL-21 alone does not limit the TFH differentiation, while removing both signals substantially abrogates TFH cells. These observations suggest a redundant function for these two cytokines in this process [48], which might be crucial for late maintenance of TFH cells.

IL-2 has been reported to play a suppressive role in TFH differentiation [65,66,67] by inducing STAT5 mediated Blimp-1 [65,67]. Moreover, in Th1 polarization conditions, a high concentration of IL-2 inhibits Bcl-6 expression by regulating STATs and Foxo binding to the Bcl-6 promoter. In addition, T-bet interacts with Bcl-6 to form a Tbet-Bcl6 complex, resulting in the inhibition of Bcl-6 dependent gene repression [66]. Toxoplasma gondii and viral infections enhance humoral responses by increasing TFH cells in the absence of T-bet [68,69], indicating that the ratio of T-bet and Bcl-6 in T helper cells is a critical determinant of Th1 and TFH cell lineages.

IL-12 is also induces IL-21 in both human and mouse CD4+ T cells and these cells have TFH-like cell phenotypes [30,48,50,69,70,71]. Interestingly, IL-21 induction by IL-12 depends on STAT3 signaling [69,70]. During in vitro Th1 differentiation, IL-12 induces both IL-21+Bcl-6+ and IFN-γ+T-bet+ CD4+ T cell populations at an early stage [50,69,70]. However, Th1 cells became a major population under the Th1 polarizing conditions, whereas TFH differentiation is blocked by persistent expression of T-bet [69] via its ability to suppress Bcl-6 [66].

2.2. Molecular Requirements for TFH Cell Function

2.2.1. CXCR5

CXCR5 represents a reliable marker of TFH cells and its expression helps them migrate into the B cell follicles in response to CXCL13 (Figure 1) [7,8]. During differentiation, TFH cells down-regulate CCR7 to avoid their relocation to the T cell zone [1,25,72]. A recent study demonstrated that expression of CXCR5 on DCs was required for optimal TFH and Th2 differentiation in response to H. polygyrus infection [17]. Deficiency of CXCR5 in T cells up-regulates Blimp-1 and decreases TFH cell frequency [13,32,73,74]. CXCR5-deficient T cells fail to migrate into B cell follicles and thus fail to induce GC B cells [25,72,75]. Bcl6-deficient T cells do not express CXCR5 [14,15]. Kitano et al. demonstrated that up-regulation of Bcl-6 and CXCR5 on all T cells were initiated two days after immunization, and peaked at day 3 [76]. In contrast, Liu and colleagues reported that, while Bcl-6 expression was gradually increased from day 2 to day 7, the expression of CXCR5 was dramatically increased at day 2, and reached a plateau at day 3 and was maintained at a high level in activated T cells [77]. Notably, over-expression of Bcl-6 alone minimally increased the expression of CXCR5 on CD4+ T cells [27,77]. Future studies will be needed to identify one or more transcription factors that directly trigger the expression of CXCR5.

2.2.2. ICOS

ICOS is up-regulated on CD4+ T cells after CD28 co-stimulation [78,79]. ICOS provides an important signal for the survival of effector CD4+ T cells, as well as for the differentiation of TFH cells. ICOSL is constitutively expressed on most of DCs and B cells [78,80,81]. ICOS signaling recruits PI3K to its cytoplasmic tail, which in turn triggers the expression of IL-21, IL-4, c-Maf and CXCR5 [31,35,82,83,84,85,86]. ICOS-deficient mice have a reduced number of TFH cells and form immature GCs after immunization [35,87,88]. ICOS has recently been shown to directly control follicular recruitment of activated T helper cells by follicular bystander B cells, rather than by antigen presenting DCs, or cognate B cells [89]. ICOS engagement induces coordinated pseudopod formation and increases persistent T cell migration at the border between the T-B zone in vitro and in vivo [89]. As a result, in the absence of ICOSL on follicular bystander B cells, activated T helper cells cannot develop into TFH cells [89].

2.2.3. CD40L–CD40

CD40 is involved in multiple stages of B cell activation and differentiation. CD40L, which is the only ligand of CD40, is highly expressed in activated CD4+ T cells [1]. Deficiency of CD40L or CD40, or patients with mutations in CD40LG, has a decreased number of TFH cells and a failure of GC formation [84,90,91]. CD40 is critical for B cell activation, proliferation and survival, and CD40L–CD40 engagement is critical for the maintenance of GC B cells [1,92]. It has been reported that CD40L together with IL-21 or IL-4 is required for the maintenance of GC B cells. In the absence of CD40L, GC B cells differentiate into plasma cells [93,94,95,96]. Furthermore, the CD40–CD40L interaction is important for migration of T cells into follicles since TFH cells from CD40L−/− mice failed to migrate into B cell follicles, which can be restored by anti-CD40 [97]. Therefore, the CD40–CD40L interaction is bidirectional and CD40L signaling to the CD4+ T cells is essential for the migration, priming and maintenance of TFH cell [97,98,99].

2.2.4. SAP:SLAM Family Receptor

SAP plays multiple roles in TFH function. First, SAP is required for the formation of T–B conjugates, which is critical for TFH differentiation [100,101]. SAP-deficient CD4+ T cells are unable to form stable conjugates with cognate B cells and fail to differentiate into TFH cells [10,26,100,101,102,103]. Importantly, patients with X-linked lympho-proliferative disease have mutations in SH2D1A (encoding SAP), and they exhibit impaired TFH cell function and poor humoral immunity [104,105]. In addition, SAP is also required for the induction of IL-4 by TFH cells, which is independent of Th2, but requires SLAM-SAP-PKCθ signaling [10,106].

Additional molecules in the T-B cell interaction include the SLAM family of receptors: SLAM (CD150), CD84 (SLAMF5), Ly108 (SLAMF6;NTB-A in humans), Ly9 (CD229, SLAMF3) and 2B4 (CD244, Natural Killer cell receptor) [107]. These SLAM family receptors can recruit SAP which is a cytoplasmic adaptor molecule and activate signal cascade through PKCθ, BCL-10, NF-κB and FYN [105]. CD84 is a SAP-binding SLAM family receptor that is up-regulated on both mouse and human TFH cells and GC B cells [22,101]. After primary integrin interaction between B and T cells, CD84 stabilizes the B:T cell conjugates and helps TFH function and GC formation in vivo [101]. Ly108 is a SAP-binding SLAM family member and has two distinct isoforms [1]. Ly108 has a role in B cell negative selection and T-B cells adhesion [101,108]. Deletion of Ly108 in CD4+ T cells reversed the Sh2d1a−/− phenotype by eliminating the SAP requirement for GCs. Its inhibitory function is dependent on immunotyrosine switch motifs (ITSMs) and SHP-1 [109]. Recruitment of high levels of SHP-1 at the T:B synapse enables Ly108 to limit T:B cell adhesion [109]. Ly9 is constitutively expressed at a high level on CD4+ T cells and there is no defect in TFH differentiation, GCs, and antibody responses in Ly9-deficient mice [110]. SLAM is known to be important for Th2-independent IL-4 expression in GC TFH cells, although IL-4 is likely not required for TFH differentiation [10,111].

2.2.5. IL-21

IL-21 has been demonstrated to be essential for TFH cell differentiation and function in vitro and in vivo [112,113]. IL-21 production in CD4+ T cell is induced by IL-21 itself, or IL-6, IL-12 and IL-27 [12,62,114,115]. IL-21 increases the expression Bcl6 and CXCR5 transcripts in CD4+ T cells in vitro [12,14]. IL-21-deficient mice exhibit relatively normal frequency of TFH cells upon immunization, however, the number of TFH cells rapidly declines [112], indicating that IL-21 signaling is essential for the maintenance of differentiated TFH cells. Importantly, IL-21 from TFH cells drives the differentiation of plasma cells from activated B cells in GC [44,116,117,118,119], and it also promotes the proliferation of GC B cells [112,113]. IL-21 is also important for the affinity maturation of immunoglobulins, but it does not affect the formation of memory B cells [112,113]. Furthermore, IL-21 signaling triggers immunoglobulin isotype switching to produce IgG3, IgA and IgG1 in human B cells, or IgG1 in murine B cells [120,121,122].

2.2.6. IL-4

Th2 cytokine IL-4 has been thought as a B cell survival and differentiation factor [123]. A series of studies have demonstrated that TFH cells, rather than Th2 cells, provide help for B cell differentiation and maturation [1]. By using IL-4 reporter mice, Reinhardt et al. showed that the majority of CD4+ T cells secreting IL-4 after Leishmania major infection are TFH cells and that IL-4 production is induced by SAP:SLAM interaction in a Th2-independent manner [10,11,106]. IL-4 triggers the Ig isotype switch to IgG1 and IgE [1,124,125]. IL-4 signaling in B cells induces Bcl-XL, an anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family gene, and strongly enhances glucose uptake [125,126]. Therefore, IL-4 production by TFH cells mediates the survival and proliferation of GC B cells.

2.3. TFH Cells and Autoimmunity

While TFH cells are necessary for humoral immune responses to infectious agents and cancerous cells, excessive TFH responses may lead to the induction of self-reactive B cells [102,127]. Indeed, increased TFH responses are tightly associated with systemic autoimmunity, such as SLE, in both humans and mice [127,128,129]. Spontaneous generation of GCs and expansion of TFH cells are key features of SLE [2,23,102,130,131,132,133].

2.3.1. TFH Cells in Animal Models of Antibody-Mediated Autoimmunity

Sanroque mice have a single recessive mutation in the Roquin gene that encodes a RING-type ubiquitin ligase protein that interrupts a repressor of ICOS expression [23]. The mutation of sanroque causes excessive numbers of TFH cells with high expression of ICOS and IL-21in T cells that lead to the development of SLE-like pathologies [23]. Adoptive transfer of TFH cells from sanroque mice into wild-type mice triggers spontaneous GC formation and production of autoantibodies [134]. SAP deficiency or Bcl-6 deletion in the sanroque mice results in the reduction of TFH cells and IL-21 production, and thus alleviates lupus-like symptoms [102,135,136]. Of note, deletion of Roquin in hematopoietic cells results in deregulation of immune homeostasis, such as increased GC B cells and effector memory T cells in the secondary lymphoid organs, but does not lead to spontaneous autoimmunity [137]. Thus, the exact role of Roquin in the generation of self-reactive TFH cells remains to be determined.

BXSB.Yaa mice also exhibit spontaneous GC formation and TFH cells [44,136]. These SLE-like autoimmune phenotypes are associated with increased IL-21 production due to the duplicated Tlr7 gene that mediates excessive signaling in response to self-RNA [135]. Genetic deletion of the IL-21 receptor in BXSB.Yaa mice significantly decreases the production of autoantibodies, TFH cell numbers and disease severity [136]. This result supports the concept that IL-21 is required for auto-reactive B cell differentiation [112,113], and that blockade of this cytokine might be a promising therapeutic approach [138].

The MRL/MpJ-Faslpr/lpr/J (MRLlpr) mouse strain is also a widely used as an experimental model of human lupus. Similar to Sanroque and BXSB.Yaa mice, MRLlpr mice exhibit increased IL-21 production. Of note, the production of autoantibodies in these mice is from B cells in the extrafollicular foci, and this process is mediated by extrafollicular helper T (TeFH) cells [139,140]. ICOS signaling is essential for the function of TeFH cells, demonstrated by the fact that ICOS deficiency in MRLlpr mice results in diminished production of autoantibodies [140,141,142]. Deficiency in IL-21R in MRLlpr mice leads to a dramatic decrease of TFH, TeFH, GC B cells, plasma cells, and plasmablasts [134].

The NZB/W F1 model is another classical experimental autoimmune model that exhibits a spontaneous lupus-like disease [143]. NZB/W F1 mice also show increased TFH and GC B cell responses that appear to be dependent on the ICOS/ICOSL pathway. Accordingly, treatment with anti-ICOSL ameliorates the disease severity by decreasing TFH and GC B cell responses [144].

BXD2 mice also exhibit a lupus-like phenotype. This strain has been established by inbreeding the intercross progeny of C57BL/6K and DBA/2J mice for more than 20 generations [145]. BXD2 mice spontaneously produce pathogenic auto-antibodies and develop glomerulonephritis and erosive arthritis [146]. CD4+ T cells in BXD2 mice express increased IL-17 levels and Il17-deficient BXD2 mice produce significantly reduced auto-antibodies [133]. Therefore, unlike the other animal model of lupus, the lupus-like phenotype of BXD2 mice is known to be IL-17-dependent. Mechanistically, B cells in BXD2 mice exhibit increased expression of IL-17RA compared to C57BL/6 mice and thus quickly activate the canonical NF-κB signaling pathway upon IL-17 [147]. Inhibition of NF-κB signaling diminishes IL-17 induced chemotactic arrest of B cells in response to CXCL12 [147]. Interestingly, the number of IL-17RA expressing CXCR5+ICOS+ TFH cells is significantly increased in BXD2 mice, and blockade of IL-17 signaling reduces TFH:B cell interaction and the generation of auto-antibody producing B cells in BXD2 mice [148].

2.3.2. TFH Cells in Human Autoimmune Diseases

While the role of TFH cells in mouse autoimmunity has been established, the role of TFH cells in humans remains largely unexplored. High levels of class-switched auto-antibodies and abnormal GC B cell populations in patients with autoimmune diseases strongly suggest the involvement of TFH cells in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases [139,149]. Increased frequencies of circulating TFH-like cells (CXCR5hiPD-1hiICOShiCD4+) are found in patients with SLE, Sjögren’s syndrome, RA, and juvenile dermatomyositis. In addition, the frequencies of TFH-like cells are positively correlated with autoantibody titers, as well as disease symptoms, in SLE patients [150,151,152,153]. These circulating TFH-like cells share phenotypic and functional properties with GC TFH cells in follicles; but they express low levels of BCL6 and IL-21 [150]. While Bcl-6 is gradually down-regulated as the GC response progresses in mouse TFH cells [76], BCL-6 is rapidly re-expressed after TCR stimulation in circulating human CXCR5hi central memory CD4+ T cells [83]. It is possible that the circulating TFH-like cells may act as TFH precursors with the potential for rapid CXCR5-mediated follicular access and B cell helper functions [83,151]. Further studies will be required to demonstrate the role of TFH cells in the pathogenesis of antibody-mediated diseases in humans.

3. Regulatory Cells that Control GC B Cell Responses

While help from TFH cells promotes the generation of high-affinity IgGs and memory B cells, excessive activation of TFH and GC B cells can lead to autoimmunity as evident in a wide range of animal models of autoimmune disorders, as well as in humans. While the existence of suppressor T cells, including Foxp3+ T cells, has been well established over the last two decades, the existence and function of regulatory cell subsets specialized for GC B cell responses and TFH cells have only recently received attention. These include IL-10-producing regulatory B cells (BREG), CXCR5+Bcl6+ follicular regulatory cells (TFR), and Qa-1-restricted CD8+ regulatory T cells (Figure 2). Although their role in autoimmunity and the mode of their suppressive activity are still under investigation, evidence from animal models strongly suggests that these cells are necessary for preventing excessive germinal center reactions in vivo.

3.1. Regulatory B Cells

Provision of ICOSL by B cells is required for the differentiation of TFH cells [12]. Thus, B cells are generally considered as positive regulator of GC reactions. However, secreted antibodies are known to influence GC responses by limiting the acquisition of antigens by B cells [154]. In addition, recent studies have identified a few subsets of B cells, termed regulatory B cells (BREG), which exhibit immunoregulatory functions [155].

3.1.1. Identification and Development of Regulatory B Cells

Mice with a genetic deficiency of B cells are more susceptible to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) [156]. Subsequent studies revealed that IL-10 production by B cells plays an immunoregulatory role in animal models of inflammatory diseases, including EAE, inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis [157,158,159]. This evidence indicates that B cells have regulatory properties. These IL-10 producing BREG cells seem to be heterogeneous, as no appropriate surface marker(s) or master transcription factor(s) has been described to define these cellular subsets [155].

Marginal-zone (MZ) B cells are shown to produce IL-10 in response to CpG stimulation and ameliorate disease severity in a murine model of lupus [160]. Phenotypically, a subset of CD1dhiCD5+ B cells produces IL-10 and B-1a, MZ B and transitional 2-MZ precursor (T2-MZP) cells share this phenotype [161]. IL-10 secretion is largely restricted in CD1dhiCD5+ B cells which consist only 1~2% of splenocytes in wild type mice. CD19+CD23+CD21+CD1dhi T2-MZP cells also express IL-10 [162]. Similarly, some of human B cells can produce IL-10 [163,164]. In particular, CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B cells contain the highest fraction of IL-10 producing B cells upon CD40 stimulation in human peripheral blood from healthy individuals [165]. In addition, CD24hiCD27+ B cells are also known to produce IL-10 [166]. Interestingly, CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B cells are associated with immature B cells, while CD24hiCD27+ B cells are related to memory B cells [165,166]. Thus, it is likely that multiple subsets of B cells are able to produce IL-10 in mice, as well as in humans.

Antibodies 02 00554 g002 1024
Figure 2. Diverse regulatory cells that control GC B cell responses. In order to maintain B cell tolerance to self-antigens and to control the size of GC reactions, the immune system establishes multiple subsets of regulatory cells, such as TFR cells, Qa-1 restricted CD8+ regulatory T cells, and regulatory B cells. (a) At least three subsets of BREG cells are known to exert immunosuppressive activity: CD1dhiCD5+ B cells, CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B cells, and CD19+CD23+CD21+CD1dhi T2-MZP B cells. They can be stimulated by TLR/CD40 signaling and secrete IL-10. (b) TFR cells express Bcl-6 and Blimp-1 in addition to Foxp3. Phenotypically, they express TFH-related molecules such as CXCR5, PD-1, ICOS, as well as the TREG-associated molecules CTLA4, GITR and IL-10. (c) T cell receptor of Qa-1 restricted CD8+ regulatory T cells recognize the MHC class Ib molecule, Qa-1, that is expressed exclusively on TFH cells. This TCR/Qa-1-peptides interaction triggers the suppressive activity of CD8+ regulatory T cells and limits GC reactions by inhibiting the function of TFH cells.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 2. Diverse regulatory cells that control GC B cell responses. In order to maintain B cell tolerance to self-antigens and to control the size of GC reactions, the immune system establishes multiple subsets of regulatory cells, such as TFR cells, Qa-1 restricted CD8+ regulatory T cells, and regulatory B cells. (a) At least three subsets of BREG cells are known to exert immunosuppressive activity: CD1dhiCD5+ B cells, CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B cells, and CD19+CD23+CD21+CD1dhi T2-MZP B cells. They can be stimulated by TLR/CD40 signaling and secrete IL-10. (b) TFR cells express Bcl-6 and Blimp-1 in addition to Foxp3. Phenotypically, they express TFH-related molecules such as CXCR5, PD-1, ICOS, as well as the TREG-associated molecules CTLA4, GITR and IL-10. (c) T cell receptor of Qa-1 restricted CD8+ regulatory T cells recognize the MHC class Ib molecule, Qa-1, that is expressed exclusively on TFH cells. This TCR/Qa-1-peptides interaction triggers the suppressive activity of CD8+ regulatory T cells and limits GC reactions by inhibiting the function of TFH cells.
Antibodies 02 00554 g002 1024

BREG cells are known to suppress inflammatory responses by producing IL-10, or by directly interacting with pathogenic T cells via a cell-to-cell contact dependent manner [167]. Activation of B cells with certain TLR agonists triggers the production of IL-10 and inhibits dendritic cell-mediated activation of T cells in vitro [168]. Interestingly, mice deficient in TLR2 and TLR4, or MyD88 in B cells, show a significantly delayed recovery from EAE, indicating that those TLR signals activate the regulatory function of B cells [168]. Human B cells express TLR9, and stimulation with CpG plus anti-Ig synergistically induces IL-10 production by human B cells [169].

CD40-CD40L interaction is required for B-cell mediated suppression. Agonistic anti-CD40 induces the differentiation of IL-10 producing B cells in splenocytes in an animal model of collagen-induced arthritis mice [159]. In humans, blood B cells treated with CD40L are shown to induce Foxp3+ TREG cells via an unknown mechanism [170]. In addition, CD40L stimulation increases the CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B cell population that can inhibit the differentiation of Th1 cells via IL-10 [165]. Notably, B cells from patients with SLE were insensitive to CD40L and produced limited amount of IL-10 [165]. Together, these findings strongly suggest that the CD40-CD40L interaction is critical for the activation of BREG cells.

B cell activating factor (BAFF) is a TNF family protein and plays a key role in B cell maturation and survival [155]. A study with BAFF transgenic mice suggests that BAFF can induce Foxp3+ TREG cells to suppress T cell responses in a B cell dependent manner [171]. Moreover, in vitro cultures, with a low dosage of BAFF, can induce CD1dhiCD5+ BREG cells, and in vivo treatment with BAFF also increases the number of BREG cells in the marginal zone [172].

3.1.2. Regulatory Mechanism of BREG Cells

The mechanisms by which BREG cells employ their regulatory functions during the immune response have been explored. Two different BREG subsets, CD19hiCD1dhiCD5+ and CD19+CD23+CD21+CD1dhi T2-MZP cells, are rare in normal conditions, however, they repress both the T cell proliferation and Th1 cytokines (IFN-γ and TNF-α) production through IL-10 [161,162,172]. BREG cells can convert effector T cells into regulatory Tr1 cells in vitro in an IL-10 dependent manner [173,174].

BREG cells are also known to control the balance between Foxp3+ and IL-17 producing T cells [175,176]. For instance, BREG cells induced by Schistosoma mansoni infection suppressed allergic airway inflammation by increasing pulmonary infiltration of Foxp3+ TREG cells in an IL-10 dependent manner [175,177]. Moreover, mice deficient in IL-10 in B cells develop severe arthritis and increased pro-inflammatory T cells (Th1/Th17) and decreased Foxp3+ TREG cells [176,178]. In vitro induced BREG cells suppress the differentiation of Th17 from naïve T cells by down-regulating the phosphorylation of STAT3 [179].

B cells can express FasL and other death-inducing ligands to promote activation-induced cell death [167]. CD5+ B cells highly express FasL and IL-10 and their regulatory functions come from their Fas-FasL mediated killing ability [167]. The expression of FasL on CD5+ B cells is increased by stimulating them with the schistosome antigens IL-4 and IL-10 [180]. These FasL+CD5+ B cells are IL-5Rhigh and can be expanded by CD40L and IL-5 stimulation without losing FasL-dependent killing capacity [181]. A recent study showed that the frequency of FasL+CD5+ B cells is inversely correlated with the severity of the disease in an animal model of collagen-induced arthritis [182], suggesting that FasL+ B cells may have a role in the suppression of autoimmune diseases. Hence, although IL-10 serves as a key mechanism for the suppressive activity of BREG cells, other mechanisms of suppression, including cell-to-cell contact dependent suppression, are also involved in their regulatory capacity.

3.1.3. BREG Cells in Animal Models of Autoimmune Diseases

BREG cells mediate immunosuppression in many types of autoimmunity [155]. Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with infiltration of activated T cells, B cells and macrophages that eventually trigger continuous destruction of cartilage and bone structure [183]. Collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) is triggered by CD4+ T cells infiltrating into the synovial membrane and by B cells producing collagen-specific antibodies [184]. Depletion of B cells by CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment prior to collagen immunization delays the onset of arthritis. On the contrary, transfer of in vitro activated B cells significantly reduces the incidence and severity in a DBA mouse model of arthritis [159]. B cells from IL-10-deficient mice failed to protect recipient mice from arthritis [159]. Moreover, adoptive transfer of BREG cells that were previously expanded ex vivo in the presence of BAFF suppresses the development of arthritis and relieves the disease severity in CIA mice [172,179]. These findings suggest that BREG cells can ameliorate the severity of RA in experimental animal models.

Both T cells and B cells are involved in the pathogenesis of SLE [155]. Interestingly, it has been shown that B cell depletion in young NZB/W F1 (four weeks) mice promotes disease onset, while B cell depletion in older mice (12–28 weeks old) delays the disease progression [185]. IL-10-producing BREG cells are known to be heavily expanded in young NZB/W F1 mice [186], an observation that might explain the different role of B cell depletion on disease severity in NZB/W F1 mice. CD19−/− NZB/W mice display delayed autoantibodies production; however, these mice show early nephritis development and poor survival rate due to the lack of BREG cells [187]. Accordingly, transfer of splenic BREG cells from NZB/W mice into CD19−/− NZB/W mice significantly increases survival rates. Similarly, transfer of anti-CD40 antibody induced BREG cells into MPLlpr mice ameliorates the disease severity and increases survival rate in an IL-10-dependent manner [174]. Therefore, BREG cells can efficiently suppress different types of antibody-mediated experimental autoimmune diseases.

3.2. Follicular Regulatory T Cells

Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (TREG) are a subset of CD4+ T cells and are necessary for immunological self-tolerance and homeostasis [188]. Previous studies demonstrated that TREG cells are found in B cell follicles and GCs [189] and directly suppress B cell responses and auto-reactive B cells [190,191]. Over the last five years, a series of studies have unveiled that distinct subsets of TREG cells selectively mediate the suppression of Th1, Th2, and Th17 responses in a CXCR3, IRF4, and STAT3-dependent mechanism, respectively [188,192]. More recently, three independent groups simultaneously discovered the existence of TFR cells—a specialized subset of Foxp3+ TREG cells—that control GC reactions in vivo [193,194,195].

3.2.1. Identification and Development of TFR

Foxp3-deficient scurfy mice exhibit a profound population of spontaneous GC B cells as early as four weeks of ages [193]. Similarly, the size of TFH population in scurfy mice is significantly increased compared to wild-type mice. These observations clearly demonstrate that Foxp3+ TREG cells are essential for the maintenance of B cell tolerance to self-antigens in the periphery. Importantly, approximately 10%~15% of the CXCR5+CD4+ T cell population expresses Foxp3. CXCR5+Foxp3+ T cells express Bcl-6 and Blimp-1, and they are absent in Bcl6-deficient, but not Blimp1-deficient mice [193,194]. Such CXCR5+Bcl6+Foxp3+ T cells are termed ‘follicular regulatory T cells’ or ‘TFR’. Importantly, TFR cells are present in all secondary lymphoid organs, but not in the thymus, and appear to express the transcription factor, Helios, that has been shown to be exclusively expressed by thymus-derived TREG cells. Thus, it is likely that TFR can be differentiated from thymus-derived TREG cells in the periphery as a result of certain inflammatory signals. Although Bcl-6 is required in this process, the type(s) of inflammatory signals that are driving the differentiation of TFR cells remains to be determined. The surface phenotype of TFR cells resembles that of TFH. TFR cells express Bcl-6, CXCR5, PD-1, ICOS, and BTLA, but they lack CD40L, IL-4, and IL-21 [193,194]. Another difference between TFR and TFH cells is that the former express Blimp-1 together with Bcl-6, while the latter only express Bcl-6. As a subset of TREG, TFR cells express GITR, CTLA4, CD25 and KLRG1. However, TFR cells do not express CXCR3, indicating that they are distinct from CXCR3+ TREG cells which are shown to be specialized for suppressing type I immune responses. Similar to that of TFH cells, differentiation of TFR cells depends on CD28, ICOS, and SAP [194]. Moreover, TFR cells are absent in B cell-deficient mice, indicating that B cells provide crucial signals during TFR differentiation in vivo [194]. Interestingly, Sage et al. recently unveiled a regulatory role for PD-1 during TFR differentiation. They showed that PD-1-deficient mice harbor a significantly increased TFR population, defined as CXCR5+ICOS+Foxp3+ T cells [196]. Moreover, they showed that PD-1-deficient TFR cells exhibit greater suppression of immunization-induced GC reactions in vivo. Hence, although TFR cells express PD-1, their interaction with PDL1 seems to inhibit the expansion and suppressive activity of TFR cells in vivo. It would be interesting to determine the involvement of the transcription factors, cytokines, and microRNA clusters that are known to mediate TFH differentiation in the differentiation of TFR cells.

3.2.2. Mechanism of TFR Suppressive Activity

TREG cells from Cxcr5−/−, Bcl6−/−, Sh2d1a−/− mice are significantly less efficient in suppressing T cell-dependent antibody production in vivo, compared to wild-type TREG cells [193,194]. Therefore, TFR cells play an essential role in controlling GC reactions [194,195,196]. Interestingly, a study by Linterman et al. showed that TFR cells control GC B cell responses by suppressing the differentiation of TFH cells [194], while our own study propose that TFR might directly suppress B cells, rather than through TFH cells [193]. These differences might be due to the difference in the experimental systems. The former study utilized mixed bone marrow chimeras with 1:1 ratio of Sh2d1a−/− and Foxp3DTR bone marrow to generate an in vivo system lacking TFR cells [194]. In the latter study, TREG cells from Bcl-6−/− or Cxcr5−/− mice and naïve CD4+ T cells were co-transferred into Tcrb−/− mice to establish mice lacking TFR cells [193]. Thus, it remains to be determined whether TFR cells directly suppress TFH, B cells, or both, during GC reactions in vivo.

The molecular mechanism by which TFR cells regulate GC reactions remains unclear. Nevertheless, current studies give some evidence that high levels of CTLA4, GITR, and IL-10 expression in TFR cells might be important for their regulatory function [193,194,197]. Cretney et al. showed that a certain population of TREG cells residing in mucosal sites expresses Blimp-1, and that Blimp-1 induces the expression of IL-10 in TREG cells [198]. Deletion of Blimp-1 caused impaired TREG activation and homeostasis. Increased transcription levels of Prdm1 and Il10 in TFR cells indicate that Blimp-1 expression mediates IL-10 expression in TFR cells [194]. As described above, PD-1 is related to a suppressive function in TFR cells. Although deletion of PD-1 does not affect TFR cell migration into GCs, PD-1 deficient mice have higher numbers of TFR cells in the lymph nodes and these cells exhibit increased suppressive ability [196]. Thus, PD-1 negatively regulates the suppressive function of TFR cells, as well as the development of the cells. Further studies will be needed to define the molecular mechanism of TFR-mediated suppression of GC reactions.

3.3. Qa-1 Restricted CD8+ T Cells

In addition to Foxp3+ TREG cells, CD8+ regulatory (CD8+ TREG) cells have been known to suppress B cell responses by suppressing Th2 immunity [199]. Subsequent studies demonstrated that Qa-1 restricted CD8+ TREG cells inhibit the immune responses mediated by Qa-1 expressing CD4+ T cells. Accordingly, Qa-1-deficient mice appeared to be more susceptible to experimental autoimmune diseases, including EAE, RA, and lupus [200,201]. Strikingly, a recent study showed that Qa-1 is exclusively expressed on TFH, but not on the other subsets of CD4+ T cells, and that CD8+ TREG cells specifically inhibit TFH responses in vivo [202].

3.3.1. Identification of Qa-1 Restricted CD8+ TREG Cells

Early studies have provided fundamental evidence for the existence of CD8+ TREG cells that suppress T cell-dependent B cell responses in a Qa-1-dependent manner [199,203,204]. In addition, a series of animal studies with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis also revealed the immune-regulatory function of Qa-1-restricted CD8+ T cells [205]. Qa-1 is the murine homolog of non-classical the MHC class 1b molecule, human leukocyte antigen-E (HLA-E) [205]. Engagement of the Qa-1/peptide complex by TCR activates and expands Ag-specific CD8+ T cells, while its binding to the CD94/NKG2A receptor decreases the activities of CD8+ T, NK, and NKT cells [205].

Importantly, the HLA-E restricted regulatory mechanism has also been reported in human autoimmune diseases. For instance, CD8+ T cells from patients with recent-onset T1D exhibit defects in the suppression of auto-reactive CD4+ T cells, a condition that can be restored by stimulation with DC primed with the HLA-E binding peptide [206]. Moreover, the frequency CD8+ T cells that specifically recognize and lyse activated myelin-reactive CD4+ T cells in an HLA-E restricted manner appeared to be largely reduced in the peripheral blood of multiple sclerosis patients during disease exacerbation, compared with patients in remission and healthy individuals [207]. These clinical observations strongly suggest a critical contribution of CD8+ TREG cells to the prevention of autoimmunity.

3.3.2. Mechanism of Qa-1 Restricted CD8+ TREG-Mediated Suppression on GC Reactions

Qa-1 can bind to two different receptors with opposing functions. Qa-1 can act as a MHC I molecule and bind to TCR and activate, as well as expand, Ag-specific CD8+ T cells. On the other hand, when Qa-1-Qdm (Qa-1 determinant modifier) binds to the CD95/NKG2A receptor, expressed by CD8+ T, NK, and NKT cells, it attenuates the activities of the cells [205]. A peptide from Heat Shock Protein 60 (Hsp60) is dominantly bound to Qa-1 and Qa-1-peptide/TCR signaling activates antigen-specific CD8+ T cells [205]. Replacement of an amino acid at Qa-1 position 227 (D to K) disrupts Qa-1 binding to the TCR/CD8 co-receptor, but has no effect on the inhibitory NKG2A receptor on CD8 and NK cells [202,208]. Accordingly, mice with this Qa-1 single mutation (D227K) do not have Qa-1 restricted CD8+ TREG cells. These mice exhibit significantly increased numbers of TFH cells in the secondary lymphoid organs and develop SLE-like disease [202,205].

Qa-1 restricted CD8+ TREG cells express CXCR5 and ICOSL and migrate to B cell follicles, and attenuate the function of highly Qa-1 expressing TFH cells [202]. Unlike conventional CD4+ TREG cells, these CD8+ TREG cells do not express Foxp3, and their suppressive function is mediated by perforin and IL-15 [202,205]. Treatment with anti-IL-15 inhibits the suppressive activity of CD8+ TREG cells [202]. Subsequent studies demonstrated the suppressive role of CD8+ TREG cells in a B6-Yaa mouse model of lupus and a mouse model of collagen induced arthritis [209,210]. Notably, in vitro expanded CD8+ TREG cells successfully inhibit CIA by reducing auto-reactive TFH and Th17 cells via a perforin-dependent mechanism [210].

Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) in humans, a functional counterpart of the Ly49 receptor in mice, is expressed in about 4%~5% of CD8+ T cells in humans [211,212]. Similar to mouse Ly49+CD8+ T cells, human KIR+CD8+ T cells recognize HLA-E, and express perforin [211]. The role of this KIR+CD8+ T cell population remains to be determined.

4. Translational Potentials

Generation of high-affinity antibodies and strong memory B cells improve vaccine efficacy. On the other hand, suppression of auto-antibody production would ameliorate systemic autoimmune diseases. Thus, the immune cell subsets discussed in this review might provide a wide range of translational opportunities for the development of immunotherapy for human diseases.

4.1. Vaccine Design

Considering the crucial contributions of TFH cells to GC B cell responses and memory B cells, enhancement of TFH differentiation/function would improve the efficacy of vaccination [213]. Recent studies showed that certain adjuvants enhanced the generation of TFH cells. For instance, vaccination with a nanoparticle (NP) delivery system promotes high-titer, high-avidity Ab responses to malaria antigens by enhancing the number of TFH cells, compared to a US FDA-approved adjuvant monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) [214]. In addition, IFN-α has been shown to enhance the expansion of TFH cells in an animal model of adenoviral-vector based vaccination [215].

Interestingly, Zheng et al. have recently shown that immunization with a DNA vaccine containing the mGITRL gene significantly enhanced the TFH population and increased the levels of Ag-specific IgG to RagB of Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) [216]. GITR/GITRL signaling can act like co-stimulatory molecules in TCR signal mediated T cell activation and proliferation [217]. However, the role of the GITR signaling pathway in TFH, or GC B cell, responses is not clear. Modulating SAP and SLAM family receptor expression on T or B cells could be another target for optimizing vaccine efficacy since SAP:SLAM family receptor interaction is critical for long-term B:TFH interaction during GC reactions [218]. Notably, over-expression of EAT2—a SLAM adapter protein—in DCs and macrophages enhances the induction of Ag-specific immune responses [219].

Similarly, blockade of inhibitory pathways during TFH and GC B cell responses might also offer attractive targets, since inhibitory co-stimulators are involved in chronic infections and cancer as immunosuppressive mechanisms [220]. For instance, since PD-L1 is known to be highly expressed in various tumors and chronic infections [220], and since its ligand PD-1 is highly expressed on TFH cells, blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 would improve the expansion and function of TFH cells in tumor-bearing or infected hosts. In addition, it has been described that blocking B7-H1, but not B7-DC, increases the differentiation of TFH cells and enhances antigen specific Ig responses [221]. Another study also demonstrated that blockade of PD-L1 and LAG3 signals in Plasmodium yoelii infected mice rapidly clears malaria by enhancing humoral immune responses with an increased number of TFH and GC B cells [222].

Ex vivo expansion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes has been established in order to obtain a large number of tumor-specific T cells. Administration of tumor-specific antibodies is one of the most successful immunotherapeutic approaches for the eradication of tumor cells in vivo. As described above, the molecular and cellular factors required for TFH cell generation are well documented. Thus, it seems possible to obtain a large number of tumor-specific TFH cells. It would be interesting to investigate whether transfusion of tumor-specific TFH cells would enhance anti-tumor immunity by inducing anti-tumor antibodies.

4.2. Autoimmune Diseases

As discussed above, in Section 2.3, exaggerated GC B cells and TFH responses represent key pathophysiologic features of antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases in humans. Despite differences in the cellular origin and suppressive mechanism, the three types of suppressor cells discussed in this review share a common outcome when it comes to their activities: inhibition of GC reaction. It is not clear if defects in these suppressor cell populations lead to autoimmunity in humans. Nevertheless, it is plausible to surmise that in vivo expansion, or administration of the suppressor cells, would be beneficial to alleviate the problem of production of autoantibodies.

Importantly, transfer of circulating blood TFR cells results in the suppression of Ag-specific IgG responses, and PD-1-deficient TFR cells show stronger suppression [196]. Similarly, adoptive transfer of Qa-1 restricted CD8+ TREG cells and BREG cells induce diminished antibody production [155,202,209]. As a next step, further studies will be needed to address if transfer of these GC suppressor cells can ameliorate the production of autoantibodies in animal models of lupus and other antibody-mediated disorders. The availability of only a limited number of suppressor cells is likely the main obstacle preventing their use in in vivo experimental studies. Given that T and B cells can be easily expanded, finding the right conditions for ex vivo expansion (or for differentiation) would enable us to overcome this obstacle. A series of future studies will be needed before GC suppressor cell-based immunotherapy can be developed as a therapy for personalized medicine.

5. Conclusions

The diverse types of immune cells involved in GC B cell responses reflect an orchestrated regulation of this process. In the past decade, there have been a number of milestone discoveries describing the regulation of GC reactions. Identification of the TFH cell lineage and the discoveries of TFR cells, CD8+ TREG cells, and BREG cells have broadened our understanding of the complex balance of B cell immunity and tolerance. We expect that future studies will define the suppressive mechanisms by which each suppressor cell subset inhibits GC B cell responses. Various types of expanded or engineered immune cells are currently under pre-clinical and clinical investigations. As discussed above, the suppressor cells of the GC reaction offer great potential for translational research and may pave the way for the development of novel therapeutics for autoimmune diseases, as well as infections and cancers [212].

Acknowledgments

We thank Eva Zsigmond (University of Texas at Houston) for critical reading of the manuscript, Sangwon Yeo (University of Texas at Houston) for his help in graphic illustration. The work is supported by a research grant (10SDG3860046) from the American Heart Association (to YC).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Crotty, S. Follicular helper CD4 T cells (TFH). Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 29, 621–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, X.; Ing, S.; Fraser, A.; Chen, M.; Khan, O.; Zakem, J.; Davis, W.; Quinet, R. Follicular helper T cells: New insights into mechanisms of autoimmune diseases. Ochsner J. 2013, 13, 131–139. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fujio, K.; Okamura, T.; Sumitomo, S.; Yamamoto, K. Regulatory cell subsets in the control of autoantibody production related to systemic autoimmunity. Ann. Rheum Dis. 2013, 72, ii85–ii89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Miller, J.F.; De Burgh, P.M.; Grant, G.A. Thymus and the production of antibody-plaque-forming cells. Nature 1965, 208, 1332–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Breitfeld, D. Follicular B helper T cells express CXC chemokine receptor 5, localize to B cell follicles, and support immunoglobulin production. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 192, 1545–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schaerli, P. CXC chemokine receptor 5 expression defines follicular homing T cells with B cell helper function. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 192, 1553–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, C.H. Subspecialization of CXCR5+ T cells: B helper activity is focused in a germinal center [mdash] localized subset of CXCR5+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 193, 1373–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ansel, K.M.; McHeyzer-Williams, L.J.; Ngo, V.N.; McHeyzer-Williams, M.G.; Cyster, J.G. In vivo-activated CD4 T cells upregulate CXC chemokine receptor 5 and reprogram their response to lymphoid chemokines. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 190, 1123–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. King, I.L.; Mohrs, M. IL-4-producing CD4+ T cells in reactive lymph nodes during helminth infection are T follicular helper cells. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 1001–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yusuf, I. Germinal center T follicular helper cell IL-4 production is dependent on signaling lymphocytic activation molecule receptor (CD150). J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 190–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reinhardt, R.L.; Liang, H.E.; Locksley, R.M. Cytokine-secreting follicular T cells shape the antibody repertoire. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nurieva, R.I. Generation of T follicular helper cells is mediated by interleukin-21 but independent of T helper 1, 2, or 17 cell lineages. Immunity 2008, 29, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Johnston, R.J. Bcl6 and Blimp-1 are reciprocal and antagonistic regulators of T follicular helper cell differentiation. Science 2009, 325, 1006–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nurieva, R.I. Bcl6 mediates the development of T follicular helper cells. Science 2009, 325, 1001–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, D. The transcriptional repressor Bcl-6 directs T follicular helper cell lineage commitment. Immunity 2009, 31, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kerfoot, S.M.; Yaari, G.; Patel, J.R.; Johnson, K.L.; Gonzalez, D.G.; Kleinstein, S.H.; Haberman, A.M. Germinal center B cell and T follicular helper cell development initiates in the interfollicular zone. Immunity 2011, 34, 947–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Leon, B.; Ballesteros-Tato, A.; Browning, J.L.; Dunn, R.; Randall, T.D.; Lund, F.E. Regulation of T(H)2 development by CXCR5+ dendritic cells and lymphotoxin-expressing B cells. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13, 681–690. [Google Scholar]
  18. Victora, G.D.; Schwickert, T.A.; Fooksman, D.R.; Kamphorst, A.O.; Meyer-Hermann, M.; Dustin, M.L.; Nussenzweig, M.C. Germinal center dynamics revealed by multiphoton microscopy with a photoactivatable fluorescent reporter. Cell 2010, 143, 592–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shulman, Z.; Gitlin, A.D.; Targ, S.; Jankovic, M.; Pasqual, G.; Nussenzweig, M.C.; Victora, G.D. T follicular helper cell dynamics in germinal centers. Science 2013, 341, 673–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nutt, S.L.; Tarlinton, D.M. Germinal center B and follicular helper T cells: Siblings, cousins or just good friends? Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 472–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, C.S.; Deenick, E.K.; Batten, M.; Tangye, S.G. The origins, function, and regulation of T follicular helper cells. J. Exp. Med. 2012, 209, 1241–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chtanova, T. T follicular helper cells express a distinctive transcriptional profile, reflecting their role as non-Th1/Th2 effector cells that provide help for B cells. J. Immunol. 2004, 173, 68–78. [Google Scholar]
  23. Vinuesa, C.G. A RING-type ubiquitin ligase family member required to repress follicular helper T cells and autoimmunity. Nature 2005, 435, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rasheed, A.U.; Rahn, H.P.; Sallusto, F.; Lipp, M.; Muller, G. Follicular B helper T cell activity is confined to CXCR5hiICOShi CD4 T cells and is independent of CD57 expression. Eur. J. Immunol. 2006, 36, 1892–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Haynes, N.M. Role of CXCR5 and CCR7 in follicular Th cell positioning and appearance of a programmed cell death gene-1high germinal center-associated subpopulation. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 5099–5108. [Google Scholar]
  26. Deenick, E.K. Follicular helper T cell differentiation requires continuous antigen presentation that is independent of unique B cell signaling. Immunity 2010, 33, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kroenke, M.A. Bcl6 and maf cooperate to instruct human follicular helper CD4 T cell differentiation. J. Immunol. 2012, 188, 3734–3744. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cattoretti, G.; Chang, C.C.; Cechova, K.; Zhang, J.; Ye, B.H.; Falini, B.; Louie, D.C.; Offit, K.; Chaganti, R.S.; Dalla-Favera, R. BCL-6 protein is expressed in germinal-center B cells. Blood 1995, 86, 45–53. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kusam, S.; Toney, L.M.; Sato, H.; Dent, A.L. Inhibition of Th2 differentiation and GATA-3 expression by BCL-6. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 2435–2441. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ma, C.S. Early commitment of naive human CD4+ T cells to the T follicular helper (TFH) cell lineage is induced by IL-12. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2009, 87, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Choi, Y.S.; Kageyama, R.; Eto, D.; Escobar, T.C.; Johnston, R.J.; Monticelli, L.; Lao, C.; Crotty, S. ICOS receptor instructs T follicular helper cell versus effector cell differentiation via induction of the transcriptional repressor Bcl6. Immunity 2011, 34, 932–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fazilleau, N.; McHeyzer-Williams, L.J.; Rosen, H.; McHeyzer-Williams, M.G. The function of follicular helper T cells is regulated by the strength of T cell antigen receptor binding. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ho, I.C.; Hodge, M.R.; Rooney, J.W.; Glimcher, L.H. The proto-oncogene c-maf is responsible for tissue-specific expression of interleukin-4. Cell 1996, 85, 973–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hiramatsu, Y.; Suto, A.; Kashiwakuma, D.; Kanari, H.; Kagami, S.; Ikeda, K.; Hirose, K.; Watanabe, N.; Grusby, M.J.; Iwamoto, I.; et al. c-Maf activates the promoter and enhancer of the IL-21 gene, and TGF-beta inhibits c-Maf-induced IL-21 production in CD4+ T cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2010, 87, 703–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bauquet, A.T.; Jin, H.; Paterson, A.M.; Mitsdoerffer, M.; Ho, I.C.; Sharpe, A.H.; Kuchroo, V.K. The costimulatory molecule ICOS regulates the expression of c-Maf and IL-21 in the development of follicular T helper cells and TH-17 cells. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pot, C.; Jin, H.; Awasthi, A.; Liu, S.M.; Lai, C.Y.; Madan, R.; Sharpe, A.H.; Karp, C.L.; Miaw, S.C.; Ho, I.C.; et al. Cutting edge: IL-27 induces the transcription factor c-Maf, cytokine IL-21, and the costimulatory receptor ICOS that coordinately act together to promote differentiation of IL-10-producing Tr1 cells. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 797–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Apetoh, L.; Quintana, F.J.; Pot, C.; Joller, N.; Xiao, S.; Kumar, D.; Burns, E.J.; Sherr, D.H.; Weiner, H.L.; Kuchroo, V.K. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacts with c-Maf to promote the differentiation of type 1 regulatory T cells induced by IL-27. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 854–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhu, J.; Yamane, H.; Paul, W.E. Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations (*). Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 28, 445–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schraml, B.U.; Hildner, K.; Ise, W.; Lee, W.L.; Smith, W.A.; Solomon, B.; Sahota, G.; Sim, J.; Mukasa, R.; Cemerski, S.; et al. The AP-1 transcription factor Batf controls T(H)17 differentiation. Nature 2009, 460, 405–409. [Google Scholar]
  40. Betz, B.C.; Jordan-Williams, K.L.; Wang, C.; Kang, S.G.; Liao, J.; Logan, M.R.; Kim, C.H.; Taparowsky, E.J. Batf coordinates multiple aspects of B and T cell function required for normal antibody responses. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 933–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ise, W.; Kohyama, M.; Schraml, B.U.; Zhang, T.; Schwer, B.; Basu, U.; Alt, F.W.; Tang, J.; Oltz, E.M.; Murphy, T.L.; et al. The transcription factor BATF controls the global regulators of class-switch recombination in both B cells and T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Spolski, R.; Leonard, W.J. Interleukin-21: Basic biology and implications for cancer and autoimmunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 26, 57–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Heinrich, P.C.; Behrmann, I.; Haan, S.; Hermanns, H.M.; Muller-Newen, G.; Schaper, F. Principles of interleukin (IL)-6-type cytokine signalling and its regulation. Biochem. J. 2003, 374, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ozaki, K.; Spolski, R.; Ettinger, R.; Kim, H.P.; Wang, G.; Qi, C.F.; Hwu, P.; Shaffer, D.J.; Akilesh, S.; Roopenian, D.C.; et al. Regulation of B cell differentiation and plasma cell generation by IL-21, a novel inducer of Blimp-1 and Bcl-6. J. Immunol. 2004, 173, 5361–5371. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kwon, H.; Thierry-Mieg, D.; Thierry-Mieg, J.; Kim, H.P.; Oh, J.; Tunyaplin, C.; Carotta, S.; Donovan, C.E.; Goldman, M.L.; Tailor, P.; et al. Analysis of interleukin-21-induced Prdm1 gene regulation reveals functional cooperation of STAT3 and IRF4 transcription factors. Immunity 2009, 31, 941–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Durant, L.; Watford, W.T.; Ramos, H.L.; Laurence, A.; Vahedi, G.; Wei, L.; Takahashi, H.; Sun, H.W.; Kanno, Y.; Powrie, F.; et al. Diverse targets of the transcription factor STAT3 contribute to T cell pathogenicity and homeostasis. Immunity 2010, 32, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Eddahri, F.; Denanglaire, S.; Bureau, F.; Spolski, R.; Leonard, W.J.; Leo, O.; Andris, F. Interleukin-6/STAT3 signaling regulates the ability of naive T cells to acquire B-cell help capacities. Blood 2009, 113, 2426–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Eto, D. IL-21 and IL-6 are critical for different aspects of B cell immunity and redundantly induce optimal follicular helper CD4 T cell (Tfh) differentiation. PLoS One 2011, 6, e17739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ma, C.S.; Chew, G.Y.; Simpson, N.; Priyadarshi, A.; Wong, M.; Grimbacher, B.; Fulcher, D.A.; Tangye, S.G.; Cook, M.C. Deficiency of Th17 cells in hyper IgE syndrome due to mutations in STAT3. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 1551–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schmitt, N.; Morita, R.; Bourdery, L.; Bentebibel, S.E.; Zurawski, S.M.; Banchereau, J.; Ueno, H. Human dendritic cells induce the differentiation of interleukin-21-producing T follicular helper-like cells through interleukin-12. Immunity 2009, 31, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Brustle, A.; Heink, S.; Huber, M.; Rosenplanter, C.; Stadelmann, C.; Yu, P.; Arpaia, E.; Mak, T.W.; Kamradt, T.; Lohoff, M. The development of inflammatory T(H)-17 cells requires interferon-regulatory factor 4. Nat. Immunol. 2007, 8, 958–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Milner, J.D.; Brenchley, J.M.; Laurence, A.; Freeman, A.F.; Hill, B.J.; Elias, K.M.; Kanno, Y.; Spalding, C.; Elloumi, H.Z.; Paulson, M.L.; et al. Impaired T(H)17 cell differentiation in subjects with autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome. Nature 2008, 452, 773–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bollig, N.; Brustle, A.; Kellner, K.; Ackermann, W.; Abass, E.; Raifer, H.; Camara, B.; Brendel, C.; Giel, G.; Bothur, E.; et al. Transcription factor IRF4 determines germinal center formation through follicular T-helper cell differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 8664–8669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Glasmacher, E.; Agrawal, S.; Chang, A.B.; Murphy, T.L.; Zeng, W.; Vander Lugt, B.; Khan, A.A.; Ciofani, M.; Spooner, C.J.; Rutz, S.; et al. A genomic regulatory element that directs assembly and function of immune-specific AP-1-IRF complexes. Science 2012, 338, 975–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, P.; Spolski, R.; Liao, W.; Wang, L.; Murphy, T.L.; Murphy, K.M.; Leonard, W.J. BATF-JUN is critical for IRF4-mediated transcription in T cells. Nature 2012, 490, 543–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fanzo, J.C.; Yang, W.; Jang, S.Y.; Gupta, S.; Chen, Q.; Siddiq, A.; Greenberg, S.; Pernis, A.B. Loss of IRF-4-binding protein leads to the spontaneous development of systemic autoimmunity. J. Clin. Invest. 2006, 116, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, Q.; Yang, W.; Gupta, S.; Biswas, P.; Smith, P.; Bhagat, G.; Pernis, A.B. IRF-4-binding protein inhibits interleukin-17 and interleukin-21 production by controlling the activity of IRF-4 transcription factor. Immunity 2008, 29, 899–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Biswas, P.S.; Gupta, S.; Stirzaker, R.A.; Kumar, V.; Jessberger, R.; Lu, T.T.; Bhagat, G.; Pernis, A.B. Dual regulation of IRF4 function in T and B cells is required for the coordination of T-B cell interactions and the prevention of autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. 2012, 209, 581–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kang, S.G.; Liu, W.H.; Lu, P.; Jin, H.Y.; Lim, H.W.; Shepherd, J.; Fremgen, D.; Verdin, E.; Oldstone, M.B.; Qi, H.; et al. MicroRNAs of the miR-17 approximately 92 family are critical regulators of T differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 14, 849–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Baumjohann, D.; Kageyama, R.; Clingan, J.M.; Morar, M.M.; Patel, S.; de Kouchkovsky, D.; Bannard, O.; Bluestone, J.A.; Matloubian, M.; Ansel, K.M.; et al. The microRNA cluster miR-17 approximately 92 promotes T cell differentiation and represses subset-inappropriate gene expression. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 14, 840–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Korn, T.; Bettelli, E.; Oukka, M.; Kuchroo, V.K. IL-17 and Th17. Cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 27, 485–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Suto, A.; Kashiwakuma, D.; Kagami, S.; Hirose, K.; Watanabe, N.; Yokote, K.; Saito, Y.; Nakayama, T.; Grusby, M.J.; Iwamoto, I.; et al. Development and characterization of IL-21-producing CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 1369–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Poholek, A.C.; Hansen, K.; Hernandez, S.G.; Eto, D.; Chandele, A.; Weinstein, J.S.; Dong, X.; Odegard, J.M.; Kaech, S.M.; Dent, A.L.; et al. In vivo regulation of Bcl6 and T follicular helper cell development. J Immunol. 2010, 185, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Harker, J.A.; Lewis, G.M.; Mack, L.; Zuniga, E.I. Late interleukin-6 escalates T follicular helper cell responses and controls a chronic viral infection. Science 2011, 334, 825–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Johnston, R.J.; Choi, Y.S.; Diamond, J.A.; Yang, J.A.; Crotty, S. STAT5 is a potent negative regulator of TFH cell differentiation. J. Exp. Med. 2012, 209, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Oestreich, K.J.; Mohn, S.E.; Weinmann, A.S. Molecular mechanisms that control the expression and activity of Bcl-6 in TH1 cells to regulate flexibility with a TFH-like gene profile. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ballesteros-Tato, A.; Leon, B.; Graf, B.A.; Moquin, A.; Adams, P.S.; Lund, F.E.; Randall, T.D. Interleukin-2 inhibits germinal center formation by limiting T follicular helper cell differentiation. Immunity 2012, 36, 847–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Marshall, H.D.; Chandele, A.; Jung, Y.W.; Meng, H.; Poholek, A.C.; Parish, I.A.; Rutishauser, R.; Cui, W.; Kleinstein, S.H.; Craft, J.; et al. Differential expression of Ly6C and T-bet distinguish effector and memory Th1 CD4(+) cell properties during viral infection. Immunity 2011, 35, 633–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Nakayamada, S.; Kanno, Y.; Takahashi, H.; Jankovic, D.; Lu, K.T.; Johnson, T.A.; Sun, H.W.; Vahedi, G.; Hakim, O.; Handon, R.; et al. Early Th1 cell differentiation is marked by a Tfh cell-like transition. Immunity 2011, 35, 919–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ma, C.S.; Avery, D.T.; Chan, A.; Batten, M.; Bustamante, J.; Boisson-Dupuis, S.; Arkwright, P.D.; Kreins, A.Y.; Averbuch, D.; Engelhard, D.; et al. Functional STAT3 deficiency compromises the generation of human T follicular helper cells. Blood 2012, 119, 3997–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Diehl, S.A.; Schmidlin, H.; Nagasawa, M.; Blom, B.; Spits, H. IL-6 triggers IL-21 production by human CD4+ T cells to drive STAT3-dependent plasma cell differentiation in B cells. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2012, 90, 802–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hardtke, S.; Ohl, L.; Forster, R. Balanced expression of CXCR5 and CCR7 on follicular T helper cells determines their transient positioning to lymph node follicles and is essential for efficient B-cell help. Blood 2005, 106, 1924–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fazilleau, N.; Mark, L.; McHeyzer-Williams, L.J.; McHeyzer-Williams, M.G. Follicular helper T cells: lineage and location. Immunity 2009, 30, 324–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Crotty, S.; Johnston, R.J.; Schoenberger, S.P. Effectors and memories: Bcl-6 and Blimp-1 in T and B lymphocyte differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Arnold, C.N.; Campbell, D.J.; Lipp, M.; Butcher, E.C. The germinal center response is impaired in the absence of T cell-expressed CXCR5. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kitano, M. Bcl6 protein expression shapes pre-germinal center B cell dynamics and follicular helper T cell heterogeneity. Immunity 2011, 34, 961–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liu, X.; Yan, X.; Zhong, B.; Nurieva, R.I.; Wang, A.; Wang, X.; Martin-Orozco, N.; Wang, Y.; Chang, S.H.; Esplugues, E.; et al. Bcl6 expression specifies the T follicular helper cell program in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 2012, 209, 1841–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yoshinaga, S.K.; Whoriskey, J.S.; Khare, S.D.; Sarmiento, U.; Guo, J.; Horan, T.; Shih, G.; Zhang, M.; Coccia, M.A.; Kohno, T.; et al. T-cell co-stimulation through B7RP-1 and ICOS. Nature 1999, 402, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Coyle, A.J.; Lehar, S.; Lloyd, C.; Tian, J.; Delaney, T.; Manning, S.; Nguyen, T.; Burwell, T.; Schneider, H.; Gonzalo, J.A.; et al. The CD28-related molecule ICOS is required for effective T cell-dependent immune responses. Immunity 2000, 13, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ling, V.; Wu, P.W.; Finnerty, H.F.; Bean, K.M.; Spaulding, V.; Fouser, L.A.; Leonard, J.P.; Hunter, S.E.; Zollner, R.; Thomas, J.L.; et al. Cutting edge: identification of GL50, a novel B7-like protein that functionally binds to ICOS receptor. J. Immunol. 2000, 164, 1653–1657. [Google Scholar]
  81. Wang, S.; Zhu, G.; Chapoval, A.I.; Dong, H.; Tamada, K.; Ni, J.; Chen, L. Costimulation of T cells by B7-H2, a B7-like molecule that binds ICOS. Blood 2000, 96, 2808–2813. [Google Scholar]
  82. Gigoux, M.; Shang, J.; Pak, Y.; Xu, M.; Choe, J.; Mak, T.W.; Suh, W.K. Inducible costimulator promotes helper T-cell differentiation through phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 20371–20376. [Google Scholar]
  83. Chevalier, N. CXCR5 expressing human central memory CD4 T cells and their relevance for humoral immune responses. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 5556–5568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bossaller, L. ICOS deficiency is associated with a severe reduction of CXCR5+CD4 germinal center Th cells. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 4927–4932. [Google Scholar]
  85. Akiba, H.; Takeda, K.; Kojima, Y.; Usui, Y.; Harada, N.; Yamazaki, T.; Ma, J.; Tezuka, K.; Yagita, H.; Okumura, K. The role of ICOS in the CXCR5+ follicular B helper T cell maintenance in vivo. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 2340–2348. [Google Scholar]
  86. Rolf, J.; Bell, S.E.; Kovesdi, D.; Janas, M.L.; Soond, D.R.; Webb, L.M.; Santinelli, S.; Saunders, T.; Hebeis, B.; Killeen, N.; et al. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity in T cells regulates the magnitude of the germinal center reaction. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 4042–4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Dong, C.; Juedes, A.E.; Temann, U.A.; Shresta, S.; Allison, J.P.; Ruddle, N.H.; Flavell, R.A. ICOS co-stimulatory receptor is essential for T-cell activation and function. Nature 2001, 409, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mak, T.W.; Shahinian, A.; Yoshinaga, S.K.; Wakeham, A.; Boucher, L.M.; Pintilie, M.; Duncan, G.; Gajewska, B.U.; Gronski, M.; Eriksson, U.; et al. Costimulation through the inducible costimulator ligand is essential for both T helper and B cell functions in T cell-dependent B cell responses. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Xu, H.; Li, X.; Liu, D.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Hou, S.; Peng, L.; Xu, C.; Liu, W.; et al. Follicular T-helper cell recruitment governed by bystander B cells and ICOS-driven motility. Nature 2013, 496, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Foy, T.M.; Laman, J.D.; Ledbetter, J.A.; Aruffo, A.; Claassen, E.; Noelle, R.J. gp39-CD40 interactions are essential for germinal center formation and the development of B cell memory. J. Exp. Med. 1994, 180, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Han, S.; Hathcock, K.; Zheng, B.; Kepler, T.B.; Hodes, R.; Kelsoe, G. Cellular interaction in germinal centers. Roles of CD40 ligand and B7–2 in established germinal centers. J. Immunol. 1995, 155, 556–567. [Google Scholar]
  92. Takahashi, Y.; Dutta, P.R.; Cerasoli, D.M.; Kelsoe, G. In situ studies of the primary immune response to (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl. V. Affinity maturation develops in two stages of clonal selection. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 187, 885–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Banchereau, J.; de Paoli, P.; Valle, A.; Garcia, E.; Rousset, F. Long-term human B cell lines dependent on interleukin-4 and antibody to CD40. Science 1991, 251, 70–72. [Google Scholar]
  94. Arpin, C.; Dechanet, J.; Van Kooten, C.; Merville, P.; Grouard, G.; Briere, F.; Banchereau, J.; Liu, Y.J. Generation of memory B cells and plasma cells in vitro. Science 1995, 268, 720–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Randall, T.D.; Heath, A.W.; Santos-Argumedo, L.; Howard, M.C.; Weissman, I.L.; Lund, F.E. Arrest of B lymphocyte terminal differentiation by CD40 signaling: Mechanism for lack of antibody-secreting cells in germinal centers. Immunity 1998, 8, 733–742. [Google Scholar]
  96. Kwakkenbos, M.J.; Diehl, S.A.; Yasuda, E.; Bakker, A.Q.; van Geelen, C.M.; Lukens, M.V.; van Bleek, G.M.; Widjojoatmodjo, M.N.; Bogers, W.M.; Mei, H.; et al. Generation of stable monoclonal antibody-producing B cell receptor-positive human memory B cells by genetic programming. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Fillatreau, S.; Gray, D. T cell accumulation in B cell follicles is regulated by dendritic cells and is independent of B cell activation. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 197, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. van Essen, D.; Kikutani, H.; Gray, D. CD40 ligand-transduced co-stimulation of T cells in the development of helper function. Nature 1995, 378, 620–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Grewal, I.S.; Xu, J.; Flavell, R.A. Impairment of antigen-specific T-cell priming in mice lacking CD40 ligand. Nature 1995, 378, 617–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Qi, H.; Cannons, J.L.; Klauschen, F.; Schwartzberg, P.L.; Germain, R.N. SAP-controlled T-B cell interactions underlie germinal centre formation. Nature 2008, 455, 764–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Cannons, J.L. Optimal germinal center responses require a multistage T cell:B cell adhesion process involving integrins, SLAM-associated protein, and CD84. Immunity 2010, 32, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Linterman, M.A. Follicular helper T cells are required for systemic autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 561–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Crotty, S.; Kersh, E.N.; Cannons, J.; Schwartzberg, P.L.; Ahmed, R. SAP is required for generating long-term humoral immunity. Nature 2003, 421, 282–287. [Google Scholar]
  104. Ma, C.S. Impaired humoral immunity in X-linked lymphoproliferative disease is associated with defective IL-10 production by CD4+ T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2005, 115, 1049–1059. [Google Scholar]
  105. Ma, C.S.; Nichols, K.E.; Tangye, S.G. Regulation of cellular and humoral immune responses by the SLAM and SAP families of molecules. Annu Rev. Immunol 2007, 25, 337–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Cannons, J.L.; Wu, J.Z.; Gomez-Rodriguez, J.; Zhang, J.; Dong, B.; Liu, Y.; Shaw, S.; Siminovitch, K.A.; Schwartzberg, P.L. Biochemical and genetic evidence for a SAP-PKC-theta interaction contributing to IL-4 regulation. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 2819–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tangye, S.G.; Ma, C.S.; Brink, R.; Deenick, E.K. The good, the bad and the ugly—TFH cells in human health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 412–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kumar, K.R.; Li, L.; Yan, M.; Bhaskarabhatla, M.; Mobley, A.B.; Nguyen, C.; Mooney, J.M.; Schatzle, J.D.; Wakeland, E.K.; Mohan, C. Regulation of B cell tolerance by the lupus susceptibility gene Ly108. Science 2006, 312, 1665–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kageyama, R. The receptor Ly108 functions as a SAP adaptor-dependent on-off switch for T cell help to B cells and NKT cell development. Immunity 2012, 36, 986–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Graham, D.B.; Bell, M.P.; McCausland, M.M.; Huntoon, C.J.; van Deursen, J.; Faubion, W.A.; Crotty, S.; McKean, D.J. Ly9 (CD229)-deficient mice exhibit T cell defects yet do not share several phenotypic characteristics associated with SLAM- and SAP-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 291–300. [Google Scholar]
  111. McCausland, M.M.; Yusuf, I.; Tran, H.; Ono, N.; Yanagi, Y.; Crotty, S. SAP regulation of follicular helper CD4 T cell development and humoral immunity is independent of SLAM and Fyn kinase. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 817–828. [Google Scholar]
  112. Linterman, M.A.; Beaton, L.; Yu, D.; Ramiscal, R.R.; Srivastava, M.; Hogan, J.J.; Verma, N.K.; Smyth, M.J.; Rigby, R.J.; Vinuesa, C.G. IL-21 acts directly on B cells to regulate Bcl-6 expression and germinal center responses. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zotos, D.; Coquet, J.M.; Zhang, Y.; Light, A.; D'Costa, K.; Kallies, A.; Corcoran, L.M.; Godfrey, D.I.; Toellner, K.M.; Smyth, M.J.; et al. IL-21 regulates germinal center B cell differentiation and proliferation through a B cell-intrinsic mechanism. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Dienz, O.; Eaton, S.M.; Bond, J.P.; Neveu, W.; Moquin, D.; Noubade, R.; Briso, E.M.; Charland, C.; Leonard, W.J.; Ciliberto, G.; et al. The induction of antibody production by IL-6 is indirectly mediated by IL-21 produced by CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Batten, M.; Ramamoorthi, N.; Kljavin, N.M.; Ma, C.S.; Cox, J.H.; Dengler, H.S.; Danilenko, D.M.; Caplazi, P.; Wong, M.; Fulcher, D.A.; et al. IL-27 supports germinal center function by enhancing IL-21 production and the function of T follicular helper cells. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 2895–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ettinger, R. IL-21 induces differentiation of human naive and memory B cells into antibody-secreting plasma cells. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 7867–7879. [Google Scholar]
  117. Good, K.L.; Bryant, V.L.; Tangye, S.G. Kinetics of human B cell behavior and amplification of proliferative responses following stimulation with IL-21. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 5236–5247. [Google Scholar]
  118. Bryant, V.L. Cytokine-mediated regulation of human B cell differentiation into Ig-secreting cells: Predominant role of IL-21 produced by CXCR5+ T follicular helper cells. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 8180–8190. [Google Scholar]
  119. Kuchen, S.; Robbins, R.; Sims, G.P.; Sheng, C.; Phillips, T.M.; Lipsky, P.E.; Ettinger, R. Essential role of IL-21 in B cell activation, expansion, and plasma cell generation during CD4+ T cell-B cell collaboration. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 5886–5896. [Google Scholar]
  120. Ozaki, K.; Spolski, R.; Feng, C.G.; Qi, C.F.; Cheng, J.; Sher, A.; Morse, H.C., 3rd; Liu, C.; Schwartzberg, P.L.; Leonard, W.J. A critical role for IL-21 in regulating immunoglobulin production. Science 2002, 298, 1630–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Pene, J. Cutting edge: IL-21 is a switch factor for the production of IgG1 and IgG3 by human B cells. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 5154–5157. [Google Scholar]
  122. Avery, D.T.; Bryant, V.L.; Ma, C.S.; de Waal Malefyt, R.; Tangye, S.G. IL-21-induced isotype switching to IgG and IgA by human naive B cells is differentially regulated by IL-4. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 1767–1779. [Google Scholar]
  123. Paul, W.E.; Ohara, J. B-cell stimulatory factor-1/interleukin 4. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1987, 5, 429–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Nelms, K.; Keegan, A.D.; Zamorano, J.; Ryan, J.J.; Paul, W.E. The IL-4 receptor: Signaling mechanisms and biologic functions. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1999, 17, 701–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wurster, A.L.; Rodgers, V.L.; White, M.F.; Rothstein, T.L.; Grusby, M.J. Interleukin-4-mediated protection of primary B cells from apoptosis through Stat6-dependent up-regulation of Bcl-xL. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 27169–27175. [Google Scholar]
  126. Dufort, F.J.; Bleiman, B.F.; Gumina, M.R.; Blair, D.; Wagner, D.J.; Roberts, M.F.; Abu-Amer, Y.; Chiles, T.C. Cutting edge: IL-4-mediated protection of primary B lymphocytes from apoptosis via Stat6-dependent regulation of glycolytic metabolism. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 4953–4957. [Google Scholar]
  127. Vinuesa, C.G.; Sanz, I.; Cook, M.C. Dysregulation of germinal centres in autoimmune disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9, 845–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Sweet, R.A.; Lee, S.K.; Vinuesa, C.G. Developing connections amongst key cytokines and dysregulated germinal centers in autoimmunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2012, 24, 658–664. [Google Scholar]
  129. King, C.; Tangye, S.G.; Mackay, C.R. T follicular helper (TFH) cells in normal and dysregulated immune responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 26, 741–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Hron, J.D.; Caplan, L.; Gerth, A.J.; Schwartzberg, P.L.; Peng, S.L. SH2D1A regulates T-dependent humoral autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. 2004, 200, 261–266. [Google Scholar]
  131. Subramanian, S.; Tus, K.; Li, Q.Z.; Wang, A.; Tian, X.H.; Zhou, J.; Liang, C.; Bartov, G.; McDaniel, L.D.; Zhou, X.J.; et al. A Tlr7 translocation accelerates systemic autoimmunity in murine lupus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 9970–9975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Luzina, I.G.; Atamas, S.P.; Storrer, C.E.; daSilva, L.C.; Kelsoe, G.; Papadimitriou, J.C.; Handwerger, B.S. Spontaneous formation of germinal centers in autoimmune mice. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2001, 70, 578–584. [Google Scholar]
  133. Hsu, H.C.; Yang, P.; Wang, J.; Wu, Q.; Myers, R.; Chen, J.; Yi, J.; Guentert, T.; Tousson, A.; Stanus, A.L.; et al. Interleukin 17-producing T helper cells and interleukin 17 orchestrate autoreactive germinal center development in autoimmune BXD2 mice. Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Rankin, A.L.; Guay, H.; Herber, D.; Bertino, S.A.; Duzanski, T.A.; Carrier, Y.; Keegan, S.; Senices, M.; Stedman, N.; Ryan, M.; et al. IL-21 receptor is required for the systemic accumulation of activated B and T lymphocytes in MRL/MpJ-Fas(lpr/lpr)/J mice. J. Immunol. 2012, 188, 1656–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Pisitkun, P.; Deane, J.A.; Difilippantonio, M.J.; Tarasenko, T.; Satterthwaite, A.B.; Bolland, S. Autoreactive B cell responses to RNA-related antigens due to TLR7 gene duplication. Science 2006, 312, 1669–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Bubier, J.A.; Sproule, T.J.; Foreman, O.; Spolski, R.; Shaffer, D.J.; Morse, H.C., 3rd; Leonard, W.J.; Roopenian, D.C. A critical role for IL-21 receptor signaling in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus in BXSB-Yaa mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 1518–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Bertossi, A.; Aichinger, M.; Sansonetti, P.; Lech, M.; Neff, F.; Pal, M.; Wunderlich, F.T.; Anders, H.J.; Klein, L.; Schmidt-Supprian, M. Loss of Roquin induces early death and immune deregulation but not autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 1749–1756. [Google Scholar]
  138. Craft, J.E. Follicular helper T cells in immunity and systemic autoimmunity. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2012, 8, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. William, J.; Euler, C.; Christensen, S.; Shlomchik, M.J. Evolution of autoantibody responses via somatic hypermutation outside of germinal centers. Science 2002, 297, 2066–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Odegard, J.M.; Marks, B.R.; DiPlacido, L.D.; Poholek, A.C.; Kono, D.H.; Dong, C.; Flavell, R.A.; Craft, J. ICOS-dependent extrafollicular helper T cells elicit IgG production via IL-21 in systemic autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 2873–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Odegard, J.M.; DiPlacido, L.D.; Greenwald, L.; Kashgarian, M.; Kono, D.H.; Dong, C.; Flavell, R.A.; Craft, J. ICOS controls effector function but not trafficking receptor expression of kidney-infiltrating effector T cells in murine lupus. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 4076–4084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Tada, Y.; Koarada, S.; Tomiyoshi, Y.; Morito, F.; Mitamura, M.; Haruta, Y.; Ohta, A.; Nagasawa, K. Role of inducible costimulator in the development of lupus in MRL/lpr mice. Clin. Immunol. 2006, 120, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Andrews, B.S.; Eisenberg, R.A.; Theofilopoulos, A.N.; Izui, S.; Wilson, C.B.; McConahey, P.J.; Murphy, E.D.; Roths, J.B.; Dixon, F.J. Spontaneous murine lupus-like syndromes. Clinical and immunopathological manifestations in several strains. J. Exp. Med. 1978, 148, 1198–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Hu, Y.L.; Metz, D.P.; Chung, J.; Siu, G.; Zhang, M. B7RP-1 blockade ameliorates autoimmunity through regulation of follicular helper T cells. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 1421–1428. [Google Scholar]
  145. Taylor, B.A.; Wnek, C.; Kotlus, B.S.; Roemer, N.; MacTaggart, T.; Phillips, S.J. Genotyping new BXD recombinant inbred mouse strains and comparison of BXD and consensus maps. Mamm. Genome 1999, 10, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Mountz, J.D.; Wang, J.H.; Xie, S.; Hsu, H.C. Cytokine regulation of B-cell migratory behavior favors formation of germinal centers in autoimmune disease. Discov. Med. 2011, 11, 76–85. [Google Scholar]
  147. Xie, S.; Li, J.; Wang, J.H.; Wu, Q.; Yang, P.; Hsu, H.C.; Smythies, L.E.; Mountz, J.D. IL-17 activates the canonical NF-kappaB signaling pathway in autoimmune B cells of BXD2 mice to upregulate the expression of regulators of G-protein signaling 16. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 2289–2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ding, Y.; Li, J.; Wu, Q.; Yang, P.; Luo, B.; Xie, S.; Druey, K.M.; Zajac, A.J.; Hsu, H.C.; Mountz, J.D. IL-17RA Is Essential for Optimal Localization of Follicular Th Cells in the Germinal Center Light Zone To Promote Autoantibody-Producing B Cells. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 1614–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Cappione, A., 3rd; Anolik, J.H.; Pugh-Bernard, A.; Barnard, J.; Dutcher, P.; Silverman, G.; Sanz, I. Germinal center exclusion of autoreactive B cells is defective in human systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Clin. Invest. 2005, 115, 3205–3216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Simpson, N. Expansion of circulating T cells resembling follicular helper T cells is a fixed phenotype that identifies a subset of severe systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2010, 62, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Morita, R. Human blood CXCR5+CD4+ T cells are counterparts of T follicular cells and contain specific subsets that differentially support antibody secretion. Immunity 2011, 34, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Li, X.Y. Role of the frequency of blood CD4+ CXCR5+ CCR6+ T cells in autoimmunity in patients with Sjogren's syndrome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 422, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ma, J. Increased frequency of circulating follicular helper T cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2012, 2012, 827–480. [Google Scholar]
  154. Zhang, Y.; Meyer-Hermann, M.; George, L.A.; Figge, M.T.; Khan, M.; Goodall, M.; Young, S.P.; Reynolds, A.; Falciani, F.; Waisman, A.; et al. Germinal center B cells govern their own fate via antibody feedback. J. Exp. Med. 2013, 210, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Yang, M.; Rui, K.; Wang, S.; Lu, L. Regulatory B cells in autoimmune diseases. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2013, 10, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wolf, S.D.; Dittel, B.N.; Hardardottir, F.; Janeway, C.A., Jr. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis induction in genetically B cell-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 184, 2271–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Fillatreau, S.; Sweenie, C.H.; McGeachy, M.J.; Gray, D.; Anderton, S.M. B cells regulate autoimmunity by provision of IL-10. Nat. Immunol. 2002, 3, 944–950. [Google Scholar]
  158. Mizoguchi, A.; Mizoguchi, E.; Takedatsu, H.; Blumberg, R.S.; Bhan, A.K. Chronic intestinal inflammatory condition generates IL-10-producing regulatory B cell subset characterized by CD1d upregulation. Immunity 2002, 16, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Mauri, C.; Gray, D.; Mushtaq, N.; Londei, M. Prevention of arthritis by interleukin 10-producing B cells. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 197, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Lenert, P.; Brummel, R.; Field, E.H.; Ashman, R.F. TLR-9 activation of marginal zone B cells in lupus mice regulates immunity through increased IL-10 production. J. Clin. Immunol. 2005, 25, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Yanaba, K.; Bouaziz, J.D.; Haas, K.M.; Poe, J.C.; Fujimoto, M.; Tedder, T.F. A regulatory B cell subset with a unique CD1dhiCD5+ phenotype controls T cell-dependent inflammatory responses. Immunity 2008, 28, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Evans, J.G.; Chavez-Rueda, K.A.; Eddaoudi, A.; Meyer-Bahlburg, A.; Rawlings, D.J.; Ehrenstein, M.R.; Mauri, C. Novel suppressive function of transitional 2 B cells in experimental arthritis. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 7868–7878. [Google Scholar]
  163. Duddy, M.E.; Alter, A.; Bar-Or, A. Distinct profiles of human B cell effector cytokines: A role in immune regulation? J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 3422–3427. [Google Scholar]
  164. Duddy, M.; Niino, M.; Adatia, F.; Hebert, S.; Freedman, M.; Atkins, H.; Kim, H.J.; Bar-Or, A. Distinct effector cytokine profiles of memory and naive human B cell subsets and implication in multiple sclerosis. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 6092–6099. [Google Scholar]
  165. Blair, P.A.; Norena, L.Y.; Flores-Borja, F.; Rawlings, D.J.; Isenberg, D.A.; Ehrenstein, M.R.; Mauri, C. CD19(+)CD24(hi)CD38(hi) B cells exhibit regulatory capacity in healthy individuals butare functionally impaired in systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients. Immunity 2010, 32, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Iwata, Y.; Matsushita, T.; Horikawa, M.; Dilillo, D.J.; Yanaba, K.; Venturi, G.M.; Szabolcs, P.M.; Bernstein, S.H.; Magro, C.M.; Williams, A.D.; et al. Characterization of a rare IL-10-competent B-cell subset in humans that parallels mouse regulatory B10 cells. Blood 2011, 117, 530–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Lundy, S.K. Killer B lymphocytes: the evidence and the potential. Inflamm. Res. 2009, 58, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Lampropoulou, V.; Hoehlig, K.; Roch, T.; Neves, P.; Calderon Gomez, E.; Sweenie, C.H.; Hao, Y.; Freitas, A.A.; Steinhoff, U.; Anderton, S.M.; et al. TLR-activated B cells suppress T cell-mediated autoimmunity. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 4763–4773. [Google Scholar]
  169. Bouaziz, J.D.; Calbo, S.; Maho-Vaillant, M.; Saussine, A.; Bagot, M.; Bensussan, A.; Musette, P. IL-10 produced by activated human B cells regulates CD4(+) T-cell activation in vitro. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010, 40, 2686–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Tu, W.; Lau, Y.L.; Zheng, J.; Liu, Y.; Chan, P.L.; Mao, H.; Dionis, K.; Schneider, P.; Lewis, D.B. Efficient generation of human alloantigen-specific CD4+ regulatory T cells from naive precursors by CD40-activated B cells. Blood 2008, 112, 2554–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Walters, S.; Webster, K.E.; Sutherland, A.; Gardam, S.; Groom, J.; Liuwantara, D.; Marino, E.; Thaxton, J.; Weinberg, A.; Mackay, F.; et al. Increased CD4+Foxp3+ T cells in BAFF-transgenic mice suppress T cell effector responses. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 793–801. [Google Scholar]
  172. Yang, M.; Sun, L.; Wang, S.; Ko, K.H.; Xu, H.; Zheng, B.J.; Cao, X.; Lu, L. Novel function of B cell-activating factor in the induction of IL-10-producing regulatory B cells. J. Immunol 2010, 184, 3321–3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Gray, M.; Miles, K.; Salter, D.; Gray, D.; Savill, J. Apoptotic cells protect mice from autoimmune inflammation by the induction of regulatory B cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 14080–14085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Blair, P.A.; Chavez-Rueda, K.A.; Evans, J.G.; Shlomchik, M.J.; Eddaoudi, A.; Isenberg, D.A.; Ehrenstein, M.R.; Mauri, C. Selective targeting of B cells with agonistic anti-CD40 is an efficacious strategy for the generation of induced regulatory T2-like B cells and for the suppression of lupus in MRL/lpr mice. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 3492–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Tedder, T.F.; Matsushita, T. Regulatory B cells that produce IL-10: a breath of fresh air in allergic airway disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 125, 1125–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Carter, N.A.; Vasconcellos, R.; Rosser, E.C.; Tulone, C.; Munoz-Suano, A.; Kamanaka, M.; Ehrenstein, M.R.; Flavell, R.A.; Mauri, C. Mice lacking endogenous IL-10-producing regulatory B cells develop exacerbated disease and present with an increased frequency of Th1/Th17 but a decrease in regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 5569–5579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Amu, S.; Saunders, S.P.; Kronenberg, M.; Mangan, N.E.; Atzberger, A.; Fallon, P.G. Regulatory B cells prevent and reverse allergic airway inflammation via FoxP3-positive T regulatory cells in a murine model. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 125, 1114–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Carter, N.A.; Rosser, E.C.; Mauri, C. Interleukin-10 produced by B cells is crucial for the suppression of Th17/Th1 responses, induction of T regulatory type 1 cells and reduction of collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2012, 14, R32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Yang, M.; Deng, J.; Liu, Y.; Ko, K.H.; Wang, X.; Jiao, Z.; Wang, S.; Hua, Z.; Sun, L.; Srivastava, G.; et al. IL-10-producing regulatory B10 cells ameliorate collagen-induced arthritis via suppressing Th17 cell generation. Am. J. Pathol. 2012, 180, 2375–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Lundy, S.K.; Boros, D.L. Fas ligand-expressing B-1a lymphocytes mediate CD4(+)-T-cell apoptosis during schistosomal infection: Induction by interleukin 4 (IL-4) and IL-10. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 812–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Klinker, M.W.; Reed, T.J.; Fox, D.A.; Lundy, S.K. Interleukin-5 Supports the Expansion of Fas Ligand-Expressing Killer B Cells that Induce Antigen-Specific Apoptosis of CD4(+) T Cells and Secrete Interleukin-10. PLoS One 2013, 8, e70131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Lundy, S.K.; Fox, D.A. Reduced Fas ligand-expressing splenic CD5+ B lymphocytes in severe collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2009, 11, R128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Feldmann, M.; Brennan, F.M.; Maini, R.N. Rheumatoid arthritis. Cell 1996, 85, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Yanaba, K.; Bouaziz, J.D.; Matsushita, T.; Magro, C.M.; St Clair, E.W.; Tedder, T.F. B-lymphocyte contributions to human autoimmune disease. Immunol. Rev. 2008, 223, 284–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Haas, K.M.; Watanabe, R.; Matsushita, T.; Nakashima, H.; Ishiura, N.; Okochi, H.; Fujimoto, M.; Tedder, T.F. Protective and pathogenic roles for B cells during systemic autoimmunity in NZB/W F1 mice. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 4789–4800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Matsushita, T.; Horikawa, M.; Iwata, Y.; Tedder, T.F. Regulatory B cells (B10 cells) and regulatory T cells have independent roles in controlling experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis initiation and late-phase immunopathogenesis. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 2240–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Watanabe, R.; Ishiura, N.; Nakashima, H.; Kuwano, Y.; Okochi, H.; Tamaki, K.; Sato, S.; Tedder, T.F.; Fujimoto, M. Regulatory B cells (B10 cells) have a suppressive role in murine lupus: CD19 and B10 cell deficiency exacerbates systemic autoimmunity. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 4801–4809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Ohkura, N.; Kitagawa, Y.; Sakaguchi, S. Development and maintenance of regulatory T cells. Immunity 2013, 38, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Lim, H.W.; Hillsamer, P.; Kim, C.H. Regulatory T cells can migrate to follicles upon T cell activation and suppress GC-Th cells and GC-Th cell-driven B cell responses. J. Clin. Invest. 2004, 114, 1640–1649. [Google Scholar]
  190. Lim, H.W.; Hillsamer, P.; Banham, A.H.; Kim, C.H. Cutting edge: direct suppression of B cells by CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 4180–4183. [Google Scholar]
  191. Gotot, J.; Gottschalk, C.; Leopold, S.; Knolle, P.A.; Yagita, H.; Kurts, C.; Ludwig-Portugall, I. Regulatory T cells use programmed death 1 ligands to directly suppress autoreactive B cells in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 10468–10473. [Google Scholar]
  192. Josefowicz, S.Z.; Lu, L.F.; Rudensky, A.Y. Regulatory T cells: Mechanisms of differentiation and function. Annu Rev. Immunol. 2012, 30, 531–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Chung, Y. Follicular regulatory T cells expressing Foxp3 and Bcl-6 suppress germinal center reactions. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Linterman, M.A. Foxp3+ follicular regulatory T cells control the germinal center response. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 975–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Wollenberg, I. Regulation of the germinal center reaction by Foxp3+ follicular regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 4553–4560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Sage, P.T.; Francisco, L.M.; Carman, C.V.; Sharpe, A.H. The receptor PD-1 controls follicular regulatory T cells in the lymph nodes and blood. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 14, 152–161. [Google Scholar]
  197. Alexander, C.M.; Tygrett, L.T.; Boyden, A.W.; Wolniak, K.L.; Legge, K.L.; Waldschmidt, T.J. T regulatory cells participate in the control of germinal centre reactions. Immunology 2011, 133, 452–468. [Google Scholar]
  198. Cretney, E.; Xin, A.; Shi, W.; Minnich, M.; Masson, F.; Miasari, M.; Belz, G.T.; Smyth, G.K.; Busslinger, M.; Nutt, S.L.; et al. The transcription factors Blimp-1 and IRF4 jointly control the differentiation and function of effector regulatory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Noble, A.; Zhao, Z.S.; Cantor, H. Suppression of immune responses by CD8 cells. II. Qa-1 on activated B cells stimulates CD8 cell suppression of T helper 2 responses. J. Immunol. 1998, 160, 566–571. [Google Scholar]
  200. Hu, D.; Ikizawa, K.; Lu, L.; Sanchirico, M.E.; Shinohara, M.L.; Cantor, H. Analysis of regulatory CD8 T cells in Qa-1-deficient mice. Nat. Immunol 2004, 5, 516–523. [Google Scholar]
  201. Lu, L.; Ikizawa, K.; Hu, D.; Werneck, M.B.; Wucherpfennig, K.W.; Cantor, H. Regulation of activated CD4+ T cells by NK cells via the Qa-1-NKG2A inhibitory pathway. Immunity 2007, 26, 593–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Kim, H.J.; Verbinnen, B.; Tang, X.; Lu, L.; Cantor, H. Inhibition of follicular T-helper cells by CD8(+) regulatory T cells is essential for self tolerance. Nature 2010, 467, 328–332. [Google Scholar]
  203. Cantor, H.; Boyse, E.A. Functional subclasses of T-lymphocytes bearing different Ly antigens. I. The generation of functionally distinct T-cell subclasses is a differentiative process independent of antigen. J. Exp. Med. 1975, 141, 1376–1389. [Google Scholar]
  204. Cantor, H.; Shen, F.W.; Boyse, E.A. Separation of helper T cells from suppressor T cells expressing different Ly components. II. Activation by antigen: after immunization, antigen-specific suppressor and helper activities are mediated by distinct T-cell subclasses. J. Exp. Med. 1976, 143, 1391–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Kim, H.J.; Cantor, H. Regulation of self-tolerance by Qa-1-restricted CD8(+) regulatory T cells. Semin. Immunol. 2011, 23, 446–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Jiang, H.; Canfield, S.M.; Gallagher, M.P.; Jiang, H.H.; Jiang, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Chess, L. HLA-E-restricted regulatory CD8(+) T cells are involved in development and control of human autoimmune type 1 diabetes. J. Clin. Invest. 2010, 120, 3641–3650. [Google Scholar]
  207. Correale, J.; Villa, A. Isolation and characterization of CD8+ regulatory T cells in multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2008, 195, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Lu, L.; Kim, H.J.; Werneck, M.B.; Cantor, H. Regulation of CD8+ regulatory T cells: Interruption of the NKG2A-Qa-1 interaction allows robust suppressive activity and resolution of autoimmune disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 19420–19425. [Google Scholar]
  209. Kim, H.J.; Wang, X.; Radfar, S.; Sproule, T.J.; Roopenian, D.C.; Cantor, H. CD8+ T regulatory cells express the Ly49 Class I MHC receptor and are defective in autoimmune prone B6-Yaa mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 2010–2015. [Google Scholar]
  210. Leavenworth, J.W.; Tang, X.; Kim, H.J.; Wang, X.; Cantor, H. Amelioration of arthritis through mobilization of peptide-specific CD8+ regulatory T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2013, 123, 1382–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Mingari, M.C.; Ponte, M.; Cantoni, C.; Vitale, C.; Schiavetti, F.; Bertone, S.; Bellomo, R.; Cappai, A.T.; Biassoni, R. HLA-class I-specific inhibitory receptors in human cytolytic T lymphocytes: molecular characterization, distribution in lymphoid tissues and co-expression by individual T cells. Int. Immunol. 1997, 9, 485–491. [Google Scholar]
  212. Anfossi, N.; Pascal, V.; Vivier, E.; Ugolini, S. Biology of T memory type 1 cells. Immunol. Rev. 2001, 181, 269–278. [Google Scholar]
  213. Wilson-Welder, J.H.; Torres, M.P.; Kipper, M.J.; Mallapragada, S.K.; Wannemuehler, M.J.; Narasimhan, B. Vaccine adjuvants: Current challenges and future approaches. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 98, 1278–1316. [Google Scholar]
  214. Moon, J.J.; Suh, H.; Li, A.V.; Ockenhouse, C.F.; Yadava, A.; Irvine, D.J. Enhancing humoral responses to a malaria antigen with nanoparticle vaccines that expand Tfh cells and promote germinal center induction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 1080–1085. [Google Scholar]
  215. Su, C.; Duan, X.; Zheng, J.; Liang, L.; Wang, F.; Guo, L. IFN-alpha as an Adjuvant for Adenovirus-Vectored FMDV Subunit Vaccine through Improving the Generation of T Follicular Helper Cells. PLoS One 2013, 8, e66134. [Google Scholar]
  216. Zheng, D.; Sun, Q.; Su, Z.; Kong, F.; Shi, X.; Tong, J.; Shen, P.; Peng, T.; Wang, S.; Xu, H. Enhancing specific-antibody production to the ragB vaccine with GITRL that expand Tfh, IFN-gamma(+) T cells and attenuates Porphyromonas gingivalis infection in mice. PLoS One 2013, 8, e59604. [Google Scholar]
  217. Tone, M.; Tone, Y.; Adams, E.; Yates, S.F.; Frewin, M.R.; Cobbold, S.P.; Waldmann, H. Mouse glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor ligand is costimulatory for T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 15059–15064. [Google Scholar]
  218. Hu, J.; Havenar-Daughton, C.; Crotty, S. Modulation of SAP dependent T:B cell interactions as a strategy to improve vaccination. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2013, 3, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Aldhamen, Y.A.; Appledorn, D.M.; Seregin, S.S.; Liu, C.J.; Schuldt, N.J.; Godbehere, S.; Amalfitano, A. Expression of the SLAM family of receptors adapter EAT-2 as a novel strategy for enhancing beneficial immune responses to vaccine antigens. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 722–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Kamphorst, A.O.; Ahmed, R. Manipulating the PD-1 pathway to improve immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2013, 25, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Hams, E.; McCarron, M.J.; Amu, S.; Yagita, H.; Azuma, M.; Chen, L.; Fallon, P.G. Blockade of B7-H1 (programmed death ligand 1) enhances humoral immunity by positively regulating the generation of T follicular helper cells. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 5648–5655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Butler, N.S.; Moebius, J.; Pewe, L.L.; Traore, B.; Doumbo, O.K.; Tygrett, L.T.; Waldschmidt, T.J.; Crompton, P.D.; Harty, J.T. Therapeutic blockade of PD-L1 and LAG-3 rapidly clears established blood-stage Plasmodium infection. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13, 188–195. [Google Scholar]
Antibodies EISSN 2073-4468 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert