Next Article in Journal
Modelling Land Sharing and Land Sparing Relationship with Rural Population in the Cerrado
Previous Article in Journal
The Relative Concentration of Interaction—A Proposal for an Integrated Understanding of Centrality and Central Places
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Needs Assessment in Land Administration: The Potential of the Nominal Group Technique

1
Public Governance Institute, KU Leuven, Parkstraat 45 bus 3609, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
2
Faculty of Governance and Global Affairs, Leiden University, Wijnhaven Building, Turfmarkt 99, 2511 DP The Hague, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 11 June 2018 / Revised: 5 July 2018 / Accepted: 17 July 2018 / Published: 20 July 2018
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [887 KB, uploaded 20 July 2018]   |  

Abstract

This paper introduces the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) for conducting needs assessments in land administration projects. Understanding the local context of what citizens, communities and organisations need remains a complex challenge yet fundamental to the success of land administration projects. To date, key methods of understanding and identifying local needs have been qualitative in nature with various strengths and limitations. For land administration, it is also important for empirical methods to attend to power imbalances amongst participants that are a hallmark and driver of land tenure security. Although NGT has hardly been used in the domain of land administration, based on our experience of employing the method in a research project in East Africa, we argue that it presents a valuable addition to needs assessment strategies. We provide a broad outline of the method before providing a detailed description of how we employed the method. We discuss the opportunities and challenges that NGT offers, arguing that it is a time and resource efficient way of engaging communities in a participatory and equitable process which facilitates the co-production of valid and reliable knowledge on needs, and consensus on how these needs should be prioritised. View Full-Text
Keywords: land administration; needs assessment; Nominal Group Technique; methodology land administration; needs assessment; Nominal Group Technique; methodology
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ho, S.; Pattyn, V.; Broucker, B.; Crompvoets, J. Needs Assessment in Land Administration: The Potential of the Nominal Group Technique. Land 2018, 7, 87.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Land EISSN 2073-445X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top