Next Article in Journal
Previous Article in Journal
Land 2013, 2(4), 656-677; doi:10.3390/land2040656
Article

Housing Density and Ecosystem Function: Comparing the Impacts of Rural, Exurban, and Suburban Densities on Fire Hazard, Water Availability, and House and Road Distance Effects

1,* , 2
, 3
 and 4
Received: 20 September 2013; in revised form: 5 November 2013 / Accepted: 6 November 2013 / Published: 21 November 2013
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [894 KB, updated 22 November 2013; original version uploaded 21 November 2013]
Abstract: Many amenity-rich regions are experiencing rapid land-use change through low-density residential development or exurbanization. Those same natural-resource amenities that attracted migration are often degraded by housing growth and associated development. This study examines the impacts of exurbanization on three ecosystem indicators (fire hazard, water availability, and generalized distance effects of houses and roads) and compares them to areas with rural and suburban housing densities in the Sonoita Plain, southeastern Arizona. We found that although they support significantly lower population densities, exurban areas have impacts on ecosystem function comparable to suburban areas. Exurban areas had the highest potential for fire, suggesting that it is the presence of people rather than the density that increases fire hazard. The increase in the number of wells in exurban areas far exceeded suburban areas and matched increases for agricultural use in rural areas. When the impacts of houses and roads on ecosystem function were considered, 98% of exurban areas were “highly” or “very highly” impacted, compared to 100% for suburban areas and 35% for rural areas. Since development in the area is not readily visible, assessing the spatial extent of impacts is important for understanding the vulnerability of systems and guiding decisions about development.
Keywords: exurbanization; amenity migration; residential development; grasslands; Arizona; conservation exurbanization; amenity migration; residential development; grasslands; Arizona; conservation
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Vukomanovic, J.; Doumas, S.L.; Osterkamp, W.R.; Orr, B.J. Housing Density and Ecosystem Function: Comparing the Impacts of Rural, Exurban, and Suburban Densities on Fire Hazard, Water Availability, and House and Road Distance Effects. Land 2013, 2, 656-677.

AMA Style

Vukomanovic J, Doumas SL, Osterkamp WR, Orr BJ. Housing Density and Ecosystem Function: Comparing the Impacts of Rural, Exurban, and Suburban Densities on Fire Hazard, Water Availability, and House and Road Distance Effects. Land. 2013; 2(4):656-677.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vukomanovic, Jelena; Doumas, Sandra L.; Osterkamp, W. R.; Orr, Barron J. 2013. "Housing Density and Ecosystem Function: Comparing the Impacts of Rural, Exurban, and Suburban Densities on Fire Hazard, Water Availability, and House and Road Distance Effects." Land 2, no. 4: 656-677.

Land EISSN 2073-445X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert