Next Article in Journal
Identification of Allele-Specific Expression Genes Associated with Maize Heterosis
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing Eco-Efficiency with Emphasis on Carbon Emissions from Fertilizers and Plastic Film Inputs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Citrus Tree Canopy Segmentation of Orchard Spraying Robot Based on RGB-D Image and the Improved DeepLabv3+
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Precision Operation Technology and Intelligent Equipment in Farmland

1
College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing 210095, China
Agronomy 2023, 13(11), 2721; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112721
Submission received: 13 October 2023 / Revised: 26 October 2023 / Accepted: 26 October 2023 / Published: 29 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Operation Technology and Intelligent Equipment in Farmland)

1. Introduction

Precision operation technology and intelligent equipment in farmland is centered on farmland cultivation, planting, management, harvesting, and other operations [1,2,3,4], integration of the Internet of Things [5,6,7], agricultural modeling [5,8,9,10,11,12,13], and robotics [11,14,15,16,17], and other advanced technologies. In doing so, an intelligent farm equipment system, with functions such as information collection [8,12,13,16], prescription generation [6,17,18,19], intelligent control [20,21], and variable implementation, can be built [11]. This system is highly integrated with agricultural machinery–agronomy–information aspects. It can fully reflect the concept of crop production in accordance with in situ conditions, intelligent management, maximizing productivity in farming, and environment protection. The theme of this Special Issue is cutting-edge research on precision farming and intelligent equipment; twelve research papers and one review article have been published, which are related to the fields of agricultural sensors, machine–crop–soil interactions, crop production modeling, new agricultural machinery, and field robots.

2. Papers in this Special Issue

Consumers are increasingly paying attention to the quality and safety of grains, which are a necessity for human life [22,23,24,25,26]. The review articles [27] discussed the application and prospect of different sensing mechanisms, such as acoustics and optics, and sensing equipment used in grain quality detection. Current methods and products that have been able to realize high-precision detection for different grain quality indicators have been summarized. Meanwhile, some difficulties in applications have also been analyzed. These difficulties include the high cost of detection associated with full-waveband instruments and the unstable results of grain quality detection based on acoustic and thermal characteristics. The authors believe that the future research of grain quality detection is to reduce the cost, improve reliability, and realize a fusion of multiple quality indicators.
Lychee branch occlusion and overlap in the natural state is one of the key problems hindering accurate picking by robots [28,29]. The second paper in this Special Issue [30] proposed a method of branch segmentation for lychee harvesting based on the improved DeepLabv3+ routine. It introduces an attention mechanism to improve the feature extraction ability of the model, thereby overcoming the problem arising from lychee branch segmentation by training the model with a constructed dataset that contains 488 images of lychee plants and fruits under different conditions. The results of that research promote the practical application of lychee-picking robots, and in the future attention should be paid to model lightweighting to increase the speed of model analysis.
Seedling cultivation and transplanting can improve the production and quality of vegetables [31,32,33]. To reduce the rate of root damage during automatic transplanting of cucumber seedlings, the third article of this Special Issue [34] discussed the effects of biochar, water content, and addition of nitrogen fertilizer on the cultivation of cucumber seedlings. The results showed that there were complex interactions among the variables related to crop growth, and that a preferred mixing ratio of substrate nutrients could improve water and nitrogen utilization in cucumber seedling cultivation. This article presents a catalyst for the development of automated transplanting cultivation operations.
Identifying occluded fruits in complex natural environments has always been a key topic for those with a research interest in image-processing techniques [35,36,37,38,39,40]. The authors of [41] used the improved YOLOv5 model for the detection of fruit targets. To reduce the leakage rate, a small target detection layer and a weighted frame fusion mechanism were added to the model. In doing so, the relationship between computational speed, accuracy, and computational volume were balanced to meet the actual needs imposed during practical fruit detection.
Pest detection is a prerequisite for precise drug application [42,43,44], and due to the small size, shape, color, and environmental similarity of some of the pest detection objects [45], the detection success rate is impaired, and the once high, stable crop yield is diminished [46,47,48]. The authors of [49] proposed a small-target detection algorithm to detect small-sized pests by taking the citrus woodlouse as an example, which improves the success rate of the model in detecting small targets by introducing an attention mechanism; the detection accuracy was 2.41% higher than that of the traditional model. This study provides a new method for the automatic detection of crop pests and diseases.
Reasonable control of the ratio of male to female flowers is key to elevating fruit quality and increasing yield [50,51], so the rapid counting of male and female flowers is key to modern farm management. The authors of [52] designed a fast and intelligent male and female flower detection system; the size of this developed detection model was only 5.91 MB, and the running power consumption was 10 W, which was significantly lower than that of the server and PC. The detection accuracy and speed met the requirements of male and female flower detection and statistical applications thereof. The authors can further pay attention to the integrity of the dataset in future research to improve the generalizability and stability of their innovative model.
The authors of [53] also conducted research on crop diseases and pests. Differing from the study published by the authors of [49], these authors considered five common pests and diseases as their research objectives, and proposed an improved, fully convolutional, first-level target detection network (FCOS-FL). This network adopted G-GhostNet-3.2 as the backbone network, realizing a lightweight model with an average accuracy of 91.3% for detection in the natural state, and the size of the model parameter set was reduced by 45%, which considerably accelerated its detection ability. Carried in a mobile terminal, it can quickly and accurately identify crop pests and diseases.
Currently, the measurement of soybean yields is mainly realized by detecting the number of pods in a single plant, and accurate counting remains a difficult problem due to the crowding and uneven distribution of pods [54,55]. Based on the VFNet detector, the authors of [56] proposed a deformable attention recurrent feature pyramid network, which was trained using a dense soybean dataset, with a final average accuracy of 90.35%. This is a significant improvement in accuracy compared to the previous detection model, and it has good stability for soybean yield measurement, with different numbers of single pods, plant shapes, and densities. In the future, it can be mounted on mobile terminals for field detection to minimize the workload in soybean breeding.
Nitrogen content is one of the important indicators for the detection of crop nutrients [57,58,59], which can directly affect crop photosynthesis and productivity [60,61,62]. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have the characteristics of being mobile and flexible and less affected by the terrain [63,64]. The authors of [65] used a UAV platform to detect nitrogen in walnut trees, and proposed a canopy simulation method that contains spectral information of walnut tree canopies to realize canopy nitrogen inversion. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis and method of realization of the rapid detection of nutrient composition in large fruit trees.
Variable rate fertilization application is the key to improving fertilizer utilization efficiency in farmland: as the initial fertility of farmland is non-uniform, the use of uniform management methods is very likely to cause a decline in crop yield [66,67,68]. In previous research conducted by the authors of [69], the authors designed an automatic fertilizer application system to control the amount of fertilizer applied between different plots through electromagnetic flow meters. After comparison, the uniformity of fertilizer addition between plots treated with the designed fertilization system was significantly higher than that of manual fertilization by farmers. This system can accurately match the fertilization strategy, thereby improving rates of fertilizer utilization.
Peanut harvesting machinery is typically based on the soil, and the fruit density is different [70,71], so the choice of an appropriate fan speed and vibrating screen to complete the fruit cleaning is important; however, current studies seldom consider the adhesion characteristics between the soil peds, which leads to a poor clearing effect. The authors of [72] coupled discrete element and fluid simulation modules, conducted experimental research on different soil volumes and soil moisture contents, and optimized the appropriate suspension speed to improve the cleaning effect of peanut harvesting machinery.
Weed management is one of the most important tasks in the crop production management chain [73,74,75]. Due to the fact that some weeds are similar in appearance to the crop and are obscured by leaves of the crop itself, they are difficult to detect and recognize when using weed control equipment [76,77]. The authors of [78] proposed a weed detection model based on the improved Swin-Unet for common weeds in corn fields. This model can efficiently and accurately identify corn and weeds in complex corn fields and retain its effectiveness when it is used to identify weeds under occlusion conditions, with a single-frame processing time of 5.28 × 10 2 s. It can also dynamically detect weeds during the operation of weeding robots.
Pest protection for traditional fruit tree orchards is mainly achieved through manual spraying, and the unified management method is used for fruit trees with different growth conditions, which leads to low spraying efficiencies [79,80,81], sometimes leading to the poisoning of operators and nearby staff. The authors of [82] proposed a fruit tree canopy segmentation model against a complex orchard background to realize precise spraying of medicinal pesticidal solutions. This is convenient for calculating the canopy size and shape, and the image is captured using a RGB-D camera, which reduces interference arising from the image background during segmentation via depth information. This lightweight model can run directly in the embedded system, which provides a reference for the precise operation of the orchard-spraying robot.

3. Conclusions

The articles in this Special Issue cover new techniques, methods, and equipment for precision field operations. The current research into precision operating techniques and intelligent equipment in farmland mainly focuses on the use of information technology and intelligent control technology [83,84], and on the integration of agricultural production management models to design or improve agricultural machinery and equipment [85,86], resulting in results that contribute to the development of high-yield, high-quality, high-efficiency, ecologically sound, and safe modern agriculture, and the promotion of more intelligent agriculture. Suitable for precise cultivation, planting, management, harvesting, and other operations, “crop-soil-agricultural machinery” system interaction mechanisms and corrective model research, as well as interactions with the seeds, fertilizer, water, chemicals, precise control of the soil, crops, and weeds, and agricultural information-sensing methods and equipment breakthroughs [87,88], we can conclude that this will improve the productivity of fertilizers and chemicals, significantly increasing crop productivity, while reducing labor costs and protecting the farmland environment. However, some of these research results require further elucidation and analysis; future research should investigate the instability of detection models against complex backgrounds [52], the high cost of making the sensing equipment [27], etc.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, L.; Dabipi, I.K.; Brown, W.L., Jr. Internet of Things Applications for Agriculture. In Internet of Things A to Z; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 507–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xiong, L.; Sun, S.; Xiao, M. Agricultural Machinery Automation and Intelligent Research and Application. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2018, 452, 042077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ye, Y.; Sun, X.; Liu, M.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wu, H. The remote farmland environment monitoring system based on ZigBee sensor network. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2018, 17, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Siddharth, D.; Saini, D.K.; Kumar, A. Precision Agriculture with Technologies for Smart Farming towards Agriculture 5.0. In Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Internet of Things (IoT); Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 247–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, J.Z.; Han, S.; Liu, J. Application Progress of Agricultural Internet of Things in Major Countries. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1087, 032013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Astill, J.; Dara, R.A.; Fraser, E.D.G.; Roberts, B.; Sharif, S. Smart poultry management: Smart sensors, big data, and the internet of things. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 170, 105291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khanna, A.; Kaur, S. Evolution of Internet of Things (IoT) and its significant impact in the field of Precision Agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 157, 218–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kuang, Y.; Shen, Y.; Lu, L.; Li, G. Farmland Monitoring System Based on Cloud Platform. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 8th Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference (ITAIC), Chongqing, China, 24–26 May 2019; pp. 335–339. [Google Scholar]
  9. Vuran, M.C.; Salam, A.; Wong, R.; Irmak, S. Internet of underground things in precision agriculture: Architecture and technology aspects. Ad Hoc Netw. 2018, 81, 160–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Siregar, R.R.A.; Seminar, K.B.; Wahjuni, S.; Santosa, E. Vertical Farming Perspectives in Support of Precision Agriculture Using Artificial Intelligence: A Review. Computers 2022, 11, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ruan, Z.; Chang, P.; Cui, S.; Luo, J.; Gao, R.; Su, Z. A precise crop row detection algorithm in complex farmland for unmanned agricultural machines. Biosyst. Eng. 2023, 232, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, F.; Wang, B.; Huang, Y.; Teng, Y.; Cai, T. Study on the Management System of Farmland Intelligent Irrigation. In Proceedings of the Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture IV, Nanchang, China, 22–25 October 2010; pp. 682–690. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, D.; Nanseki, T.; Chomei, Y.; Kuang, J. A review of smart agriculture and production practices in Japanese large-scale rice farming. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2023, 103, 1609–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xicheng, L. Recent development in unmanned agriculture vehicle: A review. In Proceedings of the Proc.SPIE, Nanjing, China, 18 July 2023; p. 127441S. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xie, D.; Chen, L.; Liu, L.; Chen, L.; Wang, H. Actuators and Sensors for Application in Agricultural Robots: A Review. Machines 2022, 10, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Y.; Ma, X.; Shu, L.; Hancke, G.P.; Abu-Mahfouz, A.M. From Industry 4.0 to Agriculture 4.0: Current Status, Enabling Technologies, and Research Challenges. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2021, 17, 4322–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gao, F.; Sa, J.; Wang, Z.; Peng, Q. Development and Application of Intelligent Agricultural Machinery—A Review. In Proceedings of the 2022 7th International Conference on Big Data Analytics (ICBDA), Guangzhou, China, 4–6 March 2022; pp. 304–309. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bacco, M.; Berton, A.; Ferro, E.; Gennaro, C.; Gotta, A.; Matteoli, S.; Paonessa, F.; Ruggeri, M.; Virone, G.; Zanella, A. Smart farming: Opportunities, challenges and technology enablers. In Proceedings of the 2018 IoT Vertical and Topical Summit on Agriculture—Tuscany (IOT Tuscany), Tuscany, Italy, 8–9 May 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fang, Z. Computer Technology in Intelligent Detection of Agricultural Machinery Equipment. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computer Applications (AEECA), Dalian, China, 20–21 August 2022; pp. 1512–1516. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ghobadpour, A.; Monsalve, G.; Cardenas, A.; Mousazadeh, H. Off-Road Electric Vehicles and Autonomous Robots in Agricultural Sector: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities. Vehicles 2022, 4, 843–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hafeez, A.; Husain, M.A.; Singh, S.P.; Chauhan, A.; Khan, M.T.; Kumar, N.; Chauhan, A.; Soni, S.K. Implementation of drone technology for farm monitoring & pesticide spraying: A review. Inf. Process. Agric. 2023, 10, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, H.; Jackson, P.; Wang, W. Consumer anxieties about food grain safety in China. Food Control 2017, 73, 1256–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mohammadi Moghaddam, T.; Razavi, S.M.A.; Taghizadeh, M. Applications of hyperspectral imaging in grains and nuts quality and safety assessment: A review. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2013, 7, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jayas, D.S.; Singh, C.B. 15—Grain quality evaluation by computer vision. In Computer Vision Technology in the Food and Beverage Industries; Sun, D.-W., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2012; pp. 400–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Halford, N.G.; Curtis, T.Y.; Chen, Z.; Huang, J. Effects of abiotic stress and crop management on cereal grain composition: Implications for food quality and safety. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 1145–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aviara, N.A.; Liberty, J.T.; Olatunbosun, O.S.; Shoyombo, H.A.; Oyeniyi, S.K. Potential application of hyperspectral imaging in food grain quality inspection, evaluation and control during bulk storage. J. Agric. Food Res. 2022, 8, 100288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, H.; Song, M.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, W.; Jiang, X.; Ni, J. Non-Destructive Quality-Detection Techniques for Cereal Grains: A Systematic Review. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hua, X.; Li, H.; Zeng, J.; Han, C.; Chen, T.; Tang, L.; Luo, Y. A Review of Target Recognition Technology for Fruit Picking Robots: From Digital Image Processing to Deep Learning. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 4160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, Q.; Chen, Y.; Tang, Y.; Zhuang, J.; He, Y.; Hou, C.; Chu, X.; Zhong, Z.; Luo, S. Lychee Fruit Detection Based on Monocular Machine Vision in Orchard Environment. Sensors 2019, 19, 4091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xie, J.; Jing, T.; Chen, B.; Peng, J.; Zhang, X.; He, P.; Yin, H.; Sun, D.; Wang, W.; Xiao, A.; et al. Method for Segmentation of Litchi Branches Based on the Improved DeepLabv3+. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, M.; Shao, Q.; Xu, E.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Yin, L. Bletilla striata: A review of seedling propagation and cultivation modes. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2019, 25, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, Q.; Zhou, X.; Li, J.; Xin, C. Effects of seedling age and cultivation density on agronomic characteristics and grain yield of mechanically transplanted rice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lei, W.-s.; Ding, Y.-F.; Li, G.-H.; Tang, S.; Wang, S.-H. Effects of soilless substrates on seedling quality and the growth of transplanted super japonica rice. J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 1053–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ma, G.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Hu, J.; Han, L.; Mao, H. Effects of Compound Biochar Substrate Coupled with Water and Nitrogen on the Growth of Cucumber Plug Seedlings. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, T.; Wu, F.; Wang, M.; Chen, Z.; Li, L.; Zou, X. Grape-Bunch Identification and Location of Picking Points on Occluded Fruit Axis Based on YOLOv5-GAP. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, C.H.; Xiong, L.Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Shi, G.; Kuremot, T.; Zhao, W.H.; Yang, Y. Integrated detection of citrus fruits and branches using a convolutional neural network. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 174, 105469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mirbod, O.; Choi, D.; Heinemann, P.H.; Marini, R.P.; He, L. On-tree apple fruit size estimation using stereo vision with deep learning-based occlusion handling. Biosyst. Eng. 2023, 226, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lu, J.; Sang, N. Detecting citrus fruits and occlusion recovery under natural illumination conditions. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2015, 110, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tabb, A.L.; Peterson, D.L.; Park, J. Segmentation of Apple Fruit from Video via Background Modeling; ASABE: St. Joseph, MI, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  40. Chen, S.; Zou, X.; Zhou, X.; Xiang, Y.; Wu, M. Study on fusion clustering and improved YOLOv5 algorithm based on multiple occlusion of Camellia oleifera fruit. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2023, 206, 107706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xie, J.; Peng, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, B.; Jing, T.; Sun, D.; Gao, P.; Wang, W.; Lu, J.; Yetan, R.; et al. Litchi Detection in a Complex Natural Environment Using the YOLOv5-Litchi Model. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Albanese, A.; Nardello, M.; Brunelli, D. Automated Pest Detection With DNN on the Edge for Precision Agriculture. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circuits Syst. 2021, 11, 458–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cui, S.; Ling, P.; Zhu, H.; Keener, H.M. Plant Pest Detection Using an Artificial Nose System: A Review. Sensors 2018, 18, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ebrahimi, M.A.; Khoshtaghaza, M.H.; Minaei, S.; Jamshidi, B. Vision-based pest detection based on SVM classification method. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 137, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Du, J.; Liu, L.; Li, R.; Jiao, L.; Xie, C.; Wang, R. Towards densely clustered tiny pest detection in the wild environment. Neurocomputing 2022, 490, 400–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jiao, L.; Dong, S.; Zhang, S.; Xie, C.; Wang, H. AF-RCNN: An anchor-free convolutional neural network for multi-categories agricultural pest detection. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 174, 105522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Y.; Xia, C.; Lee, J. Vision-based pest detection and automatic spray of greenhouse plant. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Seoul, Repulic of Korea, 5–8 July 2009; pp. 920–925. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lippi, M.; Bonucci, N.; Carpio, R.F.; Contarini, M.; Speranza, S.; Gasparri, A. A YOLO-Based Pest Detection System for Precision Agriculture. In Proceedings of the 2021 29th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED), Puglia, Italy, 22–25 June 2021; pp. 342–347. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lyu, S.; Ke, Z.; Li, Z.; Xie, J.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y. Accurate Detection Algorithm of Citrus Psyllid Using the YOLOv5s-BC Model. Agronomy 2023, 13, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ding, F.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Peng, H.; Chen, H.; Hu, F.; Lai, B.; Wei, Y.; Ma, W.; Li, H.; et al. Development of molecular markers based on the promoter difference of LcFT1 to discriminate easy- and difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources and its application in crossbreeding. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, S.-C.; Lin, J.-T.; Wang, C.-K.; Chen, H.-Y.; Yang, D.-J. Antioxidant properties of various solvent extracts from lychee (Litchi chinenesis Sonn.) flowers. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 577–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lyu, S.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, Z.; Wang, C.; Shen, J. Detection of Male and Female Litchi Flowers Using YOLO-HPFD Multi-Teacher Feature Distillation and FPGA-Embedded Platform. Agronomy 2023, 13, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xie, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Z.; Liao, F.; Wang, W.; Li, J. Detection of Litchi Leaf Diseases and Insect Pests Based on Improved FCOS. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, S.; Yan, Z.; Guo, Y.; Su, X.; Cao, Y.; Jiang, B.; Yang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Xin, D.; Chen, Q.; et al. SPM-IS: An auto-algorithm to acquire a mature soybean phenotype based on instance segmentation. Crop. J. 2022, 10, 1412–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Uzal, L.C.; Grinblat, G.L.; Namías, R.; Larese, M.G.; Bianchi, J.S.; Morandi, E.N.; Granitto, P.M. Seed-per-pod estimation for plant breeding using deep learning. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 150, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xu, C.; Lu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Liu, S.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, T. Counting Crowded Soybean Pods Based on Deformable Attention Recursive Feature Pyramid. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Clevers, J.G.P.W.; Kooistra, L. Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data for Retrieving Canopy Chlorophyll and Nitrogen Content. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2012, 5, 574–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Knyazikhin, Y.; Schull, M.A.; Stenberg, P.; Mõttus, M.; Rautiainen, M.; Yang, Y.; Marshak, A.; Latorre Carmona, P.; Kaufmann, R.K.; Lewis, P.; et al. Hyperspectral remote sensing of foliar nitrogen content. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E185–E192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kramberger, B.; Gselman, A.; Janzekovic, M.; Kaligaric, M.; Bracko, B. Effects of cover crops on soil mineral nitrogen and on the yield and nitrogen content of maize. Eur. J. Agron. 2009, 31, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, J.; Hussain, S.; Sun, X.; Zhang, P.; Javed, T.; Dessoky, E.S.; Ren, X.; Chen, X. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate Under Straw Incorporation on Photosynthesis, Productivity and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rathke, G.W.; Christen, O.; Diepenbrock, W. Effects of nitrogen source and rate on productivity and quality of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) grown in different crop rotations. Field Crops Res. 2005, 94, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Carranca, C.; Brunetto, G.; Tagliavini, M. Nitrogen Nutrition of Fruit Trees to Reconcile Productivity and Environmental Concerns. Plants 2018, 7, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Ju, C.; Son, H.I. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Agriculture: A Review of Perspective of Platform, Control, and Applications. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 105100–105115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Herwitz, S.R.; Johnson, L.F.; Dunagan, S.E.; Higgins, R.G.; Sullivan, D.V.; Zheng, J.; Lobitz, B.M.; Leung, J.G.; Gallmeyer, B.A.; Aoyagi, M.; et al. Imaging from an unmanned aerial vehicle: Agricultural surveillance and decision support. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2004, 44, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, Y.; Feng, C.; Ma, Y.; Chen, X.; Lu, B.; Song, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, R. Estimation of Nitrogen Concentration in Walnut Canopies in Southern Xinjiang Based on UAV Multispectral Images. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Franzen, D.W.; Peck, T.R. Field Soil Sampling Density for Variable Rate Fertilization. J. Prod. Agric. 1995, 8, 568–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nawar, S.; Corstanje, R.; Halcro, G.; Mulla, D.; Mouazen, A.M. Chapter Four—Delineation of Soil Management Zones for Variable-Rate Fertilization: A Review. In Advances in Agronomy; Sparks, D.L., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; Volume 143, pp. 175–245. [Google Scholar]
  68. Reyes, J.F.; Esquivel, W.; Cifuentes, D.; Ortega, R. Field testing of an automatic control system for variable rate fertilizer application. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2015, 113, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, H.; Xu, J.; Chen, B.; Li, Y.; Li, S.; Liang, H.; Jiang, Q.; He, Y.; Xi, W. Performance of an Automatic Variable-Rate Fertilization System Subject to Different Initial Field Water Conditions and Fertilizer Doses in Paddy Fields. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, S.; Hu, Z.; Yao, L.; Peng, B.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y. Simulation and parameter optimisation of pickup device for full-feed peanut combine harvester. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 192, 106602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xu, H.; Zhang, P.; Hu, Z.; Mao, E.; Yan, J.; Yang, H. Analysis of dust diffusion from a self-propelled peanut combine using computational fluid dynamics. Biosyst. Eng. 2022, 215, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Qin, M.; Jin, Y.; Luo, W.; Wu, F.; Shi, L.; Gu, F.; Cao, M.; Hu, Z. Measurement and CFD-DEM Simulation of Suspension Velocity of Peanut and Clay-Heavy Soil at Harvest Time. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Swanton, C.J.; Weise, S.F. Integrated Weed Management: The Rationale and Approach. Weed Technol. 1991, 5, 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bond, W.; Grundy, A.C. Non-chemical weed management in organic farming systems. Weed Res. 2001, 41, 383–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ghersa, C.M.; Benech-Arnold, R.L.; Satorre, E.H.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A. Advances in weed management strategies. Field Crops Res. 2000, 67, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, A.; Zhang, W.; Wei, X. A review on weed detection using ground-based machine vision and image processing techniques. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 158, 226–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, C.; Sun, L. Segmentation algorithm for overlap recognition of seedling lettuce and weeds based on SVM and image blocking. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 201, 107284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, J.; Gong, J.; Zhang, Y.; Mostafa, K.; Yuan, G. Weed Identification in Maize Fields Based on Improved Swin-Unet. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, L.; Liu, Y.; He, X.; Song, J.; Zeng, A.; Zhichong, W.; Tian, L. Assessment of spray deposition and losses in the apple orchard from agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle in China. In Proceedings of the 2018 ASABE Annual International Meeting, St. Joseph, MI, USA, 29 July–1 August 2018; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  80. Chen, C.J.; Huang, Y.Y.; Li, Y.S.; Chen, Y.C.; Chang, C.Y.; Huang, Y.M. Identification of Fruit Tree Pests With Deep Learning on Embedded Drone to Achieve Accurate Pesticide Spraying. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 21986–21997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mahmud, M.S.; Zahid, A.; He, L.; Martin, P. Opportunities and Possibilities of Developing an Advanced Precision Spraying System for Tree Fruits. Sensors 2021, 21, 3262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Xue, X.; Luo, Q.; Bu, M.; Li, Z.; Lyu, S.; Song, S. Citrus Tree Canopy Segmentation of Orchard Spraying Robot Based on RGB-D Image and the Improved DeepLabv3+. Sensors 2021, 13, 2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ragaveena, S.; Shirly Edward, A.; Surendran, U. Smart controlled environment agriculture methods: A holistic review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2021, 20, 887–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cox, S. Information technology: The global key to precision agriculture and sustainability. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2002, 36, 93–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ding, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Li, D. Model predictive control and its application in agriculture: A review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 151, 104–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, C.; Tang, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhao, X. Agricultural Machinery Information Collection and Operation Based on Data Platform. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference of Safety Produce Informatization (IICSPI), Chongqing, China, 10–12 December 2018; pp. 472–475. [Google Scholar]
  87. Ye, J.; Chen, B.; Liu, Q.; Fang, Y. A precision agriculture management system based on Internet of Things and WebGIS. In Proceedings of the 2013 21st International Conference on Geoinformatics, Kaifeng, China, 20–22 June 2013; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  88. Meng, C.; Li, G.; Xu, F.; Li, J. Field Information Collection Design and Experiment in Precision Agriculture. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 170, 032142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ni, J. Precision Operation Technology and Intelligent Equipment in Farmland. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2721. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112721

AMA Style

Ni J. Precision Operation Technology and Intelligent Equipment in Farmland. Agronomy. 2023; 13(11):2721. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112721

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ni, Jun. 2023. "Precision Operation Technology and Intelligent Equipment in Farmland" Agronomy 13, no. 11: 2721. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112721

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop