Next Article in Journal
Effect of Cross-Linking on the Performances of Starch-Based Biopolymer as Gel Electrolyte for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Presenting Precision Glycomacromolecules on Gold Nanoparticles for Increased Lectin Binding
Previous Article in Journal
Environmentally-Friendly Synthesis of Carbonate-Type Macrodiols and Preparation of Transparent Self-Healable Thermoplastic Polyurethanes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Simple and High Yield Synthesis of Metal-Polymer Nanocomposites: The Role of Theta-Centrifugation as an Essential Purification Step
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/polym9120666
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nucleobase-Containing Polymers: Structure, Synthesis, and Applications

by
Haitao Yang
1 and
Weixian Xi
2,3,*
1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China
2
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
3
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2017, 9(12), 666; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9120666
Submission received: 10 November 2017 / Revised: 25 November 2017 / Accepted: 27 November 2017 / Published: 1 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymers and Block Copolymers at Interfaces and Surfaces)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nucleobase interactions play a fundamental role in biological functions, including transcription and translation. Natural nucleic acids like DNA are also widely implemented in material realm such as DNA guided self-assembly of nanomaterials. Inspired by that, polymer chemists have contributed phenomenal endeavors to mimic both the structures and functions of natural nucleic acids in synthetic polymers. Similar sequence-dependent responses were observed and employed in the self-assembly of these nucleobase-containing polymers. Here, the structures, synthetic approaches, and applications of nucleobase-containing polymers are highlighted and a brief look is taken at the future development of these polymers.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nucleic acids in nature (DNA/RNA) represent the most powerful biomolecules. They serve as genetic material by hybridizing to a corresponding complementary strand to perform gene transcription and translation. Specifically, DNA carries genetic information from one generation to the next in living systems, and RNA guides the accurate assembly of amino acids into proteins by copying genetic information from DNA. Furthermore, in the materials science field, nucleic acids are also exploited for their selective hybridization capacities, unique geometric structures, ability to form nanoscale building blocks, directed self-assembly, and flexible programmability [1,2,3,4]. For example, DNA functionalized particles assemble into unique structures simply through the hybridization of functionalized DNA strands. This simple interaction also enables DNA nanostructures to fold into controlled shapes [5,6], nanoactuators [7,8], nanosensors [9,10,11,12], nanotweezers [13,14], and other nano-devices [15,16,17,18]. Additionally, DNA has been used as a therapeutic measure for various other biological purposes [15,16]. Despite the fact that DNA has so far enabled a handful of revolutionary advances for proof-of-concept nanomaterials, its broader impact has been limited due to restrictions imposed by the cost, scale, and scope of DNA. Thus, various attempts have been made by polymer chemists to move towards a DNA-mimicking nucleobase containing polymers [17,18,19]. In this review, we will highlight the recent advances in synthetic nucleobase-containing polymers, from their synthetic methods to their representative applications in materials science.

2. Nucleobase-Containing Polymers in Nature

DNA and RNA are the nucleobase-containing polymers in nature. The central molecular interaction between these polymers is a hydrogen bond between corresponding nucleobases; these nitrogenous bases are adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), thymine (T), and uracil (U). DNA usually forms duplexes that are stabilized by hydrogen bonding between adenine (A) and thymine (T); cytosine (C) and guanine (G). RNA, in most cases, consists one strand of nucleic acids, using uracil (U) instead of thymine (T) in its nucleobase pairing [20]. Besides the biosynthesis of DNA/RNA in nature, oligonucleotide synthesis is based on phosphoramidite chemistry, which was developed in the 1980s and later combined with solid-phase supports and automation [21,22] (Figure 1). However, the length of synthetic oligonucleotide is limited by the coupling efficiency and the following purification steps, which resulted in a typical length of synthetic single-stranded DNA/RNA of around 70~100 bases, with low error rates [23]. Most recently, Zauscher et al. utilized transferase-catalyzed living chain-growth polycondensation to synthesize well-defined natural DNA sequences such as homopolynucleotides (poly(dT), poly(dA)), random polynucleotides, and block polynucleotides with more than 1000 bases. This work is an excellent example of employing enzymatic living polymerization to achieve DNA synthesis in the absence of a DNA template [24].

3. Synthetic Nucleobase-Containing Polymers

To mimic DNA/RNA sequences in nature and implement their sequence recognition behaviors in polymers chemistry and materials science, synthetic chemists have chosen nucleobases as a “smart” functional group in the side chain of their polymers. Furthermore, with the development of various polymer synthesis skill sets, especially controlled living polymerization, more and more efforts have been made toward nucleobase-containing polymers synthesis and many of them have been exploited into self-assembly polymeric structures such as micelles or nanogels based on specific nucleobase interactions. In subsequent sections, we will highlight different nucleobase-containing polymers based on different polymerization mechanisms and discuss representative examples of each kind of nucleobase-containing polymer in various polymer science applications. The common methods for preparation of NB-containing polymers were showed in Table 1.

3.1. Synthesizing Nucleobase Polymers by ATRP

Since Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP) was independently discovered by Sawamoto and Matyjaszewski et al. [45,46] in 1995, by virtue of affording polymers of narrow molecular weight distributions, high molecular weight, and advanced macromolecular architectures, it presents a powerful method to prepare a great variety of polymers, including nucleobase-contained polymers. Spijker et al. utilized ATRP to synthesize a series of well-defined poly(ethylene glycol), (PEG)–poly(adenine) and PEG–poly(thymine) nucleobase containing block co-polymers from a PEG-based macroinitiator [26]. Nucleobase-functionalized monomer (thymine and/or adenine), catalyst (CuCl), ligand (bpy) and PEG-based macroinitiator (stoichiometric) were mixed and underwent typical ATRP procedures. The expected conversion was analyzed by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Finally, the reaction was quenched by 1-phenyl-1-(trime-thylsiloxy)ethylene (showed in Scheme 1). Furthermore, to demonstrate the unique properties of the nucleobases in the sidechain, they investigated the aggregation behavior of two complementary block copolymers in water (The structure of assembled copolymers is shown in Scheme 1). They found an interaction between the complementary thymine and adenine moieties, which resulted in an increased solubility of the block copolymers by an improved shielding of the hydrophobic blocks.
In 2007, the same group reported the synthesis and controlled polymerization of all four nucleobases’ (thymine, adenine, cytosine, and guanine) methacrylate monomers through ATRP method [25]. Technically, by alkylation of the nucleobases with 3-bromopropyl methacrylate, thymine-, adenine-, cytosine-, and guanine-functionalized methacrylate monomers were prepared and their ATRP kinetics were examined. Interestingly, they found the formation of guanine and cytosine monomer with copper(II), and these two specific polymerizations required more addition of catalyst and the use of PMDETA. From this study, all four unprotected nucleobase monomers could be polymerized in a controlled manner, but there is still space for improving the level of control in the synthesis of nucleobase-containing polymers through ATRP.
Similarly, Cheng et al. [47] synthesized poly[1-(4-vinylbenzyl)thymine] (PVBT) through ATRP at a high temperature (showed in Scheme 2) and, furthermore, performed nucleobase recognition through adding presynthesized 9-hexadecyladenine (A-C16) in the presence of polythymine homopolymers. Specifically, due to the hydrogen bonding interactions between the thymine groups of PVBT and the adenine group of A-C16, the biocomplementary PVBT/A-C16 hierarchical supramolecular complexes were formed in dilute DMSO solution. In the bulk state, these complexes self-assemble into well-ordered lamellar structures; these self-assembled structures can be tuned by different A-C16 loadings. In 2015, a water-soluble triblock polymer and a pentablock-polymer containing nucleobases were synthesized by Haddleton and Garcia et al. [27]. They utilized ATRP to polymerize methacryloyl uridine and methacryloyl adenosine from bromoisobutyroyl poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) macroinitiators. Furthermore, they investigated the secondary structures of triblock polymers and pentablock polymers in water by CD spectrum and mixing adenosine and uridine triblock copolymers in water resulted in a new supermolecular self-assembled structures, which provided direct proof of hydrogen bonding interaction between nucleobases.

3.2. Synthesizing Nucleobase Polymers by RAFT

As popular as ATRP, the RAFT (reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer) process, which was first introduced by the group of Rizzardo [48] in 1998, is also recognized as one of the most versatile methods for producing a wide range of macromolecules with well-defined functionalities and complex architectures.
In 2013, Kang et al. synthesized methacryloyl-monomers containing adenine and thymine to yield homopolymers and copolymers with excellent control over molecular weight and end group fidelity via RAFT polymerization (shown in Figure 2) [49]. Their results indicated that the polymerization solvent greatly affected the monomer reactivity; for example, chloroform promoted hydrogen bonds between the adenine monomers and thymine monomers, preferring moderate alternating copolymers, while solvent DMF suppressed these interactions, preferring statistical copolymers. Furthermore, they investigated the self-assembly properties of the copolymers and their TEM and DLS results clearly indicated that the presence or absence of hydrogen bonding between nucleobases could influence the morphology of forming micelles. Similarly, the same group explored more nucleobase-containing materials via RAFT dispersion polymerization in 1,4-dioxane and chloroform, and also investigated the behavior of copolymers self-assembly [29]. The results confirmed again that the morphologies of self-assembled nucleobase-containing polymers were dependent on polymerization solvents. For example: spherical micelles with internal structures were only observed in chloroform by varying the DP of the core-forming block. As an extension of this work, in 2015 they reported the synthesis and self-assembly of thymine-containing polymers via RAFT dispersion polymerization and a wide variety of morphologies were accessed by changing the different solvent of polymerization or incorporating adenine-containing mediators [50]. These results strongly demonstrated that nucleobase interactions played a central role in controlling the shape and size of polymeric self-assemblies.
Zhang et al. used a similar RAFT polymerization strategy to synthesize well-defined acrylic ABA triblock copolymers with nucleobase-functionalized external blocks and poly(n-butyl acrylate) (PnBA) as a central block (shown in Scheme 3) [31]. Moreover, they prepared triblock copolymer films and supramolecular blend and their results indicated that the acrylic monomer with a flexible spacer to the pendant nucleobases promoted intermolecular recognition of nucleobases, lowering the Tg of functionalized polymers. In addition, the complementary hydrogen bonding between adenine and thymine formed a thermally labile, physically crosslinked network that exhibited enhanced mechanical performance with melt processability, and the supramolecular blend exhibited a cylindrical microphase-separate morphology. More and more work has been using RAFT as an efficient and robust method for the preparation of multi-block polymers with nucleobase functionalities, and more and more morphologies have been accessed by fine tuning of the interactions between nucleobases [30,32,51]. RAFT has been the most frequently used living polymerization method in preparing nucleobase-containing polymers; however, it is still worth noting some challenges of this method. For example, RAFT usually requires careful selection of chain transfer agents (CTAs) for each monomer, which may require screening of CTAs before the polymerization of different nucleobase-containing monomers.

3.3. Synthesizing Nucleobase Polymers by NMP

As we described before, the coordination of nucleobase (guanine and cyotsine) with a metal catalyst (e.g., CuBr) usually attenuates the polymerization kinetics of ATRP. As such, nitroxide-mediated polymerization (NMP) could be utilized as another controlled radical polymerization (CRP) technique to produce nucleobase-containing polymers [52,53]. Mather et al. utilized a novel difunctional alkoxyamine initiator to polymerize styrenic nucleobase monomers with poly(n-butyl acrylate) homopolymers via a two-step NMP route [33] (Figure 3). The resulting triblock copolymers contain either adenine or thymine as outer blocks, and n-butyl acrylate rubber as inner blocks. Once adenine and thymine polymers are mixed in chloroform, the viscosity of the blend increased dramatically, indicating the existence of hydrogen-bonding interactions between complementary nucleobase subunits since viscosity is a function of effective molecular weight. Furthermore, the annealed mixture in the solid state revealed a higher softening temperature and presented further proof of a complementary A–T hard phase. Although the NMP method avoids using a metal catalyst in polymerization, it still has some inherent challenges that limit its wide application in preparing nucleobase-containing polymers. For example, the slow polymerization kinetics usually requires high temperatures and a long polymerization time.

3.4. Synthesizing Nucleobase Polymers by Conventional Radical Polymerization

Besides controlled polymerizations, conventional radical polymerization also allows efficient large-scale synthesis of nucleobase functionalized polymers. As early as 2005, Luts et al. investigated the polymerization of a series of monomers bearing nucleobases 1-(4-vinylbenzyl)uracil (VBU), 1-(4-vinylbenzyl)thymine (VBT), and 9-(4-vinylbenzyl)adenine (VBA) [37]. The corresponding homopolymers (PVBT, PVBU, and PVBA) were prepared in high yields via conventional radical polymerization, while the copolymers of dodecyl methacrylate (DMA) with either VBT or VBA were prepared by ATRP and free radical polymerization. The results indicated that these homopolymers were not very practical due to poor solubility in most of the common organic solvents. However, copolymers of DMA with either VBT or VBA could be dissolved in a range of organic solvents. Furthermore, the formed copolymers P(VBT-co-DMA) and P(VBA-co-DMA) were found to self-assemble in dilute solutions in dioxane or chloroform, as confirmed by the hypochromicity effect in UV spectroscopy. Nevertheless, it was found that at higher concentrations of chloroform, P(VBT-co-DMA), P(VBA-co-DMA), or P(VBT-co-DMA)/P(VBA-co-DMA) mixtures spontaneously self-assembled into spherical aggregates. Later in 2006, the same group studied in detail the self-organization of random copolymers composed of a nucleobase monomer (either VBT or VBA) and DMA in dilute chloroform [35]. They investigated how the balance between the molar fractions of the nucleobase monomer and DMA could affect the solubility and self-assembly behavior of nucleobase-containing copolymers. In addition, they demonstrated that hydrogen bonding was an efficient driving force for organizing synthetic nucleobase-containing polymers in a noncompetitive solvent.
Nakahata presented an interesting work that created a selective macroscopic self-assembly system by using polymer gels modified with either complementary DNA oligonucleotides or nucleobase-containing polymers [36]. Specifically, hydrogels and organogels were obtained via conventional radical terpolymerization of AAm or styrene (main chain units) and MBAAm or DVB (crosslinking units) (showed in Scheme 4). The oligonucleotide-modified hydrogels exhibited macroscopic recognition between complementary strands. Similarly, nucleobase-modified organogels exhibited the same adhesion as DNA oligonucleotide-functionalized hydrogels and were visualized on a macroscopic scale. Direct adhesion between macroscopic objects by nucleobase interaction provides the possibility of creating “smart” materials that can bind many kinds of heterogeneous materials without adhesives. Although conventional radical polymerization provides a very simple method for nucleobase-containing polymer synthesis (no metal catalyst, no precursors), it also has disadvantages such as insufficient control of the polymer length, polydispersity, and macromolecular structure, which may impair its potential applications in biology and materials science.
With the inherent property of sequence recognition, McHale et al. reported that the nucleobase core of a block copolymer micelle can serve as a template for controlled radical polymerization [28] (Figure 4). This uniquely templated polymerization yields unexpectedly high molecular weight polymers (up to ~400,000 g/mol), with low polydispersity (P ≤ 1.08); and their TEM imaging clearly demonstrated that polymerization takes place in the core of the micelle as its size changes from ~13 to ~20 nm before and after polymerization. More interestingly, the discrete micelle core structures enabled the control of the polymerization by segregation of propagating radicals.

3.5. Synthesizing Nucleobase Polymers by Click Chemistry

“Click chemistry” is a concept introduced by Sharpless [54] in 2001 and since then has become one of the most powerful paradigms in polymer chemistry and materials science [55,56,57]. Due to its simplicity and efficiency, click chemistry has been extensively employed for accessing linear polymers [58,59,60,61,62,63], branched polymers [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73], dendrimers [74,75,76,77,78,79], and polymer networks [80,81,82,83,84,85]. The combination of click chemistry and nucleobase-containing polymers is promising. For example, in 2014 Han et al. reported a facile and scalable method to synthesize DNA-mimetic sequential polymers with tailored hetero-functional groups based on radical-initiated thiol-yne click polymerization [39]. Firstly, radicals were generated from either a UV or thermal initiator, yielding a thiyl radical, enabled stepwise propagation, and polymer chain transfer (shown in Figure 5). With a delicate selection of monomers with different functionalities, various types of sequenced polymers such as linear sequence, periodic sequence, random sequence, and hyperbranched sequence were obtained (Figure 5). Furthermore, to achieve single-strand DNA-mimetic macromolecules, alternating adenine and thymine groups were introduced by another classic click chemistry: Cu-catalyzed azide and alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC). This work is an excellent example of utilizing two orthogonal click reactions to synthesize nucleobase-containing polymers from simple starting substrates in two simple steps, indicating the power of click chemistry.
In 2015, Xi et al. [38] synthesized nucleobase-containing sequence-controlled polymers (homopolymers of a single nucleobase or homopolymers of specific repeating nucleobase sequences) by combining orthogonal thiol-ene and thiol-Michael click chemistry reactions (Scheme 5) [86,87,88,89]. In this case, a thiol-protected acrylamide monomer is coupled to a functionalized thiol–allylamine monomer in a thiol-Michael addition, then the thiol group is deprotected to restore the thiol and polymerized with allyamine functional groups by radical initiation of the thiol-ene reaction. This “click” by “click” approach is a great demonstration of synthesizing nucleobase-functionalized sequence-controlled periodic copolymers/oligomers and polymers without the use of a solid support. In addition, these nucleobase-containing polymers were employed in various applications in materials science, such as sequence-controlled assembly of nanoparticles, DNA delivery [90], and organogel formation [91].
In 2017, Liu et al. [40] presented a synthesis of an intrinsically water-soluble single-stranded DNA analog formed by the synthesis of a Clickable Nucleic Acid (CNA). They formed molecules with pendant hydroxyl groups present on the main polymer backbone, and subsequent modification of those hydroxyls with sulfonate moieties further enhances the hydrophilicity (Figure 6). The CNA polymer with one pendant hydroxyl group for each dimer was obtained by the radical-mediated thiol-ene polymerization approach. A few simple steps were needed to functionalize the free hydroxyl group on the polymer backbone to obtain the water-soluble CNA polymer. Furthermore, they demonstrated that this water-soluble CNA polymer was capable of binding to complementary DNA on the surface of nanoparticles. Although click chemistry enables fast and efficient preparation of nucleobase-containing polymers, there is still a lot of space for researchers to optimize synthetic strategies/procedures to achieve longer polymers and sequence control in the future.

3.6. Synthesizing Nucleobase Polymers by ROMP

As a variation of the olefin metathesis reaction, ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) [92,93] represents another widely used method to synthesize polymer materials with tunable sizes, shapes, and functions, especially in the preparation of nucleobase-containing polymers. Bazzi et al. [94] first reported the preparation of “DNA-mimetic” homopolymers and block copolymers through controlled ring-opening metathesis polymerization of non-covalently protected monomers as early as 2002. Notably, an adenine-containing monomer was “protected” by succinimide, based on the hydrogen bonding between succinimide and the adenine moiety. Additionally, this simple introduction of succinimide increased the solubility of the resulting polymer, which prevents resultant polymers from precipitating before the reaction is complete. These nucleobase-containing block copolymers were produced by following the same ROMP procedure. Finally, the self-assembly of copolymers (m = 50, n = 5; shown in red in Figure 7) was investigated in THF solution and the results revealed the ability of these hydrogen-bonding-enabled self-complementary block copolymers to self-assemble into novel nanoscale rod morphologies.
After that, a similar ROMP strategy was utilized by Lo et al. [41] in the construction of a thymine-containing block copolymer with narrow molecular weight distribution. As shown in Scheme 6, adenine-containing monomers were aligned with hydrogen-bonding interactions to the thymine template, and subsequently underwent Sonogashira polymerization, leading to the templated synthesis of a conjugated polymer. The daughter strand is found to possess a narrow molecular weight distribution and a chain length nearly equivalent to that of the parent template, indicating that the daughter strand could copy the length and distribution information from the template strand. However, non-templated polymerization or polymerization with the incorrect template generated a short conjugated oligomer with a significantly broader molecular weight distribution.
Peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) are synthetic DNA mimetics whose backbones are electrical neutral amide bonds, which contribute high stability towards nuclease degradation and high affinity towards complementary DNA/RNA strands [95,96,97,98]. James et al. [42] reported a preparation of polymeric nucleic acids wherein single-stranded sequences of PNAs are incorporated as polymer brushes via graft-through polymerization using the ROMP initiator “Ru”. This work clearly demonstrated the power of ROMP in preparing amphiphilic brush copolymers by graft-through polymerization of a relatively large side chain: oligonucleotides (Figure 8). This approach of combining PNAs and ROMP could provide an efficient strategy for the incorporation of nucleic acids into particles and polymer-based materials, which might be useful for various applications such as affinity purification of DNA, gene delivery, and programmable materials. Like other polymerization strategies, ROMP provides another efficient method to access nucleobase-containing polymers; however, the driving force of ROMP is the relief of ring strain in cyclic monomers, which usually requires the additional step of preparing nucleobase-functionalized cyclic olefins before polymerization. The cost of the Ru catalyst is another concern, especially in large-scale polymer preparations.
Most recently, Gregory et al. [99] presented a novel work that using a ring-opening polymerization method other than ROMP. In this work, thymidine-based cyclic carbonate incorporating CO2 at 1 atm pressure and this monomer underwent ROP under mild reaction conditions with organocatalyst TBD and 4-MeBnOH alcohol initiator to yield novel thymidine-based polycarbonates. Similarly, Tsao [43] et al. presented a synthetic strategy that employed organocatalytic ROP of a six-membered cyclic phosphoester monomer at ambient temperature to afford a new type of thymidine-derived 3′,5′-linked polyphosphoester with a butenyl group located on each repeat unit. This is the first time such well-defined DNA-derived polyphosphoesters with 3′,5′-linkages in the backbones have been prepared via ROP.

3.7. Synthesizing Nucleobase Polymers by Other Polymerizations

The nucleobase chemistry has also been overlapped with conducting polymers. Bäuerle et al. [44] presented the synthesis, characterization, and polymerization of bithiophenes with the nucleobases uracil and adenine as sidechains, and found the molecular recognition could influence the electronic properties of the polythiophenes, e.g., the presence of a complementary base could induce an increase in the oxidation potential for polymers (Shown in Figure 9).

4. Applications of Nucleobase-Containing Polymers in Materials Science

4.1. Hydrogels

Hydrogels have served as matrices for 3D cell culture with widespread applications in tissue engineering, biomolecule delivery, and regenerative medicine [100,101]. Based on the crosslinking mechanism, hydrogels can be classified into physically crosslinked hydrogels and chemically crosslinked hydrogels. Although chemically crosslinked hydrogels usually provide a stable polymer network with slow degradation kinetics, physically crosslinked hydrogels have also attracted a lot of attention, especially as injectable biomaterials in translational medicine [102]. Among all the physical crosslinked mechanisms for hydrogel formation, hydrogen bonding remains one of the most frequently used methods, which makes nucleobase-containing polymers an ideal candidate for physically crosslinked hydrogels. In 2012, Tan et al. developed a biological hydrogel that self-assembled via nucleobase interaction from adenine- and thymine-functionalized tetra-arm PEG polymers (Scheme 7) [103]. This hydrogel exhibited both thermal and mechanical responsiveness, such as gel-sol transition under high strain conditions or high temperature, which could break the physical linkage between adenine and thymine. Additionally, they demonstrated that this nucleobase-interaction-based hydrogel can serve as an injectable scaffold for growth factor delivery and cell encapsulation, which indicated the excellent biocompatibility of these materials and their potential for use in further biomedical applications.

4.2. DNA Delivery

DNA delivery, especially non-viral DNA delivery, is a powerful and popular tool for gene silencing in various diseases [104,105,106,107]. However, there are still challenges to building an efficient delivery system. In most cases, cationic polymers have been widely studied and investigated for DNA delivery, but they usually encounter some difficulties such as low DNA uptake, slow DNA release, and lack of nuclear targeting [108,109]. To expand the materials toolbox for DNA delivery, Harguindey et al. utilized synthetic DNA analogs (CNAs) and synthesized triblock copolymer (PEG-CNA-PLGA) for sequester high loading of DNA [90]. These synthetic triblock copolymers were translated into polymer nanoparticles through an emulsion technique. In addition, these CNA-containing particles exhibited high encapsulation of complementary DNA sequences through specific nucleobase recognition interactions, which demonstrated the potential application of these CNA-containing particles as DNA carriers for specific gene silencing (Figure 10).

4.3. Self-Healing Materials

Self-healing materials include but are not limited to metals, polymers, and composites that have the capability to heal and recover the original state after damage (e.g., mechanical, thermal) [110,111]. Over the last decade, they have attracted much attention and been investigated intensely [112,113,114,115]. Depending on the nature of the self-healing process, it can be classified into two types: autonomic and non-autonomic [110]. Specifically, non-autonomic self-healing materials need external energy, while autonomic materials do not require extra stimulation for self-healing. Complementary nucleobase-containing polymers have a built-in advantage in the preparation of materials that exhibit tunable mechanical properties and self-healing behaviors, providing an efficient potential route to the fabrication of multifunctional materials. Cheng [116] et al. developed a multi-uracil functionalized polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS-U) and adenine end-capped three-arm polycaprolactone oligomer (PCL-A), as showed in Figure 11. Their materials showed a good complementary ability either in solution or solid state due to the uracil (U)–adenine (A) cross-linking. In addition, the prepared film materials could self-heal autonomously at room temperature without external intervention, which demonstrated a simple and efficient way to build a series of self-healing materials for a wide range of potential applications.
Ye et al. [117] utilized nucleobase interactions as another example of preparing self-healing pH-sensitive biodegradable cytosine and guanosine-modified hyaluronic acid hydrogels (HA-HMDA-C, HA-HMDA-G, and HA-HMDA-C/G) under physiological conditions (Figure 12). Their results indicated that all materials have good self-healing ability, but materials with a high concentration of HA had a short gelation time and strong mechanical properties. Furthermore, the mechanical properties of HA-HMDA-C/G hydrogels were better than those of C–C or G–G, which confirmed that the nucleobase interactions between C and G are stronger than the other two types in this case.

4.4. Self-Assembly of Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles (NPs) are among the most distinguished and promising nanomaterials and have been used in a wide variety of applications (e.g., in drug delivery, gene delivery, antibacterial, catalysis, superhydrophobicity, etc.) [118,119,120,121,122]. Among the many methods to fabricate multifunctional NPs for specific purpose, self-assembly of NPs is identified as a crucial and efficient strategy that organizes discrete components into ordered structures by specific interactions. He [123] et al. prepared novel near-infrared (NIR) multifunctional Au–UCNPs via nucleobase interaction between CNA polymer-functionalized UCNPs and complementary DNA strands functionalized AuNPs (Figure 13). They demonstrated that the conjugation of AuNPs to UCNPs enhanced UCNP fluorescence, while AuNSs (nanostars) tended to quench fluorescence. Furthermore, the assembly of AuNSs-UCNP could induce rapid increases in temperature upon NIR excitation, which provides great potential for photothermal therapy.

4.5. Metal–Nucleobase Coordination

In nature, metal ions play important roles in the structure and function of nucleic acids. A wide variety of investigations into transition metal ions’ binding to nucleic acids have been utilized extensively, such as in disease diagnostics [124,125,126]. Other than applications in biology, the ability of nucleic acids to store and transmit information has been explored in creating nanostructures and molecular electronic devices [127,128,129]. Watson et al. [130] introduced 8-hydroxyquinoline (Q) into PNA oligomers and investigated the properties of duplexes formed by these oligomers in the presence of Cu2+. Their results demonstrated that the Cu2+-containing PNA duplexes have higher thermal stability than the unmodified PNA, and furthermore, with the help of metal ions, PNA duplex pairs exhibited high tolerance to mismatches.
Recently, coordination polymers and metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted a lot of attention from researchers [131,132]. Olea et al. [133] presented a simple method to obtain single polymeric chains from crystals of [Cd(6-MCP)2·2H2O]n (6-MCP = 6-mercapto-purinate), and this particular 1D MOF exhibited significant similarities to DNA-based systems (Figure 14). García-Terán et al. [134] synthesized a 3D coordination polymer using the interaction between adenine and Cu2+. X-ray analysis indicated in this covalent 3D network: the centered Cu2+ ions are coordinated by tridentate μ-N3, N7, N9 adeninate ligands. This 3D coordination polymer has relatively large, nanometer-sized tubes and exhibited overall antiferromagnetic behavior.

5. Conclusions and Outlook

Although many nucleobase-containing polymers have been synthesized and applied in polymer science, the number of known nucleobase-containing polymers is still tiny compared with the whole polymer chemistry community. To achieve a broader impact and implementation in polymer and materials science, there are three directions to be pursued. Firstly, there is still a huge need to create novel nucleobase-containing molecular structures including monomers, oligomers, or polymers. Secondly, the development of novel polymeric approaches for nucleobase-containing polymers remains another critical need, especially since most synthesis of nucleobase-containing polymers lacks sequence control, which results in these nucleobase-containing polymers not usually exhibiting sequence-dependent behaviors such as we observed in nature. Finally, with the development of polymer chemistry itself, novel and more materials will be designed based on the nucleobase-containing polymers, which could provide the sequence-controlled features for these “smart” materials in widespread applications.

Author Contributions

Weixian Xi chose the topic; Haitao Yang and Weixian Xi wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nykypanchuk, D.; Maye, M.M.; van der Lelie, D.; Gang, O. DNA-guided crystallization of colloidal nanoparticles. Nature 2008, 451, 549–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tkachenko, A.V. Morphological diversity of DNA-colloidal self-assembly. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 148303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sun, Y.; Harris, N.C.; Kiang, C.H. The reversible phase transition of DNA-linked colloidal gold assemblies. Phys. A Stat. Mach. Appl. 2005, 354, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Leunissen, M.E.; Dreyfus, R.; Sha, R.J.; Wang, T.; Seeman, N.C.; Pine, D.J.; Chaikin, P.M. Towards self-replicating materials of DNA-functionalized colloids. Soft Matter 2009, 5, 2422–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rothemund, P.W.K. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 2006, 440, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hong, F.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Y.; Yan, H. DNA origami: Scaffolds for creating higher order structures. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 12584–12640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ke, Y.G.; Meyer, T.; Shih, W.M.; Bellot, G. Regulation at a distance of biomolecular interactions using a DNA origami nanoactuator. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Marini, M.; Piantanida, L.; Musetti, R.; Bek, A.; Dong, M.D.; Besenbacher, F.; Lazzarino, M.; Firrao, G. A revertible, autonomous, self-assembled DNA-origami nanoactuator. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 5449–5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Malashikhina, N.; Pavlov, V. DNA-decorated nanoparticles as nanosensors for rapid detection of ascorbic acid. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 33, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Morales, J.M.; Skipwith, C.G.; Clark, H.A. Quadruplex integrated DNA (quid) nanosensors for monitoring dopamine. Sensors 2015, 15, 19912–19924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Stougaard, M.; Ho, Y.P. DNA-based nanosensors for next-generation clinical diagnostics via detection of enzyme activity. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2014, 14, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Walsh, R.; Morales, J.M.; Skipwith, C.G.; Ruckh, T.T.; Clark, H.A. Enzyme-linked DNA dendrimer nanosensors for acetylcholine. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. He, L.; Lu, D.Q.; Liang, H.; Xie, S.; Luo, C.; Hu, M.; Xu, L.; Zhang, X.; Tan, W. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based DNA tetrahedron nanotweezer for highly reliable detection of tumor-related mRNA in living cells. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4060–4066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, D.; Cheng, W.; Li, Y.; Xu, Y.; Li, X.; Yin, Y.; Ju, H.; Ding, S. Catalytic hairpin assembly actuated DNA nanotweezer for logic gate building and sensitive enzyme-free biosensing of microRNAs. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 7500–7506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lechardeur, D.; Verkman, A.S.; Lukacs, G.L. Intracellular routing of plasmid DNA during non-viral gene transfer. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2005, 57, 755–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pack, D.W.; Hoffman, A.S.; Pun, S.; Stayton, P.S. Design and development of polymers for gene delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005, 4, 581–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. McHale, R.; O’Reilly, R.K. Nucleobase containing synthetic polymers: Advancing biomimicry via controlled synthesis and self-assembly. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 7665–7675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Inaki, Y. Synthetic nucleic-acid analogs. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1992, 17, 515–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Smith, W.T. Nucleic acid models. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1996, 21, 209–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Watson, J.D.; Crick, F.H.C. Molecular structure of nucleic acids—A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 1953, 171, 737–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Beaucage, S.L.; Iyer, R.P. Advances in the synthesis of oligonucleotides by the phosphoramidite approach. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 2223–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Reese, C.B. Oligo- and poly-nucleotides: 50 years of chemical synthesis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 3851–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kosuri, S.; Church, G.M. Large-scale de novo DNA synthesis: Technologies and applications. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tang, L.; Navarro, L.A.; Chilkoti, A.; Zauscher, S. High-molecular-weight polynucleotides by transferase-catalyzed living chain-growth polycondensation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 6778–6782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Spijker, H.; Van Delft, F.L.; Van Hest, J.C.M. Atom transfer radical polymerization of adenine, thymine, cytosine, and guanine nucleobase monomers. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Spijker, H.J.; Dirks, A.J.; van Hest, J.C.M. Synthesis and assembly behavior of nucleobase-functionalized block copolymers. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2006, 44, 4242–4250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Garcia, M.; Beecham, M.P.; Kempe, K.; Haddleton, D.M.; Khan, A.; Marsh, A. Water soluble triblock and pentablock poly(methacryloyl nucleosides) from copper-mediated living radical polymerisation using peg macroinitiators. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 66, 444–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. McHale, R.; Patterson, J.P.; Zetterlund, P.B.; O’Reilly, R.K. Biomimetic radical polymerization via cooperative assembly of segregating templates. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kang, Y.; Pitto-Barry, A.; Willcock, H.; Quan, W.-D.; Kirby, N.; Sanchez, A.M.; O’Reilly, R.K. Exploiting nucleobase-containing materials—From monomers to complex morphologies using raft dispersion polymerization. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hua, Z.; Pitto-Barry, A.; Kang, Y.; Kirby, N.; Wilks, T.R.; O’Reilly, R.K. Micellar nanoparticles with tuneable morphologies through interactions between nucleobase-containing synthetic polymers in aqueous solution. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 4254–4262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, K.; Aiba, M.; Fahs, G.B.; Hudson, A.G.; Chiang, W.D.; Moore, R.B.; Ueda, M.; Long, T.E. Nucleobase-functionalized acrylic ABA triblock copolymers and supramolecular blends. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 2434–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kang, Y.; Pitto-Barry, A.; Rolph, M.S.; Hua, Z.; Hands-Portman, I.; Kirby, N.; O’Reilly, R.K. Use of complementary nucleobase-containing synthetic polymers to prepare complex self-assembled morphologies in water. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 2836–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mather, B.D.; Baker, M.B.; Beyer, F.L.; Berg, M.A.G.; Green, M.D.; Long, T.E. Supramolecular triblock copolymers containing complementary nucleobase molecular recognition. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 6834–6845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, Y.-S.; Wu, Y.-C.; Kuo, S.-W. Thymine- and adenine-functionalized polystyrene form self-assembled structures through multiple complementary hydrogen bonds. Polymers 2014, 6, 1827–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lutz, J.; Pfeifer, S.; Chanana, M.; Thunemann, A.F.; Bienert, R. H-bonding-directed self-assembly of synthetic copolymers containing nucleobases: Organization and colloidal fusion in a noncompetitive solvent. Langmuir 2006, 22, 7411–7415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nakahata, M.; Takashima, Y.; Hashidzume, A.; Harada, A. Macroscopic self-assembly based on complementary interactions between nucleobase pairs. Chemistry 2015, 21, 2770–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lutz, J.-F.; Thünemann, A.F.; Nehring, R. Preparation by controlled radical polymerization and self-assembly via base-recognition of synthetic polymers bearing complementary nucleobases. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2005, 43, 4805–4818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xi, W.; Pattanayak, S.; Wang, C.; Fairbanks, B.; Gong, T.; Wagner, J.; Kloxin, C.J.; Bowman, C.N. Clickable nucleic acids: Sequence-controlled periodic copolymer/oligomer synthesis by orthogonal thiol-x reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 14462–14467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Han, J.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, B.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, C. Sequentially hetero-functional, topological polymers by step-growth thiol-yne approach. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liu, Z.; Fairbanks, B.; He, L.; Liu, T.; Shah, P.; Cha, J.N.; Stansbury, J.W.; Bowman, C.N. Water-soluble clickable nucleic acid (CNA) polymer synthesis by functionalizing the pendant hydroxyl. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 10156–10159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lo, P.K.; Sleiman, H.F. Nucleobase-templated polymerization: Copying the chain length and polydispersity of living polymers into conjugated polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4182–4183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. James, C.R.; Rush, A.M.; Insley, T.; Vukovic, L.; Adamiak, L.; Kral, P.; Gianneschi, N.C. Poly(oligonucleotide). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11216–11219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tsao, Y.T.; Wooley, K.L. Synthetic, functional thymidine-derived polydeoxyribonucleotide analogues from a six-membered cyclic phosphoester. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 5467–5473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bauerle, P.; Emge, A. Specific recognition of nucleobase-functionalized polythiophenes. Adv. Mater. 1998, 10, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, J.; Matyjaszewski, K. Controlled/“living” radical polymerization. Atom transfer radical polymerization in the presence of transition-metal complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5614–5615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kato, M.; Kamigaito, M.; Sawamoto, M.; Higashimura, T. Polymerization of methyl-methacrylate with the carbon-tetrachloride dichlorotris(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium(II) methylaluminum bis(2,6-di-tert-butylphenoxide) initiating system—Possibility of living radical polymerization. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 1721–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cheng, C.C.; Huang, C.F.; Yen, Y.C.; Chang, F.C. A “plug and play” polymer through biocomplementary hydrogen bonding. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2008, 46, 6416–6424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chiefari, J.; Chong, Y.K.; Ercole, F.; Krstina, J.; Jeffery, J.; Le, T.P.T.; Mayadunne, R.T.A.; Meijs, G.F.; Moad, C.L.; Moad, G. Living free-radical polymerization by reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer: The raft process. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 5559–5562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kang, Y.; Lu, A.; Ellington, A.; Jewett, M.C.; O’Reilly, R.K. Effect of complementary nucleobase interactions on the copolymer composition of raft copolymerizations. ACS Macro Lett. 2013, 2, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kang, Y.; Pitto-Barry, A.; Maitland, A.; O’Reilly, R.K. Raft dispersion polymerization: A method to tune the morphology of thymine-containing self-assemblies. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 4984–4992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fong, D.; Hua, Z.; Wilks, T.R.; O’Reilly, R.K.; Adronov, A. Dispersion of single-walled carbon nanotubes using nucleobase-containing poly(acrylamide) polymers. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2017, 55, 2611–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Moad, G.; Rizzardo, E. Alkoxyamine-initiated living radical polymerization: Factors affecting alkoxyamine homolysis rates. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 8722–8728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nicolas, J.; Guillaneuf, Y.; Lefay, C.; Bertin, D.; Gigmes, D.; Charleux, B. Nitroxide-mediated polymerization. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 63–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kolb, H.C.; Finn, M.G.; Sharpless, K.B. Click chemistry: Diverse chemical function from a few good reactions. Angew. Chem. 2001, 40, 2004–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Binder, W.H.; Sachsenhofer, R. ‘Click’ chemistry in polymer and material science: An update. Macromol. Rapid. Commum. 2008, 29, 952–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xi, W.X.; Scott, T.F.; Kloxin, C.J.; Bowman, C.N. Click chemistry in materials science. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 2572–2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, T.; Zheng, Z.H.; Cheng, X.; Ding, X.B.; Peng, Y.X. “Click” chemistry in materials science. Prog. Chem. 2008, 20, 1090–1101. [Google Scholar]
  58. Chernykh, A.; Agag, T.; Ishida, H. Synthesis of linear polymers containing benzoxazine moieties in the main chain with high molecular design versatility via click reaction. Polymer 2009, 50, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Helms, B.; Mynar, J.L.; Hawker, C.J.; Frechet, J.M.J. Dendronized linear polymers via “click chemistry”. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15020–15021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Johnson, J.A.; Finn, M.G.; Koberstein, J.T.; Turro, N.J. Construction of linear polymers, dendrimers, networks, and other polymeric architectures by copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition “click” chemistry. Macromol. Rapid Commum. 2008, 29, 1052–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kolli, B.; Mishra, S.P.; Joshi, M.P.; Mohan, S.R.; Dhami, T.S.; Samui, A.B. Synthesis and characterization of linear polymers for non-linear optics through click chemistry route. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 584, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Polaske, N.W.; McGrath, D.V.; McElhanon, J.R. Thermally reversible dendronized linear AB step-polymers via “click” chemistry. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 3203–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, W.A.; Muller, A.H.E. A “click chemistry” approach to linear and star-shaped telechelic poss-containing hybrid polymers. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 3148–3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, H.; Jia, J.Q.; Duan, X.; Yang, Z.; Kong, J. Reduction-cleavable hyperbranched polymers with limited intramolecular cyclization via click chemistry. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2015, 53, 2374–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Han, Y.; Gao, C. Miktoarms hyperbranched polymer brushes: One-step fast synthesis by parallel click chemistry and hierarchical self-assembly. Sci. China Chem. 2010, 53, 2461–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, S.P.; Han, J.; Gao, C. High-density and hetero-functional group engineering of segmented hyperbranched polymers via click chemistry. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 1774–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Semsarilar, M.; Ladmiral, V.; Perrier, S. Highly branched and hyperbranched glycopolymers via reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer polymerization and click chemistry. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 1438–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Medel, S.; Bosch, P.; de la Torre, C.; Ramirez, P. Click chemistry to fluorescent hyperbranched polymers. 1-synthesis, characterization and spectroscopic properties. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 59, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pandey, S.; Mishra, S.P.; Kolli, B.; Kanai, T.; Samui, A.B. Hyperbranched photo responsive and liquid crystalline azo-siloxane polymers synthesized by click chemistry. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2012, 50, 2659–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hoogenboom, R. Thiol-yne chemistry: A powerful tool for creating highly functional materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3415–3417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Popescu, D.L.; Tsarevsky, N.V. Multibrominated hyperbranched polymers: Synthesis and further functionalizations by arget atrp or click chemistry. Macromol. Rapid. Commum. 2012, 33, 869–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Saha, A.; Ramakrishnan, S. Site-specific functionalization of hyperbranched polymers using “click” chemistry. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 4028–4037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Xu, J.T.; Tao, L.; Boyer, C.; Lowe, A.B.; Davis, T.P. Combining thio-bromo “click” chemistry and raft polymerization: A powerful tool for preparing functionalized multiblock and hyperbranched polymers. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Arseneault, M.; Wafer, C.; Morin, J.F. Recent advances in click chemistry applied to dendrimer synthesis. Molecules 2015, 20, 9263–9294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Deraedt, C.; Pinaud, N.; Astruc, D. Recyclable catalytic dendrimer nanoreactor for part-per-million Cu(I) catalysis of “click” chemistry in water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 12092–12098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Franc, G.; Kakkar, A. Dendrimer design using Cu(I)-catalyzed alkyne-azide “click-chemistry”. Chem. Commun. 2008, 5267–5276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Huang, B.; Kukowska-Latallo, J.F.; Tang, S.; Zong, H.; Johnson, K.B.; Desai, A.; Gordon, C.L.; Leroueil, P.R.; Baker, J.R., Jr. The facile synthesis of multifunctional pamam dendrimer conjugates through copper-free click chemistry. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 3152–3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Li, H.; Li, Z.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, M.; Wei, L. Constructing metal nanoparticle multilayers with polyphenylene dendrimer/gold nanoparticles via “click” chemistry. Langmuir 2013, 29, 3943–3949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Meesaragandla, B.; Mahalingam, V. Synthesis of upconverting hydrogel nanocomposites using thiol-ene click chemistry: Template for the formation of dendrimer-like gold nanoparticle assemblies. Chemistry 2015, 21, 16811–16817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Qin, A.J.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Tang, B.Z. Click polymerization: Progresses, challenges, and opportunities. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 8693–8702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jiang, B.; Pu, H.T.; Pan, H.Y.; Chang, Z.H.; Jin, M.; Wan, D.C. Proton conducting membranes based on semi-interpenetrating polymer network of fluorine-containing polyimide and perfluorosulfonic acid polymer via click chemistry. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 132, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Koyuncu, F.B.; Davis, A.R.; Carter, K.R. Emissive conjugated polymer networks with tunable band-gaps via thiol-ene click chemistry. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 4410–4416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pan, H.Y.; Pu, H.T.; Jin, M.; Wan, D.C.; Modestov, A.D. Semi-interpenetrating polymer networks based-on end-group crosslinked fluorine-containing polyimide via click chemistry. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 89, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Retailleau, M.; Pierrel, J.; Ibrahim, A.; Croutxe-Barghorn, C.; Allonas, X. Sequenced click chemistry and photopolymerization: A new approach toward semi-interpenetrating polymer networks. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2017, 28, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yao, F.; Xu, L.Q.; Fu, G.D.; Lin, B.P. Sliding-graft interpenetrating polymer networks from simultaneous “click chemistry” and atom transfer radical polymerization. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 9761–9770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hoyle, C.E.; Bowman, C.N. Thiol-ene click chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1540–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Lowe, A.B. Thiol-ene “click” reactions and recent applications in polymer and materials synthesis. Polym. Chem. 2010, 1, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lowe, A.B. Thiol-ene “click” reactions and recent applications in polymer and materials synthesis: A first update. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 4820–4870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hoyle, C.E.; Lowe, A.B.; Bowman, C.N. Thiol-click chemistry: A multifaceted toolbox for small molecule and polymer synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1355–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Harguindey, A.; Domaille, D.W.; Fairbanks, B.D.; Wagner, J.; Bowman, C.N.; Cha, J.N. Synthesis and assembly of click-nucleic-acid-containing PEG-PLGA nanoparticles for DNA delivery. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Mu, X.; Sowan, N.; Tumbic, J.A.; Bowman, C.N.; Mather, P.T.; Qi, H.J. Photo-induced bending in a light-activated polymer laminated composite. Soft Matter 2015, 11, 2673–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Grubbs, R.H.; Tumas, W. Polymer synthesis and organotransition metal chemistry. Science 1989, 243, 907–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Mutch, A.; Leconte, M.; Lefebvre, F.; Basset, J.M. Effect of alcohols and epoxides on the rate of romp of norbornene by a ruthenium trichloride catalyst. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 1998, 133, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bazzi, H.S.; Sleiman, H.F. Adenine-containing block copolymers via ring-opening metathesis polymerization: Synthesis and self-assembly into rod morphologies. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 9617–9620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Nielsen, P.E. Sequence-selective DNA recognition by synthetic ligands. Bioconjug. Chem. 1991, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wittung, P.; Nielsen, P.E.; Buchardt, O.; Egholm, M.; Norden, B. DNA-like double helix formed by peptide nucleic-acid. Nature 1994, 368, 561–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Egholm, M.; Buchardt, O.; Christensen, L.; Behrens, C.; Freier, S.M.; Driver, D.A.; Berg, R.H.; Kim, S.K.; Norden, B.; Nielsen, P.E. PNA hybridizes to complementary oligonucleotides obeying the watson-crick hydrogen-bonding rules. Nature 1993, 365, 566–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Kaihatsu, K.; Janowski, B.A.; Corey, D.R. Recognition of chromosomal DNA by PNAs. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 749–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Gregory, G.L.; Hierons, E.M.; Kociok-Köhn, G.; Sharma, R.I.; Buchard, A. CO2-driven stereochemical inversion of sugars to create thymidine-based polycarbonates by ring-opening polymerisation. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 1714–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lutolf, M.P.; Hubbell, J.A. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Caliari, S.R.; Burdick, J.A. A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Guvendiren, M.; Lu, H.D.; Burdick, J.A. Shear-thinning hydrogels for biomedical applications. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 260–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tan, H.P.; Xiao, C.; Sun, J.C.; Xiong, D.S.; Hu, X.H. Biological self-assembly of injectable hydrogel as cell scaffold via specific nucleobase pairing. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 10289–10291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zeng, P.; Xu, Y.; Zeng, C.H.; Ren, H.; Peng, M.L. Chitosan-modified poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) nanospheres for plasmid DNA delivery and HBV gene-silencing. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 415, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Spelios, M.; Kearns, M.; Savva, M. From gene delivery to gene silencing: Plasmid DNA-transfecting cationic lipid 1,3-dimyristoylamidopropane-2-[bis(2-dimethylaminoethane)] carbamate efficiently promotes small interfering RNA-induced RNA interference. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 5753–5759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ewert, K.K.; Zidovska, A.; Ahmad, A.; Bouxsein, N.F.; Evans, H.M.; McAllister, C.S.; Samuel, C.E.; Safinya, C.R. Cationic liposome-nucleic acid complexes for gene delivery and silencing: Pathways and mechanisms for plasmid DNA and siRNA. Top. Curr. Chem. 2010, 296, 191–226. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  107. Beale, G.; Hollins, A.J.; Benboubetra, M.; Sohail, M.; Fox, S.P.; Benter, I.; Akhtar, S. Gene silencing nucleic acids designed by scanning arrays: Anti-EGFR activity of siRNA, ribozyme and DNA enzymes targeting a single hybridization-accessible region using the same delivery system. J. Drug Target. 2003, 11, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Oupicky, D.; Konak, C.; Ulbrich, K.; Wolfert, M.A.; Seymour, L.W. DNA delivery systems based on complexes of DNA with synthetic polycations and their copolymers. J. Control. Release 2000, 65, 149–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Luo, D.; Saltzman, W.M. Synthetic DNA delivery systems. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Hager, M.D.; Greil, P.; Leyens, C.; Der Zwaag, S.V.; Schubert, U.S. Self-healing materials. Adv. Mater. 2007, 22, 5424–5430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Wool, R.P. Self-healing materials: A review. Soft Matter 2008, 4, 400–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Neal, J.A.; Mozhdehi, D.; Guan, Z. Enhancing mechanical performance of a covalent self-healing material by sacrificial noncovalent bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4846–4850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Tuncaboylu, D.C.; Sari, M.; Oppermann, W.; Okay, O. Tough and self-healing hydrogels formed via hydrophobic interactions. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 4997–5005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Jacob, R.S.; Ghosh, D.; Singh, P.K.; Basu, S.K.; Jha, N.N.; Das, S.; Sukul, P.K.; Patil, S.B.; Sathaye, S.; Kumar, A. Self healing hydrogels composed of amyloid nano fibrils for cell culture and stem cell differentiation. Biomaterials 2015, 54, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Heo, Y.; Malakooti, M.H.; Sodano, H.A. Self-healing polymers and composites for extreme environments. J. Mater. Chem. 2016, 4, 17403–17411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Cheng, C.; Chang, F.; Dai, S.A.; Lin, Y.; Lee, D. Bio-complementary supramolecular polymers with effective self-healing functionality. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 90466–90472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ye, X.; Li, X.; Shen, Y.; Chang, G.; Yang, J.; Gu, Z. Self-healing pH-sensitive cytosine- and guanosine-modified hyaluronic acid hydrogels via hydrogen bonding. Polymer 2017, 108, 348–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Grzelczak, M.; Vermant, J.; Furst, E.M.; Lizmarzan, L.M. Directed self-assembly of nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3591–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Yang, H.; Li, G.; Stansbury, J.W.; Zhu, X.; Wang, X.; Nie, J. A smart antibacterial surface made by photopolymerization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 28047–28054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Yang, H.; Stansbury, J.W.; Ai, X.; Hu, R.; Tang, H.; Maitlo, I.; Nie, J. Nanostructure superhydrophobic surface prepared by photopolymerization. Chem. Lett. 2017, 46, 371–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Samanta, D.; Hosseininassab, N.; Zare, R.N. Electroresponsive nanoparticles for drug delivery on demand. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 9310–9317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Tian, H.; Chen, J.; Chen, X. Nanoparticles for gene delivery. Small 2013, 9, 2034–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. He, L.; Mao, C.; Cho, S.; Ma, K.; Xi, W.; Bowman, C.N.; Park, W.; Cha, J.N. Experimental and theoretical photoluminescence studies in nucleic acid assembled gold-upconverting nanoparticle clusters. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 17254–17260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Keene, F.R.; Smith, J.A.; Collins, J.G. Metal complexes as structure-selective binding agents for nucleic acids. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 2021–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ward, W.L.; Plakos, K.; Derose, V.J. Nucleic acid catalysis: Metals, nucleobases, and other cofactors. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 4318–4342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Berg, J.M. Potential metal-binding domains in nucleic acid binding proteins. Science 1986, 232, 485–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Yang, H.; Mclaughlin, C.K.; Aldaye, F.A.; Hamblin, G.D.; Rys, A.Z.; Rouiller, I.; Sleiman, H.F. Metal-nucleic acid cages. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Gu, H.; Chao, J.; Xiao, S.; Seeman, N.C. A proximity-based programmable DNA nanoscale assembly line. Nature 2010, 465, 202–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Seeman, N.C.; Lukeman, P.S. Nucleic acid nanostructures: Bottom-up control of geometry on the nanoscale. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2005, 68, 237–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Watson, R.M.; Skorik, Y.A.; Patra, G.K.; Achim, C. Influence of metal coordination on the mismatch tolerance of ligand-modified PNA duplexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14628–14639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Beobide, G.; Castillo, O.; Cepeda, J.; Luque, A.; Perezyanez, S.; Roman, P.; Thomasgipson, J. Metal-carboxylato-nucleobase systems: From supramolecular assemblies to 3D porous materials. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 2716–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Amoochoa, P.; Zamora, F. Coordination polymers with nucleobases: From structural aspects to potential applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2014, 276, 34–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Olea, D.; Alexandre, S.S.; Amoochoa, P.; Guijarro, A.; De Jesus, F.; Soler, J.M.; De Pablo, P.J.; Zamora, F.; Gomezherrero, J. From coordination polymer macrocrystals to nanometric individual chains. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 1761–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. García-Terán, J.P.; Castillo, O.; Luque, A.; García-Couceiro, U.; Román, P.; Lezama, L. An unusual 3D coordination polymer based on bridging interactions of the nucleobase adenine. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 4549–4551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Polymers 09 00666 g001 550
Figure 1. Generic chemical structures of nucleobase-containing polymers in nature and the phosphoramidite DNA synthesis cycle.
Figure 1. Generic chemical structures of nucleobase-containing polymers in nature and the phosphoramidite DNA synthesis cycle.
Polymers 09 00666 g001
Polymers 09 00666 sch001a 550Polymers 09 00666 sch001b 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of copolymer poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)–poly(nucleobase) by ATRP and schematic structure of assembled copolymers [26]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2006.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of copolymer poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)–poly(nucleobase) by ATRP and schematic structure of assembled copolymers [26]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2006.
Polymers 09 00666 sch001aPolymers 09 00666 sch001b
Polymers 09 00666 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthetic procedures used to obtain PVBT and A-C16 and graphical representations of the lamellar structures of the PVBT/A-C16 complexes in bulk state [47]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2008.
Scheme 2. Synthetic procedures used to obtain PVBT and A-C16 and graphical representations of the lamellar structures of the PVBT/A-C16 complexes in bulk state [47]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2008.
Polymers 09 00666 sch002
Polymers 09 00666 g002 550
Figure 2. Synthesis and self-assembly of adenine and thymine block copolymers using RAFT [49]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2013.
Figure 2. Synthesis and self-assembly of adenine and thymine block copolymers using RAFT [49]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2013.
Polymers 09 00666 g002
Polymers 09 00666 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Synthesis of adenine- and thymine-functionalized acrylic ABA triblock copolymers using RAFT polymerization and schematic representation of supramolecular blend of adenine and thymine-functionalized triblock copolymers [31]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of adenine- and thymine-functionalized acrylic ABA triblock copolymers using RAFT polymerization and schematic representation of supramolecular blend of adenine and thymine-functionalized triblock copolymers [31]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015.
Polymers 09 00666 sch003
Polymers 09 00666 g003 550
Figure 3. Synthesis of adenine and thymine nucleobase-functionalized triblock copolymers using NMP [33]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2007.
Figure 3. Synthesis of adenine and thymine nucleobase-functionalized triblock copolymers using NMP [33]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2007.
Polymers 09 00666 g003
Polymers 09 00666 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Chemical structures of the nucleobase organogels and a schematic illustration of their macroscopic self-assembly [36]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2015.
Scheme 4. Chemical structures of the nucleobase organogels and a schematic illustration of their macroscopic self-assembly [36]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2015.
Polymers 09 00666 sch004
Polymers 09 00666 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Self-assembly of nucleobase polymer templates into micelles and (b) the templated polymerization of complementary nucleobase monomers [28]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Springer Nature, 2012.
Figure 4. (a) Self-assembly of nucleobase polymer templates into micelles and (b) the templated polymerization of complementary nucleobase monomers [28]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Springer Nature, 2012.
Polymers 09 00666 g004
Polymers 09 00666 g005 550
Figure 5. Sequence-controlled hetero-functional, topological polymers (R1 and R2 denote two different functional groups and S represents a thioether bond, which can be transformed into a sulfone bond by oxidation) and the synthetic route to a DNA-mimetic nucleobase-containing polymer [39]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Springer Nature, 2014.
Figure 5. Sequence-controlled hetero-functional, topological polymers (R1 and R2 denote two different functional groups and S represents a thioether bond, which can be transformed into a sulfone bond by oxidation) and the synthetic route to a DNA-mimetic nucleobase-containing polymer [39]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Springer Nature, 2014.
Polymers 09 00666 g005
Polymers 09 00666 sch005 550
Scheme 5. (A) General monomer structure for thiol-based click polymerization (R represents functional group, including but not limited to nucleobases); (B) The two types of thiol click reaction; (C) Thiol-click reaction strategy for sequence-controlled periodic functional oligomers and polymers [38]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2015.
Scheme 5. (A) General monomer structure for thiol-based click polymerization (R represents functional group, including but not limited to nucleobases); (B) The two types of thiol click reaction; (C) Thiol-click reaction strategy for sequence-controlled periodic functional oligomers and polymers [38]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2015.
Polymers 09 00666 sch005
Polymers 09 00666 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of water-soluble CNA polymer synthesis [40]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017.
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of water-soluble CNA polymer synthesis [40]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017.
Polymers 09 00666 g006
Polymers 09 00666 g007 550
Figure 7. (A) ROMP with noncovalently protected monomer; (B) preparation of block copolymers via ROMP [94]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2006.
Figure 7. (A) ROMP with noncovalently protected monomer; (B) preparation of block copolymers via ROMP [94]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2006.
Polymers 09 00666 g007
Polymers 09 00666 sch006 550
Scheme 6. Templated polymerization of nucleobase-containing monomers [41]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2009.
Scheme 6. Templated polymerization of nucleobase-containing monomers [41]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2009.
Polymers 09 00666 sch006
Polymers 09 00666 g008 550
Figure 8. Preparation of poly(oligonucleotide): PNA homopolymer (A); Poly-PNA block copolymer (B) [42]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2014.
Figure 8. Preparation of poly(oligonucleotide): PNA homopolymer (A); Poly-PNA block copolymer (B) [42]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2014.
Polymers 09 00666 g008
Polymers 09 00666 g009 550
Figure 9. Structures of nucleobase-functionalized polythiophenes [44]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 1998.
Figure 9. Structures of nucleobase-functionalized polythiophenes [44]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 1998.
Polymers 09 00666 g009
Polymers 09 00666 sch007 550
Scheme 7. Poly(ethylene glycol)-maleimide (PEG-Mal) was functionalized with (a) thiol thymine (T-SH) and (b) thiol adenine (A-SH); (c) Schematic of the biological self-assembly of ideal four-arm PEG hydrogel network via intermolecular nucleobase interaction between thymine and adenine functionalities [103]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2012.
Scheme 7. Poly(ethylene glycol)-maleimide (PEG-Mal) was functionalized with (a) thiol thymine (T-SH) and (b) thiol adenine (A-SH); (c) Schematic of the biological self-assembly of ideal four-arm PEG hydrogel network via intermolecular nucleobase interaction between thymine and adenine functionalities [103]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2012.
Polymers 09 00666 sch007
Polymers 09 00666 g010 550
Figure 10. DNA loading measurement of triblock PEG-CNA-PLGA nanoparticles [90]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2017.
Figure 10. DNA loading measurement of triblock PEG-CNA-PLGA nanoparticles [90]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2017.
Polymers 09 00666 g010
Polymers 09 00666 g011 550
Figure 11. Structures of nucleobase-containing polymers and an illustration of complementary interactions between POSS-U and PCL-A [116]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015.
Figure 11. Structures of nucleobase-containing polymers and an illustration of complementary interactions between POSS-U and PCL-A [116]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015.
Polymers 09 00666 g011
Polymers 09 00666 g012 550
Figure 12. Illustration and diagram of self-healing behavior of (a) HA-HMDA-C10, (b) HA-HMDA-G10, (c) HA-HMDA-C/G10, (d) HA-HMDA-C10@HA-HMDA-G10 hydrogels, and (e) simulation diagram of HA-HMDA-C10@HA-HMDA-G10. The sketches are of hydrogen bonds between cytosine and guanosine, with themselves or each other, carried out by computer simulations: (a’) cytosines, (b’) guanosines, and (c’) cytosine and guanosine [117]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Elsevier, 2017.
Figure 12. Illustration and diagram of self-healing behavior of (a) HA-HMDA-C10, (b) HA-HMDA-G10, (c) HA-HMDA-C/G10, (d) HA-HMDA-C10@HA-HMDA-G10 hydrogels, and (e) simulation diagram of HA-HMDA-C10@HA-HMDA-G10. The sketches are of hydrogen bonds between cytosine and guanosine, with themselves or each other, carried out by computer simulations: (a’) cytosines, (b’) guanosines, and (c’) cytosine and guanosine [117]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Elsevier, 2017.
Polymers 09 00666 g012
Polymers 09 00666 g013 550
Figure 13. TEM images of the Au–UCNP clusters: (A) AuNP–UCNP, (B) 700 AuNS–UCNP, (C) 980 AuNS–UCNP and (D–F) the corresponding optical images; Images of electric field amplitude: (A’) AuNPs, (B’) AuNSs with 700 nm plasmon resonance and (C’) AuNSs with 980 nm [123]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015.
Figure 13. TEM images of the Au–UCNP clusters: (A) AuNP–UCNP, (B) 700 AuNS–UCNP, (C) 980 AuNS–UCNP and (D–F) the corresponding optical images; Images of electric field amplitude: (A’) AuNPs, (B’) AuNSs with 700 nm plasmon resonance and (C’) AuNSs with 980 nm [123]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015.
Polymers 09 00666 g013
Polymers 09 00666 g014 550
Figure 14. (A) Schematic representation of DNA and [Cd(6-MCP)2]n. (B) Scheme of the structure and spacefill model of [Cd(6-MCP)2]n [133]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2005.
Figure 14. (A) Schematic representation of DNA and [Cd(6-MCP)2]n. (B) Scheme of the structure and spacefill model of [Cd(6-MCP)2]n [133]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2005.
Polymers 09 00666 g014
Table
Table 1. Common methods for the preparation of NB-containing polymers.
Table 1. Common methods for the preparation of NB-containing polymers.
Polymerization methodNB-MonomerLengthReferences
ATRPStyrenes and derivatives10~100 bases[25,26,27]
Acrylates
Methacrylates
(Meth)acrylamides
Miscellaneous monomers
RAFTStyrenes and derivatives10~100 bases[28,29,30,31,32]
Acrylates
Methacrylates
(meth)acrylamides
NMPStyrenes and derivatives20~100 bases[33,34]
Acrylates
Conventional radical polymerizationCommon monomers80~200 bases[35,36,37]
Click chemistryAzides10~50 bases[38,39,40]
Alkynes
Thiols
Vinyls
Acrylamides
Dienes
Ring opening polymerizationCyclic monomers (e.g., cyclic olefins, acetals, lactams, lactones)10~40 bases[41,42,43]
Other polymerizationThiophenes and derivativesN.A.[44]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, H.; Xi, W. Nucleobase-Containing Polymers: Structure, Synthesis, and Applications. Polymers 2017, 9, 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9120666

AMA Style

Yang H, Xi W. Nucleobase-Containing Polymers: Structure, Synthesis, and Applications. Polymers. 2017; 9(12):666. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9120666

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Haitao, and Weixian Xi. 2017. "Nucleobase-Containing Polymers: Structure, Synthesis, and Applications" Polymers 9, no. 12: 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9120666

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop