Polymers 2013, 5(3), 1056-1067; doi:10.3390/polym5031056

Article
Preparation and Characterization of Poly(ethyl hydrazide) Grafted Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch for Removal of Ni(II) Ion in Aqueous Environment
Ili Syazana bt Johari 1, Nor Azah Yusof 1,2,*, Md Jelas Haron 3 and Siti Mariam Mohd Nor 1
1
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang UPM 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; E-Mails: ili@putra.upm.edu.my (I.S.J.); mariam@science.upm.edu.my (S.M.M.N.)
2
Institute of Advanced Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang UPM 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
3
Chemistry Unit, Centre of Foundation Studies for Agricultural Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang UPM 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; E-Mail: mdjelas@gmail.com
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: azah@science.upm.edu.my; Tel.: +603-8946-6782; Fax: +603-8943-5380.
Received: 22 May 2013 / Accepted: 2 July 2013 / Published: 25 July 2013

Abstract

: Poly(ethyl hydrazide) grafted oil palm empty fruit bunch (peh-g-opefb) fiber has been successfully prepared by heating poly(methylacrylate)-g-opefb at 60 °C for 4 h in a solution of hydrazine hydrate in ethanol. The chelating ability of peh-g-opefb was evaluated based on removal of Ni(II) ions in aqueous solution. Adsorption of Ni(II) by peh-g-opefb was characterized based on effect of pH, isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic study. This cheap sorbent based on oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber has a great future potential in water treatment industries based on high adsorption capacity, biodegradability and renewability.
Keywords:
nickel ions; oil palm empty fruit bunch; grafted polymer; sorbent

1. Introduction

Ni(II) is one of the heavy metals which is very commonly raised regarding environmental pollution and health problems [1]. The major contributor of Ni(II) in the environment is from industrial- and chemical-based agricultural activities such as mineral processing, paint formulation, electroplating, porcelain enameling, copper sulphate manufacture, steam electric power plant [2], fossil fuel consumption, disposal of nickel compounds and alloys [3], aircraft industries [4], mining, smelting and refinery works [5]. In addition, it has also been widely used as dental alloy for orthodonthic appliance [6].

The uptake of Ni(II) into the human body is mainly via inhalation and ingestion which eventually results in the deposition and accumulation of nickel in the body system. The accumulation of nickel will lead to adverse effects including pulmonary fibrosis, renal edema and skin dermatitis, gastrointestinal distress [7], lung fibrosis, cardiovascular and kidney diseases, and the most serious effect is the carcinogenicity of the element [5].

In order to overcome this problem, researchers have tried to develop a method to reduce the concentration of toxic heavy metals in waste water to an acceptable level for environment and human health [8]. Many methods were applied by previous researchers to remove metal from aqueous systems including solvent extraction, precipitation, ultra-filtration, electrode-deposition, cementation, evaporation [9], ion-exchange and reverse osmosis [10]. However, adsorption was found to be the most appropriate technique because of its simplicity and high efficiency characteristics in metal removal and recovery.

In recent years, the use of the agricultural based adsorbents has become popular, particularly on an industrial scale, since they are able to reduce the operational cost and are environmental-friendly. Malaysia is one of major producers of palm oil [11]. Therefore, the abundant waste produced after the oil palm extraction is worthy of being explored since it is able to reduce the waste management problems. In this work, the oil palm empty fruit bunch (opefb) waste was grafted with methyl acrylate to obtained pma-g-opefb and then it was converted to peh-g-opefb. The final product was used as an adsorbent for removal of Ni(II) from aqueous solutions since it is known that hydrazide forms a stable complex with metal ion [12].

Figure 1 shows an example of complex formation of poly (acryloyl benzoic hydrazide) with nickel ion [13].

Polymers 05 01056 g001 200
Figure 1. A complex of poly(acryloyl benzoic hydrazide) with nickel ion [13].

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. A complex of poly(acryloyl benzoic hydrazide) with nickel ion [13].
Polymers 05 01056 g001 1024

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Preparation of Poly(methyl acrylate) Grafted Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch (Pma-g-opefb)

The oil palm empty fruit bunch (opefb) fiber was grind using a stainless steel grinder, washed with hot water, rinsed with acetone and dried in oven at 60 °C for 24 h. The fiber was then sieved using 180 micron sieve in order to obtain homogenous fiber size. About 30.0 g of the opefb was suspended under nitrogen atmosphere into 500 mL of distilled water containing 20 mL hydrogen peroxide (6%) as initiator, 1.60 g of ferrous ammonium sulfate as co-initiator and 50 mL of purified methyl acrylate monomer. The mixture was heated at 75 °C for 3 h. After washing the grafted product with acetone, the pma-g-opefb was dried in oven at 60 °C. The details of the preparation of pma-g-opefb have been previously described [14]. The final weight was measured and grafting percentage (Pg) was calculated using the following formula:

Pg (%) = (W2W1)/W1 × 100%
where W2 and W1 are the weights of purified grafted product and initial weight of opefb respectively.

2.2. Preparation of Peh-g-opefb

Peh-g-opefb was prepared by weighing 1.0 g of pma-g-opefb and refluxed for 4 h with 100 mL of hydrazine hydrate solution in ethanol (15% v/v). Then, the final product was filtered and washed several times with ethanol and dried in oven at 60 °C.

2.3. FTIR of Peh-g-opefb

The functional group presence in opefb, pma-g-opefb and peh-g-opefb were determined using Fourier Transform Infrared Analysis (FTIR) spectrometer (Perkin Elmer Spectrum 100 Series) using KBR pellets. The infrared spectra were recorded in the range of frequency of 400 to 4000 cm−1.

2.4. Adsorption Studies

2.4.1. Effect of pH on Ni(II) Adsorption

The uptake of metal ions was carried out by mixing 0.10 g of peh-g-opefb with 20 mL of 100 mg/L of metal solution at various pH in centrifuge tube. Sodium acetate was used as a buffer for pH 4 to 6 while HCl solution was use for pH 1 to 3. The sample was filtered and the amount of remaining metal ions in the solution was determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrophotometer (ICP-OES) model Perkin Elmer Instruments, Shelton, CT, USA (Optima 2000DV).

2.4.2. Effect of Initial Concentration and Temperature on Nickel Ni(II) Adsorption

The effect of initial concentration of metal ion solution was evaluated by mixing 0.10 g of peh-g-opefb fiber with 20 mL of metal ion solution at different concentration (50–1000 mg·L−1) at optimum pH. The experiment was carried out at different temperatures (25, 50 and 75 °C) in order to determine thermodynamic parameters.

2.4.3. Kinetic Study

Metal ions uptake was carried out by mixing 0.10 g of peh-g-opefb fiber with 20 mL of metal ion solution (100 mg∙L−1) at different time interval (30, 90, 120, 250, 360, 480, 720, 840, 960 and 1200 min). After each time interval, the sample was filtered and the amount of remaining metal ions in the solution was determined by ICP-OES.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Peh-g-opefb

The pma-g-opefb was successfully prepared with percentage grafting of 117.24%. The FTIR spectra of all opefb, pma-g-opefb and peh-g-opefb are shown in Figure 2.

Polymers 05 01056 g002 200
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of opefb, pma-g-opefb and peh-g-opefb.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 2. FTIR spectra of opefb, pma-g-opefb and peh-g-opefb.
Polymers 05 01056 g002 1024

Figure 2 shows broad absorption band appear at around 3500–3200 cm−1 in opefb indicates the O–H stretching attributing to hydroxyl group of cellulose, absorbed water, hemicelluloses and lignin in opefb [15]. However, the intensity of the hydroxyl absorption band decreased in pma-g-opefb due to the formation of macroradicals fiber after reaction of opefb with hydroxyl radicals during the grafting process. In peh-g-opefb, a broad absorption band was observed at about 3300 cm−1 and 3100 cm−1 indicating the N–H stretching from amine group. The presence of the absorption band is in agreement with the N–H stretching observed for poly (acrylamidrazone-hydrazide) which appear at 3319 cm−1 and 3180 cm−1 [16].

The FTIR spectrum of pma-g-opefb gives one absorption band at 1741 cm−1 corresponding to C=O stretching of an ester functional group of the poly (methyl acrylate). When the pma-g-opefb is converted to peh-g-opefb, there is an obvious disappearance of carbonyl ester absorption band at 1741 cm−1 and appearance of new absorption band around 1650 cm−1 representing C=O stretching from amide in peh-g-opefb which is due to the conversion of majority of the ester group to hydrazide [17]. Furthermore, another absorption band observed at about 1580 cm−1 indicating N–H blending in peh-g-opefb. This result was in agreement with Liu et al. which report the presence of N–H bending absorption band at around 1560 cm−1 in poly(acrylaminophosphonic-carboxyl-hydrazide) [18]. The existence of an absorption band at around 2900 cm−1 in all grafted opefb, ungrafted opefb and peh-g-opefb is due to the C–H stretching from cellulose and lignin [14].

3.2. Effect of pH on Nickel (II) Adsorption

The result shows that the adsorption capacity towards nickel ion was low at pH 1 and 2. The low uptake of nickel ions in strong acidic medium may be attributed to the protonation of amine groups which leads to a strong electrostatic repulsions with the metal ion [19,20,21]. Hence, the protonated amine group obtained in lower pH medium has reduced the available binding sites for the adsorption of nickel ions. As the pH increased, the hydrazides on the adsorbents’ surface mainly turn into dissociated forms that allowed an increase in the uptake of nickel ions due to more binding sites with negative charge [19]. The optimum pH for Ni(II) removal by peh-g-opefb is pH 6 and therefore, it was used for subsequent experiments.

Figure 3 indicates the adsorption capacity of peh-g-opefb towards nickel ion at different pH.

Polymers 05 01056 g003 200
Figure 3. Adsorption capacity of peh-g-opefb towards nickel ion at different pH.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 3. Adsorption capacity of peh-g-opefb towards nickel ion at different pH.
Polymers 05 01056 g003 1024

3.3. Effect of Initial Concentration on Ni(II) Adsorption

The result indicates that the adsorption capacity of nickel ions by peh-g-opefb is increased from 9.52 mg∙g−1 to 41.74 mg∙g−1 at 25 °C, 10.61 mg∙g−1 to 45.29 mg∙g−1 at 50 °C and 11.86 mg∙g−1 to 52.17 mg∙g−1 at 75 °C as the initial concentrations increased from 50 mg∙L−1 to 1000 mg∙L−1.

Figure 4 shows the effect of different initial concentration of nickel ions on adsorption of Ni(II) by peh-g-opefb.

At low Ni(II) concentration (100–300 mg∙L−1), the adsorption capacities significantly increase with increase initial concentration. This suggests that the increase of amount of the metal ions in the solution enhanced the interactions between metal ions and the active sites on the surface of adsorbent [22]. The initial concentrations of metal ions act as an important driving force to overcome all mass transfer resistance of metal ions between the aqueous and solid phase [4]. However, at the high concentration range (400–1000 mg∙L−1) of Ni(II), there is only a slight increment on the adsorption capacity, indicating that peh-g-opefb is becoming saturated and fewer sites are available for metal adsorption [23].

Polymers 05 01056 g004 200
Figure 4. Effect of initial concentration of nickel ions on adsorption capacities by peh-g-opefb at different temperature.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 4. Effect of initial concentration of nickel ions on adsorption capacities by peh-g-opefb at different temperature.
Polymers 05 01056 g004 1024

3.4. Effect of Temperature Ni(II) Adsorption

In temperature study, the result reveals that the uptake of nickel ion increased as the temperature increased, indicating that the adsorption of Ni(II) onto peh-g-opefb is an endothermic process. The increase in temperature increased the number of metal ions with sufficient energy to react with the active sites on the adsorbent surface [24,25]. Furthermore, increase in temperature may produce a swelling effect within the internal structure of the adsorbent, hence increase the interaction between metal ions and the active sites on the adsorbent [26].

3.5. Adsorption Isotherm

The isotherm study is a fundamental aspect in determining the nature of adsorption between adsorbent and the metal ions. It indicates how the metal ions are distributed between adsorbents and the metal solutions at equilibrium phase [8]. The adsorption data were analyzed using Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin isotherm models.

The Langmuir isotherm model assumes that the surface of peh-g-opefb is homogenous and the adsorption potential towards Ni(II) is constant [27,28]. Langmuir isotherm model can be expressed using the following equation

Ce/qe = Ce/Qo + 1/Qob
where Qo is the maximum adsorption at monolayer (mg∙g−1), Ce is the equilibrium concentration (mg∙L−1), qe is amount of metal adsorbed at equilibrium (mg∙g−1) and b is Langmuir constant (L∙mg−1).

The Freundlich isotherm model deals with the heterogeneous surface adsorbent which assumes that different sites involve different adsorption energies [20,27,28]. It can be expressed using the following equation

lnqe = lnKF + ln(Ce/n)
where KF is the Freundlich constant (mg∙g−1) indicating adsorption capacity and n is the Freundlich constant indicating intensity of the adsorption.

Lastly, the Temkin isotherm model assumes that adsorption is characterized by a uniform distribution of binding energies and expressed by the following equation [28].

qe = (RT/b)∙lnA + (RT/b)∙lnCe
where RT/b = B. A and B are constants where B is related to the heat of adsorption.

Based on the obtained results, Ni(II) adsorption by peh-g-opefb follows Langmuir isotherm model with high correlation coefficient R2 > 0.99. Based on the R2 values, the data also fit the Freundlich and Temkin isotherm models. However, the relationship was statistically less significant in comparison to the Langmuir model. Therefore, it can be concluded that Ni(II) uptake onto peh-g-opefb involves a monolayer adsorption.

Table 1 summarized the isotherm data of Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin model for the adsorption of Ni(II) onto peh-g-opefb.

Table 1. Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin isotherm constants, maximum adsorption capacities qmax, and correlation coefficients R2 for nickel (II) adsorption at various temperatures.

Click here to display table

Table 1. Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin isotherm constants, maximum adsorption capacities qmax, and correlation coefficients R2 for nickel (II) adsorption at various temperatures.
Temperature (°C)Langmuir isothermFreundlich isothermTemkin isotherm
qmax(mg∙g−1)b (L∙mg−1)R2RLKF [mg/g(L/mg)1/n]nR2lnAbR2
2542.190.04150.99810.10879.864.39750.96191.66435.00650.9395
5044.440.06610.99590.071716.126.24610.98884.73763.87200.9862
7551.020.05450.99360.079022.127.86780.93307.21723.55430.9731

The favorability of the adsorption process was predicted in terms of dimensionless constant separation factor, (RL). Using the b value obtained from the Langmuir isotherm equation, the separation factor, RL can be calculated using following equation

RL = 1/(1 + b∙C0)
where C0 is the initial concentration of nickel (II) (mg∙L−1) and b is the Langmuir constant (mL∙mg−1).

The RL values indicate whether the isotherm is irreversible (RL = 0), favorable (0 < RL < 1), linear (RL = 1) or unfavorable (RL > 1). The obtained data shows that the RL values for nickel (II) adsorption onto peh-g-opefb are favorable at all temperatures with all RL values are 0 < RL < 1.

In addition, the n value obtained from Freundlich equation was able to give an indication as to the favorability of adsorption. According to Reddy et al., the values of n in the range of 2–10 represent good, 1–2 moderately difficult and <1 is poor adsorption [29]. Therefore, based on the data calculated, values of n for nickel (II) adsorption onto peh-g-opefb at all temperatures studied were in the range of 2–10 indicating a favorable adsorption process and this is in agreement with the RL values.

3.6. Adsorption Kinetic

Kinetic study is another important parameter to determine the rate of adsorbate uptake in solid-liquid phase interface in the adsorption system [22]. Adsorption capacities data are plotted versus time to investigate the effect of time on equilibrium phase of the adsorption.

Figure 5 shows that the adsorption capacity gradually increases until it reaches equilibrium after about 720 min.

Polymers 05 01056 g005 200
Figure 5. Adsorption capacity towards Ni(II) ion at different times.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 5. Adsorption capacity towards Ni(II) ion at different times.
Polymers 05 01056 g005 1024

In order to determine the mechanism and characteristics constant of the adsorption, two kinetic models which are the pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order kinetic models were applied to the experimental data. The pseudo first order kinetic model is expressed as follows

ln(qeqt) = ln qe – (k1t)/2.303
where qt is the amount of adsorbate on the sorbent at time (mg∙g−1), qe is the amounts of adsorbate on the sorbent at equilibrium (mg∙g−1) and k1 is the first order rate constant (min−1).

Ho and McKay [30] proposed that pseudo-second-order kinetic model based on assumption that adsorption process follows second order chemisorption. The pseudo second order kinetic model can be written as follows

t/qt = 1/(k2qe2) + t/qe
where qt is the amount of adsorbate on the sorbent at time t (mg∙g−1), qe is the amounts of adsorbate on the sorbent at equilibrium (mg∙g−1) and k2 is the second order rate constant [g∙(mg∙min−1)].

The kinetic constant with the correlation of coefficient for pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models were calculated and the data show that the qe calculated were much lower (15.92 mg∙g−1) than the experimental value (22.78 mg∙g−1) for pseudo-first order model indicating that nickel (II) adsorption is not occurring exclusively onto one site per ion [4].

On the other hand, the pseudo-second-order kinetic model gives qe calculate (23.81 mg∙g−1) close to qe exp (22.78 mg∙g−1) for nickel (II) adsorption onto peh-g-opefb with the R2 > 0.99 confirming the applicability of pseudo second order kinetic model. It is also can be concluded that the overall rate of nickel (II) adsorption process was controlled by the chemical processes [4].

3.7. Adsorption Thermodynamic

Thermodynamic parameters such as enthalpy change (∆Hθ), entropy change (∆Sθ) and free energy (∆Gθ) are important in order to determine the spontaneity of the adsorption process. Those parameters can be calculated from experimental data at various temperatures (298, 323, 348 K) using Van’t Hoff equation as below

lnKD = ∆Sθ/R − ∆Hθ/RT
where KD is distribution coefficient (mL∙g−1), ∆Sθ is standard entropy, ∆Hθ is standard enthalpy, T is absolute temperature (K) and R is gas constant. The distribution coefficient, KD is obtained from qe/Ce where qe is the adsorption capacity and Ce is the concentration at equilibrium.

The enthalpy ∆Hθ and entropy Sθ values can be obtained from the slopes and intercepts of linear regression of the plot ln KD versus 1/T whereas the free energy was determined using the following equation

Gθ = ∆HθT∙∆Sθ

Thermodynamic parameters for Ni(II) adsorption onto peh-g-opefb are tabulated in Table 2 below.

Table 2. Thermodynamic parameters of nickel (II) adsorption onto peh-g-opefb.

Click here to display table

Table 2. Thermodynamic parameters of nickel (II) adsorption onto peh-g-opefb.
Temperature (K)Enthalpy, ∆ Hθ (kJ∙mol−1)Entropy, ∆ Sθ (J∙mol−1∙K−1)Free energy, −∆ Gθ (kJ∙mol−1)
29851.38195.316.83
32311.71
34816.60

The negative values of free energy, ∆Gθ indicates the spontaneous nature of the adsorption process. The ∆Gθ for Ni(II) adsorption increase as the temperature increase which leads to an increase in the feasibility of the adsorption at higher temperature [31,32]. In other words, more negative values reflect a more energetically favorable adsorption process [7].

The positive value of entropy, ∆Sθ indicates that the system becomes more disordered at the solid-solution interface during adsorption [33], resulting in the irreversibility of the process [34]. The positive value of enthalpy ∆Hθ shows that an endothermic process occurred during adsorption of Ni(II) onto peh-g-opefb.

4. Conclusions

Poly(ethyl hydrazide) grafted opefb (peh-g-opefb) was successfully prepared via refluxing poly(methyl acrylate) grafted opefb (pma-g-opefb) with 15% (v/v) hydrazine hydrate in ethanol for 4 h. The pma-g-opefb obtained with percentage grafting (Pg) of 117.24%. The modified fiber was characterized using FTIR shows two absorption bands were observed in peh-g-opefb at about 3300 and 3100 cm−1 indicating the N–H stretching for amine group. pH study indicates that nickel adsorption occurred at pH 6 with maximum adsorption capacity of 42.19 mg∙g−1 at 25 °C. The isotherm data indicates Ni(II) adsorption fit with Langmuir model and it follow pseudo-second-order kinetic model. This study reveals that peh-g-opefb has a great future potential as biodsorbent for heavy metal removal from agricultural waste which is abundant in Malaysia.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) of Malaysia for grant ERGS/1/11/STG/UPM/01/15 and the scholarship of one of the authors and Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Keane, M.A. The removal of copper and nickel from aqueous solution using Y zeolite ion exchangers. Colloids Surf. A 1998, 138, 11–20, doi:10.1016/S0927-7757(97)00078-2.
  2. Ozturk, A. Removal of nickel from aqueous solution by the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 147, 518–523, doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.047.
  3. Kasprzak, K.S.; Sunderman, F.W., Jr.; Salnikow, K. Review: Nickel carcinogenesis. Mutat. Res. 2003, 533, 67–97, doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.08.021.
  4. Aloma, I.; Martin-Lara, M.A.; Rodriguez, I.L.; Balzquez, G.; Calero, M. Removal of nickel (II) ions from aqueous solutions by biosorption on sugarcane bagasse. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2012, 43, 275–281, doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2011.10.011.
  5. Denkhaus, E.; Salnikow, K. Nickel essentiality, toxicity, and carcinogenicity. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2002, 42, 35–56.
  6. Trombetta, D.; Mondello, M.R.; Cimino, F.; Cristani, M.; Pergolizzi, S.; Saija, A. Toxic effect of nickel in an in vitro model of human oral epithelium. Toxicol. Lett. 2005, 159, 219–225, doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.05.019.
  7. Padmavathy, V. Biosorption of nickel (II) ions by baker’s yeast: Kinetic, thermodynamic and desorption studies. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 3100–3109, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.070.
  8. Argun, M.E.; Dursun, S.; Ozdemir, C.; Karatas, M. Heavy metal adsorption by modified oak sawdust: Thermodynamics and kinetics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 141, 77–85, doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.095.
  9. Abia, A.A.; Asuquo, E.D. Kinetics of Cd2+ and Cr3+ sorption from aqueous solutions using mercaptoacetic acid modified and unmodified oil palm fruit fibre (Elaeis guineensis) adsorbents. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 2007, 12, 485–492, doi:10.1016/S1007-0214(07)70072-X.
  10. Kobya, M.; Demirbas, E.; Senturk, E.; Ince, M. Adsorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions by activated carbon prepared from apricot stone. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 1518–1521, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.12.005.
  11. Pakiam, R. Palm Oil Output in Malaysia to Gain in 2011. Available online: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-24/palm-oil-output-in-malaysia-to-gain-as-weather-boosts-yields-group-says.html (4th August 2011).
  12. Zub, V.Y.; Bugaeva, P.V.; Strizhakova, N.G.; Maletin, Y.A. Complexes of some 3d-metal salts with N,N-dimethylhydrazide of 4-nitrobenzoic acid. Russ. J. Coord. Chem. 2004, 30, 747–751, doi:10.1023/B:RUCO.0000043902.12955.5e.
  13. Gad, A.M.; El-Dissouky, A.; Mansour, E.M.; El-Maghraby, A. Thermal stability of poly acryloyl benzoic hydrazide and its complexes with some transition metals. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2000, 68, 153–158, doi:10.1016/S0141-3910(99)00178-0.
  14. Haron, M.J.; Tiansin, M.; Ibrahim, N.A.; Kassim, A.; Wan Yunus, W.M.Z. Sorption of Cu(II) by polyhydroxamic acid chelating exchanger prepared from polymethyl acrylate grafted oil palm empty fruit bunch. Bioresources 2009, 4, 1305–1318.
  15. Raju, G.; Ratnam, C.T.; Ibrahim, N.A.; Ab Rahman, M.Z.; Wan Yunus, W.M.Z. Graft copolymerization of methyl acrylate onto oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) fiber. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2007, 46, 949–955, doi:10.1080/03602550701582710.
  16. Chang, X.; Su, Z.; Luo, X.; Zhan, G. Synthesis of poly(acrylamidrazone-hydrazide) chelating fiber and application of enrichment—Separation for traces of indium, tin, chromium, vanadium and titanium from solution samples. Talanta 1993, 40, 527–532, doi:10.1016/0039-9140(93)80012-G.
  17. Bekheit, M.M.; Nawar, N.; Addison, A.W.; Abdel-Latif, D.A.; Monier, M. Preparation and characterization of chitosan-grafted-poly(2-amino-4,5-pentamethylene-thiophene-3-carboxylic acid N′-acryloyl-hydrazide) chelating resin for removal of Cu(II), Co(II) and Ni(II) metal ions from aqueous solutions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 48, 558–565, doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.01.018.
  18. Liu, R.X.; Zhang, B.W.; Tang, H.X. Synthesis and characterization of poly(acrylaminophosphonic-carboxyl-hydrazide) chelating fibre. React. Funct. Polym. 1999, 39, 71–81, doi:10.1016/S1381-5148(97)00174-0.
  19. Dai, J.; Yan, H.; Yang, H.; Cheng, R. Simple method for preparation of chitosan/poly(acrylic acid) blending hydrogel beads and adsorption of copper (II) from aqueous solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 165, 240–249, doi:10.1016/j.cej.2010.09.024.
  20. Wan Ngah, W.S.; Hanafiah, M.A.K.M. Biosorption of copper ions from dilute aqueous solutions on base treated rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) leaves powder: Kinetics, isotherm, and biosorption mechanisms. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20, 1168–1176, doi:10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62205-6.
  21. Hasar, H. Adsorption of nickel (II) from aqueous solution onto activated carbon prepared from almond husk. J. Hazard. Mater. 2003, B97, 49–57, doi:10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00237-6.
  22. Kamari, A.; Wan Ngah, W.S. Isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies of lead and copper uptake by H2SO4 modified chitosan. Colloids Surf. B 2009, 73, 257–266, doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.05.024.
  23. Bhatnagar, A.; Minocha, A.K. Biosorption optimization of nickel removal from water using Punica granatum peel waste. Colloids Surf. B 2010, 76, 544–548.
  24. Fil, B.A.; Boncukcuoglu, R.; Yilmaz, A.E.; Bayar, S. Adsorption of Ni(II) on ion exchange resin: Kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2012, 1–7.
  25. Ozcan, A.; Ozcan, A.S.; Tunali, S.; Akar, T.; Kiran, I. Determination of the equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of adsorption of copper (II) ions onto seeds of Capsicum annuum. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, B124, 200–208.
  26. Anidruhan, T.S.; Radhakrishnan, P.G. Chromium (III) removal from water and wastewater using a carboxylate-functionalized cation exchanger prepared from a lignocellulosic residue. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 316, 268–276, doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2007.08.051.
  27. Mohamad Ibrahim, M.N.; Wan Ngah, W.S.; Norliyana, M.S.; Wan Daud, W.R.; Rafatullah, M.; Sulaiman, O.; Hashim, R. A novel agricultural waste adsorbent for the removal of lead (II) ions from aqueous solutions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 182, 377–385, doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.044.
  28. Shahmohammadi-Kalalagh, S.; Babazadeh, H.; Nazemi, A.H.; Manshouri, M. Isotherm and kinetic studies on adsorption of Pb, Zn and Cu by kaolinite. Casp. J. Environ. Sci. 2011, 9, 243–255.
  29. Reddy, D.H.K.; Seshaiah, K.; Reddy, A.V.R.; Lee, S.M. Optimization of Cd(II), Cu(II) and Ni(II) biosorption by chemically modified Moringa oleifera leaves powder. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 88, 1077–1086, doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.073.
  30. Ho, Y.S.; McKay, G. The kinetics of sorption of divalent metal ions onto sphagnum moss peat. Water Res. 1999, 34, 735–742.
  31. Reddy, D.H.K.; Ramana, D.K.V.; Seshaiah, K.; Reddy, A.V.R. Biosorption of Ni(II) from aqueous phase by Moringa oleifera bark, a low cost biosorbent. Desalination 2011, 268, 150–157, doi:10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.011.
  32. Pimentel, P.M.; Melo, M.A.F.; Melo, D.M.A.; Assuncao, A.L.C.; Henrique, D.M.; Silva, C.N., Jr.; Gonzalez, G. Kinetics and thermodynamics of Cu(II) adsorption on oil shale wastes. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89, 62–67, doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.07.003.
  33. Aksu, Z. Determination of the equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of the batch biosorption of nickel (II) ions onto Chlorella vulgaris. Process Biochem. 2002, 38, 89–99, doi:10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00051-1.
  34. Tong, K.S.; Jain Kassim, M.; Azraa, A. Adsorption of copper ion from its aqueous solution by a novel biosorbent Uncaria gambir: Equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamic studies. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 170, 145–153, doi:10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.044.
Polymers EISSN 2073-4360 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert