- freely available
Crystals 2012, 2(3), 1146-1154; doi:10.3390/cryst2031146
Abstract: The crystal structure of APA2[Zn3(HPO4)4(H2O)2] (APA = 2-amino-1-phenylene-ammonium, C6H9N2+) (1), as prepared by a predominantly non-aqueous synthesis, is described and compared to related compounds. 1 is built up from an alternating array of ZnO4 and HPO4 tetrahedra sharing vertices as Zn–O–P bonds to generate infinite anionic sheets. Within these sheets, polyhedral 4-, 6- and 8-rings are apparent. The negative charge of the inorganic layer is balanced by singly-protonated APA template cations and water molecules are also present. The components are linked by Nt–H...Of, Of–H...Ow, Ow–H...Of and Of–H...Nt (t = template, f = framework, w = water) hydrogen bonds: the last of these represents an unusual framework-to-template interaction. Weak Ct–H...Of links may also play a role in consolidating the structure. Crystal data: 1 (C12H26N4O18P4Zn3), Mr = 834.36, monoclinic, C2/c (No. 15), Z = 4, a = 20.194 (8) Å, b = 8.682 (3) Å, c = 15.123 (6) Å, β = 91.510 (11)°, V = 2650.5 (17) Å3, R(F) = 0.048, wR(F2) = 0.112.
Since they were first reported in 1992 [1,2], the family of organically-templated zincophosphate frameworks (ZnPOs) has grown to encompass over 100 well-determined structures derived from single-crystal data. Hydrogen bonding from the template (typically N–H...O links from a protonated amine) to the framework is a key structure-directing feature of these phases , but it is difficult to apply the predictive paradigms of supramolecular chemistry  to this area because there are so many synthetic uncertainties.
In this short paper we describe the synthesis and crystal structure of APA2[Zn3(HPO4)4(H2O)2], a layered ZnPO incorporating a new template (APA = 2-amino-1-phenyleneammonium, C6H9N2+), in which some unusual types of hydrogen bond are present.
2. Results and Discussion
Crystal Structure of 1
The asymmetric unit of 1contains one 2-amino-1-phenyleneammonium cation, two Zn atoms (one of which lies on a crystallographic twofold axis), two (HPO4)2− hydrogen phosphate groups and one water molecule of crystallisation (Figure 1). This leads to the 3:4 ratio of Zn:P seen in this compound.
Both the zinc atoms in 1 adopt tetrahedral ZnO4 geometries: mean Zn–O separations of 1.949 Å and 1.947 Å occur for Zn1 and Zn2, respectively. The bond angles around Zn2 (site symmetry 2) are noticeably more distorted from ideal tetrahedral values than those for Zn1: angular variances as defined by Robinson et al.  of 5.25°2 (Zn1) and 37.42°2 (Zn2) arise. The Brown–Altermatt  bond valence sum (BVS) values for Zn1 and Zn2 are 2.07 and 2.08, respectively (expected value = 2.00). All the Zn–O vertices form a bi-coordinate bridge to an adjacent P atom (mean Zn–O–P = 127.3°), thus there are no Zn–O–Zn links in 1.
The hydrogen phosphate anions possess typical geometrical parameters : mean P1−O = 1.539 Å; O–P1–O angular variance = 4.14°2, mean P2–O = 1.536 Å; O–P1–O angular variance = 9.03°2. The long P1–O4 and P2–O8 bonds (Table 1) indicate that they are protonated , and the H atoms were visible in difference maps. These terminal bonds do not link to zinc atoms. The geometrical parameters for the organic cation in 1 are typical .
|Zn1–O7 i||1.916 (3)||Zn1–O5 ii||1.952 (3)|
|Zn1–O3 iii||1.962 (3)||Zn1–O2||1.965 (3)|
|Zn2–O1 iii||1.935 (3)||Zn2–O1||1.935 (3)|
|Zn2–O6||1.959 (3)||Zn2–O6 iii||1.959 (3)|
|P1–O1||1.514 (3)||P1–O2||1.527 (3)|
|P1–O3||1.535 (3)||P1–O4||1.578 (4)|
|P2–O7||1.506 (4)||P2–O6||1.530 (3)|
|P2–O5||1.531 (3)||P2–O8||1.577 (3)|
|P1–O1–Zn2||119.6 (2)||P1–O2–Zn1||119.3 (2)|
|P1–O3–Zn1 iii||126.6 (2)||P2–O5–Zn1 iv||125.7 (2)|
|P2–O6–Zn2||127.6 (2)||P2–O7–Zn1 v||145.2 (2)|
Symmetry codes: (i) 1–x, y–1, ½–z; (ii) x, 1–y, z–½; (iii) 1–x, y, ½–z; (iv) x, 1–y, ½+z; (v) 1–x, 1+y, ½–z.
|O9-H1w...O6 iii||0.91||1.92||2.819 (5)||170|
|O9-H2w...O2 v||0.88||1.87||2.723 (5)||162|
|N1-H1b...O8 vi||0.91||1.97||2.817 (5)||154|
|C4-H4...O7 vii||0.95||2.50||3.394 (6)||157|
|C5-H5...O2 viii||0.95||2.53||3.421 (6)||157|
Symmetry codes: (i) 1–x, y–1, ½–z; (ii) x, 1–y, z–½; (iii) 1–x, y, ½–z; (iv) x, 1–y, ½+z; (v) 1–x, 1+y, ½–z; (vi) 1–x, 1–y, 1–z; (vii) ½–x, 3/2–y, 1–z; (viii) ½–x, ½+y, ½–z.
The connectivity of the Zn- and P-centred building units in 1 leads to infinite sheets of tetrahedra, which propagate in the (100) plane, with the organic cations and water molecules occupying the inter-layer regions (Figure 2). Each Zn node bonds to four different P atoms and each P atom bonds to three different Zn atoms (as well as its terminal P–OH vertex), thus a topological (3,4) net  is formed. The environments of the phosphorus atoms are quite different: pairs of HP1O4 groups are connected by three ZnO4 tetrahedra to form distinctive “lantern” motifs, whereas the HP2O4 groups are linked into pairs bridged by Zn1-centred groups as well as a link to a Zn2 species.
In terms of polyhedral circuits , this connectivity leads to 4-, 6- and 8-ring loops (see Figure 3 below) in the sheets. The 4-ring is a simple grouping of two Zn1- and two P2-centred polyhedra and is generated by inversion symmetry. The 6-ring (generated by twofold rotation symmetry) is more complex and could be described as “bifurcated”  due to the presence of a lantern motif in the ring. Finally, the inversion-generated 8-ring contains two lantern motifs as part of its alternating array of Zn- and P-centred polyhedra. As discussed below, these different rings seem to strongly correlate with the hydrogen bonds present in this structure.
Hydrogen bonds are an important feature of most organically-templated networks  and the various interactions in 1 are summarised in Table 2. Atom N1 of the APA cation is protonated (as an NH3+ group) and forms two N–H...O links to bridging O atoms and one link to a terminal P–OH group. All these O atoms occur within one particular (100) sheet, i.e., there are no inter-sheet N–H...O links. Based on the short (<2.0 Å) H...O separations and large N–H...O angles (>150°), we may assume that these hydrogen bonds are relatively strong.
The situation for the un-protonated N2 group is quite different. This forms one weak (based on its much longer H...O separation of 2.30 Å) N–H...O link to a bridging O atom in the same sheet as the acceptor O atoms for the N1 bonds (Figure 1). Its other H atom does not form a hydrogen bond and points into the inter-layer region. An unusual feature of 1 is the presence of a framework-to-template O–H...N hydrogen bond arising from the P1–O4H group, which points towards the region of the presumed lone-pair of electrons of atom N2 (Figure 1).
The P2–O8H group forms an O–H...O hydrogen bond to the water molecule and the water molecule in turn forms two O–H...O hydrogen bonds to framework O atom. Again, these framework atoms are in the same (100) sheet. In terms of the graph-set notation of Bernstein et al. , the smallest circuits involving the N1H3+ and N2H2 moieties are R22(10) and R22(8) loops, respectively, whereas the water molecule is involved in an R22(8) loop.
These hydrogen bonds appear to exert a significant template effect, as shown in Figure 3. The polyhedral 8-ring is templated by no fewer than eight N–H...O links (four each from the two symmetry-related cations lying to either side of the inorganic sheet) as well as an O–H...N “back bond” from a framework P–OH grouping to each of the template N-atoms. Each O atom in the ring accepts one hydrogen bond. The 6-ring is templated by a pair of water molecules (one above the plane of the framework and one below) but again P–OH...O framework-to-water hydrogen bonds consolidate this effect.
It is notable that there are no classical hydrogen bonds that provide inter-layer connectivity in this phase, i.e., as a topological L...T...L linkage , which is commonly seen in layered ZnPOs templated by linear-chain, protonated diamines . However, two C–H...O bonds (Table 2, Figure 4) may provide this cohesion in 1: there is no ambiguity in the location of the aromatic C–H atoms in question and the H...O separations (around 2.50 Å) and C–H...O angles (>150°) fall well within the accepted criteria for such “non-classical” bonds . Conversely, there are no aromatic π–π stacking interactions in 1, as the shortest centroid–centroid separation is over 4.24 Å.
3. Experimental Section
Compound 1 was prepared from zinc nitrate, 1 M orthophosphoric acid, 1,2-phenylenediamine with ethylene glycol as a solvent, in a 1:1:1:20 ratio of reactants. Zinc nitrate was added to the 1,2-phenylenediamine in a conical flask before the addition of the ethylene glycol solvent. Finally, the orthophosphoric acid was added to the flask, which was then transferred to a hotplate and stirred for approximately one hour. The reaction mixture was transferred to a plastic bottle, sealed and placed in an 80 °C oven for 24 hours. The solid product was recovered by Büchner filtration and was washed with water and then acetone to yield a mass of colorless prisms of 1.
The single-crystal data for 1 (colorless prism 0.05 × 0.05 × 0.02 mm) were collected using a Rigaku Mercury CCD diffractometer (graphite monochromated Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å) at −180 °C with the aid of the CrystalClear program. A total of 7634 data were collected to 2θmax = 56.6° (−19 ≤ h ≤ 24, −10 ≤ k ≤ 9, −17 ≤ l ≤ 18). An empirical (multi-scan) absorption correction was applied at the data reduction stage (2401 merged reflections, RInt = 0.054) and the structure was solved by direct methods with SHELXS-97. The resulting atomic model was developed and refined against |F|2 with SHELXL-97  and the “observed data” threshold (encompassing 2192 reflections) for calculating the R(F) residuals was set as I > 2σ(I).
The C-bound H atoms were placed in idealised locations (C–H = 0.95 Å) and refined as riding atoms. The N-bound H atoms were located in a difference map: those attached to N1 were relocated to idealised locations (N–H = 0.91 Å) and refined as riding; those attached to N2 were refined as riding in their as-found relative locations. The O-bound H atoms were located in difference maps and refined as riding in their as-found relative locations. The constraint Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(carrier) was applied in all cases. The final structure was analysed and validated with PLATON . Key crystallographic parameters are listed in Table 3 and full refinement details are given in the deposited cif. IR (cm−1): 3370, 3294 (N–H stretch); 1612 (N–H bend); 1273 (C–N); 590, 540, 441 (framework).
|Temperature (K)||93 (2)|
|Space group||C2/c (No. 15)|
|a (Å)||20.194 (8)|
|b (Å)||8.682 (3)|
|c (Å)||15.123 (6)|
|β (°)||91.510 (11)|
|V (Å3)||2650.5 (17)|
|ρcalc (g cm−3)||2.091|
|Goodness-of-fit on F2||1.065|
|R(F) [I > 2σ(I)]||0.048|
|wR(F2) (all data)||0.112|
|Min., max. Δρ ( e Å−3)||−0.88, +1.29|
|CSD Deposition number||CCDC-876420|
The synthesis and crystal structure of APA2[Zn3(HPO4)4(H2O)2] have been described. This compound appears to be the first zincophosphate to be templated by a protonated aromatic amine, although a zincophosphite network containing (HPO3)2− anions  has been templated by the doubly-protonated para-isomer of the singly-protonated ortho-diamine used here. The predominantly non-aqueous synthesis of 1 is uncommon although it is not the first to report the use of ethylene glycol as solvent in preparing a ZnPO .
Compound 1 contains the expected polyhedral building units of ZnO4 and HPO4 tetrahedra sharing vertices as Zn–O–P links and the polyhedral connectivity results in infinite layers. The “dangling” P–OH bond cannot form a link to zinc, and the topological (3,4) net is the result. The topological similarity of a hydrogen phosphate (HPO42−) and a phosphite (HPO32−) group in terms of network formation has already been noted . The templating effect of the C6H9N2+ cation in 1 appears to be quite distinctive, with all its “classical” N–H...O hydrogen bonds from the adjacent NH3+ and NH2 groups forming links to a single 8-ring window in the ZnPO layer. As described above, a “synergic” framework-to-template O–H...N bond also occurs, to reinforce the template-to-framework bonds. Conversely, the water molecule templates a 6-ring aperture in the layer, but again a bond from the framework to the water molecule appears to facilitate this. In terms of bridging the inorganic layers, there are no classical hydrogen bonds in 1, but two C–H...O interactions are present.
- Harrison, W.T.A.; Martin, T.E.; Gier, T.E.; Stucky, G.D. Tetrahedral-Atom zincophosphate structures–synthesis and structural characterization of two novel anionic 8-ring frameworks containing cationic 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane guests. J. Mater. Chem. 1992, 2, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrison, W.T.A.; Nenoff, T.M.; Eddy, M.M.; Martin, T.E.; Stucky, G.D. Organic templates in zincophosphate synthesis–Zn5(PO4)2(HPO4)4·H2O·2H2N2C6H12 containing two distinct 8-ring channels and Zn3(PO4)(HPO4)2·HN2C6H12 containing tetrahedral 3-rings and Zn–N bonds. J. Mater. Chem. 1992, 2, 1127–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chidambaram, D.; Neeraj, S.; Natarajan, S.; Rao, C.N.R. Open-Framework zinc phosphates synthesized in the presence of structure-directing organic amines. J. Solid State Chem. 1999, 147, 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gale, P.A.; Steed, J.W. Supramolecular Chemistry: From Molecules to Nanomaterials; John Wiley: Weinheim, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Robinson, K.; Gibbs, G.V.; Ribbe, P.H. Quadratic elongation–quantitative measure of distortion in coordination polyhedra. Science (Washington, DC) 1971, 172, 567–570. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, I.D.; Altermatt, D. Bond-Valence parameters obtained from a systematic analysis of the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database. Acta Cryst. 1985, B41, 244–247. [Google Scholar]
- Popović, L.; de Waal, D.; Boeyens, J.C.A. Correlation between Raman wavenumbers and P–O bond lengths in crystalline inorganic phosphates. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2005, 36, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferraris, G.; Ivaldi, G. X–OH and O–H...O bond lengths in protonated oxoanions. Acta Cryst. 1984, B40, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Czapik, A.; Gdaniec, M. A new polymorph of benzene-1,2-diamine: Isomorphism with 2-aminophenol and two-dimensional isostructurality of polymorphs. Acta Cryst. 2010, C66, o198–o201. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L.; Bu, X.-H. (3,4)-Connected zincophosphites as structural analogues of zinc hydrogen phosphate. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 4654–4660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunner, G.O. Which frameworks will form SiO2 analogues: The significance of loop configurations. Zeolites 1993, 13, 592–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrison, W.T.A.; Nenoff, T.E.; Gier, T.E.; Stucky, G.D. Preparation and crystal-structure of Na2Zn(HPO4)2·4H2O, a new layered sodium zinc phosphate containing bifurcated tetrahedral 12-rings. J. Solid State Chem. 1994, 113, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natarajan, S.; Mandal, S. Open-Framework structures of transition-metal compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4798–4828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernstein, J.; Davis, R.E.; Shimoni, L.; Chang, N.-L. Patterns in hydrogen bonding: Functionality and graph-set analysis in crystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 1555–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrison, W.T.A.; Rodgers, J.A.; Phillips, M.L.F.; Nenoff, T.E. In situ template generation for zincophosphate synthesis leading to guanylurea zinc phosphate, C2H7N4O·ZnPO4, containing template-to-template N–H· ·O hydrogen bonds. Solid State Sci. 2002, 4, 969–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodgers, J.A.; Harrison, W.T.A. H3N(CH2)6NH3·Zn4(PO4)2(HPO4)2·3H2O, a novel three-dimensional zinc phosphate framework containing 5-rings and 20-rings. J. Mater. Chem. 2000, 10, 2853–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steiner, T. C–H...O hydrogen bonding in crystals. Crystallogr. Rev. 2006, 6, 1–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Cryst. 2008, A64, 112–122. [Google Scholar]
- Spek, A.L. Structure validation in chemical crystallography. Acta Cryst. 2009, D65, 148–155. [Google Scholar]
- Kirkpatrick, A.; Harrison, W.T.A. Two zincophosphite networks templated by 1,4-dianonobenzene: Syntheses and structures of C6N2H10·Zn(HPO3)2 and (C6N2H8)0.5·ZnHPO3. Solid State Sci. 2004, 6, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.N.; Yuan, H.-M.; Mao, Y.-G.; Shi, S.-H.; Lee, Y.-K.; Chang, T.-S.; Song, T.-Y.; Feng, S.-H.; Xu, R.-R. Nonaqueous synthesis and characterization of a zincophosphate with 12-membered ring channel open framework. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 2000, 21, 509–512. [Google Scholar]
© 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).