Dual-Process Reasoning in Charitable Giving: Learning from Non-Results
AbstractTo identify dual-process reasoning in giving, we exposed experimental participants making a charitable donation to vivid images of the charity’s beneficiaries in order to stimulate affect. We hypothesized that the effect of an affective manipulation on giving would be larger when we simultaneously put the subjects under cognitive load using a numerical recall task. Independent treatment checks reveal opposite responses in men and women and cast some doubt on the reliability of our mainstream treatment manipulations and assessment tools. We find no evidence for dual-process decision-making, even among women, whose responses to the manipulations conformed most to our expectations. These results highlight the need for caution in the use of these common manipulations, the importance of independent manipulation checks, and the limitations of dual-process models for understanding altruistic behavior. View Full-Text
- Supplementary File 1:
Supplementary (PDF, 4764 KB)
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Grossman, Z.; Van der Weele, J.J. Dual-Process Reasoning in Charitable Giving: Learning from Non-Results. Games 2017, 8, 36.
Grossman Z, Van der Weele JJ. Dual-Process Reasoning in Charitable Giving: Learning from Non-Results. Games. 2017; 8(3):36.Chicago/Turabian Style
Grossman, Zachary; Van der Weele, Joël J. 2017. "Dual-Process Reasoning in Charitable Giving: Learning from Non-Results." Games 8, no. 3: 36.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.