Of Coordinators and Dictators: A Public Goods Experiment
AbstractWe experimentally investigate whether human subjects are willing to give up individual freedom in return for the benefits of improved coordination. We conduct a modified iterated public goods game in which subjects in each period first decide which of two groups to join. One group employs a voluntary contribution mechanism, the other group an allocator contribution mechanism. The setup of the allocator mechanism differs between two treatments. In the coordinator treatment, the randomly selected allocator can set a uniform contribution for all group members, including herself. In the dictator treatment, the allocator can choose different contributions for herself and all other group members. We find that subjects willingly submit to authority in both treatments, even when competing with a voluntary contribution mechanism. The allocator groups achieve high contribution levels in both treatments. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Fleiß, J.; Palan, S. Of Coordinators and Dictators: A Public Goods Experiment. Games 2013, 4, 584-607.
Fleiß J, Palan S. Of Coordinators and Dictators: A Public Goods Experiment. Games. 2013; 4(4):584-607.Chicago/Turabian Style
Fleiß, Jürgen; Palan, Stefan. 2013. "Of Coordinators and Dictators: A Public Goods Experiment." Games 4, no. 4: 584-607.