Next Article in Journal
Effects of Walnut Consumption on Mood in Young Adults—A Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Association of MTHFR, SLC19A1 Genetic Polymorphism, Serum Folate, Vitamin B12 and Hcy Status with Cognitive Functions in Chinese Adults
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Vitamin D and Calcium Intakes, Physical Activity, and Calcaneus BMC among School-Going 13-Year Old Malaysian Adolescents

by
A. A. Suriawati
1,
Hazreen Abdul Majid
1,2,
Nabilla Al-Sadat
1,
Mohd Nahar Azmi Mohamed
3 and
Muhammad Yazid Jalaludin
4,*
1
Centre for Population Health (CePH), Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
2
Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
3
Sports Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
4
Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2016, 8(10), 666; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8100666
Submission received: 14 July 2016 / Revised: 6 October 2016 / Accepted: 17 October 2016 / Published: 24 October 2016

Abstract

:
Background: Dietary calcium and vitamin D are essential for bone development. Apart from diet, physical activity may potentially improve and sustain bone health. Objective: To investigate the relationship between the dietary intake of calcium and vitamin D, physical activity, and bone mineral content (BMC) in 13-year-old Malaysian adolescents. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Selected public secondary schools from the central and northern regions of Peninsular Malaysia. Participants: The subjects were from the Malaysian Health and Adolescents Longitudinal Research Team Cohort study (MyHeARTs). Methods: The data included seven-day diet histories, anthropometric measurements, and the BMC of calcaneal bone using a portable broadband ultrasound bone densitometer. Nutritionist Pro software was used to calculate the dietary calcium and vitamin D intakes from the diet histories, based on the Nutrient Composition of Malaysian Food Database guidance for the dietary calcium intake and the Singapore Energy and Nutrient Composition of Food Database for vitamin D intake. Results: A total of 289 adolescents (65.7% females) were recruited. The average dietary intakes of calcium and vitamin D were 377 ± 12 mg/day and 2.51 ± 0.12 µg/day, respectively, with the majority of subjects failing to meet the Recommended Nutrient Intake (RNI) of Malaysia for dietary calcium and vitamin D. All the subjects had a normal Z-score for the BMC (−2.00 or higher) with a mean of 0.55 ± 0.01. From the statistical analysis of the factors contributing to BMC, it was found that for those subjects with a higher intake of vitamin D, a higher combination of the intake of vitamin D and calcium resulted in significantly higher BMC quartiles. The regression analysis showed that the BMC might have been influenced by the vitamin D intake. Conclusions: A combination of the intake of vitamin D and calcium is positively associated with the BMC.

1. Introduction

Childhood and adolescence are crucial periods for skeletal mineralization. Bone mass accumulates in the skeleton, and bone density generally reaches its peak level in late adolescence [1]. This is a critical step towards achieving maximal peak bone mass early in life [2]. Hence, the risk of getting osteoporosis or low bone mass in later life can be reduced [3]. Sixty percent of the variance in peak bone mass is determined genetically. However, the remainder is most likely influenced by factors that are amenable to positive interventions, such as vitamin D, physical activity, and an adequate dietary intake of dairy products as a natural source of calcium [4]. The intake of vitamin D (a lipid-soluble vitamin) is essential for calcium absorption and utilization, and for mineral metabolism for bone development and health during adolescence [5,6,7]. There have been reports suggesting that vitamin D deficiency is common worldwide, especially in the western world, both among adults and adolescents [8,9,10]. It is necessary to increase the intake of calcium during adolescence, as it is an essential bone-forming mineral for optimal growth and development, where it can affect the acquisition of bone mass. About 45% to 50% of the skeletal mass is accumulated during adolescence [11,12,13]. It has been found that physical activity, together with nutrition, contributes to bone mass during growth [2,14,15]. Systematic reviews have found that these modifiable factors are beneficial for bone mass and density [3,16]. As far as is known, no study has been performed to date on the Asian adolescent population to address the influence of dietary vitamin D, calcium, physical activity, and BMC on the calcaneus.
Although various studies and reviews relating nutrition to bone health in adolescents have been conducted elsewhere [6,17,18,19], the research conducted in Malaysia has been limited. In the South-East Asian Nutrition Survey (SEANUTS)—a collaborative study of Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam of 6 months to 12-year-old infants and children—measurement of the bone mineral content (BMC) of the tibia and/or the radius of the Malaysian participants was taken using a quantitative ultrasound technique [20]. In the Malaysian NHMS (National Health and Morbidity Survey) in 2012, only the dietary calcium intake among subjects aged 10 to 17 years was assessed [21], but not their dietary intake of vitamin D. A study on the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency involving 402 boys and girls aged 7 to 12 years attending primary schools in Kuala Lumpur also did not assess the dietary vitamin D intake [22]. Most of the bone studies among adolescents did not assess the dietary intake, thereby limiting further analyses on the correlation between dietary intake and serum micronutrient status [22,23]. However, in this study, a validated seven-day diet history tool was used to estimate the actual habitual dietary intake among adolescents [24,25,26,27].
To date, this is the first cross-sectional study investigating the association between dietary calcium and vitamin D with BMC among adolescents in Malaysia. Through this study, healthcare professionals may gain some insight into the nutritional status of adolescents in Malaysia so that interventions can be planned accordingly.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

This study used the baseline data gathered from 13-year old adolescent schoolchildren from public schools under the Malaysian Health and Adolescents Longitudinal Research Team Cohort study (MyHeARTs). MyHeARTs is an on-going prospective cohort study using a multistage cluster sampling design. The subjects were adolescents from government schools, with the exception of boarding, religious, and vernacular schools. The study protocol was published [28] and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee, University Malaya Medical Centre (MEC Ref. No.: 896.34), and the National Medical Research Register number is 14-376-20486. Informed consent was obtained in writing prior to the data collection. A number of schools from urban and rural locations were randomly selected based on the criteria provided by the Department of Statistics, Malaysia, using computer-generated random number lists. These schools were from Kuala Lumpur, Putrajaya, and Perak, and were recommended by the Ministry of Education, Malaysia. The consent of parents or guardians was obtained. Only samples with complete data on BMC and the dietary intake of calcium and vitamin D were included in the analysis.
This analysis, which involved the first wave of the MyHeARTs cohort, was held from March to May 2012. It excluded under- and over-reporting on the diet of the subjects. Therefore, the final sample used in this article included 289 participants (65.7% females).

2.2. Anthropometric Measurements

All of the anthropometric measurements were done by trained personnel. The subjects were required to empty their bladder before their body measurements were taken. The weights of the subjects were measured using a digital electronic weighing scale (Seca 813, Seca, Birmingham, UK) and were recorded to the nearest decimal fraction of a kilogram (0.1 kg). The heights of the subjects without socks and shoes were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a calibrated vertical stadiometer (Seca Portable 217, Seca, Birmingham, UK). The body fat was analysed using a portable body composition analyser (Tanita SC- 240 MA Portable Body Composition Analyser, Tanita Europe B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Before the measurements were taken, the participants were asked to wear light clothing, remove all their accessories and socks, and empty their pockets. In this analysis, the body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing the participant’s weight (in kilograms) by the square of the participant’s height (in meters). The BMI reference used was the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) classification 2000, an international data reference produced on children in the US, UK, Hong Kong, the Netherlands, Singapore, and Brazil with regard to gender, and specifically for ages 2–18 years. The IOTF cut-off values for the BMI are linked to the adult cut-off values of 25 and 30 for risk of overweight and obesity, respectively, for adolescents aged 18 years [29,30,31].

2.3. Dietary Assessment

Generally, habitual dietary intake can be assessed using several methods, such as diet histories (24-h or seven-day dietary recall), food frequency, three days’ dietary records, and duplicate food weighing to evaluate energy intake. However, the seven-day diet history was chosen for this study, as this method has produced more valid estimates of energy intake in children and adolescents compared to other methods [24,32]. The tool was pretested on 40 participants from two different schools (one school each from an urban and rural area, respectively). For the actual study, seven qualified and trained dieticians used open-ended interviews with the students to collect information on the food and drinks that they consumed for breakfast, mid-morning snacks, lunchtime, afternoon tea, dinner, and supper over the previous seven-day period. Illustrated flip charts of local food were used as supplementary tools to assist the study participants during the dietary evaluation and to help estimate the portion size of the food portions that they consumed [33]. The intake of nutrients was calculated using the Nutritionist Pro™ Diet Analysis (Axxya Systems, Woodinville, WA, USA) software with the Nutrient Composition of Malaysian Food Database guidance for the dietary calcium intake and the Singapore Energy and Nutrient Composition of Food Database [34] for the vitamin D intake, as the Malaysian Food Database has a calcium component but not a vitamin D component. Since Singapore is geographically nearer and has food that is almost similar to the food in Malaysia, its food database was therefore chosen for analysis of the vitamin D intake.
To determine and correct for underreported dietary intake, the ratio of the energy intake to the predicted basal metabolic rate (EI:BMR) was calculated. The basal metabolic rate (BMR) was calculated using the Henry and Rees equations (1991) [35], as these were built on a database of mixed populations that included persons from tropical regions, which is similar to the mixed population and climate in Malaysia. The EI:BMR ratio was calculated by dividing the average energy intake by the BMR. Then, the ratio that was obtained was compared with the cut-off point set by Kersting et al. [36]. Those ratio values that were lower than the cut-off point were excluded from the data analysis.

2.4. Pubertal Stage

The pubertal stages were self-assessed using coloured illustrations of the Tanner stages. The rating for male sexual maturity was based on the development of external genitalia and pubic hair, while the rating for female sexual maturity depended on the development of breasts and pubic hair. A numerical scale of 1 to 5 was used for the different stages of pubertal development (i.e., from stage 1 to stage 5).

2.5. Bone Measurement

In this study, the measurement of the bone mineral content (BMC) was made at the calcaneus. According to the International Society of Clinical Densitometry (ISCD), a calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) can be used as a reference for the total BMC [37]. According to the official position statement released by ISCD 2007, the calcaneal QUS is the only recognized measurement of QUS that has been validated for clinical use as the determinant of the status of bone health [38]. A QUS at the calcaneus is useful and can provide information on the bone mineral status and the risk of fracture, as reported by Guglielmi et al. [39], Khaw et al. in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk prospective population study of British male and female populations [40], and Krieg et al. in the prediction of risk of a hip fracture at different QUS sites [41]. This has also been supported by studies which found the calcaneus QUS to be effective in predicting the risk of fracture [42,43]. Therefore, it should be used for the screening of osteoporosis, especially in developing countries such as Malaysia, where dual-X-ray absorptiometry devices are less accessible to the general population [44].
BMC of the left calcaneus was measured using a portable broadband ultrasound bone densitometer (Hologic Sahara, Hologic Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA, version 3.0.1). After a comparison was made to the appropriate normal control, the reported value was given as a percentile or a standard deviation score (known as a Z-score) for the adolescents.

2.6. Physical Activity Level

A self-reporting questionnaire on the physical activity over the previous week was assessed using a Malay version of a validated physical activity questionnaire for older children (PAQ-C), which had good internal consistency and acceptable validity, as described in previous studies [45,46,47]. Ten items in the PAQ-C were designed to capture the level of physical activity seven days prior to filling in the questionnaire. The mean self-reported physical activity score levels were further categorized into low (score < 2.33), moderate (2.33–3.66), and high (score > 3.66) [45,46,47]. The first item in the questionnaire included the type and frequency of sports or/and dances that the subjects participated in during the past seven days. The second to the eighth items in the questionnaire assessed the level of activity of the adolescents during physical education (PE) classes, recess, at lunchtime, immediately after school, in the evenings, weekend, and leisure time. The answers to items two to eight were based on a five-point Likert scale (1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)). Item nine included the frequency of participation in a daily physical activity in the previous week. Item ten asked the subjects to report any unusual activities during the previous week which had not been recorded.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to analyse the data. A univariate analysis for complex samples (CS) was performed on the weighted data. A general linear model (GLM) in the CS determined the associations between the BMC (continuous variable) and dietary vitamin D intake, dietary calcium intake, and physical activity, adjusted for gender and puberty. The values presented the adjusted B values (estimated unstandardized regression coefficient) and the standard errors. All the statistical tests and corresponding p-values were two-sided, and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The continuous data on the calcium intake (mg/day), vitamin D intake (µg/day), and physical activity (score) were transformed into quartiles of categorical data for a further regression analysis in one statistical analysis between the factors. The tested factors of the dietary vitamin D and calcium intakes were combined in the same statistical analysis to become another factor that was later known as a combination of vitamin D and calcium intakes. This was done by using a regression analysis within a statistical analysis to show the relevant relationship between the vitamin D and calcium intakes when they were taken into account together from the same data composition of each person in the study. The combination of vitamin D and calcium intakes was constructed by a statistical analysis in SPSS using a GLM, where the interactions between the independent variables (calcium intake and vitamin D intake) were calculated and tested to determine whether they were statistically related to the dependent variable, the BMC. In this analysis, adjustments were made for gender and the pubertal stage.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive Characteristics of Male and Female Subjects

Table 1 shows the descriptive characteristics of the subjects in the study according to gender. The females had a higher BMC (p < 0.05), body weight, BMI, and dietary calcium intake tendency compared to the males, but a lower vitamin D intake tendency and physical activity score. It was found that the BMC tendency was higher in those with a moderate physical activity score of 0.55 ± 0.01 compared to those with a low physical activity score (0.54 ± 0.01) with no significant effect. However, in this study, none of the subjects fulfilled the criteria to be categorized as active.

3.2. Sample Characteristics According to Puberty Level

After the children had been classified into the pre-pubertal and pubertal groups (as shown in Table 2), it was found that the BMC of the pubertal subjects was higher than that of the pre-pubertal subjects. Both groups were unable to meet calcium and Vitamin D Recommended Nutrient Intake (RNI) for Malaysians, which is 1000 mg per day and 5 μg per day, respectively. All the subjects showed low levels of physical activity with no significant differences, although it was found that the pre-pubertal subjects had a slightly higher tendency to engage in physical activity.

3.3. Quartile Values

Table 3 displays the quartile value for each factor of analysis in this study that contributed to the BMC. A quartile is a value when numerical data are divided and converted into four segments of categorical data. Q1 was the lowest and Q4 was the highest value for the Calcium intake (mg/day), Vitamin D intake (µg/day), and Physical Activity (score) parameters.

3.4. Regression Analysis

To investigate whether the BMC was influenced by calcium intake, vitamin D intake, a combination of vitamin D and calcium intakes, and physical activity, a general linear model via CS analysis was performed to test the dependency of the BMC (Table 4) on quartiles of calcium intake, vitamin D intake, and physical activity, controlled for gender and pubertal stage. Positive associations were found in the quartiles of vitamin D intake and with a combination of vitamin D and calcium intakes. However, in this model, the quartiles of calcium intake and physical activity did not show any relationship with the BMC.

4. Discussion

In Table 1, the BMC was found to be higher in females compared to the male subjects, perhaps due to a higher body weight (p < 0.01). A higher body weight may influence the BMC through the mechanical loading factor from the increased body weight [48]. A systematic review found that low body weight is one of the risk factors for fractures [49]. A study by Yilmaz et al. demonstrated that weight is one of the determinants of bone mass in adolescents [50]. Bone growth in males is different from female adolescents, where the onset is later by two years compared to females (at age 14 compared to 12 in females), and the male pubertal growth spurt lasts for an additional year compared to only three years in females [51]. This could be one of the factors contributing to the differences in BMC between male and female adolescents. There was a tendency for the calcium intake to be higher in females, but with no significant differences.
Most of the subjects (98.8% and 91.7%) were unable to meet Recommended Nutrient Intake (RNI) for dietary calcium and vitamin D, respectively in Malaysia (1000 mg/day for calcium and 5 µg/day for vitamin D). Their calcium intake was lower compared to that of Europeans in a previous study on calcium inadequacy [52,53,54]. In Germany, 80% of children aged 1 to 12 years were unable to meet the 5 µg/day vitamin D daily requirement as recommended by the German Society for Nutrition. The Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study (DONALD) [55] and Eating Study as a German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents Module (EsKiMo) [56] studies found that the vitamin D intake for adolescents was 2.5 µg/day in males and 1.9 µg/day in females. It was found that the mean value of vitamin D intake in this study was slightly higher compared to the EsKiMo study, where the intake was 2.55 µg/day in males and 2.50 µg/day in females, but was lower compared to an earlier study on Finnish girls [57], where their intake was 4.3 µg/day. A recent study found that the mean vitamin D intake from both food and supplements for Finnish children was 5.9 µg/day in males and 7.7 µg/day in females [58]. Even though female adolescents have higher BMC value compared to male adolescents, it has been found that the male adolescents have a normal mean BMC level but with a tendency for higher vitamin D intake and higher physical activity levels (p = 0.001) compared to females. This study demonstrated that the diet of male adolescents consists of more food that is high in vitamin D content compared to females. Nevertheless, it is still unable to meet the Malaysian RNI, as there is a limited number of foods fortified with vitamin D in Malaysia. Apart from dietary intake, vitamin D can be produced by exposing human skin to UV-B radiation in the range of 290 to 315 nm [11]. According to its latitude, Malaysia is considered as a sunny country, where the sun shines throughout the year. This was the reason why the production of vitamin D as a result of skin synthesis was not measured in the first wave of the MyHeART study.
The 2014 clinical report of the American Academy of Paediatrics mentioned that hormones play a role in promoting bone formation in healthy adolescents [11]. These hormones include growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I). In a study of the young healthy men, it was found that the BMC is positively correlated with the magnitude of the secretion of the growth hormone in young healthy men in the United States [59]. This may explain why the BMC of males is normal, as it may be influenced by hormones.
From Table 2 it was discovered that the BMC was higher in the pubertal group compared to the pre-pubertal group, with significant differences (p = 0.01), and that both groups had normal BMC values. Puberty plays a fundamental role in the acquisition of peak bone mass [51]. It is widely known that adolescents in the pubertal stage will have a higher bone mass compared to those in the pre-pubertal stage, as demonstrated in a study by Van Coeverden et al. [60]. A study by Yilmaz et al. [50] proved that bone mass increases throughout puberty in both genders. The substantial impact of puberty on bone is very well described in both boys and girls, where Arabi et al. reported an increase of up to 60% in bone mass in all skeletal parts at later Tanner stages [61].
Table 3 shows the quartile cut-off values that were used for the analysis in this study. The quartile data included the main factors that were considered to have been associated with BMC, such as calcium intake, vitamin D intake, and physical activity. The quartile for the combination of vitamin D and calcium intakes were further considered together in the next regression analysis, as displayed in Table 4. The quartile for the combination of vitamin D and calcium intakes was constructed using the statistical analysis of the GLM in SPSS to test the assumption of the relationship between both calcium and vitamin D intake together with the BMC.
To further assess relationships between the calcium intake, vitamin D intake, and physical activity with BMC, a GLM via CS was performed using quartile values with the controlling confounders of gender and puberty level. Table 4 demonstrates the relationship between the quartiles of vitamin D intake, calcium intake, the combination of vitamin D and calcium intakes, and physical activity, controlling for the gender of the subjects. The quartiles of vitamin D intake and the combination of vitamin D and calcium intakes that had positive correlations with the BMC accounted for 11.8% of the variance in BMC. The equation found from this study was BMC = 0.569 + (0.155 × quartiles vitamin D) + (0.199 × quartiles vitamin D and calcium intake). A previous study indicated that dietary calcium is one of the main determinants of BMD in children and adolescents [62]; and in a longitudinal study of Caucasian females, the intake of calcium—especially from dairy foods—was shown to have a favourable effect on whole-body BMC during middle childhood [63]. However, the results of the current study were in contrast to these findings, probably due to the limited number of subjects with adequate calcium intake within the sample. A study demonstrated that there was a positive relationship between spontaneous calcium intake and bone mass in a group of children with only high intake of calcium of around 1000 to 1200 mg/day [64]. Perhaps this was why this study did not show any significant relationship between calcium and BMC. A continuously adequate dietary calcium intake is necessary for calcium to have a positive effect of on bone mass. This was shown in a study where, upon discontinuing calcium supplementation, a follow-up after one-year showed no significant differences between the calcium-supplemented and the placebo-control groups [27,65]. Vitamin D plays a key role in calcium metabolism, and is essential for bone health in adolescents [6], where it is used for important bone development [7]. It has been revealed in this study that the intake of vitamin D had a positive relationship with the BMC, unlike a study among Spanish adolescents [66]. It was concluded in a systematic review that vitamin D supplementation in healthy children with deficient vitamin D levels may result in an improvement in the BMC [67]. A study by Picard et al., however, showed that the intake of vitamin D is an independent predictor of bone mass [68]. However, in this study, the combination of vitamin D and calcium intakes was shown to have a significant effect on the BMC.
This study was consistent with that of Molgaard et al. [64], where it was found that there is no significant association between the time spent on being engaged in physical activity and the BMC. This is maybe due to the lack of calcium intake among the subjects in the study, with the mean being below 1000 mg/day of the Malaysian RNI. According to Ruiz et al. [69], the association between physical activity and bone mass can only be found in those whose calcium intake is >800 mg/day. This is in agreement with a finding by Specker [70] where physical activity had no effect on the bone at a calcium intake of <1000 mg/day.
The strengths of this study are that it is the first study among adolescents in Malaysia that used the calcaneal BMC as a measurement, where it is only validated for clinical use for bone health status [38]; it is effective in predicting fracture risk [42,43], and it is more accessible to the general population in developing countries such as Malaysia [44]. This study included the calculated dietary vitamin D intake together with the calcium intake, where these were used to test the relationship with the BMC using a seven-day diet history. The seven-day diet history was conducted on a one-to-one basis by trained and certified dieticians. The dieticians used several tools to assist in their data collection: they used household measurement tools (plates, cups, glasses, bowls, ladle, spoons); a flip chart that illustrated common Malay, Chinese, and Indian foods, and a diet history collection tool. A 24-h diet recall alone would not have been able to capture the precise diet of each participant [26]. Another method for the assessment of dietary intake is the weighed record method, which is more expensive than the analysis of a group, and is not suitable for population-based studies [71]. This study had its limitations, in that there was no device to measure physical activity, the exposure to the sun was not measured, and the analysis did not include the concentrations of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD). However, the self-reporting questionnaire (PAQ-C) that was used was able to evaluate the physical activity level of the subjects. In this study, the subjects were categorised according to their physical activity level, but not their energy expenditure. In the next wave of this study, the exposure to the sun will also be included. Most of the adolescent subjects in this study did not achieve the RNI for dietary calcium and vitamin D values, thereby limiting the results of the significant effects in the statistical analysis. However, this was overcome by the exclusion of missing or unreliable data. This study was a cross-sectional study, where the results could not be interpreted in terms of cause and effect. Data from longitudinal studies were required to clarify the relationship between the calcium intake, vitamin D intake, and the combination of calcium and vitamin D intakes, physical activity, and BMC.

5. Conclusions

A positive association was observed between the BMC and vitamin D intake, as well as with the combination of vitamin D and calcium intake. Further research on the effect of other factors in addition to diet (such as exposure to the sun) should be undertaken in a longitudinal study, so that the cause–effect relationship can be determined.

Acknowledgments

Funding sources were from University of Malaya Research Programme (RP022A-14HTM and RP022B-14HTM), UM’s Postgraduate Student Grant (PG152-2015B) and UMSC fund cycle 1-2016. The sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results. The authors declare no competing financial interests in relation to the work described. We thank all participants and the team of MyHeARTs. UM will cover for the page charges. We are also grateful for the support and guidance provided by MyHeARTs group members, Maznah Dahlui, Tin Tin Su and Karuthan Chinna (University of Malaya).

Author Contributions

H.A.M., M.Y.J., N.A.-S. and M.N.A.M. conceived and designed the study; H.A.M., M.Y.J. and N.A.-S. were involved in the field work and data collection; A.A.S., H.A.M., M.Y.J., analysed the data; A.A.S., H.A.M., M.Y.J., wrote the paper. A.A.S., H.A.M., N.A.-S., M.N.A.M. and M.Y.J. was responsible for the drafting of this manuscript and all authors approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BMIBody Mass Index
BMCBone Mineral Content
BMDBone Mineral Density
BMRBasal Metabolic Rate
CSComplex Sample
EI:BMRThe ratio of the energy intake to the predicted basal metabolic rate
FFQFood Frequency Questionnaire
GLMGeneral Linear Model
ISCDInternational Society of Clinical Densitometry
MyHeARTsThe Malaysian Health and Adolescents Longitudinal Research Team Cohort study
PBMPeak Bone Mass
PAQ-CPhysical Activity Questionnaire for older Children
QUSCalcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound
RNIRecommended Nutrient Intake
UMUniversity of Malaya
UVUltra Violet
25OHD25-hydroxyvitamin D

References

  1. Bonjour, J.P.; Chevalley, T.; Ferrari, S.; Rizzoli, R. The importance and relevance of peak bone mass in the prevalence of osteoporosis. Salud Publica Mex. 2009, 51, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Heaney, R.P.; Abrams, S.; Dawson-Hughes, B.; Looker, A.; Marcus, R.; Matkovic, V.; Weaver, C. Peak bone mass. Osteoporos. Int. 2000, 11, 985–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Weaver, C.M.; Gordon, C.M.; Janz, K.F.; Kalkwarf, H.J.; Lappe, J.M.; Lewis, R.; O’Karma, M.; Wallace, T.C.; Zemel, B.S. The National Osteoporosis Foundation’s position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: A systematic review and implementation recommendations. Osteoporos. Int. 2016, 27, 1281–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Boot, A.M.; de Ridder, M.A.J.; Pols, H.A.P.; Krenning, E.P.; de Muinck Keizer-Schrama, S.M.P.F. Bone mineral density in children and adolescents: Relation to puberty, calcium intake, and physical activity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997, 82, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Blum, R.W.; Bastos, F.I.; Kabiru, C.W.; Le, L.C. Adolescent health in the 21st century. Lancet 2012, 379, 1567–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Braegger, C.; Campoy, C.; Colomb, V.; Decsi, T.; Domellof, M.; Fewtrell, M.; Hojsak, I.; Mihatsch, W.; Molgaard, C.; Shamir, R.; et al. Vitamin D in the healthy European paediatric population. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2013, 56, 692–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pettifor, J.M.; Prentice, A. The role of vitamin D in paediatric bone health. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 25, 573–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gordon, C.M.; DePeter, K.C.; Feldman, H.A.; Grace, E.; Emans, S.J. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among healthy adolescents. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2004, 158, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Vatanparast, H.; Nisbet, C.; Gushulak, B. Vitamin D insufficiency and bone mineral status in a population of newcomer children in Canada. Nutrients 2013, 5, 1561–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Van Schoor, N.M.; Lips, P. Worldwide vitamin D status. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 25, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Golden, N.H.; Abrams, S.A. Optimizing bone health in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2014, 134, e1229–e1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Palacios, C. The role of nutrients in bone health, from A to Z. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2006, 46, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mesías, M.; Seiquer, I.; Navarro, M.P. Calcium nutrition in adolescence. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bailey, D.A.; McKay, H.A.; Mirwald, R.L.; Crocker, P.R.; Faulkner, R.A. A six-year longitudinal study of the relationship of physical activity to bone mineral accrual in growing children: The university of Saskatchewan bone mineral accrual study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1999, 14, 1672–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Slemenda, C.W.; Miller, J.Z.; Hui, S.L.; Reister, T.K.; Johnston, C.C. Role of physical activity in the development of skeletal mass in children. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1991, 6, 1227–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tan, V.P.S.; Macdonald, H.M.; Kim, S.; Nettlefold, L.; Gabel, L.; Ashe, M.C.; McKay, H.A. Influence of physical activity on bone strength in children and adolescents: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014, 29, 2161–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lehtonen-Veromaa, M.K.M.; Mottonen, T.T.; Nuotio, I.O.; Irjala, K.M.A.; Leino, A.E.; Viikari, J.S.A. Vitamin D and attainment of peak bone mass among peripubertal Finnish girls: A 3-y prospective study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 76, 1446–1453. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Cashman, K.D. Diet, nutrition, and bone health. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 2507S–2512S. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Von Domarus, C.; Brown, J.; Barvencik, F.; Amling, M.; Pogoda, P. How much vitamin D do we need for skeletal health? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011, 469, 3127–3133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Schaafsma, A.; Deurenberg, P.; Calame, W.; van den Heuvel, E.G.H.M.; van Beusekom, C.; Hautvast, J.; Sandjaja; Bee Koon, P.; Rojroongwasinkul, N.; Le Nguyen, B.K.; et al. Design of the South East Asian Nutrition Survey (SEANUTS): A four-country multistage cluster design study. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 110, S2–S10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Institute for Public Health (IPH). The National Health and Morbidity Survey 2012 Malaysia School-Based Nutrition Survey 2012; Ministry of Health: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2013; Volume 13.
  22. Khor, G.L.; Chee, W.S.S.; Shariff, Z.M.; Poh, B.K.; Arumugam, M.; Rahman, J.A.; Theobald, H.E. High prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency and its association with BMI-for-age among primary school children in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hussain, S.; Elnajeh, M.; Jalaludin, M.; Harun, F. Vitamin D status of healthy adolescents from two states in Malaysia. Int. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. 2015, 2015, P62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abdul Majid, H.; Ramli, L.; Ying, S.P.; Su, T.T.; Jalaludin, M.Y.; Abdul Mohsein, N.A.-S. Dietary intake among adolescents in a middle-income country: An outcome from the malaysian health and adolescents longitudinal research team study (the MyHeARTs Study). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sjöberg, A.; Hallberg, L.; Höglund, D.; Hulthén, L. Meal pattern, food choice, nutrient intake and lifestyle factors in The Göteborg Adolescence Study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 57, 1569–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Burrows, T.L.; Martin, R.J.; Collins, C.E. A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labeled water. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2010, 110, 1501–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lee, W.T.K.; Leung, S.S.F.; Leung, D.M.; Cheng, J.C. A follow-up withdrawal study on the effects of calcium-supplement and puberty on bone acquisition of children. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996, 64, 71–711. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Hazreen, M.A.; Su, T.T.; Jalaludin, M.Y.; Dahlui, M.; Chinna, K.; Ismail, M.; Murray, L.; Cantwell, M.; Sadat, N. An exploratory study on risk factors for chronic non-communicable diseases among adolescents in Malaysia: Overview of the malaysian health and adolescents longitudinal research team study (The MyHeART study). BMC Public Health 2014, 14 (Suppl. 3), S6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cole, T.J.; Bellizzi, M.C.; Flegal, K.M.; Dietz, W.H. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. BMJ 2000, 320, 1240–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chinn, S.; Rona, R.J. International definitions of overweight and obesity for children: A lasting solution? Ann. Hum. Biol. 2002, 29, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Reilly, J.J. Assessment of childhood obesity: National reference data or international approach? Obes. Res. 2002, 10, 838–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Livingstone, M.B.E.; Robson, P.J.; Wallace, J.M.W. Issues in dietary intake assessment of children and adolescents. Br. J. Nutr. 2004, 92 (Suppl. 2), S213–S222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shahar, S.; Safii, N.S.; Manaf, Z.A.; Haron, H. Atlas of Food Exchanges and Portion Sizes; MDC Publisher Sdn Bhd: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  34. Food Composition Health Promotion Board Singapore. Available online: http://focos.hpb.gov.sg/eservices/ENCF/ (accessed on 18 February 2016).
  35. Poh, B.K.; Ismail, M.; Zawiah, H.; Henry, C. Predictive equations for the estimation of basal metabolic rate in Malaysia adolescents. Malays. J. Nutr. 1999, 5, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Sichert-Hellert, W.; Kersting, M.; Schoch, G. Underreporting of energy intake in 1 to 18 year old German children and adolescents. Z. Ernahrungswiss. 1998, 37, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Krieg, M.A.; Barkmann, R.; Gonnelli, S.; Stewart, A.; Bauer, D.C.; del Rio Barquero, L.; Kaufman, J.J.; Lorenc, R.; Miller, P.D.; Olszynski, W.P.; et al. Quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis: The 2007 ISCD official positions. J. Clin. Densitom. 2008, 11, 163–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Baim, S.; Leonard, M.B.; Bianchi, M.L.; Hans, D.B.; Kalkwarf, H.J.; Langman, C.B.; Rauch, F. Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and Executive Summary of the 2007 ISCD Pediatric Position Development Conference. J. Clin. Densitom. 2008, 11, 6–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Guglielmi, G.; Adams, J.; Link, T.M. Quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of skeletal status. Eur. Radiol. 2009, 19, 1837–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Khaw, K.-T.T.; Reeve, J.; Luben, R.; Bingham, S.; Welch, A.; Wareham, N.; Oakes, S.; Day, N. Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men and women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Lancet 2004, 363, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Krieg, M.-A.; Cornuz, J.; Ruffieux, C.; van Melle, G.; Büche, D.; Dambacher, M.A.; Hans, D.; Hartl, F.; Häuselmann, H.J.; Kraenzlin, M.; et al. Prediction of hip fracture risk by quantitative ultrasound in more than 7000 Swiss women > or =70 years of age: Comparison of three technologically different bone ultrasound devices in the SEMOF study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2006, 21, 1457–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bauer, D.C.; Glüer, C.C.; Cauley, J.A.; Vogt, T.M.; Ensrud, K.E.; Genant, H.K.; Black, D.M. Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch. Intern. Med. 1997, 157, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hans, D.; Dargent-Molina, P.; Schott, A.M.; Sebert, J.L.; Cormier, C.; Kotzki, P.O.; Delmas, P.D.; Pouilles, J.M.; Breart, G.; Meunier, P.J. Ulrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: The EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 1996, 348, 511–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chin, K.Y.; Ima-Nirwana, S. Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound as a determinant of bone health status: What properties of bone does it reflect? Int. J. Med. Sci. 2013, 10, 1778–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kowalski, K.C.; Crocker, P.R.; Faulkner, R.A. Validation of the physical activity questionnaire for older children. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 1997, 9, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dan, S.P.; Mohd Nasir, M.T.; Zalilah, M.S. Determination of factors associated with physical activity levels among adolescents attending school in Kuantan, Malaysia. Malays. J. Nutr. 2011, 17, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Nor Aini, J.; Poh, B.K.; Chee, W.S.S. Validity of a children’s physical activity questionnaire (cPAQ) for the study of bone health. Pediatr. Int. 2013, 55, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Krabbe, S.; Transbøl, I.; Christiansen, C. Bone mineral homeostasis, bone growth, and mineralisation during years of pubertal growth: A unifying concept. Arch. Dis. Child. 1982, 57, 359–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Espallargues, M.; Sampietro-Colom, L.; Estrada, M.D.; Solà, M.; del Rio, L.; Setoain, J.; Granados, A. Identifying bone-mass-related risk factors for fracture to guide bone densitometry measurements: A systematic review of the literature. Osteoporos. Int. 2001, 12, 811–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Yilmaz, D.; Ersoy, B.; Bilgin, E.; Gümüşer, G.; Onur, E.; Pinar, E.D. Bone mineral density in girls and boys at different pubertal stages: Relation with gonadal steroids, bone formation markers, and growth parameters. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2005, 23, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Saggese, G.; Baroncelli, G.I.; Bertelloni, S. Puberty and bone development. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 16, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lambert, J.; Agostoni, C.; Elmadfa, I.; Hulshof, K.; Krause, E.; Livingstone, B.; Socha, P.; Pannemans, D.; Samartín, S. Dietary intake and nutritional status of children and adolescents in Europe. Br. J. Nutr. 2004, 92 (Suppl. 2), S147–S211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kersting, M.; Alexy, U.; Sichert-Hellert, W. Dietary intake and food sources of minerals in 1 to 18 year old German children and adolescents. Nutr. Res. 2001, 21, 607–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Elmadfa, I.; Freisling, H. Nutritional status in Europe: Methods and results. Nutr. Rev. 2009, 67, S130–S134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kersting, M. Die Kalzium- und Vitamin-D-Zufuhr von Kindern. Wiss. Forsch. 2008, 55, 523–527. [Google Scholar]
  56. Mensink, G.B.M.; Bauch, A.; Vohmann, C.; Stahl, A.; Six, J.; Kohler, S.; Fischer, J.; Heseker, H. EsKiMo—Das Ernahrungs-modul im Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurvey (KiGGS). Bundesgesundheitsbla 2007, 50, 902–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lamberg-Allardt, C.; Ojaniemi, R.; Ahola, M.; Räsänen, L. The vitamin D intake of children and adolescents in Finland. Hum. Nutr. Appl. Nutr. 1984, 38, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Soininen, S.; Eloranta, A.-M.; Lindi, V.; Venäläinen, T.; Zaproudina, N.; Mahonen, A.; Lakka, T.A. Determinants of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration in Finnish children: The Physical Activity and Nutrition in Children (PANIC) study. Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 25, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Russell-Aulet, M.; Shapiro, B.; Jaffe, C.A.; Gross, M.D.; Barkan, A.L. Peak bone mass in young healthy men is correlated with the magnitude of endogenous growth hormone secretion. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998, 83, 3463–3468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Van Coeverden, S.C.; de Ridder, C.M.; Roos, J.C.; van’t Hof, M.A.; Netelenbos, J.C.; de Delemarre-Van Waal, H.A. Pubertal maturation characteristics and the rate of bone mass development longitudinally toward menarche. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2001, 16, 774–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Arabi, A.; Nabulsi, M.; Maalouf, J.; Choucair, M.; Khalifé, H.; Vieth, R.; El-Hajj Fuleihan, G. Bone mineral density by age, gender, pubertal stages, and socioeconomic status in healthy Lebanese children and adolescents. Bone 2004, 35, 1169–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Johnston, C.C.; Miller, J.Z.; Slemenda, C.W.; Reister, T.K.; Hui, S.; Christian, J.C.; Peacock, M. Calcium supplementation and increases in bone mineral density in children. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992, 327, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Fiorito, L.M.; Mitchell, D.C.; Smiciklas-Wright, H.; Birch, L.L. Girls’ calcium intake is associated with bone mineral content during middle childhood. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Molgaard, C.; Thomsen, B.L.; Michaelsen, K.F. The influence of calcium intake and physical activity on bone mineral content and bone size in healthy children and adolescents. Osteoporos. Int. 2001, 12, 887–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Slemenda, C.W.; Peacock, M.; Hui, S.; Zhou, L.; Johnston, C.C. Reduced rates of skeletal remodeling are associated with increased bone mineral density during the development of peak skeletal mass. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1997, 12, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Mouratidou, T.; Vicente-Rodriguez, G.; Gracia-Marco, L.; Huybrechts, I.; Sioen, I.; Widhalm, K.; Valtueña, J.; González-Gross, M.; Moreno, L.A. Associations of dietary calcium, vitamin D, milk intakes, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D with bone mass in spanish adolescents: The HELENA study. J. Clin. Densitom. 2013, 16, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Winzenberg, T.; Powell, S.; Shaw, K.A.; Jones, G. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on bone density in healthy children: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2011, 342, c7254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Picard, D.; Imbach, A.; Couturier, M.; Lepage, R.; Ste-Marie, L.G. Longitudinal study of bone density and its determinants in women in peri- or early menopause. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2000, 67, 356–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ruiz, J.C.; Mandel, C.; Garabedian, M. Influence of spontaneous calcium intake and physical exercise on the vertebral and femoral bone mineral density of children and adolescents. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1995, 10, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Specker, B.L. Evidence for an interaction between calcium intake and physical activity on changes in bone mineral density. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1996, 11, 1539–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Van Staveren, W.A.; de Boer, J.O.; Burema, J. Validity and reproducibility of a dietary history method estimating the usual food intake during one month. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1985, 42, 554–559. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Table 1. Characteristics of participants according to gender (n = 289).
Table 1. Characteristics of participants according to gender (n = 289).
CharacteristicsAll a (n = 289)Male a (n = 99, 34.23%)Female a (n = 190, 65.7%)p-Value b
Height (cm)150.8 ± 0.41150.1 ± 0.89151.1 ± 0.44NS
Weight (kg)42. 6 ± 0.6440.3 ± 1.0443.7 ± 0.800.010 (S)
BMI (kg/m2)18.65 ± 0.2417.78 ± 0.3619.08 ± 0.310.006 (S)
Calcium intake (mg/day)377 ± 12356 ± 16387 ± 16NS
Vitamin D intake (µg/day)2.51 ± 0.122.55 ± 0.232.50 ± 0.14NS
BMC (Z-score)0.55 ± 0.010.52 ± 0.010.56 ± 0.010.004 (S)
Physical Activity (Score)2.01 ± 0.032.18 ± 0.061.93 ± 0.040.001 (S)
a Data expressed as mean ± standard error; b p < 0.05 (two-tailed); S—significant and NS—not significant. BMC: bone mineral content; BMI: body mass index.
Table 2. Characteristics according to puberty level (n = 289).
Table 2. Characteristics according to puberty level (n = 289).
CharacteristicsAlla (n = 289)Pre-Pubertal a (n = 21, 0.1%)Pubertal a (n = 268, 99.9%)p-Value b
Height (cm)150.8 ± 0.41146.9 ± 1.32151.0 ± 0.420.004 (S)
Weight (kg)42. 6 ± 0.6441.4 ± 2.6842.6 ± 0.66NS
BMI (kg/m2)18.65 ± 0.2419.1 ± 1.1118.6 ± 0.31NS
Calcium intake (mg/day)377 ± 12414 ± 35375 ± 12NS
Vitamin D intake (µg/day)2.51 ± 0.122.39 ± 0.282.52 ± 0.13NS
BMC (Z-score)0.55 ± 0.010.46 ± 0.020.56 ± 0.010.001 (S)
Physical Activity (score)2.01 ± 0.032.18 ± 0.181.20 ± 0.03NS
a Data expressed as mean ± standard error; b p < 0.05 (two-tailed); S—significant and NS—not significant.
Table 3. Quartile values of dietary calcium, vitamin D, and physical activity.
Table 3. Quartile values of dietary calcium, vitamin D, and physical activity.
ParameterQ1 aQ2 aQ3 aQ4 a
Calcium intake (mg/day)207 ± 5350 ± 6581 ± 10926 ± 55
Vitamin D intake (µg/day)0.85 ± 0.042.17 ± 0.043.71 ± 0.075.68 ± 0.22
Physical activity (score)1.49 ± 0.011.79 ± 0.012.11 ± 0.012.66 ± 0.01
a Data expressed as mean ± standard error; Q1—quartile 1, Q2—quartile 2, Q3—quartile 3 and Q4—quartile 4.
Table 4. Associations between BMC and quartiles of dietary calcium, vitamin D, and physical activity of individuals in the Malaysian Health and Adolescents Longitudinal Research Team Cohort study (MyHeARTs) (unstandardized parameter estimates).
Table 4. Associations between BMC and quartiles of dietary calcium, vitamin D, and physical activity of individuals in the Malaysian Health and Adolescents Longitudinal Research Team Cohort study (MyHeARTs) (unstandardized parameter estimates).
CharacteristicsBMC (Z-Score) R2 = 0.156
B aSEp-Value b
Quartiles of vitamin D intake (µg/day)0.7940.0540.028 (S)
Quartiles of calcium intake (mg/day)0.5160.089NS
Quartiles of combination of vitamin D (µg/day) and Calcium intake (mg/day)0.2030.0700.020 (S)
Quartiles of physical activity (scores)0.6390.036NS
Abbreviation: BMC, bone mineral content. All data adjusted for gender and puberty. All variables were in quartiles. a B is the estimated unstandardized regression coefficient; b Significant, p < 0.05; NS—not significant.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suriawati, A.A.; Majid, H.A.; Al-Sadat, N.; Mohamed, M.N.A.; Jalaludin, M.Y. Vitamin D and Calcium Intakes, Physical Activity, and Calcaneus BMC among School-Going 13-Year Old Malaysian Adolescents. Nutrients 2016, 8, 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8100666

AMA Style

Suriawati AA, Majid HA, Al-Sadat N, Mohamed MNA, Jalaludin MY. Vitamin D and Calcium Intakes, Physical Activity, and Calcaneus BMC among School-Going 13-Year Old Malaysian Adolescents. Nutrients. 2016; 8(10):666. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8100666

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suriawati, A. A., Hazreen Abdul Majid, Nabilla Al-Sadat, Mohd Nahar Azmi Mohamed, and Muhammad Yazid Jalaludin. 2016. "Vitamin D and Calcium Intakes, Physical Activity, and Calcaneus BMC among School-Going 13-Year Old Malaysian Adolescents" Nutrients 8, no. 10: 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8100666

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop