Next Article in Journal
Iron, Meat and Health
Previous Article in Journal
Iodine Deficiency in Pregnancy: The Effect on Neurodevelopment in the Child
Previous Article in Special Issue
Food Intake of Kansans Over 80 Years of Age Attending Congregate Meal Sites
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Nutrients 2011, 3(3), 274-282; doi:10.3390/nu3030274

Aging and Longevity: Why Knowing the Difference Is Important to Nutrition Research

Department of Nutrition, University of California, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 January 2011 / Revised: 7 February 2011 / Accepted: 25 February 2011 / Published: 28 February 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrition and Aging)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [238 KB, uploaded 28 February 2011]   |  

Abstract

Life expectancies after the age of 70 and the number of individuals living with age-related chronic conditions that affect daily activities continue to increase. Age-specific nutritional recommendations may help to decrease the incidence or severity of age-related debilitating chronic disorders. However, research in this area has seen limited success in identifying nutrition-related mechanisms that underlie the functional loss and chronic conditions that occur as a function of time. We believe that the limited success in establishing age-specific nutrition recommendations for the older population reflects, at least in part, research designs that fail to consider the evolutionary and biological bases of aging and longevity. Longevity has evolved as a by-product of genes selected for their contribution in helping the organism survive to the age of reproduction. As such, the principle of genetic determinism provides an appropriate underlying theory for research designs evaluating nutritional factors involved with life span. Aging is not a product of evolution and reflects stochastic and/or random events that most likely begin during the early, reproductively-active years. The genetic determinism model by which young (normal, control) are compared to old (abnormal, experimental) groups will not be effective in identifying underlying mechanisms and nutritional factors that impact aging. The purpose of this commentary is to briefly discuss the difference between aging and longevity and why knowing the difference is important to nutrition research and to establishing the most precise nutritional recommendations possible for the older population. View Full-Text
Keywords: chance and aging; evolution of longevity; genetic determinism; nutrition recommendations chance and aging; evolution of longevity; genetic determinism; nutrition recommendations
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

McDonald, R.B.; Ruhe, R.C. Aging and Longevity: Why Knowing the Difference Is Important to Nutrition Research. Nutrients 2011, 3, 274-282.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top