Next Article in Journal
The Chilean Diet: Is It Sustainable?
Previous Article in Journal
Biological Role of Nutrients, Food and Dietary Patterns in the Prevention and Clinical Management of Major Depressive Disorder
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Five Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Vegans and Omnivores from Germany and Finland
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 15
10.3390/nu14153101
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Vegetarian and Vegan Diets: Beliefs and Attitudes of General Practitioners and Pediatricians in France

by
Cécile Villette
1,
Pauline Vasseur
2,
Nathanael Lapidus
2,3,
Marion Debin
2,
Thomas Hanslik
2,4,5,
Thierry Blanchon
2,
Olivier Steichen
6 and
Louise Rossignol
1,2,*
1
Département de Médecine Générale, Université de Paris Cité, 16 rue Henri Huchard, F75018 Paris, France
2
Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, IPLESP, 27 rue de Chaligny, F75012 Paris, France
3
Public Health Department, Saint-Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, F75012 Paris, France
4
UFR Simone Veil-Santé, Université Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, 55 Avenue de Paris, F78000 Versailles, France
5
AP-HP, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Service de Médecine Interne, 9 Avenue Charles de Gaulle, F92100 Boulogne Billancourt, France
6
AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Service de Médecine Interne, Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, F75020 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(15), 3101; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14153101
Submission received: 21 June 2022 / Revised: 19 July 2022 / Accepted: 20 July 2022 / Published: 28 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontier: Vegan Diets and Human Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Studies suggest a decreasing trend in the consumption of meat products and a growing interest in vegetarian diets. Medical support may be relevant, especially when switching to a vegan diet. Our objective was to describe the beliefs and attitudes of primary care physicians toward vegetarian diets. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among general practitioners and pediatricians thorough a questionnaire including socio-demographic characteristics, specific care to vegetarians, and the risks and benefits of vegetarian diets according to physicians. Out of the 177 participating physicians, 104 (59%) have seen at least one vegetarian patient in consultation in the last three months. Half of the physicians declared that they would dissuade their patients from switching to a vegan diet (n = 88, 51%) and 14% (n = 24) from switching to an ovo-lacto-vegetarian (OLV) diet. Most physicians (n = 141, 88%) did not feel informed enough about these diets. Physicians thought that the most frequent deficiencies for OLV and vegan diets were iron (76% and 84%, respectively) and protein (45% and 79%, respectively). These results highlight the fact that French primary care physicians feel concerned by this subject and need more information on these diets. Specific recommendations would be useful to support their practice and relationship with vegetarians.

1. Introduction

In recent studies, vegetarians, including ovo-lacto-vegetarian (OLV) and vegan diets, represented 2% of the population in the United States, 3.25% in the United Kingdom, and 32.8% in India [1,2,3]. In France, the proportion of vegetarians has been estimated to represent 2.7% of the population [4]. Several French studies suggested a downward trend in the consumption of meat products: the average yearly consumption of meat decreased from 94 kg in 1998 to 86 kg in 2014 [5]; sales of vegetarian and vegan products increased by 24% in 2018 [6].
Evidence about the potential benefits of vegetarian diets (including the vegan diet) is inconsistent and confounded by many factors. A protective effect of the vegetarian diets was found on blood pressure as well as on type 2 diabetes and obesity, even in childhood [7,8,9,10,11,12]. Regarding cancer, the results of studies are inconsistent, except for the consumption of red meat (especially of processed meat), which is associated with an increased risk of cancer (especially colorectal and stomach) [13,14,15]. For stroke, myocardial infarction, and overall mortality, the results are inconsistent [16,17,18].
Regarding the risks associated with these diets, vitamin B12 deficiency is the only one that has been clearly described, especially for the vegan diet [19]. This deficiency slowly occurs and may remain undetected until its clinical consequences show up. A recent systematic review showed that a vegan diet may result in deficiencies in micronutrients (vitamin B12, zinc, calcium, and selenium), which should not be disregarded [20]. Another systematic review qualitatively comparing the vegetarian and nonvegetarian diets concluded that OVLs and vegans had a higher overall diet quality (4.5–16.4 points higher on the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010)) compared with nonvegetarians in 9 of 12 studies [21]. The authors explained that, for vegetarians, higher scores were driven by a closer adherence to recommendations for total fruit, whole grains, seafood and plant protein, and sodium. For nonvegetarians, adherence to recommendations for refined grains and total protein foods was better.
Diet is central to improving health outcomes. However, nutrition counseling is very limited during medical visits worldwide [22,23]. Limited time and gaps in knowledge have been identified as barriers [22,24]. Concerning the knowledge of diets, a systematic review showed that nutrition is insufficiently incorporated into medical education, regardless of country, setting, or year of education [25]. Deficits in nutrition education affect students’ knowledge, skills, and confidence to implement nutrition care into patient care. A study evaluated how U.S. medical students and family medicine residents rated their nutrition training [26]. Most trainees felt that they were inadequately trained during medical school, although they expressed a high interest in whole-foods plant-based nutrition to address the burden of chronic diseases [26].
Primary care physicians (general practitioners and pediatricians) are the first-care providers for the population. Our objective was to describe the beliefs and attitudes of general practitioners (GPs) and pediatricians toward the OLV and vegan diets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Participants

In June and July 2018, we led a cross-sectional survey among GPs and pediatricians of the French Sentinel Network. The Sentinel Network (http://www.sentiweb.fr (accessed on 27 July 2022) is a computerized system comprising 1300 volunteer GPs (about 2% of the French GPs population) and 114 pediatricians, located throughout mainland France and participating in the ongoing surveillance of health indicators and epidemiological studies [27]. We only contacted physicians who had participated in at least one survey since 2016.

2.2. Survey

The survey was created using LimeSurvey® (LimeSurvey GmbH est représentée par Carsten Schmitz et Jory Nagel, HAmbourg, Deutschland) and sent by e-mail in June 2018. Two reminders were carried out in two-week intervals. We defined the OLV diet as a diet that excludes the consumption of meat (including fish, seafood, and the flesh of any other animal) but may include eggs, dairy, and honey; and we defined the vegan diet as one which excludes all animal products. The survey contained 31 questions and was split into four parts:
  • Physician’s characteristics: demography, practice, location, nutrition degree, and personal diet.
  • Care of vegetarian patients: impact on the physician–patient relationship, advice provided on switching to an OLV or vegan diet, and specific monitoring and treatments.
  • Representations of the risks and benefits of the OLV and vegan diets. Physicians had to estimate: (i) the impact of an OLV or vegan diet on several health issues from 0 (“deleterious effect”) to 10 (“protective effect”) for adults and children; (ii) the risk of deficiencies associated with these two diets; (iii) whether the diets were suitable for different types of populations, including some specific subgroups (e.g., pregnant women, the elderly, infants, children, teenagers, athletes, and patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease).
  • Understanding of the patients following a vegetarian diet: perceived motives for the patients to adopt a vegetarian diet (health, environmental, ethical reasons, beliefs, fashion, or eating disorders).
In the survey, nutrition degrees included university diplomas and interuniversity diplomas in the field of nutrition.

2.3. Data Analysis

A descriptive analysis was performed on all of the studied variables. Outliers were checked and corrected if necessary. GP age was split into two groups (less than 50 years vs. 50 years old or more).
The determinants of physician’s advice against switching to a vegan diet were analyzed only for the GPs (the number of pediatricians was too small). For this analysis, the variables grading the strength of opposition and the perceived risks of deficiency were recoded into a binary variable (categories “strongly agree” and “agree” were grouped into “agree” and categories “disagree”, “strongly disagree”, and “I do not know” into “disagree”). The association between advising against switching to a vegan diet and each explanatory variable was tested in unadjusted logistic models. These variables were chosen based on the literature and clinical considerations. The odds ratios, with their 95% confidence interval, are given for each variable.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Physicians

Out of the 636 physicians of the Sentinel Network who were contacted for the survey (521 GPs and 115 pediatricians), 28% completed the questionnaire: they comprised 149 GPs and 28 pediatricians. The median ages of the responding GPs and pediatricians were 49 and 56 years old, respectively. Women accounted for 93% of the pediatricians (n = 26) and 41% of the GPs (n = 61) (Table 1). Practice location was urban for 59 GPs (40%) and 24 pediatricians (86%). Concerning nutrition, four GPs and one pediatrician had a nutrition degree (3% of the 177 physicians). Six GPs and one pediatrician were following a vegetarian diet (5% out of the 177 physicians).

3.2. Opinions about the Effects of an OLV or Vegan Diet on Adults and Children

Among adults, most of the physicians considered that the adoption of an OLV diet led to a protective effect on the overall cardiovascular risk, myocardial infarction, high blood pressure, obesity, and global risk of cancer, with a median of 7 on the scores ranging from 0 (harmful effect) to 10 (protective effect) (Table 2). Physicians’ views were less favorable toward the vegan diet in adults, or either vegetarian diet in children.
Regarding the deficiencies, 132 (76%) physicians felt that an OLV diet was at risk of iron deficiency, 84 (49%) mentioned vitamin B12 deficiency and 78 (45%) mentioned protein deficiency (Figure 1). These proportions were higher for a vegan diet: risk of iron deficiency (n = 143, 84%), vitamin B12 deficiency (n = 124, 69%), and protein deficiency (n = 133, 79%) (Figure 2).

3.3. Suitability of OLV or Vegan Diets and Reasons for Adopting These Diets

The OLV diet was considered unsuitable for children under six months by 94 physicians (54%), for children over six months by 116 physicians (67%), for teenagers by 93 physicians (53%), for pregnant and breastfeeding women by 87 physicians (51%), and for elderly persons by 88 physicians (51%) (Figure 3). The vegan diet was deemed unsuitable by most of the physicians for all specific subgroups: children under six months (n = 148, 87%), children over six months (n = 161, 95%), teenagers (n = 143, 83%), pregnant and breastfeeding women (n = 155, 91%), and elderly persons (n = 137, 81%) (Figure 4).
Regarding the reasons why patients chose to follow a vegetarian diet, 86% of the physicians thought that it could be for health reasons (n = 150), 80% for animal welfare (n = 139), 74% for environmental care (n = 130), 52% for fashion (n = 89), 32% linked with eating disorder (n = 55), and 18% for religious beliefs (n = 31).

3.4. Vegetarian Diets and Physician–Patient Relationship

Most physicians had seen at least one recognized vegetarian (OLV or vegan diet) patient in the last three months (n = 104, 59%). Regarding medical practice, 145 (83%) adapted their routine care for vegetarian children and 88 (51%) for vegetarian adults.
Whereas 24 (14%) physicians declared that they would advise their patients against switching to an OLV diet, 88 (51%) would advise patients against switching to a vegan diet. According to 46% of the physicians (n = 81). Most physicians (n = 141, 81%) did not feel informed enough about the vegetarian diets (Table 3).
Among GPs, we found determinants associated with advising against a vegan diet. In unadjusted analyses, these factors were GPs aged over 50 years (odds ratio (OR) = 2.1 [95% confidence interval: 1.04–4.2]) and agreeing that a vegan diet is associated with a risk of folate deficiency (OR = 2.2 [1.1–4.4]) (Table 4).

4. Discussion

As vegetarian diets are becoming increasingly common in France, the accuracy of information delivered by healthcare providers is crucial. In this survey, while half of the GPs and pediatricians have seen at least one recognized vegetarian patient during the previous three months, most (81%) did not feel sufficiently informed about these diets. Half of the physicians declared that they would dissuade their patient from switching to a vegan diet (51%).
Most of the physicians involved in this survey declared that, in their opinion, OLV and vegan diets were associated with iron deficiency (76% and 84%, respectively) and protein deficiency (45% and 79%, respectively). There is now evidence that balanced vegetarian diets are not at risk of protein deficiency in developed countries [28,29], and although vegetarians usually have lower iron stores, there is no evidence of adverse health effects (moderately lower iron stores may even be associated with a lower risk of chronic diseases) [30]. In our survey, the risk of vitamin B12 deficiency came fourth after iron, calcium, and protein deficiencies, according to the physicians’ beliefs; whereas it represents the greatest risk of deficiency in vegetarian or vegan diets [16]. Vitamin B12 is present only in animal products [31]. Vegan patients, as well as many OLV patients, require vitamin B12 supplementation. Several case reports have been published about vegetarian children with growth disorders due to severe vitamin B12 deficiency [32,33,34], often associated with defective medical follow-up in the context of distrust toward pediatricians by the affected families [35]. An Italian survey showed that parents who chose alternative diets often lack confidence in their pediatrician [36]. In this survey, 22% of the families decided to adopt an alternative diet without pediatric advice. In about half of the cases, families did not consider the pediatrician to be competent enough to give adequate indications regarding their diet. Most of these parents reported antagonism from their pediatrician (77%). These results are consistent with our survey, as 95% of the physicians declared that a vegan diet is not suitable for children. According to another Italian survey conducted in 2020, parents did not inform their primary care pediatricians about the vegan diet in 36% of the cases. In 71% of the cases, primary care pediatricians were perceived as skeptical or against a vegan diet [37].
In univariate analyses, advice against switching to a vegan diet was associated with the age of the GP being older and with the physician believing that vegan diets put patients at risk of folate deficiency. As folate is present in large quantities in plants, OLV and vegan patients are unlikely to have any deficiency. The association with age suggests that younger physicians may be more open or informed to vegetarian and vegan diets. This could be a consequence of recent changes in how vegetarian and vegan diets are considered in the general population [4]. It remains unlikely that recent evolution in the medical education might explain this result, as information on these diets is still scarce throughout medical studies.
Agreement on the risk of folate deficiency in a vegan diet may therefore be interpreted as a marker of limited knowledge in these diets, and such physicians might be more likely to discourage patients from switching to a vegetarian diet. These initial results suggest a lack of awareness and some apprehension of GPs and pediatricians regarding the care of vegetarian patients. Pediatric academic societies have taken different positions worldwide. In France, the Pediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Nutrition Group, advises against a vegan diet in children [38]. Regular dietary monitoring is essential in vegan children, where vitamin D (also noted for other diets) and vitamin B12 supplementation is necessary. Iron, calcium, docosahexaenoic acid, iodine, and zinc can be supplemented on a case-by-case basis.
Concerning adults, they are exposed to vitamin B12 deficiency as well and must be supplemented [16]. Several countries have already published guidelines to help physicians in the follow-up of their vegetarian patients [39,40,41,42]; yet, such recommendations are still lacking in France.
According to the physicians in our survey, patients mainly adopt a vegetarian diet for health reasons (n = 150, 86%). In an American survey [43], the authors found that the reason depended on age, and younger people (11 to 20 years old) were more likely to choose a vegetarian diet for moral or environmental reasons. In the above-mentioned Italian survey, the decision to exclude animal foods from the child’s diet was agreed upon by both parents (77.1%); health benefits and ethics were the most common reason (75.5%) [37]. A French survey also found that a vegetarian diet may be a masked form of mental anorexia in a few patients [44]. An American survey studied the inter-relationships between vegetarianism and eating disorders among women. It found that individuals with an eating disorder history were significantly more likely to have ever been vegetarian (52% vs. 12%), to be currently vegetarian (24% vs. 6%), and to be primarily motivated by weight-related reasons (42% vs. 0%) [45]. Knowing this information would allow for earlier detection of these diseases among vegetarians.
Primary care physicians presented a knowledge gap in nutrition; yet, the prevalence of vegetarian diets are increasing. More and more patients choose to follow a vegetarian diet. Physicians perceived that their training was insufficient to deliver good advice to their patient. Specific training in this topic is needed. As stated by the World Health Organization: “Health professionals play a central and critical role in improving access and quality health care for the population. They provide essential services that promote health, prevent diseases and deliver health care services to individuals, families and communities based on the primary health care approach” [46]. Involvement in this area falls not only to physicians alone, but the entire primary care community, i.e., dieticians/nutritionists, psychologists, and nurses.
Our study was limited by a small sample size, and it can be assumed that participating physicians felt more concerned by this subject, which induced recruitment bias. Our population may not be fully representative of French physicians, but we relied on a physician network that is used to conduct epidemiological studies in primary care [27]. As with any survey-based study, our results could have been affected by reporting bias among respondents.

5. Conclusions

The results about the medical care of vegetarian patients highlighted an apprehension and a need for information from the GPs and pediatricians. Half of the physicians discouraged their patients from adopting a vegan diet. However, most respondents did not feel sufficiently informed about these diets. They seemed to find themselves helpless when facing this frequent situation, where they are expected to be key for the nutritional education and follow-up of their patient. Specific and detailed recommendations should be made, for example, about the appropriate intake of vitamin B12. It may be of interest to conduct such surveys in countries where recommendations do exist, in order to assess whether physicians are more comfortable with providing advice on these diets.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.V., N.L., M.D., and L.R.; data curation, C.V. and L.R.; formal analysis, P.V. and L.R.; investigation, C.V., P.V., and L.R.; methodology, C.V., P.V., M.D., and L.R.; supervision, N.L. and L.R.; writing—original draft, C.V., P.V., N.L., M.D., T.H., T.B., O.S., and L.R.; writing—review and editing, C.V., P.V., N.L., M.D., T.H., T.B., O.S., and L.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available on request from the Sentinelles network www.sentiweb.fr (accessed on 27 July 2022).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the physicians who participated in the survey.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that four of them follow a vegetarian diet.

References

  1. Shridhar, K.; Dhillon, P.K.; Bowen, L.; Kinra, S.; Bharathi, A.V.; Prabhakaran, D.; Reddy, K.S.; Ebrahim, S. Nutritional Profile of Indian Vegetarian Diets—The Indian Migration Study (IMS). Nutr. J. 2014, 13, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Find out How Many Vegans There Are in Great Britain. Available online: https://www.vegansociety.com/whats-new/news/find-out-how-many-vegans-there-are-great-britain (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  3. Public Health England. NDNS: Results from Years 1 to 4 Combined of the Rolling Programme for 2008 and 2009 to 2011 and 2012; Public Health England: London, UK, 2017; 27p.
  4. France Agrimer. Panorama Végétarisme en Europe. Available online: https://www.franceagrimer.fr/fam/content/download/62309/document/11_Synthèse%20Panorama%20végétarisme%20en%20Europe.pdf?version=1 (accessed on 27 July 2022).
  5. France Agrimer. Impact de la Crise Économique sur la Consommation de Viandes et Évolutions des Comportements Alimentaires; Rapport 2015. Available online: https://www.franceagrimer.fr/fam/content/download/38713/document/SYN-VIA-21-impact%20crise%20conso%20viande%20comportement-2015.pdf?version=4 (accessed on 27 July 2022).
  6. Ouest-France Avec Reuters. Le Marché Végétarien et Végan a Augmenté de 24% en 2018. Available online: https://www.ouest-france.fr/economie/consommation/le-marche-vegetarien-et-vegan-augmente-de-24-en-2018-6162850 (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  7. Barnard, N.D.; Cohen, J.; Jenkins, D.J.; Turner-McGrievy, G.; Gloede, L.; Green, A.; Ferdowsian, H. A Low-Fat Vegan Diet and a Conventional Diabetes Diet in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Controlled, 74-Wk Clinical Trial1234. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 1588S–1596S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Appleby, P.N.; Key, T.J. The Long-Term Health of Vegetarians and Vegans. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2016, 75, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Schmidt, J.A.; Rinaldi, S.; Ferrari, P.; Carayol, M.; Achaintre, D.; Scalbert, A.; Cross, A.J.; Gunter, M.J.; Fensom, G.K.; Appleby, P.N.; et al. Metabolic Profiles of Male Meat Eaters, Fish Eaters, Vegetarians, and Vegans from the EPIC-Oxford Cohort. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 102, 1518–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Sabaté, J.; Wien, M. Vegetarian Diets and Childhood Obesity Prevention. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 91, 1525S–1529S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lee, Y.; Park, K. Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Nutrients 2017, 14, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gan, Z.H.; Cheong, H.C.; Tu, Y.K.; Kuo, P.H. Association between Plant-Based Dietary Patterns and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Nutrients 2021, 5, 3952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Red Meat and Processed Meat; IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2018; ISBN 978-92-832-0152-6.
  14. Bouvard, V.; Loomis, D.; Guyton, K.Z.; Grosse, Y.; Ghissassi, F.E.; Benbrahim-Tallaa, L.; Guha, N.; Mattock, H.; Straif, K.; International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group. Carcinogenicity of Consumption of Red and Processed Meat. Lancet Oncol. 2015, 16, 1599–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zhao, Y.; Zhan, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D. The Relationship Between Plant-Based Diet and Risk of Digestive System Cancers: A Meta-Analysis Based on 3,059,009 Subjects. Front. Public Health 2022, 3, 892153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tong, T.Y.N.; Appleby, P.N.; Bradbury, K.E.; Perez-Cornago, A.; Travis, R.C.; Clarke, R.; Key, T.J. Risks of Ischaemic Heart Disease and Stroke in Meat Eaters, Fish Eaters, and Vegetarians over 18 Years of Follow-up: Results from the Prospective EPIC-Oxford Study. BMJ 2019, 366, l4897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Appleby, P.N.; Crowe, F.L.; Bradbury, K.E.; Travis, R.C.; Key, T.J. Mortality in Vegetarians and Comparable Nonvegetarians in the United Kingdom123. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 103, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Orlich, M.J.; Singh, P.N.; Sabaté, J.; Jaceldo-Siegl, K.; Fan, J.; Knutsen, S.; Beeson, W.L.; Fraser, G.E. Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Mortality in Adventist Health Study 2. JAMA Intern. Med. 2013, 173, 1230–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rizzo, G.; Laganà, A.S.; Rapisarda, A.M.C.; La Ferrera, G.M.G.; Buscema, M.; Rossetti, P.; Nigro, A.; Muscia, V.; Valenti, G.; Sapia, F.; et al. Vitamin B12 among Vegetarians: Status, Assessment and Supplementation. Nutrients 2016, 8, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Neufingerl, N.; Eilander, A. Nutrient Intake and Status in Adults Consuming Plant-Based Diets Compared to Meat-Eaters: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2021, 14, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Parker, H.W.; Vadiveloo, M.K. Diet quality of vegetarian diets compared with nonvegetarian diets: A systematic review. Nutr. Rev. 2019, 77, 144–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kushner, R.F. Barriers to providing nutrition counseling by physicians: A survey of primary care practitioners. Prev. Med. 1995, 24, 546–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Aggarwal, M.; Devries, S.; Freeman, A.M.; Ostfeld, R.; Gaggin, H.; Taub, P.; Rzeszut, A.K.; Allen, K.; Conti, R.C. The Deficit of Nutrition Education of Physicians. Am. J. Med. 2018, 131, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kolasa, K.M.; Rickett, K. Barriers to providing nutrition counseling cited by physicians: A survey of primary care practitioners. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2010, 25, 502–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Crowley, J.; Ball, L.; Hiddink, G.J. Nutrition in medical education: A systematic review. Lancet Planet Health 2019, 3, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Morton, K.F.; Pantalos, D.C.; Ziegler, C.; Patel, P.D. A Place for Plant-Based Nutrition in US Medical School Curriculum: A Survey-Based Study. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2021, 16, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Flahault, A.; Blanchon, T.; Dorléans, Y.; Toubiana, L.; Vibert, J.F.; Valleron, A.J. Virtual Surveillance of Communicable Diseases: A 20-Year Experience in France. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 2006, 15, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Clarys, P.; Deliens, T.; Huybrechts, I.; Deriemaeker, P.; Vanaelst, B.; De Keyzer, W.; Hebbelinck, M.; Mullie, P. Comparison of Nutritional Quality of the Vegan, Vegetarian, Semi-Vegetarian, Pesco-Vegetarian and Omnivorous Diet. Nutrients 2014, 6, 1318–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Marsh, K.A.; Munn, E.A.; Baines, S.K. Protein and Vegetarian Diets. Med. J. Aust. 2013, 199, S7–S10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hunt, J.R. Bioavailability of Iron, Zinc, and Other Trace Minerals from Vegetarian Diets. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 78, 633S–639S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gilsing, A.M.J.; Crowe, F.L.; Lloyd-Wright, Z.; Sanders, T.A.B.; Appleby, P.N.; Allen, N.E.; Key, T.J. Serum Concentrations of Vitamin B12 and Folate in British Male Omnivores, Vegetarians and Vegans: Results from a Cross-Sectional Analysis of the EPIC-Oxford Cohort Study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 64, 933–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bousselamti, A.; El Hasbaoui, B.; Echahdi, H.; Krouile, Y. Psychomotor Regression Due to Vitamin B12 Deficiency. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2018, 30, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Blasco-Alonso, J.; Gil-Gómez, R.; García Ruiz, A.; Cortés Hernández, M.; Gutiérrez Schiaffino, G. Severe encephalopathy and vitamin B12 deficiency: Reversibility after nutritional therapy. Nutr. Hosp. 2020, 37, 1285–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dubaj, C.; Czyż, K.; Furmaga-Jabłońska, W. Vitamin B12 Deficiency as a Cause of Severe Neurological Symptoms in Breast Fed Infant—A Case Report. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2020, 46, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Farella, I.; Panza, R.; Baldassarre, M.E. The Difficult Alliance between Vegan Parents and Pediatrician: A Case Report. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Baldassarre, M.E.; Panza, R.; Farella, I.; Posa, D.; Capozza, M.; Mauro, A.D.; Laforgia, N. Vegetarian and Vegan Weaning of the Infant: How Common and How Evidence-Based? A Population-Based Survey and Narrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bivi, D.; Di Chio, T.; Geri, F.; Morganti, R.; Goggi, S.; Baroni, L.; Mumolo, M.G.; de Bortoli, N.; Peroni, D.G.; Marchi, S.; et al. Raising Children on a Vegan Diet: Parents’ Opinion on Problems in Everyday Life. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lemale, J.; Mas, E.; Jung, C.; Bellaiche, M.; Tounian, P.; French-speaking Pediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Nutrition Group (GFHGNP). Vegan Diet in Children and Adolescents—Recommendations from the French-Speaking Pediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Nutrition Group (GFHGNP). Arch. Pediatr. 2019, 26, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Agnoli, C.; Baroni, L.; Bertini, I.; Ciappellano, S.; Fabbri, A.; Papa, M.; Pellegrini, N.; Sbarbati, R.; Scarino, M.L.; Siani, V.; et al. Position Paper on Vegetarian Diets from the Working Group of the Italian Society of Human Nutrition. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017, 27, 1037–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Melina, V.; Craig, W.; Levin, S. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2016, 116, 1970–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Craig, W.J.; Mangels, A.R.; American Dietetic Association. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Vegetarian Diets. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009, 109, 1266–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hever, J. Plant-Based Diets: A Physician’s Guide. Perm. J. 2016, 20, 15-082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Pribis, P.; Pencak, R.C.; Grajales, T. Beliefs and Attitudes toward Vegetarian Lifestyle across Generations. Nutrients 2010, 2, 523–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mathieu, S.; Dorard, G. Vegetarianism and veganism lifestyle: Motivation and psychological dimensions associated with selective diet. Presse Med. 2016, 45, 726–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bardone-Cone, A.M.; Fitzsimmons-Craft, E.E.; Harney, M.B.; Maldonado, C.R.; Lawson, M.A.; Smith, R.; Robinson, D.P. The Inter-Relationships between Vegetarianism and Eating Disorders among Females. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2012, 112, 1247–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. WHO. Health Professions Networks. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/health-workforce/health-professions-networks (accessed on 12 July 2022).
Nutrients 14 03101 g001 550
Figure 1. Perceived risk of deficiencies related to an ovo-lacto-vegetarian (OLV) diet.
Figure 1. Perceived risk of deficiencies related to an ovo-lacto-vegetarian (OLV) diet.
Nutrients 14 03101 g001
Nutrients 14 03101 g002 550
Figure 2. Perceived risk of deficiencies related to a vegan diet.
Figure 2. Perceived risk of deficiencies related to a vegan diet.
Nutrients 14 03101 g002
Nutrients 14 03101 g003 550
Figure 3. Ovo-lacto-vegetarian diet’s suitability, depending on different populations.
Figure 3. Ovo-lacto-vegetarian diet’s suitability, depending on different populations.
Nutrients 14 03101 g003
Nutrients 14 03101 g004 550
Figure 4. Vegan diet’s suitability, depending on different populations.
Figure 4. Vegan diet’s suitability, depending on different populations.
Nutrients 14 03101 g004
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of participating physicians n (%).
Table 1. Characteristics of participating physicians n (%).
Participating GPs N = 149French GPs *
N = 58,450		Participating Pediatricians
N = 28		French Pediatricians *
N = 2026
Age (median (min–max)), mv: 1049 (27–71)5156 (35–69)49
Sex, mv: 1
Female61 (41)23,617 (40)26 (93)1322 (65)
Male87 (59)34,833 (60)2 (7)704 (35)
Practice location, mv: 1
Urban59 (40)24 (86)
Semi-rural56 (38)3 (11)
Rural33 (22)1 (3)
University nutrition degree, mv: 2
No143 (97)26 (96)
Yes4 (3)1 (4)
Vegetarian diet, mv: 22
No124 (95)24 (96)
Yes6 (5)1 (4)
* Data from the report on physician demographics 2018 of the Ministry of Solidarity and Health in mainland France (33); mv = missing value.
Table
Table 2. Effects of an ovo-lacto-vegetarian or vegan diet “conducted in the best possible way” on adults and children, according to physicians. (0 = harmful effect; 5 = neutral effect; 10 = protective effect; n (%).
Table 2. Effects of an ovo-lacto-vegetarian or vegan diet “conducted in the best possible way” on adults and children, according to physicians. (0 = harmful effect; 5 = neutral effect; 10 = protective effect; n (%).
Ovo-Lacto-Vegetarian DietVegan Diet
Participating Physicians
N = 177		Median
(Q1–Q3)		I Do Not Know n(%)Missing Values (n)Median
(Q1–Q3)		I Do Not Know n(%)Missing Values (n)
Adults
Overall cardiovascular disease7 (5–8)26 (14)07 (5–8)39 (23)9
Myocardial infarction7 (6–8)29 (16)07 (5–8)40 (24)9
High blood pressure7 (5–8)24 (13)16 (5–8)36 (21)9
Type 2 diabetes6 (5–8)29 (17)26 (5–8)40 (24)11
Obesity7 (6–8)21 (12)17 (5–8)33 (20)12
Cancer (global risk)7 (5–8)34 (19)26 (5–7)46 (27)10
Osteoporosis5 (3–5)25 (15)22 (1–4)24 (14)9
Anemia3 (2–5)14 (8)02 (1–3)15 (9)9
Neurodegenerative disorder5 (5–6)67 (39)75 (3–5)71 (43)13
Depression5 (4–5)63 (37)74 (2–5)60 (36)11
Children (2–11 years old)
Obesity in childhood6 (5–8)36 (20)17 (5–8)48 (29)9
Obesity in adulthood7 (5–8)43 (25)26 (5–8)50 (30)9
Anemia3 (2–5)14 (8)02 (1–3)15 (9)7
Growth disorder4 (2–5)24 (14)12 (1–3)16 (9)7
Psychomotor development disorder5 (3–5)31 (18)33 (1–4)36 (21)7
Asthma5 (5–5)62 (36)75 (4–5)73 (45)15
Table
Table 3. Vegetarian diets and physician–patient relationships n (%).
Table 3. Vegetarian diets and physician–patient relationships n (%).
Total Participating Physicians
N = 177		Participating GPs
N = 149		Participating Pediatricians
N = 28		Missing Values
Vegetarian patient seen in the last three months 2
Yes104 (59)90 (61)14 (50)
No64 (37)51 (35)13 (46)
I do not know7 (4)6 (4)1 (4)
Dissuasion when switching to an OLV diet 2
Absolutely2 (1)1 (1)1 (4)
Prefer yes22 (13)13 (9)9 (32)
Prefer not70 (40)56 (38)14 (50)
Absolutely not81 (46)77 (52)4 (14)
I do not know0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Dissuasion when switching to a vegan diet 2
Absolutely38 (22)23 (16)15 (54)
Prefer yes50 (29)39 (27)11 (39)
Prefer not58 (33)57 (39)1 (3,5)
Absolutely not27 (15)27 (18)0 (0)
I do not know2 (1)1 (1)1 (3,5)
Sufficient information about vegetarian diets 3
Absolutely6 (3)6 (4)0 (0)
Prefer yes26 (15)19 (13)7 (25)
Prefer not83 (48)72 (49)11 (39)
Absolutely not58 (33)48 (33)10 (36)
I do not know1 (1)1 (1)0 (0)
Physician-patient relationship influenced by patient’s diet choice 1
Absolutely7 (4)5 (3)2 (7)
Prefer yes74 (42)60 (41)14 (50)
Prefer not59 (34)52 (35)7 (25)
Absolutely not25 (14)23 (16)2 (7)
I do not know11 (6)8 (5)3 (11)
Adult-specific care 3
Yes88 (51)71 (48)17 (65)
No45 (26)43 (29)2 (8)
I do not know41 (23)34 (23)7 (27)
Adult-specific biological follow-up 5
Yes102 (59)87 (59)15 (60)
No43 (25)40 (27)3 (12)
I do not know27 (16)20 (14)7 (28)
Child-specific care 2
Yes145 (83)120 (82)
No11 (6)11 (7)
I do not know19 (11)16 (11)
Child-specific biological follow-up 3
Yes128 (74)103 (70)25 (89)
No16 (9)14 (10)2 (7)
I do not know30 (17)29 (20)1 (4)
GP: general practitioner; OLV: ovo-lacto-vegetarian.
Table
Table 4. Determinants associated with advising against a vegan diet in the GP population N = 149.
Table 4. Determinants associated with advising against a vegan diet in the GP population N = 149.
VariablesAdvising against a Vegan DietOR in Univariate Analysis [95% CI]
Yes n (%)No n (%)
Socio-Demographic Criteria
Age
50 years old24 (33)48 (67)ref
>50 years old33 (51)32 (49)2.1 [1.04–4.2]
Sex
Male36 (42)50 (58)ref
Female26 (43)34 (57)1.1 [0.5–2.1]
Exercise environment
Urban22 (39)35 (61)ref
Semi-rural26 (46)30 (54)1.4 [0.7–2.9]
Rural14 (42)19 (58)1.2 [0.5–2.8]
Nutrition degree
Yes1 (25)3 (75)ref
No60 (43)81 (57)2.2 [0.3–45.5]
Vegetarian Diet followed by physicians
Yes2 (33)4 (66)ref
No55 (45)67 (55)1.6 [0.3–12.2]
Vegetarian patient seen in the last 3 months
Yes40 (45)49 (55)ref
No18 (35)33 (65)0.7 [0.3–1.3]
I do not know3 (50)3 (50)1.2 [0.2–6.9]
Insufficient information on vegetarian diets
Yes9 (47)16 (53)ref
No53 (52)67 (48)1.4 [0.6–3.6]
Perceived risk of deficiency
Folate if vegan diet
Disagree/I do not know30 (35)56 (65)ref
Agree29 (53)25 (46)2.2 [1.1–4.4]
Folate if OLV diet
Disagree/I do not know40 (38)66 (62)ref
Agree20 (54)17 (46)1.9 [0.9–4.2]
Vitamin B12 if vegan diet
Disagree/I do not know14(31)31 (69)ref
Agree45 (48)49 (52)2.0 [0.97–4.4]
Vitamin B12 if OLV diet
Disagree/I do not know27 (36)48 (64)ref
Agree34 (49)35 (51)1.7 [0.9–3.4]
Ref: reference category; OLV: ovo-lacto-vegetarian; OR: odds ratio.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Villette, C.; Vasseur, P.; Lapidus, N.; Debin, M.; Hanslik, T.; Blanchon, T.; Steichen, O.; Rossignol, L. Vegetarian and Vegan Diets: Beliefs and Attitudes of General Practitioners and Pediatricians in France. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3101. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14153101

AMA Style

Villette C, Vasseur P, Lapidus N, Debin M, Hanslik T, Blanchon T, Steichen O, Rossignol L. Vegetarian and Vegan Diets: Beliefs and Attitudes of General Practitioners and Pediatricians in France. Nutrients. 2022; 14(15):3101. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14153101

Chicago/Turabian Style

Villette, Cécile, Pauline Vasseur, Nathanael Lapidus, Marion Debin, Thomas Hanslik, Thierry Blanchon, Olivier Steichen, and Louise Rossignol. 2022. "Vegetarian and Vegan Diets: Beliefs and Attitudes of General Practitioners and Pediatricians in France" Nutrients 14, no. 15: 3101. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14153101

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop