Next Article in Journal
Satellite Climate Data Records: Development, Applications, and Societal Benefits
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparison of Mangrove Canopy Height Using Multiple Independent Measurements from Land, Air, and Space
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Remote Sens. 2016, 8(4), 330;

Comparison of Small Baseline Interferometric SAR Processors for Estimating Ground Deformation

Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe 76131, Germany
COMET, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Zhong Lu and Prasad S. Thenkabail
Received: 23 January 2016 / Revised: 27 March 2016 / Accepted: 7 April 2016 / Published: 15 April 2016
Full-Text   |   PDF [8585 KB, uploaded 15 April 2016]   |  


The small Baseline Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Interferometry (SBI) technique has been widely and successfully applied in various ground deformation monitoring applications. Over the last decade, a variety of SBI algorithms have been developed based on the same fundamental concepts. Recently developed SBI toolboxes provide an open environment for researchers to apply different SBI methods for various purposes. However, there has been no thorough discussion that compares the particular characteristics of different SBI methods and their corresponding performance in ground deformation reconstruction. Thus, two SBI toolboxes that implement a total of four SBI algorithms were selected for comparison. This study discusses and summarizes the main differences, pros and cons of these four SBI implementations, which could help users to choose a suitable SBI method for their specific application. The study focuses on exploring the suitability of each SBI module under various data set conditions, including small/large number of interferograms, the presence or absence of larger time gaps, urban/vegetation ground coverage, and temporally regular/irregular ground displacement with multiple spatial scales. Within this paper we discuss the corresponding theoretical background of each SBI method. We present a performance analysis of these SBI modules based on two real data sets characterized by different environmental and surface deformation conditions. The study shows that all four SBI processors are capable of generating similar ground deformation results when the data set has sufficient temporal sampling and a stable ground backscatter mechanism like urban area. Strengths and limitations of different SBI processors were analyzed based on data set configuration and environmental conditions and are summarized in this paper to guide future users of SBI techniques. View Full-Text
Keywords: interferometry; synthetic aperture radar; time series; deformation monitoring interferometry; synthetic aperture radar; time series; deformation monitoring

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Gong, W.; Thiele, A.; Hinz, S.; Meyer, F.J.; Hooper, A.; Agram, P.S. Comparison of Small Baseline Interferometric SAR Processors for Estimating Ground Deformation. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 330.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top