Next Article in Journal
Real-Time Classification of Seagrass Meadows on Flat Bottom with Bathymetric Data Measured by a Narrow Multibeam Sonar System
Next Article in Special Issue
Uncertainties in Tidally Adjusted Estimates of Sea Level Rise Flooding (Bathtub Model) for the Greater London
Previous Article in Journal
Hyperspectral Imagery Classification Using Sparse Representations of Convolutional Neural Network Features
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Remote Sens. 2016, 8(2), 98; doi:10.3390/rs8020098

Study of the Effect of Temporal Sampling Frequency on DSCOVR Observations Using the GEOS-5 Nature Run Results (Part I): Earth’s Radiation Budget

1
Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MA 20771, USA
2
Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research, Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MA 20771, USA
3
Climate and Radiation Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MA 20771, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Yudong Tian, Alfredo R. Huete and Prasad S. Thenkabail
Received: 30 November 2015 / Revised: 6 January 2016 / Accepted: 20 January 2016 / Published: 27 January 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Uncertainties in Remote Sensing)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [8532 KB, uploaded 27 January 2016]   |  

Abstract

Satellites always sample the Earth-atmosphere system in a finite temporal resolution. This study investigates the effect of sampling frequency on the satellite-derived Earth radiation budget, with the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) as an example. The output from NASA’s Goddard Earth Observing System Version 5 (GEOS-5) Nature Run is used as the truth. The Nature Run is a high spatial and temporal resolution atmospheric simulation spanning a two-year period. The effect of temporal resolution on potential DSCOVR observations is assessed by sampling the full Nature Run data with 1-h to 24-h frequencies. The uncertainty associated with a given sampling frequency is measured by computing means over daily, monthly, seasonal and annual intervals and determining the spread across different possible starting points. The skill with which a particular sampling frequency captures the structure of the full time series is measured using correlations and normalized errors. Results show that higher sampling frequency gives more information and less uncertainty in the derived radiation budget. A sampling frequency coarser than every 4 h results in significant error. Correlations between true and sampled time series also decrease more rapidly for a sampling frequency less than 4 h. View Full-Text
Keywords: radiation budget; satellite sampling frequency; DSCOVR; EPIC; time series; Arctic; climate change; GEOS-5; Nature Run radiation budget; satellite sampling frequency; DSCOVR; EPIC; time series; Arctic; climate change; GEOS-5; Nature Run
Figures

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Holdaway, D.; Yang, Y. Study of the Effect of Temporal Sampling Frequency on DSCOVR Observations Using the GEOS-5 Nature Run Results (Part I): Earth’s Radiation Budget. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 98.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top