Next Article in Journal
A Dimension Reduction Framework for HSI Classification Using Fuzzy and Kernel NFLE Transformation
Previous Article in Journal
An Unmanned Airship Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing System for Low-Altitude and High Spatial Resolution Monitoring of Urban Thermal Environments: Integration and an Experiment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Technical Note

Monitoring the Impacts of Severe Drought on Southern California Chaparral Species using Hyperspectral and Thermal Infrared Imagery

1
Department of Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 84112 UT, USA
2
Department of Geography, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, 93106 CA, USA
3
Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California Davis, Davis, 95616 CA, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2015, 7(11), 14276-14291; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71114276
Submission received: 31 August 2015 / Revised: 2 October 2015 / Accepted: 16 October 2015 / Published: 28 October 2015

Abstract

:
Airborne hyperspectral and thermal infrared imagery acquired in 2013 and 2014, the second and third years of a severe drought in California, were used to assess drought impacts on dominant plant species. A relative green vegetation fraction (RGVF) calculated from 2013–2014 Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) data using linear spectral unmixing revealed seasonal and multi-year changes relative to a pre-drought 2011 reference AVIRIS image. Deeply rooted tree species and tree species found in mesic areas showed the least change in RGVF. Coastal sage scrub species demonstrated the highest seasonal variability, as well as a longer-term decline in RGVF. Ceanothus species were apparently least well-adapted to long-term drought among chaparral species, showing persistent declines in RGVF over 2013 and 2014. Declining RGVF was associated with higher land surface temperature retrieved from MODIS-ASTER Airborne Simulator (MASTER) data. Combined collection of hyperspectral and thermal infrared imagery may offer new opportunities for mapping and monitoring drought impacts on ecosystems.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

California has been subjected to a multi-year, extreme drought, with tree ring records indicating that the drought may be the most severe in the last millennium [1]. Both warmer temperatures and greatly reduced wet season precipitation over multiple years [2] have increased stress on vegetation. Long-term, severe drought can cause canopy dieback and mortality in woody plants, resulting from loss of hydraulic conductance, depletion of non-structural carbohydrate reserves, and secondary stress by insect attack [3,4,5,6,7]. Plant senescence, canopy dieback, and mortality result in a reduction of leaf area and fraction of the ground surface covered by green vegetation. Drought impacts will vary by species, however, based on factors such as leaf structure, root depth, and cavitation resistance [8,9,10,11,12,13,14].
Hyperspectral data have capabilities for estimating vegetation biophysical and biochemical parameters [15,16,17,18] and mapping vegetation species [19,20,21,22,23,24]. These complementary capabilities give hyperspectral data strong potential for monitoring drought impacts on vegetation [25,26], but a paucity of hyperspectral time series datasets has prevented the development of drought monitoring applications. Thermal infrared time series data also have considerable potential for monitoring drought due to drought impacts on evapotranspiration and canopy temperature [27,28,29,30]. NASA has proposed the Hyperspectral Infrared Imager (HyspIRI) satellite mission, which would combine a hyperspectral imaging spectrometer covering the visible, near infrared, and shortwave infrared spectral regions (VSWIR) with a multispectral thermal infrared (TIR) sensor [31]. HyspIRI would provide new opportunities for global monitoring of terrestrial ecosystems [32], potentially including seasonal monitoring of drought stress on vegetation.
The California drought has coincided with data collection for NASA’s HyspIRI Preparatory Campaign, a campaign designed to acquire data using VWSIR- and TIR-like airborne instruments. Data from the Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) [33] and the MODIS-ASTER Airborne Simulator (MASTER) [34] were acquired from an airborne platform over key ecosystems in California in 2013 and 2014, providing a valuable dataset for quantifying the impacts of the persistent drought on vegetation. This effort uses these newly available data to identify the initial impacts of a long-term drought on dominant plant species in the Santa Barbara region of southern California. Seasonal changes in fractional vegetation cover calculated from AVIRIS data and land surface temperature (LST) retrieved from MASTER data reveal differences in how individual species are responding to long-term drought.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area includes the Santa Barbara Coast and portions of the Santa Ynez Mountains and Santa Ynez Valley (Figure 1). This area spans an elevation range from sea level to 1300 m, with coastal sage scrub and grassland communities dominating at lower coastal elevations, oak forest, and chaparral shrublands at higher elevation, riparian forest in mountain drainages, and oak savanna, coastal sage scrub, and grassland in drier inland areas. Precipitation and soil moisture data collected from a station in the study area [35] demonstrate reduced monthly precipitation and decreasing soil volumetric moisture content (VMC) since the last winter with above average precipitation, 2010–2011 (Figure 2).

2.2. Image Data

Data from AVIRIS and MASTER were acquired over the study area on 19 July 2011, providing a pre-drought baseline. New data acquisitions occurred in April, June, and November/December 2013, and April, June, and August 2014. All data acquisitions occurred on a single date except for November/December 2013 (two flights separated by nine days) and June 2014 (two flights separated by two days). AVIRIS data cover a spectral range of approximately 350–2500 nm with 224 10 nm spectral bands [33]. An AVIRIS surface reflectance product at a uniform 18 m spatial resolution was provided by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). Apparent surface reflectance was retrieved using ATREM as described by [36]. Surface reflectance images for each date were registered to an 18 m spatial resolution orthoimage basemap to improve co-registration between dates. Registration spatial error was required to be less than one pixel for all areas containing reference polygons. MASTER has 50 bands covering the visible through TIR [34]. A land surface temperature (LST) product retrieved from the TIR bands at a mean 35 m spatial resolution was provided by JPL. Temperature-emissivity separation required for retrieving LST used a water vapor scaling method described by [37]. Root mean square error of LST retrieval has been estimated at 1.2 K for ASTER data by [38] and at 0.7 K for MASTER data [39]. LST data were registered to the same 18 m orthoimage basemap and were resampled to 18 m spatial resolution using nearest neighbor resampling.

2.3. Ground Reference Data

Patches dominated by 13 vegetation species, including one case of two intermixed species, were used to construct a set of reference polygons covering 12 species classes (Table 1). Reference polygons were mapped using methods adapted from [40]. Homogeneous vegetation patches were manually delineated on high spatial resolution imagery, and a high-powered spotting scope was combined with in situ inspection to estimate species dominance within each patch. Reference polygons were required to be at least 75% dominated by a single species (or in one case by intermixed Artemisia californica and Salvia leucophylla) and to have a minimum approximate size of 40 m by 40 m. Reference polygons were mapped within the study area in 2003, 2009, and 2012 (Figure 1), and were collected from outside of areas burned by recent fires in the Santa Ynez Mountains. Reference data collection is described in further detail in [21] and [41].

2.4. Analysis

Linear spectral unmixing (also known as spectral mixture analysis) models reflectance spectra as a linear mixture of endmembers representing pure cover types [42]. Unmixing assigns a fractional composition to each endmember, with green vegetation (GV), non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV), soil, and shade representing typical endmember types used for vegetation analysis [43]. In a previous adaption of linear spectral unmixing, relative endmember fractions were modeled by unmixing time series data [44].
Figure 1. The study region covering the Santa Barbara Coast and portions of the Santa Ynez Mountains and Santa Ynez Valley, California. An AVIRIS images acquired in July 2011 is shown in a 1651 nm (red), 831 nm (green), 658 nm (blue) false color composite. Reference polygons dominated by plant species are marked by yellow dots.
Figure 1. The study region covering the Santa Barbara Coast and portions of the Santa Ynez Mountains and Santa Ynez Valley, California. An AVIRIS images acquired in July 2011 is shown in a 1651 nm (red), 831 nm (green), 658 nm (blue) false color composite. Reference polygons dominated by plant species are marked by yellow dots.
Remotesensing 07 14276 g001
Table 1. Species, code, functional type, and number of pixels sampled per date.
Table 1. Species, code, functional type, and number of pixels sampled per date.
Species/Vegetation TypeCodeFunctional TypeN Pixels
Adenostoma fasciculatumADFAevergreen chaparral2727
Artemisia californica-Salvia leucophyllaARCA-SALEcoastal sage scrub1548
Arctostaphylos glauca/glandulosaARGLevergreen chaparral342
Ceanothus cuneatusCECUevergreen chaparral318
Ceanothus megacarpusCEMEevergreen chaparral720
Ceanothus spinosusCESPevergreen chaparral957
Eriogonum fasciculatumERFAcoastal sage scrub1212
Pinus sabinianaPISAevergreen tree1203
Platanus racemosaPLRAdeciduous tree720
Quercus agrifoliaQUAGevergreen tree1536
Quercus douglasiiQUDOdeciduous tree2769
Umbellularia californicaUMCAevergreen tree249
Figure 2. Precipitation and soil moisture measured at Sedgwick Ranch, California. (a) Monthly precipitation; (b) percent of each month with a volumetric moisture content (VMC) greater than 0.08 at a depth of 15 cm. The 0.08 VMC threshold was empirically determined to be just above the wilting point in this soil type; and (c) percent of each month with a VMC greater than 0.08 at a depth of 46 cm.
Figure 2. Precipitation and soil moisture measured at Sedgwick Ranch, California. (a) Monthly precipitation; (b) percent of each month with a volumetric moisture content (VMC) greater than 0.08 at a depth of 15 cm. The 0.08 VMC threshold was empirically determined to be just above the wilting point in this soil type; and (c) percent of each month with a VMC greater than 0.08 at a depth of 46 cm.
Remotesensing 07 14276 g002
Changes in GV fraction over the AVIRIS time series were modeled using a relative linear spectral unmixing technique. The July 2011 AVIRIS image was selected as a reference date because it represents a high rainfall year for which shrub and tree canopy spectra would reflect peak growth conditions expressed by high near infrared/red contrast and minimum levels of exposed stems, branches, and soil. For each pixel in the study area, the July 2011 spectrum was used as a GV endmember representing a baseline green vegetation cover. An empirically-determined normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) threshold of 0.3 was used to mask out non-vegetated pixels (Figure 3). For each date in 2013 and 2014, each pixel was modeled as a linear combination of its July 2011 spectrum representing the GV endmember, a non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV) endmember from a lab spectrum of bare branches, and a zero reflectance shade endmember. Singular value decomposition was used to calculate the fractions of GV, NPV, and shade endmembers for the 2013 and 2014 dates, providing a relative GV fraction (RGVF) based on change relative to the July 2011 spectrum. RGVF was shade-normalized to correct for solar zenith effects by dividing by the sum of the non-shade fractions.
Figure 3. An NDVI threshold of 0.3 was empirically determined using spectra extracted from species reference polygons (GV) and from areas with senesced grassland and soil cover (non-GV). Non-GV cover was identified based on appearance in high resolution orthoimagery and manual inspection of spectral shape in the July 2011 AVIRIS image. 95% of GV-type spectra were above the 0.3 NDVI threshold, while only 12% of non-GV-type spectra were above the same threshold.
Figure 3. An NDVI threshold of 0.3 was empirically determined using spectra extracted from species reference polygons (GV) and from areas with senesced grassland and soil cover (non-GV). Non-GV cover was identified based on appearance in high resolution orthoimagery and manual inspection of spectral shape in the July 2011 AVIRIS image. 95% of GV-type spectra were above the 0.3 NDVI threshold, while only 12% of non-GV-type spectra were above the same threshold.
Remotesensing 07 14276 g003
Use of a relative fraction calculated on a per-pixel basis accommodates spectral variability that occurs by species and over space [45]. Thus RGVF represents change from a previous baseline for each pixel, rather than an absolute measure of vegetation cover. RGVF was used rather than a relative NPV or soil fraction due to the high spectral contrast between green vegetation and other sub-pixel components. This minimizes the impact of spectral confusion between NPV and soil on RGVF [43,46]. Since the GV endmember used to model each pixel is fixed, RGVF avoids problems with best fit endmembers potentially changing over time in a multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis-type model [20,47]. Use of a four-endmember model for RGVF calculation (including a soil endmember in addition to the GV endmember from the 2011 image plus NPV and shade endmembers) was attempted, but similarity between soil and NPV endmembers resulted in unrealistically large changes in soil and NPV fractions from date to date in response to changes in the spectral shape of modeled pixels. Since the NPV endmember best captured the dominant signal of canopy dieback and mortality, it was chosen over the soil endmember for the three endmember model used to calculate RGVF. Increased soil cover associated with canopy dieback and mortality will increase NPV fraction in the three endmember model due to the spectral similarity of soil and NPV.
Severe drought impacts on vegetation canopies, representing die-back or mortality, would result in decreased RGVF compared to the 2011 baseline. The reference polygons were used to extract RGVF values for each species. Distributions of RGVF for each date were calculated. Decreased GV cover relative to July 2011 would result in a RGVF below one, while increased GV cover would result in a RGVF greater than one. RGVF was also compared to LST extracted from MASTER data using the same reference polygons.

3. Results and Discussion

RGVF exhibited broad, seasonal decreases over both 2013 and 2014 (Figure 4). Agriculture (Figure 5a) and fire scars (Figure 5c) provided areas with RGVF values that were sometimes higher than one, indicating increased vegetation cover relative to July 2011. In the case of agriculture, higher RGVF values resulted from irrigation. Scars of the 2008 Gap and Tea fires and 2009 Jesusita fire have higher GV cover relative to 2011 in the April and June images, due to continued vegetation recovery since July 2011. Higher elevation chaparral areas (Figure 4 and Figure 5b,c) showed the strongest declines in RGVF through the time series. In the April 2013 image, RGVF was close to one in the Santa Ynez Mountain areas untouched by recent fires. RGVF moved to negative values in June 2013 and to strongly negative values in November 2013 (Figure 2). Relative fraction values in the Santa Ynez Mountains did not recover to near neutral values in the following April. A short period of high precipitation in late February/early March 2014 did result in less change in RGVF between April and June 2014, compared to 2013.
Distributions of RGVF for each dominant plant species demonstrated trends toward decreased vegetation cover (Figure 6). Evergreen chaparral species such as ADFA, ARGL, CECU, CEME, and CESP (see species abbreviations listed Table 1) showed persistent declines in RGVF; April 2014 showed no or little recovery in RGVF for these species compared to November 2013, although higher February/March 2014 precipitation did result in similar RGVF distributions in June 2013 and 2014. Ceanothus species (CECU, CEME, and CESP) had more severe decreases in RGVF compared to ADFA, corresponding with Ceanothus canopy dieback observed in the Santa Ynez Mountains and other southern California mountain ranges. Among Ceanothus species, CECU seems to have been most strongly impacted by drought stress, with RGVF declining across every date in the time series.
Figure 4. Relative GV fraction for dates in 2013 and 2014. White areas indicate pixels with an NDVI less than 0.3 in the July 2011 data. An instrument malfunction resulted in missing data for the white strip shown in the 2014-06-04 image. Fire scars for the Gap, Jesusita, and Tea fires are indicated by the letters G, J, and T, respectively. The location of the Sedgwick Ranch station recording precipitation and soil moisture data shown in Figure 2 is indicated by the letter S.
Figure 4. Relative GV fraction for dates in 2013 and 2014. White areas indicate pixels with an NDVI less than 0.3 in the July 2011 data. An instrument malfunction resulted in missing data for the white strip shown in the 2014-06-04 image. Fire scars for the Gap, Jesusita, and Tea fires are indicated by the letters G, J, and T, respectively. The location of the Sedgwick Ranch station recording precipitation and soil moisture data shown in Figure 2 is indicated by the letter S.
Remotesensing 07 14276 g004
Tree species (PISA, PLRA, QUAG, QUDO, and UMCA) had narrower distributions in RGVF, and exhibited more limited declines during the time series. In all cases, RGVF distributions were similar in April 2013 and 2014, indicating recovery of vegetation cover following the wet season. QUDO demonstrated the largest decreases in RGVF from spring to summer and fall. QUDO is drought deciduous, but RGVF values larger than one in the April images indicate that the green-up and senescence of grasses surrounding and underneath QUDO canopies may be the primary contributor to seasonal trends. QUAG and PLRA, frequently found in riparian areas, had stable RGVF distributions across all dates.
Coastal sage scrub species (ARCA-SALE and ERFA) had the most variable RGVF distributions. ARCA-SALE exhibited RGVF values above one in April 2013. These species are drought deciduous, and higher GV fraction in spring 2013 relative to summer 2011 would be expected. ARCA-SALE and ERFA both had RGVF below one in April 2014, indicating that reduced winter precipitation in successive years may have reduced GV cover. ARCA-SALE displayed an unusual RGVF distribution centered below zero in November 2013. These extremely low relative fractions resulted from a total lack of chlorophyll absorption and red edge in ARCA-SALE spectra, indicating complete senescence.
Coastal sage scrub species had the highest LST values, likely associated with lower vegetation cover, lower evapotranspiration, and south-facing slopes typical of coastal sage scrub communities (Figure 7). QUAG, a broadleaf evergreen tree species, anchored the lower end of the LST scale. Roberts et al. [30] previously found that many species in this study area formed unique clusters in the space defined by GV fraction and LST. Species also formed clusters in the space defined by RGVF and LST (Figure 7). In April 2013, these clusters had a RGVF close to one and a wider range of LST values. Over the remainder of 2013 and all of 2014, the relationship between RGVF and LST skewed negative. Coastal sage scrub and chaparral species with large reductions in RGVF relative to July 2011 tended to have higher LST values, while tree species demonstrated smaller changes in RGVF and lower LST values.
Variability in RGVF corresponded to physiological and environmental characteristics. PLRA and UMCA are tree species found in the most mesic areas of the Santa Ynez Mountains, and had minimal changes in RGVF during 2013 and 2014. QUAG is very deeply rooted [12], and also demonstrated minimal change in RGVF. Among chaparral species, ADFA had less extreme declines in RGVF over 2013 and 2014 compared to CECU, CEME, and CESP. ADFA has been found to be more deeply rooted than Ceanothus species [48]. While Ceanothus species may have a higher cavitation resistance than ADFA [14], this did not prevent widespread dieback of Ceanothus species and corresponding declines in RGVF. Coastal sage scrub species are the most shallowly rooted [48] and have low cavitation resistance [13]. These species exhibited the largest seasonal swings in RGVF.
Deeply rooted species that were least affected by drought in 2013 and 2014 are likely to become more severely impacted as the drought continues. In situ data reveal that the continued drought has resulted in soil moisture depletion (Figure 2). The percent of each month with soil volumetric moisture content (VMC) less than an empirically determined wilting point of 0.08 has declined as the drought has persisted, especially at 46 cm depth (Figure 2c). Winter precipitation has not percolated deep enough to substantially recharge soil moisture at depth. Continuation of the drought beyond 2015 is also likely to worsen drought effects beyond those seen in 2013 and 2014. The lagged response of shrub species to precipitation in February/March 2014 demonstrates that both timing and amount of precipitation are important for determining drought impacts.
This study did not differentiate between plant senescence, canopy dieback, and mortality. Senescence and dieback should produce seasonal cycles in RGVF, although long-term declines in vegetation cover may result from long-term drought stress. Mortality should result in more persistent reductions in RGVF, however, recruitment of herbaceous vegetation following mortality could introduce more seasonal variability. Hyperspectral VSWIR data have demonstrated the ability to map dominant plant species [19,20,21,22,23,24,30], which could be used to separate senescence and dieback (persistence of the same species) from mortality and replacement of one dominant species with another.
Dominant species cover mapped using hyperspectral data could be used to extend these results beyond a limited number of field-assessed reference polygons. In doing so, variation in drought impacts on individual species may be found to vary by elevation, aspect, slope, and soil type. Accuracy of species mapping, especially in areas where no single species dominates, will need to be assessed to validate trends in RGVF and LST over larger areas. RGVF should be compared to ground measures such as leaf area index [49] and canopy cover to determine how canopy structural changes correspond to drought-associated decreases in RGVF.
Figure 5. Relative GV fraction for dates in 2013. The areas shown are subsets of the study area shown in Figure 4: (a) Agriculture in the Santa Ynez valley; (b) chaparral (top-right of subset) and coastal sage scrub and grasslands (bottom-left of subset); (c) the fire scar of the 2008 Gap fire (top of subset) and agriculture and grasslands (bottom of subset). White areas indicate pixels with an NDVI less than 0.3 in the July 2011 data.
Figure 5. Relative GV fraction for dates in 2013. The areas shown are subsets of the study area shown in Figure 4: (a) Agriculture in the Santa Ynez valley; (b) chaparral (top-right of subset) and coastal sage scrub and grasslands (bottom-left of subset); (c) the fire scar of the 2008 Gap fire (top of subset) and agriculture and grasslands (bottom of subset). White areas indicate pixels with an NDVI less than 0.3 in the July 2011 data.
Remotesensing 07 14276 g005
The HyspIRI Preparatory Campaign acquired AVIRIS and MASTER data over an area totaling approximately 130,000 km2. Due to the limited availability of pre-drought baseline imagery, our study area was limited to a much smaller 650 km2. A satellite mission could provide longer-term monitoring of drought conditions, leveraging the complementary abilities of VSWIR data to measure vegetation condition and TIR data to measure LST. Models combining VSWIR and TIR data may be useful for constraining reductions in evapotranspiration resulting from drought [50]. The capabilities of a combined hyperspectral VSWIR and TIR mission for mapping species and monitoring vegetation drought impacts could be used to investigate species response to drought along environmental gradients.
Figure 6. Relative GV fraction distributions for individual species. Species codes are listed in Table 1. Density is the kernel density estimate calculated using the “density” function in R statistical software (http://www.R-project.org/).
Figure 6. Relative GV fraction distributions for individual species. Species codes are listed in Table 1. Density is the kernel density estimate calculated using the “density” function in R statistical software (http://www.R-project.org/).
Remotesensing 07 14276 g006
Figure 7. Land surface temperature versus relative GV fraction for pixels in species polygons. Species codes are listed in Table 1.
Figure 7. Land surface temperature versus relative GV fraction for pixels in species polygons. Species codes are listed in Table 1.
Remotesensing 07 14276 g007

4. Conclusions

RGVF provides a method for measuring per-pixel change in GV fraction over time relative to a baseline image. Change in RGVF and LST were examined for dominant plant species in the second and third years of a continuing, severe drought. Species showed a range of responses to drought stress, corresponding with physiological and environmental characteristics. Deeply rooted tree species and tree species found in mesic areas showed the least change in RGVF relative to a pre-drought image. Coastal sage scrub species had the highest seasonal variability during 2013 and 2014, and both chaparral and coastal sage scrub species demonstrated long-term decline in RGVF. If the drought persists, cumulative, more severe impacts can be expected across a wider range of species. Hyperspectral VSWIR and TIR data hold promise for monitoring drought impacts. Improved knowledge of species-specific drought impacts may improve understanding of changes in ecosystem structure and function resulting from drought-induced mortality of select species [51,52,53].

Acknowledgements

Image data used in this study are available from http://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/ and http://master.jpl.nasa.gov/. Precipitation and soil moisture data are available from http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/ideas/. Funding for this study was provided by NASA grant #NNX12AP08G. We thank four anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author Contributions

Coates and Dennison conceived of the research, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. Roberts contributed to the development of research ideas and reviewed the manuscript. Roth and Dennison carried out the field work. Roth also reviewed the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Griffin, D.; Anchukaitis, K.J. How unusual is the 2012–2014 California drought? Geophys. Res. Lett. 2014, 41, 9017–9023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Diffenbaugh, N.S.; Swain, D.L.; Touma, D. Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 3931–3936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Anderegg, W.R.; Flint, A.; Huang, C.-Y.; Flint, L.; Berry, J.A.; Davis, F.W.; Sperry, J.S.; Field, C.B. Tree mortality predicted from drought-induced vascular damage. Nat. Geosci. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bréda, N.; Huc, R.; Granier, A.; Dreyer, E. Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: A review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Ann. For. Sci. 2006, 63, 625–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McDowell, N.G.; Pockman, W.T.; Allen, C.D.; Breshears, D.D.; Cobb, N.; Kolb, T.; Plaut, J.; Sperry, J.; West, A.; Williams, D.G. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: Why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol. 2008, 178, 719–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. McDowell, N.G.; Fisher, R.A.; Xu, C.; Domec, J.; Hölttä, T.; Mackay, D.S.; Sperry, J.S.; Boutz, A.; Dickman, L.; Gehres, N. Evaluating theories of drought-induced vegetation mortality using a multimodel–experiment framework. New Phytol. 2013, 200, 304–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Davis, S.D.; Ewers, F.W.; Sperry, J.S.; Portwood, K.A.; Crocker, M.C.; Adams, G.C. Shoot dieback during prolonged drought in ceanothus (rhamnaceae) chaparral of California: A possible case of hydraulic failure. AmJ. Bot. 2002, 89, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Choat, B.; Jansen, S.; Brodribb, T.J.; Cochard, H.; Delzon, S.; Bhaskar, R.; Bucci, S.J.; Feild, T.S.; Gleason, S.M.; Hacke, U.G. Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature 2012, 491, 752–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Maherali, H.; Pockman, W.T.; Jackson, R.B. Adaptive variation in the vulnerability of woody plants to xylem cavitation. Ecology 2004, 85, 2184–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Miller, P.C.; Poole, D.K. Patterns of water use by shrubs in southern California. For. Sci. 1979, 25, 84–98. [Google Scholar]
  11. Royce, E.B.; Barbour, M.G. Mediterranean climate effects. I. Conifer water use across a Sierra Nevada ecotone. Am. J. Bot. 2001, 88, 911–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Canadell, J.; Jackson, R.; Ehleringer, J.; Mooney, H.; Sala, O.; Schulze, E.-D. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia 1996, 108, 583–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jacobsen, A.L.; Pratt, R.B.; Davis, S.D.; Ewers, F.W. Comparative community physiology: Nonconvergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities. New Phytol. 2008, 180, 100–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jacobsen, A.L.; Pratt, R.B.; Davis, S.D.; Tobin, M.F. Geographic and seasonal variation in chaparral vulnerability to cavitation. Madroño 2014, 61, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Asner, G.P.; Jones, M.O.; Martin, R.E.; Knapp, D.E.; Hughes, R.F. Remote sensing of native and invasive species in Hawaiian forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112, 1912–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ustin, S.L.; Gitelson, A.A.; Jacquemoud, S.; Schaepman, M.; Asner, G.P.; Gamon, J.A.; Zarco-Tejada, P. Retrieval of foliar information about plant pigment systems from high resolution spectroscopy. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, S67–S77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Serbin, S.P.; Singh, A.; McNeil, B.E.; Kingdon, C.C.; Townsend, P.A. Spectroscopic determination of leaf morphological and biochemical traits for northern temperate and boreal tree species. Ecol. Appl. 2014, 24, 1651–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Serbin, S.P.; Singh, A.; Desai, A.R.; Dubois, S.G.; Jablonski, A.D.; Kingdon, C.C.; Kruger, E.L.; Townsend, P.A. Remotely estimating photosynthetic capacity, and its response to temperature, in vegetation canopies using imaging spectroscopy. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 167, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dennison, P.E.; Roberts, D.A. The effects of vegetation phenology on endmember selection and species mapping in southern California chaparral. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 87, 295–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dudley, K.L.; Dennison, P.E.; Roth, K.L.; Roberts, D.A.; Coates, A.R. A multi-temporal spectral library approach for mapping vegetation species across spatial and temporal phenological gradients. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 167, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Roth, K.L.; Roberts, D.A.; Dennison, P.E.; Alonzo, M.; Peterson, S.H.; Beland, M. Differentiating plant species within and across diverse ecosystems with imaging spectroscopy. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 167, 135–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Féret, J.-B.; Asner, G.P. Tree species discrimination in tropical forests using airborne imaging spectroscopy. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2013, 51, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Clark, M.L.; Roberts, D.A.; Clark, D.B. Hyperspectral discrimination of tropical rain forest tree species at leaf to crown scales. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 96, 375–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Baldeck, C.; Colgan, M.; Féret, J.-B.; Levick, S.R.; Martin, R.; Asner, G. Landscape-scale variation in plant community composition of an African savanna from airborne species mapping. Ecol. Appl. 2014, 24, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Asner, G.P.; Nepstad, D.; Cardinot, G.; Ray, D. Drought stress and carbon uptake in an Amazon forest measured with spaceborne imaging spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 6039–6044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dennison, P.E.; Roberts, D.A.; Thorgusen, S.R.; Regelbrugge, J.C.; Weise, D.; Lee, C. Modeling seasonal changes in live fuel moisture and equivalent water thickness using a cumulative water balance index. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 88, 442–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Otkin, J.A.; Anderson, M.C.; Hain, C.; Mladenova, I.E.; Basara, J.B.; Svoboda, M. Examining rapid onset drought development using the thermal infrared–based evaporative stress index. J. Hydrometeorol. 2013, 14, 1057–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wan, Z.; Wang, P.; Li, X. Using MODIS land surface temperature and normalized difference vegetation index products for monitoring drought in the southern great plains, USA. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Anderson, M.C.; Allen, R.G.; Morse, A.; Kustas, W.P. Use of Landsat thermal imagery in monitoring evapotranspiration and managing water resources. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 122, 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Roberts, D.A.; Dennison, P.E.; Roth, K.L.; Dudley, K.; Hulley, G. Relationships between dominant plant species, fractional cover and land surface temperature in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 167, 152–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, C.M.; Cable, M.L.; Hook, S.J.; Green, R.O.; Ustin, S.L.; Mandl, D.J.; Middleton, E.M. An introduction to the NASA Hyperspectral Infrared Imager (HyspIRI) mission and preparatory activities. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 167, 6–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hochberg, E.J.; Roberts, D.A.; Dennison, P.E.; Hulley, G.C. Special issue on the Hyperspectral Infrared Imager (HyspIRI): Emerging science in terrestrial and aquatic ecology, radiation balance and hazards. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 167, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Green, R.O.; Eastwood, M.L.; Sarture, C.M.; Chrien, T.G.; Aronsson, M.; Chippendale, B.J.; Faust, J.A.; Pavri, B.E.; Chovit, C.J.; Solis, M. Imaging spectroscopy and the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS). Remote Sens. Environ. 1998, 65, 227–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hook, S.J.; Myers, J.J.; Thome, K.J.; Fitzgerald, M.; Kahle, A.B. The MODIS/ASTER airborne simulator (MASTER)—A new instrument for earth science studies. Remote Sens. Environ. 2001, 76, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Roberts, D.A.; Bradley, E.; Roth, K.; Eckmann, T.; Still, C. Linking physical geography education and research through the development of an environmental sensing network and project-based learning. J. Geosci. Educ. 2010, 58, 262–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Thompson, D.R.; Gao, B.-C.; Green, R.O.; Roberts, D.A.; Dennison, P.E.; Lundeen, S.R. Atmospheric correction for global mapping spectroscopy: ATREM advances for the HyspIRI preparatory campaign. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 167, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hulley, G. HyspIRI level-2 thermal infrared (TIR) land surface temperature and emissivity algorithm theoretical basis document; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, National Aeronautics and Space Administration: Pasadena, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hulley, G.C.; Hughes, C.G.; Hook, S.J. Quantifying uncertainties in land surface temperature and emissivity retrievals from ASTER and MODIS thermal infrared data. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Grigsby, S.P.; Hulley, G.C.; Roberts, D.A.; Scheele, C.; Ustin, S.L.; Alsina, M.M. Improved surface temperature estimates with MASTER/AVIRIS sensor fusion. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 167, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Meentemeyer, R.K.; Moody, A. Rapid sampling of plant species composition for assessing vegetation patterns in rugged terrain. Landsc. Ecol. 2000, 15, 697–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Roth, K.L.; Dennison, P.E.; Roberts, D.A. Comparing endmember selection techniques for accurate mapping of plant species and land cover using imaging spectrometer data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 127, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Adams, J.B.; Smith, M.O.; Gillespie, A.R. Imaging spectroscopy: Interpretation based on spectral mixture analysis. Remote Geochem. Anal.: Elemental Mineral. Compos. 1993, 7, 145–166. [Google Scholar]
  43. Roberts, D.A.; Smith, M.O.; Adams, J.B. Green vegetation, nonphotosynthetic vegetation, and soils in AVIRIS data. Remote Sens. Environ. 1993, 44, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Okin, G.S. Relative spectral mixture analysis—A multitemporal index of total vegetation cover. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 106, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Somers, B.; Asner, G.P.; Tits, L.; Coppin, P. Endmember variability in spectral mixture analysis: A review. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115, 1603–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Meyer, T.; Okin, G. Evaluation of spectral unmixing techniques using MODIS in a structurally complex savanna environment for retrieval of green vegetation, nonphotosynthetic vegetation, and soil fractional cover. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 161, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Roberts, D.A.; Gardner, M.; Church, R.; Ustin, S.; Scheer, G.; Green, R. Mapping chaparral in the Santa Monica Mountains using multiple endmember spectral mixture models. Remote Sens. Environ. 1998, 65, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hellmers, J.; Horton, J.S.; Juhren, G.; O'Keefe, J.O. Root systems of some chaparral plants in southern california. Ecol. 1955, 36, 667–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gower, S.T.; Kucharik, C.J.; Norman, J.M. Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, f(apar), and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sens. Environ. 1999, 70, 29–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Scherrer, D.; Bader, M.K.-F.; Körner, C. Drought-sensitivity ranking of deciduous tree species based on thermal imaging of forest canopies. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2011, 151, 1632–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guardiola-Claramonte, M.; Troch, P.A.; Breshears, D.D.; Huxman, T.E.; Switanek, M.B.; Durcik, M.; Cobb, N.S. Decreased streamflow in semi-arid basins following drought-induced tree die-off: A counter-intuitive and indirect climate impact on hydrology. J. Hydrol. 2011, 406, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Royer, P.D.; Cobb, N.S.; Clifford, M.J.; Huang, C.Y.; Breshears, D.D.; Adams, H.D.; Villegas, J.C. Extreme climatic event-triggered overstorey vegetation loss increases understorey solar input regionally: Primary and secondary ecological implications. J. Ecol. 2011, 99, 714–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mueller, R.C.; Scudder, C.M.; Porter, M.E.; Talbot Trotter, R.; Gehring, C.A.; Whitham, T.G. Differential tree mortality in response to severe drought: Evidence for long-term vegetation shifts. J. Ecol. 2005, 93, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Coates, A.R.; Dennison, P.E.; Roberts, D.A.; Roth, K.L. Monitoring the Impacts of Severe Drought on Southern California Chaparral Species using Hyperspectral and Thermal Infrared Imagery. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 14276-14291. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71114276

AMA Style

Coates AR, Dennison PE, Roberts DA, Roth KL. Monitoring the Impacts of Severe Drought on Southern California Chaparral Species using Hyperspectral and Thermal Infrared Imagery. Remote Sensing. 2015; 7(11):14276-14291. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71114276

Chicago/Turabian Style

Coates, Austin R., Philip E. Dennison, Dar A. Roberts, and Keely L. Roth. 2015. "Monitoring the Impacts of Severe Drought on Southern California Chaparral Species using Hyperspectral and Thermal Infrared Imagery" Remote Sensing 7, no. 11: 14276-14291. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71114276

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop