Remote Sens. 2014, 6(4), 3446-3474; doi:10.3390/rs6043446

Rain-Use-Efficiency: What it Tells us about the Conflicting Sahel Greening and Sahelian Paradox

1,* email, 1email, 1email, 1email, 1email, 2email and 1email
Received: 16 January 2014; in revised form: 3 April 2014 / Accepted: 8 April 2014 / Published: 22 April 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monitoring Global Vegetation with AVHRR NDVI3g Data (1981-2011))
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract: Rain Use Efficiency (RUE), defined as Aboveground Net Primary Production (ANPP) divided by rainfall, is increasingly used to diagnose land degradation. Yet, the outcome of RUE monitoring has been much debated since opposite results were found about land degradation in the Sahel region. The debate is fueled by methodological issues, especially when using satellite remote sensing data to estimate ANPP, and by differences in the ecological interpretation. An alternative method which solves part of these issues relies on the residuals of ANPP regressed against rainfall (“ANPP residuals”). In this paper, we use long-term field observations of herbaceous vegetation mass collected in the Gourma region in Mali together with remote sensing data (GIMMS-3g Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) to estimate ANPP, RUE, and the ANPP residuals, over the period 1984–2010. The residuals as well as RUE do not reveal any trend over time over the Gourma region, implying that vegetation is resilient over that period, when data are aggregated at the Gourma scale. We find no conflict between field-derived and satellite-derived results in terms of trends. The nature (linearity) of the ANPP/rainfall relationship is investigated and is found to have no impact on the RUE and residuals interpretation. However, at odds with a stable RUE, an increased run-off coefficient has been observed in the area over the same period, pointing towards land degradation. The divergence of these two indicators of ecosystem resilience (stable RUE) and land degradation (increasing run-off coefficient) is referred to as the “second Sahelian paradox”. When shallow soils and deep soils are examined separately, high resilience is diagnosed on the deep soil sites. However, some of the shallow soils show signs of degradation, being characterized by decreasing vegetation cover and increasing run-off coefficient. Such results show that contrasted changes may co-exist within a region where a strong overall re-greening pattern is observed, highlighting that both the scale of observations and the scale of the processes have to be considered when performing assessments of vegetation changes and land degradation.
Keywords: Sahel; re-greening; degradation; RUE; RESTREND; NDVI; GIMMS-3g; MODIS; herbaceous vegetation; Sahelian paradox; run-off
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [3016 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014 02:20 CEST]

Export to BibTeX |

MDPI and ACS Style

Dardel, C.; Kergoat, L.; Hiernaux, P.; Grippa, M.; Mougin, E.; Ciais, P.; Nguyen, C.-C. Rain-Use-Efficiency: What it Tells us about the Conflicting Sahel Greening and Sahelian Paradox. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 3446-3474.

AMA Style

Dardel C, Kergoat L, Hiernaux P, Grippa M, Mougin E, Ciais P, Nguyen C-C. Rain-Use-Efficiency: What it Tells us about the Conflicting Sahel Greening and Sahelian Paradox. Remote Sensing. 2014; 6(4):3446-3474.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dardel, Cécile; Kergoat, Laurent; Hiernaux, Pierre; Grippa, Manuela; Mougin, Eric; Ciais, Philippe; Nguyen, Cam-Chi. 2014. "Rain-Use-Efficiency: What it Tells us about the Conflicting Sahel Greening and Sahelian Paradox." Remote Sens. 6, no. 4: 3446-3474.

Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert