Next Article in Journal
Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager Radiometric Calibration and Stability
Previous Article in Journal
Satellite Observations of Wind Farm Impacts on Nocturnal Land Surface Temperature in Iowa
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Remote Sens. 2014, 6(12), 12247-12274; doi:10.3390/rs61212247

Extraction of Plant Physiological Status from Hyperspectral Signatures Using Machine Learning Methods

1
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
2
German Research Center for Geosciences, Section Remote Sensing, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
3
Department of Applied Environmental Science (ITM) and the Bert Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
4
Department Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, 07745 Jena, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 17 July 2014 / Revised: 25 November 2014 / Accepted: 27 November 2014 / Published: 8 December 2014
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1343 KB, uploaded 12 December 2014]   |  

Abstract

The machine learning method, random forest (RF), is applied in order to derive biophysical and structural vegetation parameters from hyperspectral signatures. Hyperspectral data are, among other things, characterized by their high dimensionality and autocorrelation. Common multivariate regression approaches, which usually include only a limited number of spectral indices as predictors, do not make full use of the available information. In contrast, machine learning methods, such as RF, are supposed to be better suited to extract information on vegetation status. First, vegetation parameters are extracted from hyperspectral signatures simulated with the radiative transfer model, PROSAIL. Second, the transferability of these results with respect to laboratory and field measurements is investigated. In situ observations of plant physiological parameters and corresponding spectra are gathered in the laboratory for summer barley (Hordeum vulgare). Field in situ measurements focus on winter crops over several growing seasons. Chlorophyll content, Leaf Area Index and phenological growth stages are derived from simulated and measured spectra. RF performs very robustly and with a very high accuracy on PROSAIL simulated data. Furthermore, it is almost unaffected by introduced noise and bias in the data. When applied to laboratory data, the prediction accuracy is still good (C\(_{ab}\): \(R^2\) = 0.94/ LAI: \(R^2\) = 0.80/BBCH (Growth stages of mono-and dicotyledonous plants) : \(R^2\) = 0.91), but not as high as for simulated spectra. Transferability to field measurements is given with prediction levels as high as for laboratory data (C\(_{ab}\): \(R^2\) = 0.89/LAI: \(R^2\) = 0.89/BBCH: \(R^2\) = \(\sim\)0.8). Wavelengths for deriving plant physiological status based on simulated and measured hyperspectral signatures are mostly selected from appropriate spectral regions (both field and laboratory): 700–800 nm regressing on C\(_{ab}\) and 800–1300 nm regressing on LAI. Results suggest that the prediction accuracy of vegetation parameters using RF is not hampered by the high dimensionality of hyperspectral signatures (given preceding feature reduction). Wavelengths selected as important for prediction might, however, vary between underlying datasets. The introduction of changing environmental factors (soil, illumination conditions) has some detrimental effect, but more important factors seem to stem from measurement uncertainties and plant geometries. View Full-Text
Keywords: hyperspectral data; vegetation status; random forest; PROSAIL; crop hyperspectral data; vegetation status; random forest; PROSAIL; crop
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Doktor, D.; Lausch, A.; Spengler, D.; Thurner, M. Extraction of Plant Physiological Status from Hyperspectral Signatures Using Machine Learning Methods. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 12247-12274.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top