Next Article in Journal
Improved Feature Detection in Fused Intensity-Range Images with Complex SIFT (ℂSIFT)
Next Article in Special Issue
Estimating Crown Variables of Individual Trees Using Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanners
Previous Article in Journal
Issues in Establishing Climate Sensitivity in Recent Studies
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 2057-2075; doi:10.3390/rs3092057

Consequences of Uncertainty in Global-Scale Land Cover Maps for Mapping Ecosystem Functions: An Analysis of Pollination Efficiency

PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, P.O. Box 303, 3720 AH Bilthoven, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 20 June 2011 / Revised: 1 September 2011 / Accepted: 5 September 2011 / Published: 16 September 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing on Earth Observation and Ecosystem Services)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [670 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014]   |  

Abstract

Mapping ecosystem services (ESs) is an important tool for providing the quantitative information necessary for the optimal use and protection of ecosystems and biodiversity. A common mapping approach is to apply established empirical relationships to ecosystem property maps. Often, ecosystem properties that provide services to humanity are strongly related to the land use and land cover, where the spatial allocation of the land cover in the landscape is especially important. Land use and land cover maps are, therefore, essential for ES mapping. However, insight into the uncertainties in land cover maps and how these propagate into ES maps is lacking. To analyze the effects of these uncertainties, we mapped pollination efficiency as an example of an ecosystem function, using two continental-scale land cover maps and two global-scale land cover maps. We compared the outputs with maps based on a detailed national-scale map. The ecosystem properties and functions could be mapped using the GLOBCOVER map with a reasonable to good accuracy. In homogeneous landscapes, an even coarser resolution map would suffice. For mapping ESs that depend on the spatial allocation of land cover in the landscape, a classification of satellite images using fractional land cover or mosaic classes is an asset. View Full-Text
Keywords: ecosystem functions; ecosystem services; land cover maps; The Netherlands; geometric uncertainty; thematic uncertainty ecosystem functions; ecosystem services; land cover maps; The Netherlands; geometric uncertainty; thematic uncertainty
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Schulp, C.J.; Alkemade, R. Consequences of Uncertainty in Global-Scale Land Cover Maps for Mapping Ecosystem Functions: An Analysis of Pollination Efficiency. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 2057-2075.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top