Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 2051-2056; doi:10.3390/rs3092051

Issues in Establishing Climate Sensitivity in Recent Studies

1 National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USA 2 School of Engineering, University of St. Thomas, OSS101, 2115 Summit Ave., St. Paul, MN 55105, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 September 2011; Accepted: 16 September 2011 / Published: 16 September 2011
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [314 KB, Updated Version, uploaded 21 September 2011 16:10 CEST]
The original version is still available [329 KB, uploaded 16 September 2011 11:23 CEST]
Abstract: Numerous attempts have been made to constrain climate sensitivity with observations [1-10] (with [6] as LC09, [8] as SB11). While all of these attempts contain various caveats and sources of uncertainty, some efforts have been shown to contain major errors and are demonstrably incorrect. For example, multiple studies [11-13] separately addressed weaknesses in LC09 [6]. The work of Trenberth et al. [13], for instance, demonstrated a basic lack of robustness in the LC09 method that fundamentally undermined their results. Minor changes in that study’s subjective assumptions yielded major changes in its main conclusions. Moreover, Trenberth et al. [13] criticized the interpretation of El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) as an analogue for exploring the forced response of the climate system. In addition, as many cloud variations on monthly time scales result from internal atmospheric variability, such as the Madden-Julian Oscillation, cloud variability is not a deterministic response to surface temperatures. Nevertheless, many of the problems in LC09 [6] have been perpetuated, and Dessler [10] has pointed out similar issues with two more recent such attempts [7,8]. Here we briefly summarize more generally some of the pitfalls and issues involved in developing observational constraints on climate feedbacks. [...]

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Trenberth, K.E.; Fasullo, J.T.; Abraham, J.P. Issues in Establishing Climate Sensitivity in Recent Studies. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 2051-2056.

AMA Style

Trenberth KE, Fasullo JT, Abraham JP. Issues in Establishing Climate Sensitivity in Recent Studies. Remote Sensing. 2011; 3(9):2051-2056.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Trenberth, Kevin E.; Fasullo, John T.; Abraham, John P. 2011. "Issues in Establishing Climate Sensitivity in Recent Studies." Remote Sens. 3, no. 9: 2051-2056.

Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert