Remote Sens. 2011, 3(5), 1014-1028; doi:10.3390/rs3051014
Article

A Comparison of Three Geometric Self-Calibration Methods for Range Cameras

1 Department of Geomatics Engineering, The University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada 2 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, 134 Shinchondong, Seodaemungu, Seoul 120-749, Korea
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 25 March 2011; in revised form: 4 May 2011 / Accepted: 10 May 2011 / Published: 20 May 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Time-of-Flight Range-Imaging Cameras)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [400 KB, uploaded 20 May 2011 10:26 CEST]
Abstract: Significant instrumental systematic errors are known to exist in data captured with range cameras using lock-in pixel technology. Because they are independent of the imaged object scene structure, these errors can be rigorously estimated in a self-calibrating bundle adjustment procedure. This paper presents a review and a quantitative comparison of three methods for range camera self-calibration in order to determine which, if any, is superior. Two different SwissRanger range cameras have been calibrated using each method. Though differences of up to 2 mm (in object space) in both the observation precision and accuracy measures exist between the methods, they are of little practical consequence when compared to the magnitude of these measures (12 mm to 18 mm). One of the methods was found to underestimate the principal distance but overestimate the rangefinder offset in comparison to the other two methods whose estimates agreed more closely. Strong correlations among the rangefinder offset, periodic error terms and the camera position co-ordinates are indentified and their cause explained in terms of network geometry and observation range.
Keywords: range camera; geometric self-calibration; error modeling; correlation

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Lichti, D.D.; Kim, C. A Comparison of Three Geometric Self-Calibration Methods for Range Cameras. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 1014-1028.

AMA Style

Lichti DD, Kim C. A Comparison of Three Geometric Self-Calibration Methods for Range Cameras. Remote Sensing. 2011; 3(5):1014-1028.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lichti, Derek D.; Kim, Changjae. 2011. "A Comparison of Three Geometric Self-Calibration Methods for Range Cameras." Remote Sens. 3, no. 5: 1014-1028.

Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert