A Comparison of Three Geometric Self-Calibration Methods for Range Cameras
AbstractSignificant instrumental systematic errors are known to exist in data captured with range cameras using lock-in pixel technology. Because they are independent of the imaged object scene structure, these errors can be rigorously estimated in a self-calibrating bundle adjustment procedure. This paper presents a review and a quantitative comparison of three methods for range camera self-calibration in order to determine which, if any, is superior. Two different SwissRanger range cameras have been calibrated using each method. Though differences of up to 2 mm (in object space) in both the observation precision and accuracy measures exist between the methods, they are of little practical consequence when compared to the magnitude of these measures (12 mm to 18 mm). One of the methods was found to underestimate the principal distance but overestimate the rangefinder offset in comparison to the other two methods whose estimates agreed more closely. Strong correlations among the rangefinder offset, periodic error terms and the camera position co-ordinates are indentified and their cause explained in terms of network geometry and observation range.
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Lichti, D.D.; Kim, C. A Comparison of Three Geometric Self-Calibration Methods for Range Cameras. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 1014-1028.
Lichti DD, Kim C. A Comparison of Three Geometric Self-Calibration Methods for Range Cameras. Remote Sensing. 2011; 3(5):1014-1028.Chicago/Turabian Style
Lichti, Derek D.; Kim, Changjae. 2011. "A Comparison of Three Geometric Self-Calibration Methods for Range Cameras." Remote Sens. 3, no. 5: 1014-1028.