Next Article in Journal
Comparative Measurements of Astrogeodetic Deflection of the Vertical by Latvian and Swiss Digital Zenith Cameras
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Accuracy of PRISMA Standard Reflectance Products in Globally Distributed Aquatic Sites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Block Geometry Configuration on Multi-Image Dense Matching
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Trends in High-Resolution Imagery Processing

by
Valerio Baiocchi
1 and
Francesca Giannone
2,*
1
Department of Civil Construction and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy
2
Area of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Niccolò Cusano University, Via Don Carlo Gnocchi 3, 00166 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(8), 2164; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15082164
Submission received: 22 March 2023 / Accepted: 10 April 2023 / Published: 19 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in High Resolution Imagery Processing)
Photogrammetry is a technique that was limited to a few specific sensors and application fields until a few years ago. In the last twenty years, the landscape related to remote sensing applications has drastically changed because of technological advances such as the exponential development of new sensors and new hardware capabilities, including increasingly high-performance digital cameras; an increase in the number of platforms dedicated to high/very-high-resolution (HR/VHR) image acquisitions, from aerial and terrestrial to satellite and UAV—Unmanned Aerial Vehicle platforms; and the evolution of algorithms required for digital image processing including Structure For Motion—SFM algorithms.
These recent advances in sensor technology and algorithm development enable the use of HR remote sensing imagery in different application fields, ranging from landslide and landfill monitoring to archaeological applications, monitoring an active volcanic area, morphological studies, and so on.
By combining the potential of remote sensing with disciplines in different fields, interesting and evolving research areas can be developed; particular attention can be paid to remote sensing applications dedicated to cultural and archaeological heritage. High-precision geomatic surveys, which include GNSS—Global Navigation Satellite System, TLS—Terrestrial Laser Scanning, and photogrammetric surveys, can be used to support the archaeological and historical interpretation of observable structures and help to establish the exact site location, improving the accurate planning of the archeological excavation [1]. Remote sensing data can support mapping the archaeological potential of a given area and offer predictive hypotheses related to the presence of buried sites; therefore, it is important to evaluate the potential and the reliability of classification techniques such as object-based image analysis (OBIA) for archaeological predictive modeling [2].
Some remote sensing techniques and procedures that can be considered consolidated are still being studied and investigated more deeply; operations of fundamental interest for the proper use of satellite imagery are constantly evolving to improve procedural efficiency and the accuracy of results; among these, we can mention the fusion of images acquired from different sensors [3] and pansharpening—a technique that allows combining spectral information with the higher geometric accuracy of panchromatic images—an operation of fundamental importance for many feature extraction processes [4,5]. Similarly, the extraction of elevation information from stereo pairs and triple acquisitions (tri-image acquisition) requires specific in-depth analysis to optimize workflows [6,7,8]. The reverse problem of observing the satellite orbit from the ground can also be implemented with a complete and portable system for image acquisition [9].
Regardless of the application, each product must be validated to define the metric level of precision and accuracy. High- and very-high-resolution images are affected by deformation mainly because of camera distortions and acquisition geometry, and then they must undergo a geometric rectification process to be used for metrical purposes. New satellite platforms dedicated to remote sensing with increasingly technologically advanced sensors onboard may present new acquisition geometries that need to be analyzed to perform proper orientation of new products, a fundamental procedure that is the basis of modern photogrammetry [10].

Author Contributions

V.B. and F.G. contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baiocchi, V.; Brigante, R.; Del Pizzo, S.; Giannone, F.; Onori, M.; Radicioni, F.; Stoppini, A.; Tosi, G.; Troisi, S.; Baumgartner, M. Integrated Geomatic Techniques for Georeferencing and Reconstructing the Position of Underground Archaeological Sites: The Case Study of the Augustus Sundial (Rome). Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 4064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Magnini, L.; Bettineschi, C. Object-Based Predictive Modeling (OBPM) for Archaeology: Finding Control Places in Mountainous Environments. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Sun, Y.; Ai, H. 3MRS: An Effective Coarse-to-Fine Matching Method for Multimodal Remote Sensing Imagery. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stępień, I.; Oszust, M. No-Reference Quality Assessment of Pan-Sharpening Images with Multi-Level Deep Image Representations. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alcaras, E.; Parente, C.; Vallario, A. Automation of Pan-Sharpening Methods for Pléiades Images Using GIS Basic Functions. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bruno, N.; Roncella, R.; Diotri, F.; Thoeni, K.; Giacomini, A. Influence of Block Geometry Configuration on Multi-Image Dense Matching. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 3784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Santana, L.S.; Ferraz, G.A.e.S.; Marin, D.B.; Faria, R.d.O.; Santana, M.S.; Rossi, G.; Palchetti, E. Digital Terrain Modelling by Remotely Piloted Aircraft: Optimization and Geometric Uncertainties in Precision Coffee Growing Projects. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Melis, M.T.; Pisani, L.; De Waele, J. On the Use of Tri-Stereo Pleiades Images for the Morphometric Measurement of Dolines in the Basaltic Plateau of Azrou (Middle Atlas, Morocco). Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Danescu, R.G.; Itu, R.; Muresan, M.P.; Rednic, A.; Turcu, V. SST Anywhere—A Portable Solution for Wide Field Low Earth Orbit Surveillance. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baiocchi, V.; Giannone, F.; Monti, F. How to Orient and Orthorectify PRISMA Images and Related Issues. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baiocchi, V.; Giannone, F. New Trends in High-Resolution Imagery Processing. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2164. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15082164

AMA Style

Baiocchi V, Giannone F. New Trends in High-Resolution Imagery Processing. Remote Sensing. 2023; 15(8):2164. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15082164

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baiocchi, Valerio, and Francesca Giannone. 2023. "New Trends in High-Resolution Imagery Processing" Remote Sensing 15, no. 8: 2164. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15082164

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop