Comparison of Topographic Correction Methods
AbstractA comparison of topographic correction methods is conducted for Landsat-5 TM, Landsat-7 ETM+, and SPOT-5 imagery from different geographic areas and seasons. Three successful and known methods are compared: the semi-empirical C correction, the Gamma correction depending on the incidence and exitance angles, and a modified Minnaert approach. In the majority of cases the modified Minnaert approach performed best, but no method is superior in all cases.
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Richter, R.; Kellenberger, T.; Kaufmann, H. Comparison of Topographic Correction Methods. Remote Sens. 2009, 1, 184-196.
Richter R, Kellenberger T, Kaufmann H. Comparison of Topographic Correction Methods. Remote Sensing. 2009; 1(3):184-196.Chicago/Turabian Style
Richter, Rudolf; Kellenberger, Tobias; Kaufmann, Hermann. 2009. "Comparison of Topographic Correction Methods." Remote Sens. 1, no. 3: 184-196.