Comparison of Topographic Correction Methods
AbstractA comparison of topographic correction methods is conducted for Landsat-5 TM, Landsat-7 ETM+, and SPOT-5 imagery from different geographic areas and seasons. Three successful and known methods are compared: the semi-empirical C correction, the Gamma correction depending on the incidence and exitance angles, and a modified Minnaert approach. In the majority of cases the modified Minnaert approach performed best, but no method is superior in all cases. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Richter, R.; Kellenberger, T.; Kaufmann, H. Comparison of Topographic Correction Methods. Remote Sens. 2009, 1, 184-196.
Richter R, Kellenberger T, Kaufmann H. Comparison of Topographic Correction Methods. Remote Sensing. 2009; 1(3):184-196.Chicago/Turabian Style
Richter, Rudolf; Kellenberger, Tobias; Kaufmann, Hermann. 2009. "Comparison of Topographic Correction Methods." Remote Sens. 1, no. 3: 184-196.