Next Article in Journal
Eco-Efficiency of Government Policy and Exports in the Bioenergy Technology Market
Next Article in Special Issue
‘Interrupted’ Landscapes: Post-Earthquake Reconstruction in between Urban Renewal and Social Identity of Local Communities
Previous Article in Journal
A Multi-Stakeholder Delphi Study to Determine Key Space Management Components for Elderly Facilities in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
National Water Footprint: Toward a Comprehensive Approach for the Evaluation of the Sustainability of Water Use in Italy
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Sustainability 2017, 9(9), 1566; doi:10.3390/su9091566

Article
Oxidative Status and Presence of Bioactive Compounds in Meat from Chickens Fed Polyphenols Extracted from Olive Oil Industry Waste
Raffaella Branciari 1Orcid, Roberta Galarini 2Orcid, Danilo Giusepponi 2, Massimo Trabalza-Marinucci 1,*Orcid, Claudio Forte 2, Rossana Roila 1Orcid, Dino Miraglia 1, Maurizio Servili 3, Gabriele Acuti 1 and Andrea Valiani 2Orcid
1
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via S. Costanzo 4, Perugia 06126, Italy
2
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Umbria e delle Marche, Via G. Salvemini 1, Perugia 06126, Italy
3
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno 74, Perugia 06121, Italy
*
Correspondence: Tel.: +39-075-585-7707
Received: 18 July 2017 / Accepted: 29 August 2017 / Published: 5 September 2017

Abstract

:
A study was carried out to determine the quality characteristics, antioxidant capacity, oxidative status, and consumer acceptability of chicken meat after dietary administration of a semi-solid olive cake, known as “paté” (pOC), in broilers. pOC is an olive oil industry waste rich in bioactive compounds, such as polyphenols, obtained by mechanical extraction from destoned olives. Two hundred and ninety-seven 22-day-old fast growing (Ross 308) female chicks were randomly assigned to three experimental grower-finisher diets. Each dietary group consisted of three replicates, each with 33 birds. The experimental treatments were: (1) basal control diet (C); (2) C diet supplemented with a low dose of pOC (82.5 g/Kg, L-pOC); and (3) C diet supplemented with a high dose of pOC (165.0 g/Kg, H-pOC). Chicken growth rate increased with increasing pOC concentration in the diet. Polyphenol analyses were performed through liquid-chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry technique (LC-MS/MS). In meat of animals belonging to L-pOC and H-pOC groups, tyrosol and sulphate metabolites of hydroxytyrosol were detected. Meat quality parameters and proximate composition were not affected by the dietary treatment, whereas the antioxidant status and the oxidative stability of meat were positively affected, especially when the highest level of pOC was applied. These results demonstrate that pOC can be recommended in chicken diets to improve performance and meat oxidative status.
Keywords:
olive oil by-products; meat quality; antioxidant; sulphate metabolites; circular economy; sustainable development

1. Introduction

The cultivation of olive tree for olive oil production is widespread worldwide, but is especially located in the Mediterranean area. Europe produces 75% of the world’s olive oil and Italy is one of the largest producers of olive oil in the EU (with 31% of the global production) [1]. Olive oil extraction generates a variety of by-products, in different amounts depending on the production techniques used, which are all considered and treated as potential pollutants [2]. Among these, solid olive residues account for approximately 35% (w/w) of the processed olives according to the extraction method used. The “paté” is a semi-solid destoned olive cake (pOC), with 75% moisture, which includes both conventional olive cake and olive mill waste waters. It also contains a variable amount of olive oil (approximately 8–12%, depending on the water content), high levels of structural carbohydrates and sugars, and moderate concentrations of crude protein. Fatty acids are mainly represented by oleic acid and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Major phenolic compounds contained in olive cake are included in the following classes [3,4,5]: (a) hydroxytyrosol (3,4-DHPEA) and tyrosol (p-HPEA) (class of phenolic alcohols); (b) dialdehydic form of decarboxymethyl elenolic acid linked to 3,4-DHPEA or p-HPEA (3,4-DHPEA-EDA or p-HPEA-EDA) (class of secoiridoids derivatives); (c) verbascoside (a derivative of the hydroxicinnamic acid); (d) caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid and vanillic acid (class of phenolic acids and derivatives); (e) lutein (class of flavones); and (f) (+)-acetoxypinoresinol and (+)-pinoresinol (class of lignans). Polyphenols are bioactive molecules commonly used as antioxidants and antimicrobials in food industry [6,7]. It has been demonstrated that polyphenols with more than one hydroxyl group, such as hydroxytyrosol, exert a higher antioxidant activity [5].
In virgin oil, a relationship between concentrations of simple phenols, lignans and secoiridoids, antioxidant activity and shelf life has been observed [5,8]. Furthermore, the advantage of using olive oil byproducts as feed supplements to reduce oxidative stress and improve meat antioxidant status, oxidative stability, and shelf life, has been demonstrated in different food producing animals, such as lambs [9], chickens [10,11], rabbits [3], and beef cattle [2]. However, no reports are available on the use of pOC and the metabolic pathway of these compounds in poultry.
Poultry meat is particularly prone to oxidative deterioration due to its high concentration of polyunsaturated fatty acids [12]. There are many studies showing an improvement in the oxidative stability of chicken meat after feeding poultry with natural antioxidants as dietary additives [10,11,13], causing an increase in the market value of the resulting products. Olive industry by-products could represent a different source of nutrients for animals and their inclusion in animal diets could be a convenient strategy to reduce oxidative deterioration in meat and increase olive oil production sustainability.
From an analytical point of view, at present, the more efficient technique for the analysis of polyphenols in complex matrices such as food is the liquid-chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry [14,15]. Due to the low volatility of polyphenols, gas-chromatographic techniques are generally not applied for their separation, since they would require an additional derivatization step. Mass analyzers furnish the best selectivity, sensitivity, and universality, compared to traditional detectors such as diode array or fluorescence. However, these techniques are still used to analyze polyphenols in food of animal and vegetal origin [16,17]. Sample preparation plays a pivotal role in polyphenol analysis, especially when low concentrations (parts per billions) have to be detected and quantified: a clean-up step with SPE cartridges is generally provided after analyte extraction with polar solvents [18,19,20].
To our knowledge, no studies have been conducted so far on the effects of dietary pOC on oxidative stability and the presence of bioactive polyphenols in chicken meat. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the effects of pOC dietary supplementation at two different levels on performance, quality characteristics, consumer acceptance, and antioxidant and oxidative status of meat in broilers. The presence of phenolic compounds and their metabolites in chicken meat was also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Experimental Design

The trial was conducted in 2015 in an experimental farm located in Umbria, Italy, with environmental conditions similar to those found in conventional industrial poultry houses.
Two hundred and ninety-seven 22-day-old fast growing (Ross 308) female chicks were randomly assigned to three experimental grower-finisher diets. Each dietary group consisted of three replicates, each with 33 birds. The experimental treatments were: (1) a basal control diet (C); (2) C diet supplemented with a low dosage of olive cake (82.5 g/Kg, L-pOC); and (3) C diet supplemented with a high dosage of olive cake (165.0 g/Kg, H-pOC). The same starter diet was used for all experimental groups from 1 to 21 days of age.
The experiment lasted 20 days. All experimental feeds were formulated to be isoenergetic and isonitrogenous and according to the National Research Council standards for broiler chickens [21]. The three experimental diets are presented in Table 1. Feed and water were offered ad libitum during the whole experimental period.
Animal care procedures complied with European recommendations (Directive 2007/43/EU), which set welfare standards for keeping chickens for meat production. The experimental protocol was approved by the Italian Ministry of Health.
The birds were individually weighed at 28, 35, and 42 days of age. Feed conversion ratio was calculated as feed intake divided by average weight gain. At the end of the experiment (day 42), 10 broilers from each replicate were slaughtered in a local slaughterhouse. Carcasses were maintained at 4 °C for 24 h, then samples from Pectoralis major muscles were collected, vacuum-packed, and stored at −20 °C for three months for consumer test and at −80 °C for other analyses.
A graphical representation of the experimental design is presented in Figure 1.

2.2. Analysis of Polyphenols in Feed and Meat

Considering the expected concentrations of polyphenols in the two matrices (mg/kg for feed versus µg/kg for meat), two different sample treatments were performed. Both methods were internally developed starting from previous published papers [18,19,20].
For feed analysis, the extraction of polyphenols was conducted from 5 g of minced sample mixed with methanol/water 80/20 (v/v) solution containing 20 mg/L of BHT (2 × 25 mL). Two aliquots of the extract were collected and diluted 50 and 500 fold with a mixture of Na2EDTA 0.1 M/methanol 90/10 (v/v). After filtration, the two aliquots were injected in LC-MS/MS.
For meat analysis, the analytes were extracted twice on 5 g of homogenized sample with a methanol/water 80/20 (v/v) solution containing 20 mg/L of BHT (2 × 10 mL). After volume reduction under nitrogen stream, the extract was purified using an SPE OASIS HLB cartridge (200 mg/6 mL, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) previously conditioned with 6 mL of methanol and 6 mL of water. The extract was loaded; the cartridge was washed with 6 mL of water; and the analytes eluted with 6 mL of methanol. The eluate was evaporated and re-suspended in 1 mL of Na2EDTA 0.1 M/methanol 90/10 (v/v) solution. After filtration, the sample was injected in LC-MS/MS.
Liquid chromatographic separation and mass spectrometric detection and quantification were performed on a LC-MS/MS system consisting of a Finnigan Surveyor LC pump, combined with a triple quadrupole TSQ Quantum Ultra mass spectrometer via electrospray ionization (ESI) interface (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). Chromatographic separation was carried out on a Gemini analytical column (100 mm × 2.0 mm, 3 µm, Phenomenex, Torrence, CA, USA) with a binary mobile phase with water (A) and methanol (B). The gradient started with 5% eluent B for 1 min, and linearly increased to 43% B in 8 min, followed by a linear increase to 95% B in 6 min. After 7 min, the system decreased to 5% B in 1 min and was re-equilibrated for 12 min. The column temperature was 30 °C and the sample temperature was kept at 16 °C. The flow rate was 0.25 mL/min and the injection volume 10 µL. For LC-MS/MS detection, the ESI source was operated in negative ion mode. High-purity nitrogen was used as sheath (30 arbitrary units) and auxiliary gas (20 arbitrary units). The collision gas was high-purity argon (1.5 mTorr). The parameters were as follows: spray voltage, −2.5 kV; capillary temperature, 200 °C. The selected precursor ion and optimized collision voltages of product ions used for quantification and confirmation are shown in Table 2. Thermo Scientific Excalibur software version 3.0 was employed for data acquisition and processing. Quantification was carried out by comparison with a four-point curve applying matrix-matched calibration (analytes added immediately prior to LC injection). Specific curve was prepared depending on matrix and, for feed, also on dilution factor.

2.3. Physicochemical Analysis of Meat

Samples of P. major muscle from 10 animals per replicate (n = 30) were analyzed for chemical composition according to the Association of Analytical Chemists methods [21]. The moisture content was obtained by oven-drying meat samples (125 °C for 2 h) (method 950.46). The fat content was gravimetrically determined using ether solvent extraction (method 960.30). The nitrogen content was determined using the Kjeldahl method (method 992.15). The protein content was obtained by multiplying the total Kjeldahl nitrogen with a coefficient factor of 6.25. The ash content was obtained using a muffle furnace at 600 °C (method 923.03). The TBARS (2-ThioBarbituric Acid Reactive Substances) value was determined according to Ranucci et al. [24] and the results were expressed as mg malonaldehyde (MDA)∙kg−1.

2.4. Antioxidant Capacity of Meat

Meat samples (1 g) were mixed with ethanol/HCL 0.1 M 9.9/0.1 (v/v) solution at pH 4.0, homogenized with Ultra-Turrax homogenizer (Ultra Turrax T25 Basic, IKA Labortechnik Janke & Kunkel GmbH, Stavfen, Germany) for 1 min, and then vortexed for 2 min. The homogenates were centrifuged at 6000 rpm at 4 °C for 20 min and the supernatant used for DPPH assays. The DPPH free radical scavenging activity of ethanolic extracts was measured using the method described by Blasi et al. [25], with some modifications. Briefly, a 0.06 mmol/L solution of DPPH in ethanol was prepared and left for 1 h in the dark at 4 °C; 0.06 mM ethanolic DPPH solution (3.9 mL) was added to ethanolic extracts (0.1 mL). The solutions were vortexed and left for 30 min in the dark. Absorbance was measured at 517 nm using a Jasco 7850 UV–Vis spectrophotometer against a blank and DPPH radical scavenging activity was expressed as mg of Trolox equivalents (TE) per 100 g sample from a standard curve developed with Trolox.

2.5. Meat Quality Measurements

Samples of P. major muscle from 10 animals per replicate were analyzed. The pH was measured on P. major muscle 45 min and 24 h post-mortem using a penetrating electrode connected to a portable pH-meter (Mod SG2, Mettler Toledo AG, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland). Color measurements were performed 24 h after slaughter on P. major muscle following a 30 min bloom period at the refrigeration temperature. Color parameters (CIE L*a*b* color system) coordinates [26] were determined using a Minolta Chromameter CR400 (Minolta, Osaka, Japan—light source of D65 calibrated against a standard white tile). The results were expressed as lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*). The hue value (tan−1 b*/a*) and saturation index or chroma ((a*2 + b*2)1/2), were also calculated.
Drip loss and cooking loss were measured in samples from the P. major muscle as described by Honikel [27]. For drip loss determination, meat samples were inserted in a plastic box on a grid parallel to the fiber direction and then stored at 4 °C for 24 h. For cooking loss determination, meat samples were held in plastic bags, then cooked in a water-bath at 80 °C for 30 min, and finally cooled under running tap water for 15 min. Samples were weighed before and after cooking, and losses were calculated as 100 × (initial weight-final weight)/initial weight [28].
The Warner-Bratzler (WB) shear force value was also measured [27]. Three cylindrical cores (Ø 1.25 cm), which were cut parallel to the P. major muscle fibers, were obtained from cooking loss samples and tested for shear force using a WB shear device fitted to an INSTRON universal texting machine (INSTRON model 1011, INSTRON Instrument, Norwood, MA, USA; 50 kg loading range, shear velocity 100 mm/min). The peak force, which was expressed in Newton, was recorded and then converted to kg/cm2.

2.6. Consumer Acceptance Test

Consumer acceptance tests were performed at the Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia (Perugia, Italy). All consumers were asked to complete a questionnaire which included information regarding their age, sex, and the frequency of chicken meat consumption [29]. In total, 110 regular chicken meat consumers (aged 20–60; 60 females and 50 males) were included for the consumer evaluation. The assessors tasted samples of the P. major muscle, which was placed on steel trays covered with aluminum foil and oven cooked at 180 °C (10% relative humidity) for approximately 25 min to an internal temperature of 71.1 °C, which was measured using a thermometer with a handheld probe (TES-1300, TES Electrical Electronic Co., Taipei, Taiwan). The cooked breast was cut into 2 × 2 × 2 cm pieces and kept warm until the slices were served. Practicing sessions were performed before the test to allow consumers to become familiar with the use of a hedonic scale and to explain the meaning of the used attributes. Samples were individually served on white plastic plates identified by three random digit codes. Consumers were asked to rate sensory attributes using a nine-point hedonic scale for overall appearance, odor, taste, overall texture, and overall acceptance. Purchase intent was evaluated using the binomial (yes/no) scale before and after acquiring information about dietary supplementation of the chicken [30].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the GLM procedure of SAS [31]. An ANOVA model was used with diet (C, L-pOC and H-pOC) as the fixed factor. The replicate effect was found not significant and removed from the model. The differences of the means were detected using the Tukey test and considered significant when p < 0.05. McNemar’s test was applied to determine if significant difference existed between consumers’ purchase intent before compared with after having gained information about the dietary supplementation of the chicken. Statistically significant difference was established at p < 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

Table 3 shows broiler performance data recorded during the trail at weekly intervals. At all intervals, pOC supplemented groups showed increased live weights and this increase was higher with increasing pOC concentration in the diet. However, the difference between the control and the H-pOC group became significant at 35 days of age (p = 0.014), after 15 days of dietary supplementation. At the end of the trial, both pOC supplemented groups showed higher live weights compared to the control (p < 0.001).
Most interestingly, feed conversion ratio decreased with increasing dose of pOC in the birds’ diet. Possibly, the effect is a result of the polyphenol action on the oxidative state of the animal and the intestinal microflora which increased the birds’ welfare level [10]. According to Tufarelli et al. [11], the positive effect of olive oil polyphenols on the chickens’ growth rate is possibly related with the increased feed digestibility caused by the reduced digesta passage rate. The only study which reports the effects of pOC on broiler performance demonstrated a positive effect of these supplements in birds when slaughtered at 49 days of age with diets which contained amounts of pOC similar to those of the present experiment [6]. In previous studies where olive mill by-products or other polyphenol-rich by-products were used in broilers, inconsistent results were reported due to differences in the composition of feeds or in the experimental design [10,11,32,33].
The contents of polyphenols in feed are shown in Table 4. The four molecules were selected on the base of previous research data: tyrosol, hydroxytyrosol, verbascoside, and pinoresinol, evaluated in this study, are some of the most abundant phenolic compounds present in the olive mill waste, characterized by a high antioxidant activity, a large bioavailability, and significant bioactive properties [5,34,35,36,37]. In particular, hydroxytyrosol was reported as the major phenolic compound in olive oil waters and as one of the most abundant in olive cake [38].
Most abundant polyphenol compounds in the experimental feeds were tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol, followed by verbascoside and pinoresinol. Taken into the account the different concentrations of polyphenols found in feed spanning about two orders of magnitude, each analyte was determined choosing the injected sample with the more suitable dilution factor (50 or 500 fold).
As expected, the H-pOC feed had the highest total polyphenol content, followed by the L-pOC one. The presence of low concentrations of tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol in the C feed is probably related to the presence of olive oil, added to this feed (1.75%) to balance the energy and fatty acid content of the three diets (Table 1).
Regarding the analysis of P. major muscle samples, pinoresinol, verbascoside, and hydroxytyrosol were not detected (<0.5 µg/kg). Only tyrosol was detected in two samples belonging to the H-pOC group (8 and 47 µg/kg). In Figure 2, the LC-MS/MS chromatograms of a blank, spiked, and incurred meat sample are showed. Figure 2b demonstrates the ability of the here-developed method to determine polyphenols at trace levels (1 µg/kg).
The detection of polyphenol metabolites has been documented in the literature in human/animal biological fluids, as well as in rat tissues [39,40,41]. Therefore, in order to complete the analytical study, the possible presence of glucuronide and sulphate metabolites of hydroxytyrosol and tyrosol was investigated. For this purpose, the specific SMR transitions were acquired during all the chromatographic run [19]. Only the hydroxytyrosol-sulphate was found and it was detected in all meat samples of both supplemented groups (L-pOC and H-pOC) in a concentration range from about 1 to about 5 µg/kg. Identification studies carried out with the authentic standards revealed that both isomers (hydroxytyrosol-3-sulphate and hydroxytyrosol-4-sulphate) were present (data not shown). It must be underlined that most of the previous studies [18,19,20,41] were performed measuring polyphenols and their metabolites immediately after the administration of high doses of polyphenols. To the best of our knowledge, to date no research has reported residue levels of these compounds in meat of food-producing animals within an on-farm trial.
The results of the meat quality traits and chemical composition on P. major muscle are shown in Table 5.
No differences in the pH of P. major muscle 24 h after slaughter were detected among groups. Values of cooking loss, drip loss, WB shear force, and color were also not affected by the dietary treatment. Similarly, Dal Bosco et al. [3] reported that quality traits of rabbit meat were not affected after supplementation with olive pomace. In meat of other species, the difference in a* value between controls and animals fed a diet supplemented with antioxidants only increased during sample storage [2]. The proximate composition of muscles was also not affected by diet. The same results were obtained by Dal Bosco et al. [3] in meat of rabbits fed with olive pomace.
Values of TBARS and DPPH measurements in meat samples are shown in Table 6.
H-pOC animals showed lower meat TBARS values when compared to the other two groups. These results are in agreement with Gerasopoulos et al. [10], who found a decrease in lipid peroxidation, as shown by the reduction in TBARS levels in meat of chicken fed with olive mill waste water. Furthermore, other studies have shown that some of the major polyphenols found in olive mill waste water (e.g., hydroxytyrosol, verbascoside, and isoverbascoside) are effective to inhibit lipid peroxidation [42]. Several authors found extended meat oxidative stability and a decreased lipid oxidation during storage in lamb and beef muscles after olive cake dietary supplementation [2,9]. Tufarelli et al. [11] found an increased antioxidant defense system and a reduced lipid peroxidation in chicken liver following dietary supplemented with extra virgin olive oil.
In accordance with the higher presence of polyphenols in the H-pOC diet, the DPPH assay showed higher antioxidant activity in H-pOC meat compared to the other two groups. Polyphenols derived from the olive waste could act as primary antioxidants and inhibit oxidation acting as chain breakers by donation of a hydrogen to alkylperoxyl radicals generated by the lipid oxidation. The ability to act as a hydrogen donor to inhibit oxidation is higher in those molecules with an increasing number of hydroxyl groups, such as hydroxytyrosol, that possesses the highest antioxidant and radical scavenger activity [43]. Nevertheless, the presence of tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol sulphate may have played a role in the antioxidant capacity and oxidative status of meat.
The results of consumer acceptance tests performed for chicken meat are reported in Table 7. No differences among groups were found regarding the examined attributes and consumer acceptability. It is possible that the efficacy of polyphenols in preventing lipid oxidation, thus preserving chicken meat sensory properties, is more evident during storage, since lipid oxidation in poultry meat is one of the primary causes for limiting its quality [2]. As for the evaluation of purchase intent, consumers would prefer H-pOC meat (affirmative purchase intent of 48.15%), compared to C (46.29%) and L-pOC (44.4%) meat, before providing information about the chicken diet. After providing the information about treatments used to consumers, the purchase intent of L-pOC and H-pOC meat increased based on the McNemar test (p < 0.05), while the purchase intent of the C meat decreased. Consumers were positively affected by the information, showing that the choice can be influenced by product information. Other studies on different kinds of meat demonstrated how the effect of the information can be able to modify consumer behavior and perception [24].

4. Conclusions

The present results show that poultry meat antioxidant capacity can be modified by the animal diet. Olive cake supplementation provides variable amounts of tyrosol, hydroxytyrosol, verbascoside, and pinoresinol in the feed. This work reports for the first time traces of tyrosol and sulphate metabolites of hydroxytyrosol in chicken meat obtained from an on-farm study. The use of these polyphenols in chicken diets can increased the antioxidant activity of meat without affecting its quality and composition, indicating the feasibility of adding olive mill waste as an antioxidant to animal diets to increase growth performance and nutraceutical value of meat.

Acknowledgments

This work is part of a research project funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (RC 0072012—“Valutazione dell’effetto di una dieta integrata con polifenoli derivanti da reflui dell’industria elaiotecnica sulle caratteristiche igienico-sanitarie, chimico-fisiche, reologiche e organolettiche della carne fresca e delle preparazioni di carne: filiera del pollo da carne”).

Author Contributions

Andrea Valiani planned the study and coordinated the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale group; Roberta Galarini and Danilo Giusepponi developed and validated the LC-MS/MS methods for the determination of polyphenols in feed and meat and they performed the analyses; Claudio Forte and Gabriele Acuti followed the experiment at the farm and analysed the performance of the animals; Massimo Trabalza-Marinucci developed the experimental diets and co-planned the study; Rossana Roila performed the test on oxidative stability and antioxidant activity; Raffaella Branciari co-planned the study and wrote the manuscript; Dino Miraglia performed the analyses of meat quality; Maurizio Servili implemented the technology for the use of olive by-products as feed additives.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Olive Council. 2017. Available online: www.internationaloliveoil.org (accessed on 22 March 2017).
  2. Branciari, R.; Ranucci, D.; Miraglia, D.; Urbani, S.; Esposto, S.; Servili, M. Effect of dietary treatment with olive oil by-product (olive cake) on physicochemical, sensory and microbial characteristics of beef during storage. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2015, 4, 225–229. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dal Bosco, A.; Mourvaki, E.; Cardinali, R.; Servili, M.; Sebastiani, B.; Ruggeri, S.; Castellini, C. Effect of dietary supplementation with olive pomaces on the performance and meat quality of growing rabbits. Meat Sci. 2012, 4, 783–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ghanbari, R.; Anwar, F.; Alkharfy, K.M.; Gilani, A.H.; Saari, N. Valuable nutrients and functional bioactives in different parts of olive (Olea europaea L.)—A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 3291–3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Servili, M.; Sordini, B.; Esposto, S.; Urbani, S.; Veneziani, G.; Di Maio, I.; Selvaggini, R.; Taticchi, A. Biological activities of phenolic compounds of extra virgin olive oil. Antioxidants 2013, 3, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Branciari, R.; Ranucci, D.; Ortenzi, R.; Roila, R.; Trabalza-Marinucci, M.; Servili, M.; Papa, P.; Galarini, R.; Valiani, A. Dietary Administration of Olive Mill Wastewater Extract Reduces Campylobacter spp. Prevalence in Broiler Chickens. Sustainability 2016, 8, 837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Roila, R.; Branciari, R.; Ranucci, D.; Ortenzi, R.; Urbani, S.; Servili, M.; Valiani, A. Antimicrobial activity of olive mill wastewater extract against Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from mozzarella cheese. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2016, 5, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Di Maio, I.; Esposto, S.; Taticchi, A.; Selvaggini, R.; Veneziani, G.; Urbani, S.; Servili, M. Characterization of 3,4-DHPEA-EDA oxidation products in virgin olive oil by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 1381–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Luciano, G.; Pauselli, M.; Servili, M.; Mourvaki, E.; Serra, A.; Monahan, F.J.; Lanza, M.; Priolo, A.; Zinnai, A.; Mele, M. Dietary olive cake reduces the oxidation of lipids, including cholesterol, in lamb meat enriched in polyunsaturated fatty acids. Meat Sci. 2013, 93, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gerasopoulos, K.; Stagos, D.; Kokkas, S.; Petrotos, K.; Kantas, D.; Goulas, P.; Kouretas, D. Feed supplemented with byproducts from olive oil mill wastewater processing increases antioxidant capacity in broiler chickens. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 82, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tufarelli, V.; Laudadio, V.; Casalino, E. An extra-virgin olive oil rich in polyphenolic compounds has antioxidant effects in meat-type broiler chickens. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2016, 23, 6197–6204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Igene, J.O.; Pearson, A.M. Role of phospholipids and triglycerides in warmed over flavor development in meat model systems. J. Food Sci. 1979, 44, 1285–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Botsoglou, N.A.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Christaki, E.; Fletouris, D.J.; Spais, A.B. Effect of dietary oregano essential oil on performance of chickens and on iron-induced lipid oxidation of breast, thigh and abdominal fat tissues. Br. Poult. Sci. 2002, 43, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Oroian, M.; Escriche, I. Antioxidants: Characterization, natural sources, extraction and analysis. Food Res. Int. 2015, 74, 10–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lucci, P.; Saurina, J.; Núñez, O. Trends in LC-MS and LC-HRMS analysis and characterization of polyphenols in food. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2017, 88, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Taticchi, A.; Esposto, S.; Urbani, S.; Veneziani, G.; Selvaggini, R.; Sordini, B.; Servili, M. Effect of an olive phenolic extract added to the oily phase of a tomato sauce, on the preservation of phenols and carotenoids during domestic cooking. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 84, 572–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Balzan, S.; Taticchi, A.; Cardazzo, B.; Urbani, S.; Servili, M.; Di Lecce, G.; Zabalza, I.B.; Rodriguez-Estrada, M.T.; Novelli, E.; Fasolato, L. Effect of phenols extracted from a by-product of the oil mill on the shelf-life of raw and cooked fresh pork sausages in the absence of chemical additives. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 85, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Suárez, M.; Romero, M.P.; Macià, A.; Valls, R.M.; Fernàndez, S.; Solà, R.; Motilva, M.J. Improved method for identifying and quantifying olive oil phenolic compounds and their metabolites in human plasma by microelution solid-phase extraction plate and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 2009, 877, 4097–4106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Orozco-Solano, M.I.; Ferreiro-Vera, C.; Priego-Capote, F.; Luque de Castro, M.D. Automated method for determination of olive oil phenols and metabolites in human plasma and application in intervention studies. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1258, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lòpez de las Hazas, M.C.; Rubiò, L.; Kotronoulas, A.; de la Torre, R.; Solà, R.; Motilva, M.J. Dose effect on the uptake and accumulation of hydroxytyrosol and its metabolites in target tissues in rats. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 1395–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, 9th ed.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1994; ISBN 978-0-309-04892-7. [Google Scholar]
  22. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists Inc.: Arlington, VA, USA, 2000; ISBN 13 978-093558467-7. [Google Scholar]
  23. Carré, B.; Rozo, E. La prédiction de la valeur énérgetique des matières premières destinées à l’aviculture. Prod. Anim. 1990, 3, 163–169. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ranucci, D.; Beghelli, D.; Trabalza-Marinucci, M.; Branciari, R.; Forte, C.; Olivieri, O.; Acuti, G. Dietary effects of a mix derived from oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) essential oil and sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) wood extract on pig performance, oxidative status and pork quality traits. Meat Sci. 2015, 100, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Blasi, F.; Urbani, E.; Simonetti, M.S.; Chiesi, C.; Cossignani, L. Seasonal variations in antioxidant compounds of Olea europaea leaves collected from different Italian cultivars. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2016, 89, 202–207. [Google Scholar]
  26. Commission International de l’Eclairage. Colourimetry: Official Recommendations of the International Commission on Illumination; Publication CIE No. 15 (E-1.3.1); Bureau Central de la Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage: Paris, France, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  27. Honikel, K.O. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci. 1998, 49, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Branciari, R.; Ranucci, D.; Forte, C.; Acuti, G.; Miraglia, D.; Olivieri, O.; Trabalza-Marinucci, M. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in broiler diets: 2. Meat rheological properties and consumer perception. Progr. Nutr. 2014, 16, 303–309. [Google Scholar]
  29. Branciari, R.; Valiani, A.; Trabalza-Marinucci, M.; Miraglia, D.; Ranucci, D.; Acuti, G.; Mughetti, L. Consumer acceptability of ovine cheese from ewes fed extruded linseed-enriched diets. Small Rumin. Res. 2012, 106, S43–S48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Branciari, R.; Ranucci, D.; Urbani, E.; Valiani, A.; Trabalza-Marinucci, M.; Dal Bosco, A.; Franceschini, R. Freshwater fish burgers made from four different fish species as a valuable strategy appreciated by consumers for introducing EPA and DHA into a human diet. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2017, 26, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. JMP® 9 Basic Analysis and Graphing; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2010.
  32. Hughes, R.J.; Brooker, J.D.; Smyl, C. Growth rate of broiler chickens given condensed tannins extracted from grape seed. Aust. Poult. Sci. Symp. 2005, 17, 65–68. [Google Scholar]
  33. Viveros, A.; Chamorro, S.; Pizarro, M.; Arija, I.; Centeno, C.; Brenes, A. Effects of dietary polyphenol-rich grape products on intestinal microflora and gut morphology in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 566–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lozano-Sánchez, J.; Bendini, A.; Di Lecce, G.; Valli, E.; Gallina Toschi, T.; Segura-Carretero, A. Macro and micro functional components of a spreadable olive by-product (pâté) generated by new concept of two-phase decanter. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dermeche, S.; Nadour, M.; Larroche, C.; Moulti-Mati, F.; Michaud, P. Olive mill wastes: Biochemical characterizations and valorization strategies. Process. Biochem. 2013, 48, 1532–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cardinali, A.; Linsalata, V.; Lattanzio, V.; Ferruzzi, M.G. Verbascosides from olive mill waste water: Assessment of their bioaccessibility and intestinal uptake using an in vitro digestion/Caco-2 model system. J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Suárez, M.; Valls, R.M.; Romero, M.P.; Macià, A.; Fernàndez, S.; Solà, R.; Giralt, M.; Motilva, M.J. Bioavalibility of phenols from a phenol-enriched olive oil. Br. J. Nutr. 2011, 877, 4097–4106. [Google Scholar]
  38. Araújo, M.; Pimentel, F.B.; Alves, R.C.; Oliveira, M.B.P. Phenolic compounds from olive mill wastes: Health effects, analytical approach and application as food antioxidants. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 45, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Serra, A.; Rubió, L.; Borràs, X.; Macià, A.; Romero, M.P.; Motilva, M.J. Distribution of olive oil phenolic compounds in rat tissues after administration of a phenolic extract from olive cake. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2012, 56, 486–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. De Bock, M.; Thorstensen, E.B.; Derraik, J.G.; Henderson, H.V.; Hofman, P.L.; Cutfield, W.S. Human absorption and metabolism of oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol ingested as olive (Olea europaea L.) leaf extract. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 2079–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lee, D.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, M.J.; Ahn, J.; Ha, T.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Jang, Y.J.; Jung, C.H. Pharmacokinetics of Tyrosol Metabolites in Rats. Molecules 2016, 21, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cardinali, A.; Pati, S.; Minervini, F.; D’Antuono, I.; Linsalata, V.; Lattanzio, V. Verbascoside, isoverbascoside, and their derivatives recovered from olive mill wastewater as possible food antioxidants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 1822–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Baldioli, M.; Servili, M.; Perretti, G.; Montedoro, G.F. Antioxidant activity of tocopherols and phenolic compounds of virgin olive oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1996, 73, 1589–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental design showing treatments and performed analyses.
Figure 1. Experimental design showing treatments and performed analyses.
Sustainability 09 01566 g001
Figure 2. Liquid-chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry technique (LC-MS/MS) chromatograms: (a) a meat sample of group C; (b) the same meat sample spiked at 1 µg/kg with the four polyphenols; and (c) the meat sample (group H-pOC) containing 47 µg/kg of tyrosol (c).
Figure 2. Liquid-chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry technique (LC-MS/MS) chromatograms: (a) a meat sample of group C; (b) the same meat sample spiked at 1 µg/kg with the four polyphenols; and (c) the meat sample (group H-pOC) containing 47 µg/kg of tyrosol (c).
Sustainability 09 01566 g002
Table 1. Ingredients of experimental diets.
Table 1. Ingredients of experimental diets.
Grower/Finisher Diet
Ingredients (kg/100 kg)CL-pOCH-pOC
Maize57.9954.4349.19
Soybean meal (44% crude protein)20.6416.3420.64
Maize gluten meal4.796.734.79
Brewer’s yeast3.484.893.48
Dicalcium phosphate1.221.711.22
Calcium carbonate0.871.220.87
Palm oil0.741.050.74
Potato protein concentrate0.580.820.58
Extruded linseed0.580.820.58
Mineral and vitamin premix *0.600.600.60
Zeolite0.290.410.29
Lysine0.260.360.26
Sodium dicarbonate0.170.240.17
Enzymes0.060.080.06
Sodium chloride0.030.050.03
Wheat bran6.002.00-
Olive oil1.70--
Olive cake-8.2516.50
Chemical composition (kg/100 kg)
Dry matter90.3589.8189.83
Crude protein19.5619.4619.19
Ether extracts5.205.125.21
Ash5.616.146.37
Neutral detergent fiber22.1422.1623.52
Acid detergent fiber3.012.973.44
Lignin0.961.061.15
Lysine1.241.291.22
Methionine + Cystine0.890.980.89
Starch41.4041.4840.39
Metabolizable energy (Kcal/kg)312931353130
* Integrations per Kg of feed: vitamin A 13500 U.I.; vitamin D3 U.I. 3750; ferrous carbonate mg 93.2; anhydrous calcium iodate mg 2.3; copper sulfate pentaidrate mg 59; manganese oxide 51.6 mg; manganese sulphate monohydrate mg 123.2; zinc oxide 93 mg; sodium selenite mg 0.4. Feed analyses were performed acccording to AOAC [22]. Metabolizable energy was calculated according to Carré and Rozo [23].
Table 2. Optimised SRM conditions for the analysis of the four examined polyphenolic compounds by LC-MS/MS.
Table 2. Optimised SRM conditions for the analysis of the four examined polyphenolic compounds by LC-MS/MS.
AnalytePrecursor Ion (m/z)Product Ion (m/z)Collision Energy (eV)
Hydroxytyrosol153.193.135
95.128
123.117
Tyrosol137.1106.118
107.117
119.118
137.110
Verbascoside623.2135.148
161.029
342.137
Pinoresinol357.1136.037
151.021
342.121
Table 3. Effect of dietary treatment on live weight (LW), daily weight gain, and feed conversion ratio.
Table 3. Effect of dietary treatment on live weight (LW), daily weight gain, and feed conversion ratio.
CL-pOCH-pOCSEp Value
LW at 28 days (g)766.67784.55813.6424.250.388
LW at 35 days (g)985.88 b1036.13 a,b1295.20 a80.200.014
LW at 42 days (g)1357.51 b1478.97 a1553.82 a24.29<0.001
Average daily weight gain (g)43.46 b52.53 a57.88 a52.53<0.001
Feed conversion ratio3.45 c3.13 b3.01 a0.01<0.001
C = basal control diet; L-pOC = concentrate containing 82.5 g/Kg pOC; H-pOC = concentrate containing 165.0 g/Kg pOC. SE = standard error of the mean. Different letters in the same row denote significant difference.
Table 4. Levels of selected polyphenols in experimental feeds.
Table 4. Levels of selected polyphenols in experimental feeds.
FeedTyrosol (mg/kg)Hydroxytyrosol (mg/kg)Verbascoside (mg/kg)Pinoresinol (mg/kg)Polyphenol Sum (mg/kg)
C3.70.28ND aND a4.0
L-pOC8.74.60.220.2814
H-pOC139.50.750.4724
C = basal control diet; L-pOC = C diet supplemented with olive cake at a rate of 82.5 g/kg; H-pOC = C diet supplemented with olive cake at a rate of 165.0 g/kg. a Not detected (<0.1 mg/kg).
Table 5. Physico-chemical and proximate composition analyses of breast meat.
Table 5. Physico-chemical and proximate composition analyses of breast meat.
CL-pOCH-pOCp Value
pH 24 h5.62 ± 0.115.69 ± 0.165.69 ± 0.110.294
L* 24 h56.99 ± 2.6257.28 ± 2.9158.45 ± 3.680.401
a* 24 h1.29 ± 0.921.13 ± 0.651.04 ± 0.840.706
b* 24 h4.20 ± 2.035.49 ± 2.525.84 ± 2.140.864
Drip Loss (%)1.35 ± 0.451.57±0.731.44 ± 0.360.966
Cooking Loss (%)15.80 ± 2.4914.60 ± 2.0913.83 ± 2.300.073
Shear force (kg/cm2)2.83 ± 0.783.01 ± 0.882.77 ± 0.440.694
Moisture (%)74.10 ± 0.4473.98 ± 0.2974.19 ± 0.520.603
Protein (%)23.88 ± 0.4223.99 ± 0.2923.72 ± 0.510.433
Lipid (%)0.76 ± 0.040.81 ± 0.050.82 ± 0.070.091
Ashes (%)1.24 ± 0.081.22 ± 1.001.27 ± 0.090.648
Results are the mean values of a total of n = 30 samples (10 samples for each replicate for the 3 dietary treatment in the 3 trials). C = basal control diet; L-pOC = C diet supplemented with olive cake at a rate of 82.5 g/kg; H-pOC = C diet supplemented with olive cake at a rate of 165.0 g/kg.
Table 6. DPPH and 2-ThioBarbituric Acid Reactive Substances (TBARS) in muscle.
Table 6. DPPH and 2-ThioBarbituric Acid Reactive Substances (TBARS) in muscle.
CL-pOCH-pOCp Value
DPPH (mg TE/100 g)80.52 ± 3.46 a83.39 ± 3.48 a92.98 ± 6.32 b<0.001
TBARS (mg MDA/kg)0.53 ± 0.03 b0.51 ± 0.05 b0.37 ± 0.04 a0.013
Results are the mean values of a total of n = 30 samples (10 samples for each replicate for the 3 dietary treatment); C = basal control diet; L-pOC = C diet supplemented with olive cake at a rate of 82.5 g/kg; H-pOC = C diet supplemented with olive cake at a rate of 165.0 g/kg; a–c within a row, means without a common superscript differ (p < 0.001).
Table 7. Mean consumer scores for sensory acceptability and purchase intent of breast meat.
Table 7. Mean consumer scores for sensory acceptability and purchase intent of breast meat.
AttributesCL-pOCH-pOCp-Value
Taste5.96 ± 1.396.39 ± 1.686.56 ± 1.480.117
Juiciness6.11 ± 1.346.19 ± 1.496.54 ± 1.400.249
Overall texture6.00 ± 1.556.31 ± 1.456.46 ± 1.150.215
Overall acceptance6.06 ± 1.276.35 ± 1.596.48 ± 1.330.273
Positive (Yes) purchase intent (%) a
Before information46.29%44.44%48.15%
After information35.16% *62.96% *68.52% *
Mean ± standard deviation based on 110 consumers and a 9-point hedonic scale (1 = dislike extremely, 5 = neither like nor dislike, 9 = like extremely). Means within the same row followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05); a Purchase intent was obtained from both before and after consumers had gained information about the chicken diet; * Indicated significant differences of purchase intent (before compared with after) based on the McNemar’s test (p < 0.05).
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top