Next Article in Journal
Societal Relations to Nature in Times of Crisis—Social Ecology’s Contributions to Interdisciplinary Sustainability Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of China’s Mitigation Targets in an Effort-Sharing Framework
Article Menu
Issue 7 (July) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(7), 1105; doi:10.3390/su9071105

Positioning and Priorities of Growth Management in Construction Industrialization: Chinese Firm-Level Empirical Research

1
School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Middle-section of Nan’er Huan Road, Xi’an 710064, China
2
Department of Technology, College of Applied Science and Technology, Illinois State University, Turner 5100, Normal, IL 61790, USA
3
School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, No. 161, Chang’an Road, Xi’an 710061, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 27 March 2017 / Revised: 14 June 2017 / Accepted: 20 June 2017 / Published: 25 June 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1252 KB, uploaded 25 June 2017]   |  

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to quantitatively evaluate the growth phase, position, and priorities of the industrialization policy management of the construction industry at firm level. The goal is to integrate quantitative dynamics into the policy-making process for sustainable policy development in future China. This research proposes an integrated framework, including growth management model and industrial policy evaluation method, to identify the challenges of construction industrialization and policy management. The research applies the mixed system method, which includes entropy method and average score method, to analyze the growth stage and major impact indexes targeting 327 survey samples. The empirical results show that the proposed conceptual framework and policy evaluation method could effectively determine the growth position and directions of the construction industrialization. For verification purpose, the study uses the local industry data from Shaanxi Province, China. The calculation results substantiate that the construction industry is in the middle section of the third growth phase. The comparison of the results from statistical methods shows that the local construction industry still needs substantial effort in policy management to improve its sustainable industrialization level. As countermeasures, the policy priorities should concentrate on: (1) enhancing effective cooperation among universities, research institutions and enterprises; (2) improving actions towards technology transfer into productivity; and (3) encouraging market acceptance of construction industrialization. This research complements the existing literature of policy evaluation of construction industrialization. Moreover, it provides theoretical and operational steps on industry policy evaluation and growth management framework, with accurate and ample data analysis on firm-level survey. Researchers and policy makers can use this research for further extensions of policy management for construction industrialization. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable position; construction industry; industrial policy assessment; growth management model; industrialization sustainable position; construction industry; industrial policy assessment; growth management model; industrialization
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Xie, H.; Li, H. Positioning and Priorities of Growth Management in Construction Industrialization: Chinese Firm-Level Empirical Research. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1105.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top