Next Article in Journal
Agricultural Productivity Growth and the Role of Capital in South Asia (1980–2013)
Previous Article in Journal
Making Sense of Sustainability: A Practice Theories Approach to Buying Food
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainability, Ethics and Nuclear Energy: Escaping the Dichotomy
Article Menu
Issue 3 (March) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(3), 469; doi:10.3390/su9030469

International Project Risk Management for Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Construction: Featuring Comparative Analysis with Fossil and Gas Power Plants

1
The Chartered Research Institute of Construction Costs, Seoul 138-830, Korea
2
College of Architecture, Myongji University, Yongin 449-728, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Barry D. Solomon
Received: 18 December 2016 / Revised: 10 March 2017 / Accepted: 15 March 2017 / Published: 21 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Nuclear Power)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [5426 KB, uploaded 21 March 2017]   |  

Abstract

The concern of risk management has continuously increased in international construction projects. International projects have a high level of risk and complexity, which results in greater possibilities of cost overruns and schedule conflicts when compared with local projects. Therefore, the goal of risk management is to improve project performance by systematically identifying and assessing project risks, developing strategies to reduce or avoid risks and to maximize opportunities. However, there have been very limited studies in systemized risk management methods due to the unstructured nature of the risk items and knowledge, especially for nuclear power plant projects. In order to address this issue, this paper proposes a standardized risk management methodology for nuclear power plant (NPP) construction with a capability of comparing distinctive risk characteristics among fossil, gas, and nuclear power plants. The proposed methodology includes standard risk classifications and structured risk evaluation techniques in terms of likelihood, impact, and weightings for different types of power plants. It also defines risk packages and risk paths for effective manipulation in a structured manner. The proposed methodology, variables, and initial values were identified by an extensive literature review and expert interviews. Finally, a customizable prototype of risk management system in power-plant construction projects was proposed in order to examine the viability. Implications of this paper reveal that the nuclear power plant has much higher risks in all areas when compared with fossil and gas power plants. It was stressed, throughout this study, that the risk factors of nuclear power plant construction need to be continuously monitored and evaluated in order to explore sustainable nuclear power plants. View Full-Text
Keywords: nuclear power plant (NPP); construction; risk management system; risk breakdown structure (RBS); risk weighting; risk path nuclear power plant (NPP); construction; risk management system; risk breakdown structure (RBS); risk weighting; risk path
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, M.; Lee, I.; Jung, Y. International Project Risk Management for Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Construction: Featuring Comparative Analysis with Fossil and Gas Power Plants. Sustainability 2017, 9, 469.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top