Next Article in Journal
Encouraging Vietnamese Household Recycling Behavior: Insights and Implications
Previous Article in Journal
Why Organic Farming Should Embrace Co-Existence with Cisgenic Late Blight–Resistant Potato
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(2), 180; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020180

A Framework for Building Efficient Environmental Permitting Processes

1
Department of Planning, Policy and Design, University of California, Irvine, 206B Social Ecology I, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
2
Bill Lane Center for the American West, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega Room 173, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
3
Department of Political Science, Stanford University, Encina Hall West Suite 100, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
4
Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Tan Yigitcanlar
Received: 20 December 2016 / Revised: 23 January 2017 / Accepted: 23 January 2017 / Published: 25 January 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Urban and Rural Development)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [523 KB, uploaded 25 January 2017]   |  

Abstract

Despite its importance as a tool for protecting air and water quality, and for mitigating impacts to protected species and ecosystems, the environmental permitting process is widely recognized to be inefficient and marked by delays. This article draws on a literature review and interviews with permitting practitioners to identify factors that contribute to delayed permit decisions. The sociopolitical context, projects that are complex or use novel technology, a fragmented and bureaucratic regulatory regime, serial permit applications and reviews, and applicant and permitting agency knowledge and resources each contribute to permitting inefficiency when they foster uncertainty, increase transaction costs, and allow divergent interests to multiply, yet remain unresolved. We then use the interviews to consider the potential of a collaborative dialogue between permitting agencies and applicants to mitigate these challenges, and argue that collaboration is well positioned to lessen permitting inefficiency. View Full-Text
Keywords: environmental regulation; environmental permitting; water management; efficiency; collaborative governance environmental regulation; environmental permitting; water management; efficiency; collaborative governance
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ulibarri, N.; Cain, B.E.; Ajami, N.K. A Framework for Building Efficient Environmental Permitting Processes. Sustainability 2017, 9, 180.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top