- freely available
Sustainability 2017, 9(10), 1759; doi:10.3390/su9101759
2. Outlining the Field: RRI and CSR
3. Defining Incentives and Our Approach
4. Incentives for RRI in Industry
4.1. RRI Stakeholders
4.2. External Stakeholder Incentives
4.2.1. Corporate Reputation and Critical Consumerism
4.3. Internal Stakeholder Incentives
5. Factors of Effective Incentives
5.1. Size of a Company: SMEs vs. Large Corporations
5.2. Type of Industry and Ecosystem
6. Limitations of the Research
Conflicts of Interest
- Von Schomberg, R. A vision of responsible research and innovation. In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 51–74. Available online: https://www.rri-tools.eu/documents/10184/106979/VonSchomberg2013_AVisionofRRI.pdf/f39a800d-6a51-4ad8-89bf-f962714a1454 (accessed on 6 June 2017).
- Eurostat. Newsrelease 238/2016—30 November 2016. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7752010/9-30112016-BP-EN.pdf/62892517-8c7a-4f23-8380-ce33df016818 (accessed on 18 May 2017).
- SATORI Project, The European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration. Available online: http://satoriproject.eu/the-project/ (accessed on 10 May 2017).
- Gurzawska, A.; Cardone, R.; Porcari, A.; Mantovani, E.; Brey, P. SATORI Deliverable 1.1: Ethical Assessment of R&I: A Comparative Analysis; Annex 3h: Ethics Assessment in Different Types of Organizations: Industry, SATORI Project. 2015. Available online: http://satoriproject.eu/media/3.h-Industry.pdf (accessed on 13 May 2017).
- Lubberink, R.; Blok, V.; van Ophem, J.; Omta, O. Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices. Sustainability 2017, 9, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stahl, B.C.; Obach, M.; Yaghmaei, E.; Ikonen, V.; Chatfield, K.; Brem, A. The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porter, M.E.; Kramer, M.R. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2006, 84, 78–92. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Porter, M.E.; Kramer, M.R. The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2011, 89, 62–77. [Google Scholar]
- Schiederig, T.; Tietze, F.; Herstatt, C. Green innovation in technology and innovation management—An exploratory literature review. R&D Manag. 2012, 42, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karakaya, E.; Hidalgo, A.; Nuur, C. Diffusion of eco-innovations: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 33, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voegtlin, C.; Scherer, A. Responsible Innovation and the Innovation of Responsibility: Governing Sustainable Development in a Globalized World. J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 143, 227–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Girth, A.M. Incentives in Third-Party Governance: Management Practices and Accountability Implications. Public Adm. Rev. 2017, 77, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Responsible Industry Project, The European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration. Available online: http://www.responsible-industry.eu/ (accessed on 10 May 2017).
- Hahn, J.; Ladikas, M.; Yaghil, A. Stakeholder Dialogue Final Report, Deliverable 4.3, Responsible Industry Project. Available online: http://www.responsible-industry.eu/dissemination/deliverables (accessed on 20 July 2017).
- Borsella, E.; Porcari, A.; Mantovani, E.; Italian Association for Industrial Research (AIRI). Delphi Exercise Report and 1st Draft Implementation Plan, Responsible Industry, Deliverable 2.2. 2015. Available online: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxyZXNwb25zaWJsZWluZHVzdHJ5d2Vic2l0ZXxneDozYjc3YWU5YzY2NmQyMDc1 (accessed on 20 July 2017).
- Burget, M.; Bardone, E.; Pedaste, M. Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2017, 23, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- European Commission. Responsible Research and Innovation: Europe’s Ability to Respond to Societal Challenges; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Stilgoe, J.; Owen, R.; Macnaghten, P. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res. Policy 2013, 42, 1568–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taebi, B.; Correljé, A.; Cuppen, E.; Dignum, M.; Pesch, U. Responsible innovation as an endorsement of public values: The need for interdisciplinary research. J. Resp. Innov. 2014, 1, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnaldi, S.; Gorgoni, G.; Pariotti, E. RRI as a governance paradigm: What is new. In Navigating towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation. Approach, Process and Results of the Res-AGorA Project; Lindner, R., Kuhlmann, S., Randles, S., Bedsted, B., Gorgoni, G., Griessler, E., Loconto, A., Mejlgaard, N., Eds.; Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI): Karlsruhe, Germany, 2016; pp. 23–29. [Google Scholar]
- Owen, R.; Macnaghten, P.; Stilgoe, J. Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Sci. Public Policy 2012, 39, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reber, B. RRI as the inheritor of deliberative democracy and the precautionary principle. J. Resp. Innov. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutcliffe, H. A Report on Responsible Research & Innovation. 2011. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2017).
- European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Renewed EU Strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility, Brussels, 25.10.2011 COM(2011) 681 Final. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed on 18 May 2017).
- Gauttier, S.; Søraker, J.H.; Arora, C.; Brey, P.A.E.; Mäkinen, M. Models of RRI in Industry, Deliverable 3.3, Responsible Industry Project. 2017. Available online: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxyZXNwb25zaWJsZWluZHVzdHJ5d2Vic2l0ZXxneDo2YTQwZDc4Y2YxYTFhNmFm (accessed on 12 June 2017).
- Nano2All. Available online: http://www.nano2all.eu/ (accessed on 26 July 2017).
- Sweeney, M.; Sweeney, M. The challenge of business incentives for state policymakers: A practitioner’s perspective. Spectr. J. State Gov. 2004, 77, 8–12. [Google Scholar]
- Grant, R.W. The ethics of incentives: Historical origins and contemporary understandings. Econ. Philos. 2002, 18, 111–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McGuire, T.J.; Bartik, T.J. Who Benefits From State and Local Economic Development Policies? Natl. Tax J. 1992, 45, 458–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernstein, J.I. The effect of direct and indirect tax incentives on Canadian industrial R&D expenditures. Can. Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques 1986, 12, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, M.M. Industrial incentives: The response from the profession. Econ. Dev. Rev. 1999, 16, 33–35. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, J.; Sensoy, B.A.; Weisbach, M.S. Indirect incentives of hedge fund managers. J. Financ. 2016, 71, 871–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, E.; Richard, L.O. Perspectives on Behavior-Based Versus Outcome-Based Salesforce Control Systems. J. Mark. 1987, 51, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cravens, D.; Ingram, T.; Laforge, R.; Young, C. Behavior-based and outcome-based salesforce control systems. J. Mark. 1993, 57, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, Z.; Feick, L. Sales managers’ perceptions of gray markets: The role of incentives, channel dependence, and type of gray market. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 2002, 22, 273–283. [Google Scholar]
- Locke, E.A. Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organ. Behavi. Hum. Perform. 1968, 3, 157–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mackenzie, C. Boards, incentives and corporate social responsibility: The case for a change of emphasis. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2007, 15, 935–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williamson, O.E. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. J. Econ. Lit. 2000, 38, 595–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sen, A.K. Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philos. Public Aff. 1977, 6, 317–344. [Google Scholar]
- North, D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990; ISBN 0521394163. [Google Scholar]
- Thaler, R.H.; Sunstein, C.R. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Const. Political Econ. 2008, 19, 356–360. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, J. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Econ. Philos. 2010, 26, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thaler, R.H.; Sunstein, C.R. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Cialdini, R.B. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion; Book Summary; Collins: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Michie, S.; van Stralen, M.M.; West, R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement. Sci. 2011, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ostrom, E. Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. Am. Econ. Rev. 2010, 100, 641–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freeman, E.R. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach; Pitman: Boston, MA, USA; London, UK, 1984; ISBN 0273019139. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Horizon2020: Science with and for Society. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/science-and-society (accessed on 25 July 2017).
- Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 Amending Directive 2013/34/EU as Regards Disclosure of Non-Financial and Diversity Information by Certain Large Undertakings and Groups Text with EEA Relevance. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32014L0095 (accessed on 25 July 2017).
- European Commission. Business, Economy, Euro, Company Reporting and Auditing, Company Reporting. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en (accessed on 25 July 2017).
- Arnold, R.D.; Wade, J.P. A Definition of Systems Thinking: A Systems Approach. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015, 44, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agboola, A.O. Neoclassical Economics and New Institutional Economics. Prop. Manag. 2015, 33, 412–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatfield, K.; Iatridis, K.; Stahl, B.C.; Paspallis, N. Innovating Responsibly in ICT for Ageing: Drivers, Obstacles and Implementation. Sustainability 2017, 9, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anitha, J. Determinants of Employee Engagement and Their Impact on Employee Performance. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2014, 63, 308–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cook, S. Essential Guide to Employee Engagement—Better Business Performance through Staff Satisfaction; Kogan Page: London, UK, 2008; ISBN 9780749454968. [Google Scholar]
- Kompaso, S.M.; Sridevi, M.S. Employee Engagement: The Key to Improving Performance. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2010, 5, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, Y.; Gong, T. If Employees “go the Extra Mile,” do Customers Reciprocate with Similar Behavior? Psychol. Mark. 2008, 25, 961–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Loo, J.; de Grip, A.; de Steur, M. Skills Obsolescence: Causes and Cures. Int. J. Manpow. 2001, 22, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heskett, J.L.; Jones, T.O.; Loveman, G.W.; Sasser, W.E.; Schlesinger, L.A. Putting the Service—Profit Chain to Work. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2008, 86, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, Y.; Nataraajan, R.; Gong, T. Customer Participation and Citizenship Behavioral Influences on Employee Performance, Satisfaction, Commitment, and Turnover Intention. J. Bus. Res. 2011, 64, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bijmolt, T.H.A.; Leeflang, P.S.H.; Block, F.; Eisenbeiss, M.; Hardie, B.G.S.; Lemmens, A.; Saffert, P. Analytics for Customer Engagement. J. Serv. Res. 2010, 13, 341–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hennig-Thurau, T.; Gwinner, K.P.; Gremler, D.D. Understanding Relationship Marketing Outcomes: An Integration of Relational Benefits and Relationship Quality. J. Serv. Res. 2002, 4, 230–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Achterkamp, M.C.; Vos, J.F.J. Investigating the use of the stakeholder notion in project management literature, a meta-analysis. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2008, 26, 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freeman, R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach; Pitman: Boston, MA, USA, 1984; Volume 46, ISBN 0273019139. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, T.M. Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1995, 20, 404–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brem, A.; Viardot, E. Adoption of Innovation Balancing Internal and External Stakeholders in the Marketing of Innovation. In Adoption of Innovation Balancing Internal and External Stakeholders in the Marketing of Innovation; Brem, A., Viardot, E., Eds.; Springer eBooks: Berlin, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Cardwell, L.A.; Williams, S.; Pyle, A. Corporate public relations dynamics: Internal vs. external stakeholders and the role of the practitioner. Public Relat. Rev. 2017, 43, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crane, A.; Ruebottom, T. Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 102, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajfel, H.; Turner, J.C. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Psychology of Intergroup Relations; Worchel, S., Austin, L.W., Eds.; Nelson-Hall: Chicago, IL, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Lai, C.; Chiu, C.; Yang, C.; Pai, D. The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Performance: The Mediating Effect of Industrial Brand Equity and Corporate Reputation. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 95, 457–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maden, C.; Arıkan, E.; Telci, E.E.; Kantur, D. Linking corporate social responsibility to corporate reputation: A study on understanding behavioral consequences. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 58, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya, C.B.; Sen, S. Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2004, 47, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, S.; Bhattacharya, C.B.; Sen, S. Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2010, 12, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melo, T.; Garrido-Morgado, A. Corporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2012, 19, 11–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hur, W.M.; Kim, H.; Woo, J. How CSR leads to corporate brand equity: Mediating mechanisms of corporate brand credibility and reputation. J. Bus. Ethics 2014, 125, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker-Olsen, K.L.; Cudmore, B.A.; Hill, R.P. The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. J. Bus. Res. 2006, 59, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menon, S.; Kahn, B.E. Corporate sponsorships of philanthropic activities: When do they impact perception of sponsor brand? J. Consum. Psychol. 2003, 13, 316–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sen, S.; Bhattacharya, C.B. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Mark. Res. 2001, 38, 225–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fair Trade Foundation. Available online: http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/ (accessed on 17 May 2017).
- Rangi, S.; Brey, P.; Jansen, P.; Sattarov, F.; Toljan, D.; Bhatt, S.; Gurzawska, A.; Warso, Z.; Sczaniecki, M. How Globalisation Is Changing Research Agendas, Activities and Assessment Procedures within Research & Innovation, SATORI Project. 2015. Available online: http://satoriproject.eu/media/D3.3_legal_aspects_globalisation.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2017).
- Brunk, K.H. Shedding Light on the Ethical Consumer Debate: Evidence from a Qualitative Investigation of Body Shop Consumers. In The Customer Is NOT Always Right? Marketing Orientationsin a Dynamic Business World; Springer: Cham, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 292–300. [Google Scholar]
- Beckmann, S.C. Consumers and corporate social responsibility: Matching the unmatchable? Aust. Mark. J. 2007, 15, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freeman, B. Substance sells: Aligning corporate reputation and corporate responsibility. Public Relat. Q. 2006, 51, 12. [Google Scholar]
- Bray, J. Attracting reputable companies to risky environments: Petroleum and mining companies. In Natural Resources and Violent Conflict: Options and Actions; Bannon, I., Collier, P., Eds.; World Bank: Washington, WA, USA, 2003; pp. 287–352. Available online: http://www.academia.edu/2191961/Attracting_reputable_companies_to_risky_environments_petroleum_and_mining_companies (accessed on 10 June 2017).
- Project Just. Available online: http://projectjust.com (accessed on 13 May 2017).
- Chalofsky, N.; Krishna, V. Meaningfulness, Commitment, and Engagement: The Intersection of a Deeper Level of Intrinsic Motivation. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 2009, 11, 189–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ethical Consumer. Available online: http://www.ethicalconsumer.org/ (accessed on 11 May 2017).
- Ethical Consumer. Quick Guide to Using Ethical Consumer. Available online: http://www.ethicalconsumer.org/home/quickguide.aspx (accessed on 11 May 2017).
- GoodGuide. Available online: https://www.goodguide.com (accessed on 12 May 2017).
- GoodGuide. Raitings. Available online: https://www.goodguide.com/about/ratings (accessed on 12 May 2017).
- Social Accountability International. SA8000® Standard. Available online: http://www.sa-intl.org/sa8000 (accessed on 11 May 2017).
- Stichting Coördinatie Certificatie Milieu- en Arbomanagement-Systemen (SCCM). OHSAS 18001. Available online: http://english.sccm.nl/content/occupational-health-ohsas-18001 (accessed on 11 May 2017).
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 14001:2004. Available online: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=31807 (accessed on 11 May 2017).
- B Corporation. Available online: https://www.bcorporation.net/b-corp-community (accessed on 11 May 2017).
- Wu, S.I.; Wang, W.H. Impact of CSR perception on brand image, brand attitude and buying willingness: A study of a global café. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 2014, 6, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arikan, E.; Kantur, D.; Maden, C.; Telci, E.E. Investigating the mediating role of corporate reputation on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and multiple stakeholder outcomes. Qual. Quant. 2016, 50, 129–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harbaugh, R.; Maxwell, J.W.; Roussillon, B. Label Confusion: The Groucho Effect of Uncertain Standards. Manag. Sci. 2011, 57, 1512–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delmas, M.A.; Burbano, V.C. The Drivers of Greenwashing. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2011, 54, 64–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahl, R. Green washing: Do you know what you’re buying? Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, A246–A252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Furlow, N. Greenwashing in the New Millennium. J. Appl. Bus. Econ. 2009, 10, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
- Zimmer, M.R.; Stafford, T.F.; Stafford, M.R. Green issues: Dimensions of environmental concern. J. Bus. Res. 1994, 30, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- B Corporation. Available online: https://www.bcorporation.net/become-a-b-corp/how-to-become-a-b-corp/make-it-official-global (accessed on 11 May 2017).
- Kim, S.; Karlesky, M.J.; Myers, C.G.; Schifeling, T. Why Companies Are Becoming B Corporations. Har. Bus. Rev. 2016. Available online: https://hbr.org/2016/06/why-companies-are-becoming-b-corporations (accessed on 21 July 2017). [Google Scholar]
- Suntae, K.; Schifeling, T. Varied Incumbent Behaviors and Mobilization for New Organizational Forms: The Rise of Triple-Bottom Line Business amid Both Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility. 2016. Available online at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2794335 (accessed on 21 July 2017).
- Crabtree, S. Worldwide, 13% of employees are engaged at work. GALLUP News, 8 October 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Morales, B.; Vuerich, M. Keep the EU Flower a Label of Environmental Excellence: Keep the EU Flower a Label of Environmental Excellence Consumer Organisations and Environmental NGOs Response to the European Commission´s Consultation to Support the Evaluation of the Implementation of the EU Ecolabel Regulation (EC) 66/2010. 2014. Available online: http://www.eeb.org/?LinkServID=FDC3572B-5056-B741-DB10A20ECF26425E (accessed on 12 May 2017).
- European Environmental Bureau (EEB). EU Ecolabel. Available online: http://eeb.org/work-areas/resource-efficiency/eu-ecolabel/ (accessed on 11 May 2017).
- Waldman, K.B.; Kerr, J.M. Limitations of Certification and Supply Chain Standards for Environmental Protection in Commodity Crop Production. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 2014, 61, 429–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etilé, F.; Teyssier, S. Signaling Corporate Social Responsibility: Third-Party Certification versus Brands. Scand. J. Econ. 2016, 118, 397–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roe, B.E.; Teisl, M.F.; Deans, C.R. The Economics of Voluntary versus Mandatory Labels. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 2014, 61, 407–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dröge, S. Ecological Labelling and the World Trade Organization. DIW Discussion Papers. 2001. Available online: http://www.diw.de/sixcms/detail.php?id=diw_01.c.444213.de (accessed on 21 July 2017).
- Ponte, S. Greener than Thou: The Political Economy of Fish Ecolabeling and Its Local Manifestations in South Africa. World Dev. 2008, 36, 159–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klooster, D. Environmental Certification of Forests in Mexico: The Political Ecology of a Nongovernmental Market Intervention. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2006, 96, 541–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meister, J.C.; Willyerd, K. Mentoring Millennials. Harvard Business Review. 2010. Available online: https://hbr.org/2010/05/mentoring-millennials (accessed on 1 June 2011).
- Tehrani, N.; Humpage, S.; Willmott, B.; Haslam, I. What’s Happening with Well-Being at Work; Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development: London, UK, 2007; Available online: http://www2.cipd.co.uk/NR/rdonlyres/DCCE94D7-781A-485A-A702-6DAAB5EA7B27/0/whthapwbwrk.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2017).
- Harter, J.K.; Schmidt, F.L.; Keyes, C.L. Well-being in the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup studies. In Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the Life Well-Lived; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2003; Volume 2, pp. 205–224. Available online: http://media.gallup.com/documents/whitePaper--Well-BeingInTheWorkplace.pdf (accessed on 11 June 2017).
- Suff, R.; Miller, J. Growing the Health and Well-Being Agenda: From First Steps to Full Potential (CIPD Report). 2016. Available online: https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/culture/well-being/health-agenda-report (accessed on 10 June 2010).
- Corporate Leadership Council, Driving Performance and Retention through Employee Engagement. 2004. Available online: https://www.stcloudstate.edu/humanresources/_files/documents/supv-brown-bag/employee-engagement.pdf (accessed on 19 May 2017).
- Huselid, M.A. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Acad. Manag. J. 1995, 38, 635–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grant, A.M. Relational Job Design and the Motivation to Make a Prosocial Difference. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 393–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cartwright, S.; Holmes, N. The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2006, 16, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Responsible-Industry Project Consortium (2017). Responsible-Industry Guide for the Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in the Industrial Context. Available online: http://www.responsible-industry.eu/dissemination/deliverables (accessed on 15 June 2017).
- Chatfield, K.; Borsella, E.; Mantovani, E.; Porcari, A.; Stahl, B.C. An Investigation into Risk Perception in the ICT Industry as a Core Component of Responsible Research and Innovation. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malerba, F. Sectoral Systems: How and Why Innovation Differs across Sectors. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation; Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 380–406. ISBN 9780199264551. [Google Scholar]
- Albareda, L. CSR governance innovation: Standard competition-collaboration dynamic. Corp. Gov. 2013, 13, 551–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbott, K.W.; Snidal, D. Hard and soft law in international governance. Int. Organ. 2000, 54, 421–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nilsson, M.; Persson, Å. Can Earth system interactions be governed? Governance functions for linking climate change mitigation with land use, freshwater and biodiversity protection. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 75, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbott, K.; Snidal, D. International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration. Rev. Int. Organ. 2010, 5, 315–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voegtlin, C.; Patzer, M.; Scherer, A. Responsible Leadership in Global Business: A New Approach to Leadership and Its Multi-Level Outcomes. J. Bus. Ethics 2012, 105, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunsson, N.; Rasche, A.; Seidl, D. The dynamics of standardization: Three perspectives on standards in organization studies. Organ. Stud. 2012, 33, 613–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Growth. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/business-friendly-environment/sme-definition_en (accessed on 18 May 2017).
- Rostek, K. SMEs and Competitiveness: Facts and Challenges. In Benchmarking Collaborative Networks: A Key to SME Competitiveness; Springer International Publishing: Cham, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
- Tam, F.Y.; Moon, K.L.; Ng, S.F.; Hui, C.L. Production Sourcing Strategies and Buyer-supplier Relationships: A Study of the Differences between Small and Large Enterprises in the Hong Kong Clothing Industry. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2007, 11, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moon, T.H.; Sohn, S.Y. Technology Credit Scoring Model Considering Both SME Characteristics and Economic Conditions: The Korean Case. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2010, 61, 666–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobre, O.I. Differences of Organizational Culture between Small and Large Enterprises. Ovidius Univ. Ann. Econ. Sci. Ser. 2016, XVI, 296–301. [Google Scholar]
- Basole, R.C.; Clear, T.; Hu, M.; Mehrotra, H.; Stasko, J. Understanding Interfirm Relationships in Business Ecosystems with Interactive Visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2013, 19, 2526–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thompson, C.; LeBlanc, M. Independent Sector, In Organizational Relationships, Individuals Matter. Available online: https://independentsector.org/news-post/organizational-relationships-individuals-matter/ (accessed on 22 June 2017).
|Problem in SMEs||Attractive Incentive|
|Lack of financial resources||Setting responsibility as a criterion for public funding or funding from foundations|
Financial benefits of RRI
|Lack of human resources||Reputation among professionals|
Engaged employees have motivation to work harder for the company
Skilled employees have knowledge to perform at high level
|Brand creation||Responsibility awards|
Positive media attention
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).