Next Article in Journal
Applying Limestone or Basalt in Combination with Bio-Fertilizer to Sustain Rice Production on an Acid Sulfate Soil in Malaysia
Next Article in Special Issue
Low Carbon Urban Transitioning in Shenzhen: A Multi-Level Environmental Governance Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
The Adoption of Environmental Practices in Small Hotels. Voluntary or Mandatory? An Empirical Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Between Participation and Collective Action—From Occasional Liaisons towards Long-Term Co-Management for Urban Resilience
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2016, 8(7), 701; doi:10.3390/su8070701

Comparing Conceptualizations of Urban Climate Resilience in Theory and Practice

1
School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
2
Urban and Regional Planning, Unviersity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
3
The Climate Resilience Fund, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Patricia Romero-Lankao, Olga Wilhelmi and Mary Hayden
Received: 27 May 2016 / Revised: 6 July 2016 / Accepted: 18 July 2016 / Published: 21 July 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Resilience and Urban Sustainability: From Research to Practice)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2044 KB, uploaded 21 July 2016]   |  

Abstract

In the face of climate change, scholars and policymakers are increasingly concerned with fostering “urban resilience”. This paper seeks to contribute towards a better understanding of synergies and differences in how academics and local decision-makers think about resilience in the context of climate change. We compare definitions and characteristics of urban climate resilience in the academic literature with a survey of 134 local government representatives from across the U.S. Our analysis shows discrepancies in how academics and practitioners define and characterize urban climate resilience, most notably in their focus on either “bouncing back” or “bouncing forward” after a disturbance. Practitioners have diverse understandings of the concept, but tend to favor potentially problematic “bouncing back” or engineering-based definitions of resilience. While local government respondents confirm the importance of all 16 resilience characteristics we identified in the academic literature, coding practitioners’ free response definitions reveals that they rarely mention qualities commonly associated with resilience in the scholarly literature such as diversity, flexibility, and redundancy. These inconsistencies need to be resolved to ensure both the usability of climate resilience research and the effectiveness of resilience policy. View Full-Text
Keywords: climate change; resilience; urban resilience; resilient city; climate resilience; adaptation climate change; resilience; urban resilience; resilient city; climate resilience; adaptation
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Meerow, S.; Stults, M. Comparing Conceptualizations of Urban Climate Resilience in Theory and Practice. Sustainability 2016, 8, 701.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top