The Establishment of a Green Supplier Selection and Guidance Mechanism with the ANP and IPA
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Supply Chain Evolution
2.2. Establishment of Supplier Mode
2.3. Supplier Selection
2.4. Green Supplier Selection Criteria
3. Research Method and Design
3.1. ANP (Analytic Network Process)
3.2. IPA (Importance–Performance Analysis)
- Quadrant I: keep up the good work: with a high degree of emphasis and a high degree of satisfaction, this area is also called the “advantage keeping area”;
- Quadrant II: concentrate here: with a high degree of emphasis and a low degree of satisfaction, this area is also called the “preferential improvement area”;
- Quadrant III: low priority: with a low degree of emphasis and a low degree of satisfaction, this area is also called the “secondary improvement area”;
- Quadrant IV: possible overkill: with a low degree of emphasis and a high degree of satisfaction, this area is also called the “excessive emphasis area.”
3.3. Research Design
3.3.1. Research Process
- Stage 1: determination of green supplier evaluation indexes
- 2.
- Stage 2: green supplier ANP selection analysis
- 3.
- Stage 3: green supplier IPA guidance analysis
3.3.2. Connotation of the Integrated Application of ANP and IPA
- ANP stage
- 2.
- ANP and IPA integration stage
- 3.
- IPA stage
4. Case Analysis
4.1. About the Company
4.2. Green Supplier Selection and Guidance of a Case Company
4.2.1. Determination of Green Supplier Evaluation Indexes
4.2.2. Green Supplier ANP Selection Analysis
4.2.3. Green Supplier IPA Guidance Analysis
Analysis of the Importance of Evaluation Indexes
Supplier Performance Analysis
Green Supplier’s IPA Explanation
5. Conclusion and Implications
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix
Appendix A
Suppliers | 1. Operation | 2. Ability | 3. Green | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | ||
Suppliers | A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.315 | 0.169 | 0.174 | 0.135 | 0.232 | 0.068 | 0.200 | 0.093 | 0.090 | 0.375 | 0.373 |
B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.107 | 0.343 | 0.075 | 0.262 | 0.075 | 0.321 | 0.104 | 0.310 | 0.187 | 0.079 | 0.164 | |
C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.148 | 0.184 | 0.082 | 0.287 | 0.080 | 0.298 | 0.097 | 0.283 | 0.291 | 0.187 | 0.133 | |
D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.197 | 0.221 | 0.374 | 0.073 | 0.107 | 0.214 | 0.200 | 0.153 | 0.270 | 0.113 | 0.212 | |
E | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.233 | 0.083 | 0.294 | 0.243 | 0.506 | 0.099 | 0.400 | 0.161 | 0.162 | 0.247 | 0.118 | |
1 | 1.1 | 0.311 | 0.303 | 0.200 | 0.226 | 0.363 | 0 | 0.350 | 0.315 | 0.327 | 0 | 0.316 | 0.490 | 0.511 | 0.421 | 0.330 | 0.290 |
1.2 | 0.258 | 0.275 | 0.313 | 0.135 | 0.140 | 0.365 | 0 | 0.347 | 0.349 | 0.600 | 0.333 | 0 | 0 | 0.218 | 0.511 | 0.153 | |
1.3 | 0.228 | 0.194 | 0.255 | 0.299 | 0.177 | 0.328 | 0.331 | 0 | 0.324 | 0.400 | 0 | 0.510 | 0.263 | 0 | 0 | 0.120 | |
1.4 | 0.203 | 0.229 | 0.231 | 0.340 | 0.320 | 0.307 | 0.319 | 0.338 | 0 | 0 | 0.351 | 0 | 0.226 | 0.361 | 0.160 | 0.437 | |
2 | 2.1 | 0.306 | 0.345 | 0.191 | 0.187 | 0.354 | 0 | 0.501 | 0.340 | 0 | 0 | 0.345 | 0.318 | 0.324 | 0.500 | 0 | 0 |
2.2 | 0.258 | 0.250 | 0.301 | 0.300 | 0.124 | 0 | 0.499 | 0 | 0 | 0.326 | 0 | 0.318 | 0.317 | 0 | 0.333 | 0.348 | |
2.3 | 0.235 | 0.192 | 0.261 | 0.381 | 0.354 | 0.667 | 0 | 0.335 | 0 | 0.349 | 0.336 | 0 | 0.358 | 0 | 0 | 0.315 | |
2.4 | 0.201 | 0.212 | 0.248 | 0.132 | 0.169 | 0.333 | 0 | 0.325 | 0 | 0.325 | 0.319 | 0.365 | 0 | 0.500 | 0.667 | 0.338 | |
3 | 3.1 | 0.393 | 0.465 | 0.272 | 0.500 | 0.172 | 0.332 | 0.333 | 0.512 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.600 | 0.333 | 0 | 0.417 | 0.429 |
3.2 | 0.327 | 0.291 | 0.394 | 0.167 | 0.587 | 0.363 | 0 | 0.488 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.506 | 0 | 0.571 | |
3.3 | 0.280 | 0.245 | 0.334 | 0.333 | 0.240 | 0.305 | 0.667 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.400 | 0.667 | 0.494 | 0.583 | 0 |
Appendix B
Suppliers | 1. Operation | 2. Ability | 3. Green | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | ||
Suppliers | A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.043 | 0.023 | 0.024 | 0.051 | 0.091 | 0.027 | 0.053 | 0.024 | 0.022 | 0.093 | 0.092 |
B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.015 | 0.047 | 0.010 | 0.099 | 0.029 | 0.126 | 0.027 | 0.082 | 0.046 | 0.019 | 0.041 | |
C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.020 | 0.025 | 0.011 | 0.109 | 0.032 | 0.117 | 0.025 | 0.075 | 0.072 | 0.046 | 0.033 | |
D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.027 | 0.030 | 0.051 | 0.028 | 0.042 | 0.084 | 0.053 | 0.040 | 0.067 | 0.028 | 0.052 | |
E | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.032 | 0.011 | 0.040 | 0.092 | 0.199 | 0.039 | 0.105 | 0.043 | 0.040 | 0.061 | 0.029 | |
1 | 1.1 | 0.051 | 0.050 | 0.033 | 0.037 | 0.059 | 0 | 0.078 | 0.070 | 0.203 | 0 | 0.098 | 0.102 | 0.107 | 0.080 | 0.063 | 0.055 |
1.2 | 0.042 | 0.045 | 0.051 | 0.022 | 0.023 | 0.082 | 0 | 0.078 | 0.216 | 0.187 | 0.104 | 0 | 0 | 0.041 | 0.097 | 0.029 | |
1.3 | 0.037 | 0.032 | 0.042 | 0.049 | 0.029 | 0.073 | 0.074 | 0 | 0.201 | 0.125 | 0 | 0.106 | 0.055 | 0 | 0 | 0.023 | |
1.4 | 0.033 | 0.037 | 0.038 | 0.056 | 0.052 | 0.069 | 0.071 | 0.076 | 0 | 0 | 0.109 | 0 | 0.047 | 0.069 | 0.030 | 0.083 | |
2 | 2.1 | 0.103 | 0.117 | 0.064 | 0.063 | 0.119 | 0 | 0.133 | 0.090 | 0 | 0 | 0.102 | 0.063 | 0.064 | 0.124 | 0 | 0 |
2.2 | 0.087 | 0.085 | 0.102 | 0.101 | 0.042 | 0 | 0.132 | 0 | 0 | 0.096 | 0 | 0.063 | 0.063 | 0 | 0.082 | 0.086 | |
2.3 | 0.079 | 0.065 | 0.088 | 0.129 | 0.119 | 0.177 | 0 | 0.089 | 0 | 0.103 | 0.099 | 0 | 0.071 | 0 | 0 | 0.078 | |
2.4 | 0.068 | 0.072 | 0.084 | 0.045 | 0.057 | 0.088 | 0 | 0.086 | 0 | 0.096 | 0.094 | 0.072 | 0 | 0.124 | 0.165 | 0.083 | |
3 | 3.1 | 0.196 | 0.232 | 0.135 | 0.249 | 0.086 | 0.124 | 0.125 | 0.192 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.198 | 0.110 | 0 | 0.131 | 0.135 |
3.2 | 0.163 | 0.145 | 0.197 | 0.083 | 0.293 | 0.136 | 0 | 0.182 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.160 | 0 | 0.180 | |
3.3 | 0.140 | 0.122 | 0.167 | 0.166 | 0.120 | 0.114 | 0.249 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.132 | 0.220 | 0.156 | 0.184 | 0 |
Appendix C
Suppliers | 1. Operation | 2. Ability | 3. Green | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | ||
Suppliers | A | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 |
B | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | |
C | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | |
D | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | |
E | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | |
1 | 1.1 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 |
1.2 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | |
1.3 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | |
1.4 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.051 | |
2 | 2.1 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 |
2.2 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | |
2.3 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.062 | |
2.4 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | |
3 | 3.1 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.109 |
3.2 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | |
3.3 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 |
Appendix D
1. Operation | 2. Ability | 3. Green | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | ||
1 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.350 | 0.315 | 0.327 | 0 | 0.316 | 0.490 | 0.511 | 0.421 | 0.330 | 0.290 |
1.2 | 0.365 | 0 | 0.347 | 0.349 | 0.600 | 0.333 | 0 | 0 | 0.218 | 0.511 | 0.153 | |
1.3 | 0.328 | 0.331 | 0 | 0.324 | 0.400 | 0 | 0.510 | 0.263 | 0 | 0 | 0.120 | |
1.4 | 0.307 | 0.319 | 0.338 | 0 | 0 | 0.351 | 0 | 0.226 | 0.361 | 0.160 | 0.437 | |
2 | 2.1 | 0 | 0.501 | 0.340 | 0 | 0 | 0.345 | 0.318 | 0.324 | 0.500 | 0 | 0 |
2.2 | 0 | 0.499 | 0 | 0 | 0.326 | 0 | 0.318 | 0.317 | 0 | 0.333 | 0.348 | |
2.3 | 0.667 | 0 | 0.335 | 0 | 0.349 | 0.336 | 0 | 0.358 | 0 | 0 | 0.315 | |
2.4 | 0.333 | 0 | 0.325 | 0 | 0.325 | 0.319 | 0.365 | 0 | 0.500 | 0.667 | 0.338 | |
3 | 3.1 | 0.332 | 0.333 | 0.512 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.600 | 0.333 | 0 | 0.417 | 0.429 |
3.2 | 0.363 | 0 | 0.488 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.506 | 0 | 0.571 | |
3.3 | 0.305 | 0.667 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.400 | 0.667 | 0.494 | 0.583 | 0 |
Appendix E
1. Operation | 2. Ability | 3. Green | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | ||
1 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.092 | 0.083 | 0.327 | 0 | 0.158 | 0.137 | 0.143 | 0.107 | 0.084 | 0.074 |
1.2 | 0.096 | 0 | 0.091 | 0.349 | 0.300 | 0.167 | 0 | 0 | 0.056 | 0.130 | 0.039 | |
1.3 | 0.086 | 0.087 | 0 | 0.324 | 0.200 | 0 | 0.143 | 0.074 | 0 | 0 | 0.031 | |
1.4 | 0.081 | 0.084 | 0.089 | 0 | 0 | 0.176 | 0 | 0.063 | 0.092 | 0.041 | 0.111 | |
2 | 2.1 | 0 | 0.158 | 0.107 | 0 | 0 | 0.172 | 0.089 | 0.091 | 0.164 | 0 | 0 |
2.2 | 0 | 0.157 | 0 | 0 | 0.163 | 0 | 0.089 | 0.089 | 0 | 0.110 | 0.114 | |
2.3 | 0.210 | 0 | 0.106 | 0 | 0.174 | 0.168 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0 | 0.103 | |
2.4 | 0.105 | 0 | 0.102 | 0 | 0.162 | 0.159 | 0.102 | 0 | 0.164 | 0.219 | 0.111 | |
3 | 3.1 | 0.140 | 0.141 | 0.216 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.264 | 0.147 | 0 | 0.173 | 0.179 |
3.2 | 0.153 | 0 | 0.206 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.211 | 0 | 0.238 | |
3.3 | 0.128 | 0.281 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.176 | 0.294 | 0.206 | 0.243 | 0 |
Appendix F
1. Operation | 2. Ability | 3. Green | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | ||
1 | 1.1 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 |
1.2 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | |
1.3 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | |
1.4 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | |
2 | 2.1 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 |
2.2 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | |
2.3 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | |
2.4 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | |
3 | 3.1 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 |
3.2 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | |
3.3 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 |
Appendix G
1. Operation | 2. Ability | 3. Green | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | ||
1 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.350 | 0.315 | 0.327 | 0 | 0.316 | 0.490 | 0.511 | 0.421 | 0.330 | 0.290 |
1.2 | 0.365 | 0 | 0.347 | 0.349 | 0.600 | 0.333 | 0 | 0 | 0.218 | 0.511 | 0.153 | |
1.3 | 0.328 | 0.331 | 0 | 0.324 | 0.400 | 0 | 0.510 | 0.263 | 0 | 0 | 0.120 | |
1.4 | 0.307 | 0.319 | 0.338 | 0 | 0 | 0.351 | 0 | 0.226 | 0.361 | 0.160 | 0.437 | |
2 | 2.1 | 0 | 0.501 | 0.340 | 0 | 0 | 0.345 | 0.318 | 0.324 | 0.500 | 0 | 0 |
2.2 | 0 | 0.499 | 0 | 0 | 0.326 | 0 | 0.318 | 0.317 | 0 | 0.333 | 0.348 | |
2.3 | 0.667 | 0 | 0.335 | 0 | 0.349 | 0.336 | 0 | 0.358 | 0 | 0 | 0.315 | |
2.4 | 0.333 | 0 | 0.325 | 0 | 0.325 | 0.319 | 0.365 | 0 | 0.500 | 0.667 | 0.338 | |
3 | 3.1 | 0.332 | 0.333 | 0.512 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.600 | 0.333 | 0 | 0.417 | 0.429 |
3.2 | 0.363 | 0 | 0.488 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.506 | 0 | 0.571 | |
3.3 | 0.305 | 0.667 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.400 | 0.667 | 0.494 | 0.583 | 0 |
Appendix H
1. Operation | 2. Ability | 3. Green | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | ||
1 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.092 | 0.083 | 0.327 | 0 | 0.158 | 0.137 | 0.143 | 0.107 | 0.084 | 0.074 |
1.2 | 0.096 | 0 | 0.091 | 0.349 | 0.300 | 0.167 | 0 | 0 | 0.056 | 0.130 | 0.039 | |
1.3 | 0.086 | 0.087 | 0 | 0.324 | 0.200 | 0 | 0.143 | 0.074 | 0 | 0 | 0.031 | |
1.4 | 0.081 | 0.084 | 0.089 | 0 | 0 | 0.176 | 0 | 0.063 | 0.092 | 0.041 | 0.111 | |
2 | 2.1 | 0 | 0.158 | 0.107 | 0 | 0 | 0.172 | 0.089 | 0.091 | 0.164 | 0 | 0 |
2.2 | 0 | 0.157 | 0 | 0 | 0.163 | 0 | 0.089 | 0.089 | 0 | 0.110 | 0.114 | |
2.3 | 0.210 | 0 | 0.106 | 0 | 0.174 | 0.168 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0 | 0.103 | |
2.4 | 0.105 | 0 | 0.102 | 0 | 0.162 | 0.159 | 0.102 | 0 | 0.164 | 0.219 | 0.111 | |
3 | 3.1 | 0.140 | 0.141 | 0.216 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.264 | 0.147 | 0 | 0.173 | 0.179 |
3.2 | 0.153 | 0 | 0.206 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.211 | 0 | 0.238 | |
3.3 | 0.128 | 0.281 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.176 | 0.294 | 0.206 | 0.243 | 0 |
Appendix I
1. Operation | 2. Ability | 3. Green | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | ||
1 | 1.1 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 |
1.2 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.097 | |
1.3 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | |
1.4 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.070 | |
2 | 2.1 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 |
2.2 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.067 | |
2.3 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | |
2.4 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 0.102 | |
3 | 3.1 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.118 |
3.2 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | |
3.3 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 |
References
- Barney, J.B. Purchasing, supply chain management and sustained competitive advantage: The relevance of resource-based theory. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2012, 48, 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.L. The triple-A supply chain. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2004, 82, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Chopra, S.; Sodhi, M.S. Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2004, 46, 53. [Google Scholar]
- Shepherd, C.; Günter, H. Measuring Supply Chain Performance: Current Research And Future Directions, in Behavioral Operations in Planning and Scheduling; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010; pp. 105–121. [Google Scholar]
- Tayur, S.; Ganeshan, R.; Magazine, M. Quantitative Models For Supply Chain Management; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Jayaram, J.; Avittathur, B. Green supply chains: A perspective from an emerging economy. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 164, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, K.W., Jr.; Kenneth, W.; Zelbst, P.J.; Meacham, J.; Bhadauria, V.S. Green supply chain management practices: Impact on performance. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2012, 17, 290–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.-C.; Shih, H.-S.; Shyur, H.-J.; Wu, K.-S. A business strategy selection of green supply chain management via an analytic network process. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 64, 2544–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abalo, J.; Varela, J.; Manzano, V. Importance values for Importance–Performance Analysis: A formula for spreading out values derived from preference rankings. J. Bus. Rese. 2007, 60, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coghlan, A. Facilitating reef tourism management through an innovative importance-performance analysis method. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houssiaux, J. Le concept de" quasi-integration" et le role des sous-traitants dans l'industrie. Revue écon. 1957, 8, 221–247. (in French). [Google Scholar]
- Blois, K.J. Vertical Quasi-Integration. J. Ind. Econ. 1972, 20, 253–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aoki, M. Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy: A Microtheory of the Japanese Economy; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Colombo, M.G.; Mariotti, S. Organizing vertical markets: The Italtel case. Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 1998, 4, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klein, B.; Crawford, R.G.; Alchian, A.A. Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process. J. Law Econ. 1978, 21, 297–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dornier, P.-P.; Ernst, R. The logistics impact of the channel tunnel. Interfaces 1997, 27, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stadtler, H. Supply Chain Management: An Overview, in Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 3–28. [Google Scholar]
- Nalebuff, B.; Brandenburger, A.; Maulana, A. Co-Opetition; HarperCollinsBusiness: London, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Brandenburger, A.M.; Nalebuff, B.J. Co-Opetition; Crown Business: Haarlem, the Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Padula, G.; Dagnino, G.B. Untangling the rise of coopetition: The intrusion of competition in a cooperative game structure. Int. Stud. Manag. Org. 2007, 37, 32–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grittner, P. Four elements of successful sourcing strategies. Manag. Rev. 1996, 85, 41. [Google Scholar]
- Reck, R.F.; Long, B.G. Purchasing: A competitive weapon. J. Purch. Mater. Manag. 1988, 24, 2–8. [Google Scholar]
- Asanuma, B. Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill. J. Jpn. Int. Econ. 1989, 3, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esposito, E.; Raffa, M. The evolution of Italian subcontracting firms: Empirical evidence. Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 1994, 1, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ross, D.F. Competing through Supply Chain Management: Creating Market-Winning Strategies through Supply Chain Partnerships; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Stock, J.R.; Lambert, D.M. Strategic Logistics Management; McGraw-Hill/Irwin: Boston, MA, USA, 2001; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
- Walley, K. Coopetition: An introduction to the subject and an agenda for research. Int. Stud. Manag. Org. 2007, 37, 11–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nenni, M.E.; Giustiniano, L. Increasing integration across the supply chain through an approach to match performance and risk. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2013, 10, 1009–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landeros, R.; Monczka, R.M. Cooperative Buyer/Seller Relationships and A Firm's Competi. J. Purch. Mater. Manag. 1989, 25, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
- Jangga, R.; Ali, N.M.; Ismail, M.; Sahari, N. Effect of Environmental Uncertainty and Supply Chain Flexibility towards Supply Chain Innovation: An exploratory Study. Procedia Econ. Finance 2015, 31, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watts, C.A.; Hahn, C.K. Supplier development programs: An empirical analysis. Int. J. Purch. Mater. Manag. 1993, 29, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sako, M. Prices, Quality and Trust: Inter-Firm Relations in Britain & Japan; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Krause, D.R.; Ellram, L.M. Success Factors in Supplier Development. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Log. Manag. 1997, 27, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stevenson, M.; Spring, M. Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: Definition and review. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2007, 27, 685–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkis, J.; Talluri, S. A model for strategic supplier selection. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2002, 38, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Boer, L.; van der Wegen, L.L.M. Practice and promise of formal supplier selection: A study of four empirical cases. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2003, 9, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, S.H.; Krishnan, R. A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a competitive supply chain. Expert Syst. Appl. 2008, 34, 1303–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seuring, S. A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decis. Support Syst. 2013, 54, 1513–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruno, G.; Esposito, E.; Genovese, A.; Passaro, R. AHP-based approaches for supplier evaluation: Problems and perspectives. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2012, 18, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mani, V.; Agrawal, R.; Sharma, V. Supplier selection using social sustainability: AHP based approach in India. Int. Strat. Manag. Rev. 2014, 2, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labib, A.W. A supplier selection model: A comparison of fuzzy logic and the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2011, 49, 6287–6299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, J.; Fahim, P.B.M.; Tavasszy, L. Supplier selection in the airline retail industry using a funnel methodology: Conjunctive screening method and fuzzy AHP. Exp. Syst. Appl. 2014, 41, 8165–8179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bozdağ, C.E.; Kahraman, C.; Ruan, D. Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems. Comput. Ind. 2003, 51, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruno, G.; Esposito, E.; Genovese, A.; Simpson, M. Applying supplier selection methodologies in a multi-stakeholder environment: A case study and a critical assessment. Exp. Syst. Appl. 2016, 43, 271–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gölcük, İ.; Baykasoğlu, A. An analysis of DEMATEL approaches for criteria interaction handling within ANP. Exp. Syst. Appl. 2016, 46, 346–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Büyüközkan, G.; Çifçi, G. A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Exp. Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 3000–3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dargi, A.; Anjomshoae, A.; Galankashi, M.R.; Memari, A.; Tap, M.B.M. Supplier Selection: A Fuzzy-ANP Approach. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2014, 31, 691–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.-C.; Chen, B.-S. Key quality performance evaluation using fuzzy AHP. J. Chin. Instit. Ind. Eng. 2004, 21, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, T.Y.; Hartley, J.L. An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain. J. Oper. Manag. 1996, 14, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber, C.A.; Current, J.R.; Benton, W.C. Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eur. J. Operational Res. 1991, 50, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wisner, J.; Tan, K.-C.; Leong, G. Principles of supply chain management: A balanced approach; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Tognetti, A.; Grosse-Ruyken, P.T.; Wagner, S.M. Green supply chain network optimization and the trade-off between environmental and economic objectives. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 170, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noci, G. Designing “green” vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier's environmental performance. Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 1997, 3, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, A.A.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L.; Latan, H.; de Oliveira, J.H.C. Green training and green supply chain management: Evidence from Brazilian firms. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 116, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, C.R.; Easton, P.L. Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Log. Manag. 2011, 41, 46–62. [Google Scholar]
- Diabat, A.; Govindan, K. An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Humphreys, P.K.; Li, W.L.; Chan, L.Y. The impact of supplier development on buyer–supplier performance. Omega 2004, 32, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, P.; Govindan, K.; Choi, T.-M.; Rajendran, S. Supplier selection problems in fashion business operations with sustainability considerations. Sustainability 2015, 7, 1603–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azzone, G.; Bertelè, U. Exploiting green strategies for competitive advantage. Long Range Plan. 1994, 27, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mokhlesian, S. How Do Contractors Select Suppliers for Greener Construction Projects? The Case of Three Swedish Companies. Sustainability 2014, 6, 4133–4151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Guo, S. Selecting Green Supplier of Thermal Power Equipment by Using a Hybrid MCDM Method for Sustainability. Sustainability 2014, 6, 217–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, P. Greening the supply chain: A new initiative in South East Asia. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2002, 22, 632–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, T.; Hsu, C.-W.; Li, J.-Y. Developing a Green Supplier Selection Model by Using the DANP with VIKOR. Sustainability 2015, 7, 1661–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q.; Cote, R.P. Integrating green supply chain management into an embryonic eco-industrial development: A case study of the Guitang Group. J. Clean. Prod. 2004, 12, 1025–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkis, J. A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2003, 11, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J. An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: Drivers and practices. J. Clean. Prod. 2006, 14, 472–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govindan, K.; Muduli, K.; Devika, K.; Barve, A. Investigation of the influential strength of factors on adoption of green supply chain management practices: An Indian mining scenario. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016, 107, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J.; Lai, K.-H. Green supply chain management: Pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2007, 15, 1041–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, J. Environmental supply chain dynamics. J. Clean. Prod. 2000, 8, 455–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkis, J.; Zhu, Q.; Lai, K.-H. An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2011, 130, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saaty, T.L. Fundamentals of the analytic network process—Dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 2004, 13, 129–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Satty, T.L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process; RWS Publication: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Network Proces; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Saaty, T.; Kearns, K. Analytic Planning-The Organization of Systems, International Series in Modern Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 7; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Abdi, M.R.; Labib, A.W. Performance evaluation of reconfigurable manufacturing systems via holonic architecture and the analytic network process. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2011, 49, 1319–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karpak, B.; Topcu, I. Small medium manufacturing enterprises in Turkey: An analytic network process framework for prioritizing factors affecting success. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2010, 125, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martilla, J.A.; James, J.C. Importance-performance analysis. J. Market. 1977, 41, 77–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matzler, K.; Bailom, F.; Hinterhuber, H.H.; Renzl, B.; Pichler, J. The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: A reconsideration of the importance–performance analysis. Ind. Market. Managem. 2004, 33, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chapman, R.G. Brand performance comparatives. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 1993, 2, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chéron, E.J.; McTavish, R.; Perrien, J. Segmentation of bank commercial markets. Int. J. Bank Market. 1989, 7, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sampson, S.E.; Showalter, M.J. The performance-importance response function: Observations and implications. Serv. Ind. J. 1999, 19, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O'Sullivan, E.L. Marketing for Parks, Recreation, and Leisure; Venture State College: State College, PA, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Dyer, J.H.; Hatch, N.W. Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: Creating advantage through network relationships. Strat. Manag. J. 2006, 27, 701–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gulati, R.; Nohria, N.; Zaheer, A. Guest editors’s introduction to the special issue: Strategic networks. Strat. Manag. J. 2000, 21, 199–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, V.H.; Ooi, K.B.; Chong, A.Y.-L.; Seow, C. Creating technological innovation via green supply chain management: An empirical analysis. Exp. Syst. Appl. 2014, 41, 6983–6994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dwyer, L.; Cvelbar, L.K.; Edwards, D.; Mihalic, T. Fashioning a destination tourism future: The case of Slovenia. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Category | Evaluation index | Scoring | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
Operation management (Integrated into operation category) | 1. Finance | 8.62 | Reserved |
2. Green image | 7.31 | Reserved and classified into green category | |
3. Quality certification | 7.12 | Reserved | |
4. R&D cost | 6.95 | Classified into cost category | |
5. Operation cost | 7.68 | Reserved | |
Production management (Integrated into ability category) | 1. Quality abnormity treatment | 6.91 | Classified into quality index |
2. Capacity | 7.22 | Reserved | |
3. Technical capacity | 7.35 | Reserved | |
4. Education and training | 6.25 | Classified into technical capacity index | |
5. Green R&D ability | 6.84 | Classified into technical capacity index | |
Customer management (this category is deleted; each index under this category will be moved to each category) | 1. Customer service | 7.93 | Reserved and classified into operation category |
2. Delivery time | 8.32 | Reserved and classified into ability category | |
3. Response capability | 7.67 | Reserved and classified into ability category | |
Green management (Integrated into green category) | 1.Environmental specification | 7.74 | Reserved |
2. Environmental assessment | 6.94 | Classified into environmental benefit index | |
3. Environmental benefit | 7.43 | Reserved | |
4. Hazardous substance specification | 6.45 | Classified into environmental specification index | |
5. Recycle | 6.82 | Classified into environmental benefit index |
Category | Evaluation Index | Weight under Category | Category Ranking | Overall Weight | Overall Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Operation (0.348) | 1.1 Finance | 0.298 | 1 | 0.104 | 3 |
1.2 Customer service | 0.279 | 2 | 0.097 | 5 | |
1.3 Quality | 0.221 | 3 | 0.077 | 7 | |
1.4 Cost | 0.202 | 4 | 0.070 | 10 | |
Ability (0.317) | 2.1 Delivery Time | 0.223 | 3 | 0.071 | 9 |
2.2 Response Capability | 0.212 | 4 | 0.067 | 11 | |
2.3 Capacity | 0.244 | 2 | 0.077 | 7 | |
2.4 Technical Capacity | 0.322 | 1 | 0.102 | 4 | |
Green (0.335) | 3.1 Environmental Specification | 0.353 | 2 | 0.118 | 2 |
3.2 Green Image | 0.261 | 3 | 0.087 | 6 | |
3.3 Environmental Benefit | 0.386 | 1 | 0.130 | 1 |
Performance Index | Performance Index Level | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supplier A | Supplier B | Supplier C | Supplier D | Supplier E | |
1.1 Finance | 0.051 | 0.050 | 0.033 | 0.037 | 0.059 |
1.2 Customer service | 0.042 | 0.045 | 0.051 | 0.022 | 0.023 |
1.3 Quality | 0.037 | 0.032 | 0.042 | 0.049 | 0.029 |
1.4 Cost | 0.033 | 0.037 | 0.038 | 0.056 | 0.052 |
2.1 Delivery Time | 0.103 | 0.117 | 0.064 | 0.063 | 0.119 |
2.2 Response Capability | 0.087 | 0.085 | 0.102 | 0.101 | 0.042 |
2.3 Capacity | 0.079 | 0.065 | 0.088 | 0.129 | 0.119 |
2.4 Technical Capacity | 0.068 | 0.072 | 0.084 | 0.045 | 0.057 |
3.1 Environmental Specification | 0.196 | 0.232 | 0.135 | 0.249 | 0.086 |
3.2 Green Image | 0.163 | 0.145 | 0.197 | 0.083 | 0.293 |
3.3 Environmental Benefit | 0.140 | 0.122 | 0.167 | 0.166 | 0.120 |
Performance Index | Performance Index Level | Performance Index Importance |
---|---|---|
1.1 Finance | 0.059 | 0.104 |
1.2 Customer service | 0.023 | 0.097 |
1.3 Quality | 0.029 | 0.077 |
1.4 Cost | 0.052 | 0.070 |
2.1 Delivery Time | 0.119 | 0.071 |
2.2 Response Capability | 0.042 | 0.067 |
2.3 Capacity | 0.119 | 0.077 |
2.4 Technical Capacity | 0.057 | 0.102 |
3.1 Environmental Specification | 0.086 | 0.118 |
3.2 Green Image | 0.293 | 0.087 |
3.3 Environmental Benefit | 0.120 | 0.130 |
Threshold Value | 0.091 | 0.091 |
© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chung, C.-C.; Chao, L.-C.; Lou, S.-J. The Establishment of a Green Supplier Selection and Guidance Mechanism with the ANP and IPA. Sustainability 2016, 8, 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030259
Chung C-C, Chao L-C, Lou S-J. The Establishment of a Green Supplier Selection and Guidance Mechanism with the ANP and IPA. Sustainability. 2016; 8(3):259. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030259
Chicago/Turabian StyleChung, Chih-Chao, Li-Chung Chao, and Shi-Jer Lou. 2016. "The Establishment of a Green Supplier Selection and Guidance Mechanism with the ANP and IPA" Sustainability 8, no. 3: 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030259