Next Article in Journal
Projected Crop Production under Regional Climate Change Using Scenario Data and Modeling: Sensitivity to Chosen Sowing Date and Cultivar
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Optimization for Wastewater Treatment System Using PSF-HS
Previous Article in Journal
Where’s Wally? In Search of Citizen Perspectives on the Smart City
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2016, 8(3), 212; doi:10.3390/su8030212

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Two On-Site Small-Scale Activated Sludge Total Oxidation Systems in Plastic and Vibrated Reinforced Concrete

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II, 132-84084 Fisciano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen
Received: 11 December 2015 / Revised: 4 February 2016 / Accepted: 24 February 2016 / Published: 26 February 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1157 KB, uploaded 26 February 2016]   |  

Abstract

This study proposes a comparison of the environmental impacts calculated with the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology of two on-site small-scale activated sludge total oxidation systems in linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) and vibrated reinforced concrete (VRC). The plants were designed to ensure a treatment capacity of 5, 10, 20 and 30 equivalent inhabitants (PE). The main aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of construction, disposal and operation phases on the total impacts evaluated with three different methods: ReCiPe 2008, Ecological Footprint and IPCC 2007 100 years. The most significant phase for both treatment lines was the use phase, which contributed more than 80% to the total impacts. The construction phase was the second most impactful phase with an incidence less than 25% for both systems and for all the considered impacts assessment methods. The plant in LLDPE was more eco-friendly than that in (VRC). The plant in VRC was always most impactful, even comparing each single phase of the life cycle and for all the treatment capacities taken into consideration. Finally, the obtained results were not dependent on the impact assessment method considered. View Full-Text
Keywords: activated sludge; comparison; Ecological Footprint; IPCC; LCA; plastic; ReCiPe; total oxidation; small-scale; vibrated reinforced concrete activated sludge; comparison; Ecological Footprint; IPCC; LCA; plastic; ReCiPe; total oxidation; small-scale; vibrated reinforced concrete
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

De Feo, G.; Ferrara, C.; Iuliano, G. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Two On-Site Small-Scale Activated Sludge Total Oxidation Systems in Plastic and Vibrated Reinforced Concrete. Sustainability 2016, 8, 212.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top