Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Cultivated Landscape Changes under Different Management Modes: A Case Study in Sanjiang Plain
Next Article in Special Issue
Continuation of Health Behaviors: Psychosocial Factors Sustaining Drinking Water Chlorination in a Longitudinal Study from Chad
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Drought Impact on Main Cereal Crops Using a Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index in Liaoning Province, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adopters and Non-Adopters of Low-Cost Household Latrines: A Study of Corbelled Pit Latrines in 15 Districts of Malawi
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2016, 8(10), 1070; doi:10.3390/su8101070

The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer on Toilet Use in eThekwini, South Africa

1
Eawag, Ueberlandstrasse 133, 8600 Duebendorf, Switzerland
2
Department of Environmental Health, University of Malawi, The Polytechnic, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi
3
NADEL: Centre for Development and Cooperation, ETH Zurich, Clausiusstrasse 37, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Vincenzo Torretta
Received: 12 August 2016 / Revised: 15 October 2016 / Accepted: 18 October 2016 / Published: 22 October 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [900 KB, uploaded 22 October 2016]   |  

Abstract

In the developing world, having access to a toilet does not necessarily imply use: infrequent or non-use limits the desired health outcomes of improved sanitation. We examine the sanitation situation in a rural part of South Africa where recipients of novel, waterless “urine-diverting dry toilets” are not regularly using them. In order to determine if small, conditional cash transfers (CCT) could motivate families to use their toilets more, we paid for urine via different incentive-based interventions: two were based on volumetric pricing and the third was a flat-rate payment (irrespective of volume). A flat-rate payment (approx. €1) resulted in the highest rates of regular (weekly) participation at 59%. The low volumetric payment (approx. €0.05/L) led to regular participation rates of only 12% and no increase in toilet use. The high volumetric payment (approx. €0.1/L) resulted in lower rates of regular participation (35%), but increased the average urine production per household per day by 74%. As a first example of conditional cash transfers being used in the sanitation sector, we show that they are an accepted and effective tool for increasing toilet use, while putting small cash payments in the hands of poor, largely unemployed populations in rural South Africa. View Full-Text
Keywords: sanitation; urine; South Africa; CCT; incentives; economics; cash transfer sanitation; urine; South Africa; CCT; incentives; economics; cash transfer
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

  • Externally hosted supplementary file 1
    Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QPHB7Z
    Description: Data set

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Tilley, E.; Günther, I. The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer on Toilet Use in eThekwini, South Africa. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1070.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top