Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Urban Development Calls for Responsibility through Life Cycle Management
Previous Article in Journal
The Customer Citizenship Behaviors of Food Blog Users
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2015, 7(9), 12521-12538; doi:10.3390/su70912521

Application of a Decision Support Tool in Three Renovation Projects

SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, P.O. Box 857, Borås S-501 15, Sweden
Department of Building Physics, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, Lund S-221 00, Sweden
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen
Received: 26 June 2015 / Revised: 21 August 2015 / Accepted: 9 September 2015 / Published: 11 September 2015
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [811 KB, uploaded 11 September 2015]   |  


Building owners are encouraged to reduce energy use in order to both contribute to national energy-saving goals and reduce the costs of heating and operation. It is important to choose the most optimal renovation measures available so as to achieve cost-effective energy use while maintaining excellent indoor environments, without sacrificing architectural quality or negatively affecting the environment. Building owners and managers often have neither the time nor the expertise required to properly evaluate the available renovation options before making a final decision. Renovation measures are often calculated to repay investments in a short time, rather than taking into account life-cycle costs (LCC), despite the fact that a thoughtful, comprehensive renovation is often more cost-effective in the long run. This paper presents a systematic approach for evaluating different renovation alternatives based on a number of sustainability criteria. The methodology has been verified using three multi-family apartment buildings in Sweden. The benefit of using the proposed methodology is made clear through a comparison between the different renovation alternatives from a sustainability perspective, and will hopefully serve as encouragement to choose renovation measures which involve marginally increased investments but lead to significant environmental and social benefits in the long-term. View Full-Text
Keywords: case study; sustainable renovation; decision-making; life-cycle cost; life-cycle assessment; social indicators case study; sustainable renovation; decision-making; life-cycle cost; life-cycle assessment; social indicators

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Malmgren, L.; Mjörnell, K. Application of a Decision Support Tool in Three Renovation Projects. Sustainability 2015, 7, 12521-12538.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top