Next Article in Journal
Development of a Framework for the Evaluation of the Environmental Benefits of Controlled Traffic Farming
Next Article in Special Issue
Aligning Public Participation to Stakeholders’ Sustainability Literacy—A Case Study on Sustainable Urban Development in Phoenix, Arizona
Previous Article in Journal
Local Level Stormwater Harvesting and Reuse: A Practical Solution to the Water Security Challenges Faced by Urban Trees
Previous Article in Special Issue
Managing Knowledge to Promote Sustainability in Australian Transport Infrastructure Projects
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2015, 7(7), 8649-8683; doi:10.3390/su7078649

Framing Processes in the Envisioning of Low-Carbon, Resilient Cities: Results from Two Visioning Exercises

1
Swinburne Institute for Social Research, Swinburne University, Hawthorn VIC 3122, Australia
2
Victorian Eco-Innovation Lab (VEIL), Faculty of Architecture, Building and Environment, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3010, Australia
3
Faculty of Built Environment and Centre for Energy and Environmental Markets, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Tan Yigitcanlar and Md. Kamruzzaman
Received: 10 May 2015 / Revised: 13 June 2015 / Accepted: 24 June 2015 / Published: 3 July 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Planning, Development and Management of Sustainable Cities)

Abstract

Visioning exercises were convened in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia, to explore how these cities could become low-carbon and maintain resilience over the next 25 years. Drawing on the concept of frames—in particular Schon and Rein’s conceptualisation of a frame as a “diagnostic-prescriptive story” that is based on an underlying structure of beliefs, perceptions and appreciation—this paper seeks to: Attend to the ways that workshop participants framed the problems (of emissions reduction and maintaining resilience); surface framing processes and potential related sources of political contention; and discuss the role of visioning exercises in sustainability transitions. Five frames are identified, along with the interpretive orientations underpinning each frame, framing processes and the potential for frame conflict and alignment. The study suggests that the designers and facilitators of visioning exercises need to be attentive to framing processes, potential framing contests, and related social processes during a visioning exercise. Key implications are identified, with a focus on whether an exercise seeks to “open up” a complex issue or to agree upon a singular, i.e., consensual, agenda. View Full-Text
Keywords: frames; framing processes; low carbon cities; visioning; urban resilience frames; framing processes; low carbon cities; visioning; urban resilience
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

McGrail, S.; Gaziulusoy, A.I.; Twomey, P. Framing Processes in the Envisioning of Low-Carbon, Resilient Cities: Results from Two Visioning Exercises. Sustainability 2015, 7, 8649-8683.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top